Most talented Pats team of all time

BaseballJones

ivanvamp
SoSH Member
Oct 1, 2015
24,812
We spend a lot of time talking about talent, and how this Pats team "has no talent" (what some NFL people have said about NE). What's the most talented team the Pats have ever had?

I look at the 2004 team and this is what I see for talent:

Brady - GOAT QB, 15x Pro Bowl, 3x All Pro, 3x MVP, 5x SB MVP
Dillon - 4x Pro Bowler
Branch - SB MVP
Light - 3x Pro Bowl, 1x All Pro
Koppen - 1x Pro Bowl
Seymour - HOF, 7x Pro Bowl, 3x All Pro
McGinest - 2x Pro Bowl
Wilfork - 5x Pro Bowl, 1x All Pro
Bruschi - 1x Pro Bowl
Vrabel - 1x Pro Bowl, 1x All Pro
Law - HOF, 5x Pro Bowl, 2x All Pro
Harrison - 2x Pro Bowl, 2x All Pro, only player ever with 30 INT and 30 sacks
Samuel - 4x Pro Bowl, 1x All Pro
Izzo - 3x Pro Bowl
Vinatieri - 3x Pro Bowl, 3x All Pro

In the HOF: Brady, Law, Seymour
Should/Will be in the HOF: Wilfork, Harrison, Vinatieri

So that's 15 guys on the roster that made it to a Pro Bowl, and 9 guys that were on at least one All Pro team.


2007 Team
Brady - GOAT QB, 15x Pro Bowl, 3x All Pro, 3x MVP, 5x SB MVP
Moss - HOF, 6x Pro Bowl, 4x All Pro
Welker - 5x Pro Bowl, 2x All Pro
Light - 3x Pro Bowl, 1x All Pro
Mankins - 7x Pro Bowl, 1x All Pro
Wilfork - 5x Pro Bowl, 1x All Pro
Vrabel - 1x Pro Bowl, 1x All Pro
Harrison - 2x Pro Bowl, 2x All Pro, only player ever with 30 INT and 30 sacks
Samuel - 4x Pro Bowl, 1x All Pro
Thomas - 2x Pro Bowl, 1x All Pro
Gostkowski - 4x Pro Bowl, 2x All Pro
Seau - HOF, 12x Pro Bowl, 6x All Pro

In the HOF: Brady, Moss, Seau
Should/Will be in the HOF: Wilfork, Gostkowski (?), Welker

That's 12 guys that made it to a Pro Bowl, and all 12 of them made at least one All Pro team.


Hard to say what's been the most talented Pats team ever. These are two of them, I'd think. Of course Junior Seau ON THE PATRIOTS wasn't nearly the same HOF caliber player that he was when he was with the Chargers in his prime. That kind of thing needs to be taken into consideration as well.

And of course, Pro Bowls and All Pro teams aren't the only way to measure talent. It's just a quick and dirty thing to look up.

The 2023 Patriots....are not the most talented Pats team ever, unfortunately.
 

Smiling Joe Hesketh

Throw Momma From the Train
Moderator
SoSH Member
May 20, 2003
35,912
Deep inside Muppet Labs
By DVOA the 2007 Pats were the best team in franchise history (52.9) and the second-best of all time behind the 1991 Washington club. The 2004 Pats were among the top 20 at 34.2. The 2010 and 2012 teams were high up there as well via DVOA.
 

slamminsammya

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2006
9,427
San Francisco
Its 07 and I don't think it's at all close. Randy Moss has a case for being a top ten player ever at his peak, which he was, Brady at the peak of his powers, Welker was probably the best in his role ever, also at his peak.
 

tims4wins

PN23's replacement
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
37,666
Hingham, MA
Its 07 and I don't think it's at all close. Randy Moss has a case for being a top ten player ever at his peak, which he was, Brady at the peak of his powers, Welker was probably the best in his role ever, also at his peak.
Flip side, almost all of the defensive players were better in 2004. Vrabel, Bruschi, Seymour, Ty Law, Willie, Rodney, Colvin, Ty Warren. Maybe the only guy who was better in 2007 than 2004 was Wilfork.

Vinatieri was also better than 2nd year Gost.
 

BaseballJones

ivanvamp
SoSH Member
Oct 1, 2015
24,812
By DVOA the 2007 Pats were the best team in franchise history (52.9) and the second-best of all time behind the 1991 Washington club. The 2004 Pats were among the top 20 at 34.2. The 2010 and 2012 teams were high up there as well via DVOA.
Right. I'm not asking which was the best team though. Just which team was the most *talented*. It may very well still be 2007. But it's at least a different question from what you're addressing here.
 

slamminsammya

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2006
9,427
San Francisco
Flip side, almost all of the defensive players were better in 2004. Vrabel, Bruschi, Seymour, Ty Law, Willie, Rodney, Colvin, Ty Warren. Maybe the only guy who was better in 2007 than 2004 was Wilfork.

