NFL: News and transactions

Jungleland

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 2, 2009
2,473
He would be an enormous upgrade for the Vikes or Dolphins if he's healthy. I don't think the Colts get a first, but if the injury was just an excuse to get out of Colts camp, I think there's 2-4 teams for whom he's worth a 2nd and change maybe.
 

BigSoxFan

Member
SoSH Member
May 31, 2007
49,140
He would be an enormous upgrade for the Vikes or Dolphins if he's healthy. I don't think the Colts get a first, but if the injury was just an excuse to get out of Colts camp, I think there's 2-4 teams for whom he's worth a 2nd and change maybe.
Yeah, not a whole lot of landing spots. This is a move for a team that has a legit chance at a SB so that likely takes away rebuilding teams like TB, New Orleans, Arizona, etc. Would the Bears be interested? He makes a lot of sense for them as a running team but doubt they'd give up a potential high first for him. I could see a team like the Vikings, Dolphins, or Bills caving and giving up a first. But, most likely, I'd bet on a 2nd and maybe a later pick. The RB values are just so depressed.
 

Mooch

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
5,178
Colts have changed course on Jonathan Taylor. Seeking first round pick. Not sure anyone is ponying up one given how de-valued the position is. Would expect teams like the Dolphins and Bills to potentially be interested. Other teams like the Cowboys might view it as a reasonable GFIN move, similar to SF with McCaffrey. A Taylor/Pollard combo would be a nightmare for defenses.
I wouldn't count out the Bengals. Mixon is in the last year of his deal and he's been running out of steam as a workhorse back. Pretty sure they're still sitting on some cap space too.
 

Rudy's Curve

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 4, 2006
2,448
I wouldn't count out the Bengals. Mixon is in the last year of his deal and he's been running out of steam as a workhorse back. Pretty sure they're still sitting on some cap space too.
They're not parting with picks and the cap space needs to be saved for extensions, including a particularly notable one. They could certainly use an upgrade, but they committed to Mixon when they agreed to a lower cap number and have young guys behind him fighting for time. I'd say the chances are between slim and none and I'm pretty sure slim just left the building.
 

j44thor

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
11,447
It would be very much against the grain for how they operate but GB makes a ton of sense. They have extra draft capital from the Rodgers trade and enough cap space to fit Taylor in who starred at University of WI. They could send AJ Dillon and a 2nd to IND.
 

johnmd20

mad dog
Lifetime Member
Gold Supporter
SoSH Member
Dec 30, 2003
63,695
New York City
Josh Jacobs is back, 1 year, 12 million.

Meanwhile, in the NBA, PJ Washington just signed for 3 years, 48 million. Playing in the NFL is tough.
 

Mystic Merlin

Member
SoSH Member
Sep 21, 2007
49,595
Hartford, CT
There is no suggestion in the initial reports that the Raiders agreed not to tag him again. So, he got almost a couple million more out of his holdout. Tough times for RB.
 

BigSoxFan

Member
SoSH Member
May 31, 2007
49,140
There is no suggestion in the initial reports that the Raiders agreed not to tag him again. So, he got almost a couple million more out of his holdout. Tough times for RB.
Yup. Seems like the Saquon situation. We’ll give you a little extra to keep you happy but no dice on long term deal at similar levels.
 

johnmd20

mad dog
Lifetime Member
Gold Supporter
SoSH Member
Dec 30, 2003
63,695
New York City
Yup. Seems like the Saquon situation. We’ll give you a little extra to keep you happy but no dice on long term deal at similar levels.
RBs are in a tough spot. Jacobs can't take the year off, can't sit at home and not make the 11-12 million. But he also isn't getting a 4 year, 60 million dollar deal, either. If he plays well, he will get franchised again.

At this point, my view is that no team should be able to franchise a player two years in a row. The franchise tag is punishing RBs.
 

BigSoxFan

Member
SoSH Member
May 31, 2007
49,140
RBs are in a tough spot. Jacobs can't take the year off, can't sit at home and not make the 11-12 million. But he also isn't getting a 4 year, 60 million dollar deal, either. If he plays well, he will get franchised again.

At this point, my view is that no team should be able to franchise a player two years in a row. The franchise tag is punishing RBs.
100%. They just have to take the best deal they can get and hope they don’t get hurt. But even if they don’t, the physical toll and ease of replacement kills them.

I really wish the franchise tag could only be used once. I guess it doesn’t impact enough guys to get the NFLPA to fight harder for that.
 

axx

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 16, 2005
8,283
I thought the tag was the average of Top 5 of all of Football if you got tagged a second time. Might not be the case anymore. That would certinately fix the issue since nobody is paying a running back $30 million.
 

johnmd20

mad dog
Lifetime Member
Gold Supporter
SoSH Member
Dec 30, 2003
63,695
New York City
I thought the tag was the average of Top 5 of all of Football if you got tagged a second time. Might not be the case anymore. That would certinately fix the issue since nobody is paying a running back $30 million.
The tag is the average of the top 5 salaries. If you get tagged a 2nd time, you get a 20% raise guaranteed, or the average of the top 5 contracts, whichever is higher.

If you're tagged 3 years in a row, you get the average of the top 5 of the highest paid position.(which will always be QB) So there is a 0% chance that would ever happen for a RB.
 

Old Fart Tree

the maven of meat
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jan 10, 2001
15,035
Boulder, CO
I thought the tag was the average of Top 5 of all of Football if you got tagged a second time. Might not be the case anymore. That would certinately fix the issue since nobody is paying a running back $30 million.
Top 5 of your position first year and 120% of that number if tagged a second time (I think). That's why Jimmy Graham fought being classified as a TE. Wanted the WR comp.
 

Jungleland

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 2, 2009
2,473
It seems odd to me to not at least activate him off PUP. One would think the trade value of him being available before week 5 is of greater benefit to the team than whoever will be the 53rd player onto the roster now.
 

BigSoxFan

Member
SoSH Member
May 31, 2007
49,140
It seems odd to me to not at least activate him off PUP. One would think the trade value of him being available before week 5 is of greater benefit to the team than whoever will be the 53rd player onto the roster now.
Yeah, this makes no sense unless he truly isn't ready to play. Hard to know with this franchise.
 

Van Everyman

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 30, 2009
28,900
Newton
Time to learn how to punt i guess
I got drinks one time with a guy who had been in camp with the Carolina Panthers as a punter when they had all pro (and all PED) Todd Sauerbrun punting for them.

It was a fascinating conversation because it’s all about perfectly repeating the same mechanics every snap. Which is why he told me even the slightest injury would wreck a punter’s mechanics and career. Which happened to him and ultimately, Sauerbrun.
 

Smiling Joe Hesketh

Throw Momma From the Train
Moderator
SoSH Member
May 20, 2003
37,672
Deep inside Muppet Labs
I got drinks one time with a guy who had been in camp with the Carolina Panthers as a punter when they had all pro (and all PED) Todd Sauerbrun punting for them.

It was a fascinating conversation because it’s all about perfectly repeating the same mechanics every snap. Which is why he told me even the slightest injury would wreck a punter’s mechanics and career. Which happened to him and ultimately, Sauerbrun.
Chris Kluwe spoke about punting mechanics quite a bit when he was given endless "why can't punters also kick FGs and teams could save a roster spot?" questions. Really interesting analysis on the skills and muscles needed for punting.
 

SoxinSeattle

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 6, 2003
2,410
Here
No punishment for Hill smacking a guy at a marina. I would hope "accidentally" bringing your gun to the airport will also go unpunished. Guns change things but I would argue hitting a man is the worse offense here.
 

Saints Rest

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
I got drinks one time with a guy who had been in camp with the Carolina Panthers as a punter when they had all pro (and all PED) Todd Sauerbrun punting for them.

It was a fascinating conversation because it’s all about perfectly repeating the same mechanics every snap. Which is why he told me even the slightest injury would wreck a punter’s mechanics and career. Which happened to him and ultimately, Sauerbrun.
I wonder if that is what happened to Jake Bailey.
 

katnado

New Member
Aug 14, 2016
2,210
Alaska
TIL, Bailey made the Dolphins. Interesting to see if he bounces back.
Dolphins seem to think he will. Got roughly 1.1 million of his contract guaranteed and the 18th richest punter contract in the league. I just can't see it. But as much as I hate the Dolphins I hope he succeeds in bouncing back. Always seemed like a good kid.
 

dcdrew10

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 8, 2005
1,412
Washington, DC via Worcester
Dolphins seem to think he will. Got roughly 1.1 million of his contract guaranteed and the 18th richest punter contract in the league. I just can't see it. But as much as I hate the Dolphins I hope he succeeds in bouncing back. Always seemed like a good kid.
I hope he gets lots of in-game opportunities to show his punting abilities.
 

johnmd20

mad dog
Lifetime Member
Gold Supporter
SoSH Member
Dec 30, 2003
63,695
New York City
Travis Kelce hyper extended his knee in practice and Andy Reid says his status for Thursday is uncertain.

I bet he somehow finds a way to play but this is pretty huge news. If the Chiefs don't have Jones and Kelce, that is two of their 3 best players off the field.
 

tims4wins

PN23's replacement
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
40,187
Hingham, MA
To me this just shows as a link, not the tweet itself. If you put (media)TWEET(/media) around the link it shows up readable--replacing the ( ) with [ ]
Didn't used to be like this for Twitter. Once it changed to X it's all screwed up