Vinatieri was also better than 2nd year Gost.
Sure, but the gaps are much much smaller IMO. Vrabel had 12.5 sacks in 07, was he even better in 04? Asante Samuel and Ty Law match up pretty well at that point in their respective careers.
 

rodderick

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 24, 2009
12,944
Belo Horizonte - Brazil
In terms of talent it's the 2007 team and honestly second place would probably belong to the 2008 team had Brady not gotten hurt. That team was just as loaded and they faced the 4th easiest schedule in the league after having a very tough one in 2007. I don't think that team loses more than two games with Brady under center the whole season and they'd have a real shot at 16-0 again, not even being hyperbolic.
 

slamminsammya

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2006
9,427
San Francisco
Flip side, almost all of the defensive players were better in 2004. Vrabel, Bruschi, Seymour, Ty Law, Willie, Rodney, Colvin, Ty Warren. Maybe the only guy who was better in 2007 than 2004 was Wilfork.

Vinatieri was also better than 2nd year Gost.
Ty Warren was also 1st team all pro in 07, and not in 04, for what thats worth.
 

BigSoxFan

Member
SoSH Member
May 31, 2007
47,272
Surprised no love for the 2023 Pats. There are, like, 8-9 guys on the team capable of going for 10 receiving yards on a given day.
 

Mooch

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
4,553
Am I crazy for thinking that in a winner-take-all game, the 2004 team would beat the 2007 team more often than not? I think the ‘04’s balanced offensive attack and more complete defense would limit the ‘07 team’s explosiveness.
 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
34,948
probably 2007, but there is a case on pure talent (not achievement) for some of the early 2010 teams.

No Moss, but you replace him with Gronk probably the best ever at his position.

2012 gives you:
Brady
Gronk
Welker
Edelman
He who shall not be named
Talib
Chandler Jones
Wilfork
Mayo
McCourty
Branch
Hightower
 

tims4wins

PN23's replacement
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
37,666
Hingham, MA
Surprised no love for the 2023 Pats. There are, like, 8-9 guys on the team capable of going for 10 receiving yards on a given day.
Corey Dillon. The 2003 team really couldn't run the ball well. Their offense wasn't very good.

Edit lol misread 2003 for 2023
 

BigSoxFan

Member
SoSH Member
May 31, 2007
47,272
Am I crazy for thinking that in a winner-take-all game, the 2004 team would beat the 2007 team more often than not? I think the ‘04’s balanced offensive attack and more complete defense would limit the ‘07 team’s explosiveness.
Since it’s a hypothetical, certainly not crazy. Of course, I don’t know who on the 2004 team would be able to hang with Moss. Young Asante Samuel and Randall Gay vs. Moss/Welker is a huge mismatch. I’m not sure the 2004 DL would get on 2007 Brady the way the Giants did.
 

Hoya81

Member
SoSH Member
Feb 3, 2010
8,495
I’m not sure if they all appeared on the field at the same time but in weeks 1-4 of 2010 the Pats could have gone 5 wide with Gronk, Hernandez, Moss, Welker and Edelman.
 

slamminsammya

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2006
9,427
San Francisco
probably 2007, but there is a case on pure talent (not achievement) for some of the early 2010 teams.

No Moss, but you replace him with Gronk probably the best ever at his position.

2012 gives you:
Brady
Gronk
Welker
Edelman
He who shall not be named
Talib
Chandler Jones
Wilfork
Mayo
McCourty
Branch
Hightower
Vereen, Ridley, and Woodhead was a pretty solid group at the time as well.
 

Was (Not Wasdin)

family crest has godzilla
SoSH Member
Jul 26, 2007
3,743
The Short Bus
I think it is 2007 as well, but 2014 is up there

Brady, Gronk, Wilfork, Revis, McCourty gives you five legit "all time" guys.

Hightower, Mayo, Collins, Chandler Jones is a beastly LB/DE group.

Gostkowski, Jules, Brandon Browner, Nink, all top tier at their respective positions.

OL maybe a little lacking, but at the top they are right there.
 

tims4wins

PN23's replacement
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
37,666
Hingham, MA
Since it’s a hypothetical, certainly not crazy. Of course, I don’t know who on the 2004 team would be able to hang with Moss. Young Asante Samuel and Randall Gay vs. Moss/Welker is a huge mismatch. I’m not sure the 2004 DL would get on 2007 Brady the way the Giants did.
Of course are we talking the 2004 Super Bowl team vs. the 2004 peak strength team. Ty Law / Ty Poole was a great tandem but they were both done for the year come the playoffs. If fully healthy, I stick Poole on Moss with Eugene Wilson playing deep safety, I let Law erase Stallworth / Gaffney, and I stick Asante on Welker in the slot.
 

BaseballJones

ivanvamp
SoSH Member
Oct 1, 2015
24,812
I think it is 2007 as well, but 2014 is up there

Brady, Gronk, Wilfork, Revis, McCourty gives you five legit "all time" guys.

Hightower, Mayo, Collins, Chandler Jones is a beastly LB/DE group.

Gostkowski, Jules, Brandon Browner, Nink, all top tier at their respective positions.

OL maybe a little lacking, but at the top they are right there.
I love them, but neither Wilfork nor McCourty are anywhere close to "all time" guys.
 

BaseballJones

ivanvamp
SoSH Member
Oct 1, 2015
24,812
So how badly would 2004 or 2007 or even 2010 New England beat 2023 New England? Like....those games might end up like 70-0.
 

Ale Xander

Hamilton
SoSH Member
Oct 31, 2013
73,537
If the 1985 team had a QB . . . (And perhaps a younger Hannah and more help on both lines)
 

8slim

has trust issues
SoSH Member
Nov 6, 2001
24,970
Unreal America
If the 1985 team had a QB . . . (And perhaps a younger Hannah and more help on both lines)
'85 was loaded though. The OL also had Brian Holloway and Pete Brock. Stanley Morgan and Irving Fryar at WR. Craig James and Tony Collins at RB. Lin Dawson and Derrick Ramsey at TE. Monster LB and DB core (Tippet, Blackmon, Rembert, Marion, Lippett, R. James).

Obviously, not loaded like most all of the 2004-2018 teams. But tons of high-end talent all over the field.
 

BigSoxFan

Member
SoSH Member
May 31, 2007
47,272
Ted Washington was the best nose tackle that came through. Or maybe ever was.

and I loooove Wilfork.
I loved Ted Washington so much. The guy was an absolute force. That Panthers SB often gets overlooked but the Pats defense was absolutely murdering Carolina’s offense before the injuries started to mount.

Carolina’s longest play for their first 6 series was…5 yards. Took them until their 24th or 25th play to finally exceed it.
 

BaseballJones

ivanvamp
SoSH Member
Oct 1, 2015
24,812
I loved Ted Washington so much. The guy was an absolute force. That Panthers SB often gets overlooked but the Pats defense was absolutely murdering Carolina’s offense before the injuries started to mount.

Carolina’s longest play for their first 6 series was…5 yards. Took them until their 24th or 25th play to finally exceed it.
That game was bonkers. No offense and then an explosion at the end of the first half by both teams. Then very little in the second half then an explosion at the end.
 

BigSoxFan

Member
SoSH Member
May 31, 2007
47,272
That game was bonkers. No offense and then an explosion at the end of the first half by both teams. Then very little in the second half then an explosion at the end.
Including 2 missed FGs by Vinatieri, which was nuts given it was indoors where he was generally awesome although I guess one was blocked.
 

tims4wins

PN23's replacement
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
37,666
Hingham, MA
Ted Washington in 2003 had a top 10 all time Patriots defender performance IMO.

The Panthers had negative yardage in that game through 26 minutes IIRC.
 

Kliq

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 31, 2013
22,861
The 2003-2004 Pats don't get enough conversation in "Best Defense Ever" conversations. #1 and #2 defense in back-to-back years, winning back-to-back Super Bowls. I think they are underrated because Brady is the face of those teams (as opposed to the Steel Curtain, '85 Bears, 2000 Ravens, 2002 Bucs, etc.) even if he wasn't quite TOM BRADY yet. They also "only" have two Hall of Fame players in Law and Seymour--but the team was just full of "Hall of Very Good" guys at all three levels--Ted Washington, Wilfork, Bruschi, McGinest, Rodney Harrison, Vrabel, etc.
 

TFisNEXT

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 21, 2005
12,537
'85 was loaded though. The OL also had Brian Holloway and Pete Brock. Stanley Morgan and Irving Fryar at WR. Craig James and Tony Collins at RB. Lin Dawson and Derrick Ramsey at TE. Monster LB and DB core (Tippet, Blackmon, Rembert, Marion, Lippett, R. James).

Obviously, not loaded like most all of the 2004-2018 teams. But tons of high-end talent all over the field.
I remember reading years ago that because of how obscenely unstoppable Andre Tippett was in 1984 (think he had 18 or 19 sacks that year?), he was drawing almost full-time double teams in 1985 which helped the other defenders really excel….I think they mentioned Blackmon had a career high in sacks. Tippett still had some ridiculous number too (15 or 16?) but just not as obscene as 1984.
 

Dick Drago

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 28, 2002
1,312
Pre-Brady/BB they’d be my choice (1978, meant to quote Saint’s post above):

WR Morgan and Harold Jackson, both over 20 yards per catch-I’d say both are all time greats, considering the era.

TE Russ Francis, probably = Casper as best blocking and receiving TE of the ‘70s.
All time great John Hannah and all-pro Leon Gray.
Sam Cunningham, maybe best all around FB at the time plus 3 other “good” RBs.

Great secondary, Clayborn and Haynes two of the best, and a very good safety in Tim Fox. Haynes certainly an all-time great. Steve Nelson, Rod Shoate, Julius Adams.
Tremendous talent-but I think turnovers (and the Fairbanks-Sullivan drama) doomed them.

I loved Grogan-he was a great runner, and strong arm—but he made so many ridiculous decisions-his arm was FAR stronger than Mac obviously, he threw a great deep ball…but he’d constantly try those cross-field throws on the move ala Mac Vs Dallas-and had days when he was great…but also could be terrible. Far too many picks—Cunningham and Ivory also fumbled all the time.

I’d say for pure talent they are up there, #1 pre-dynasty, but performance rarely matched up to their potential.
 
Last edited: