Mikal Bridges to NYK for 4 unprotected 1sts + more

Status
Not open for further replies.

Euclis20

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 3, 2004
9,125
Imaginationland
LOL WUT? Ingram is not a better defender than Bridges. Bridges was the runner up to DPOY in 2022. Did Bridges knock up your girlfriend or something? It seem like a grudge because you are all over the place on the guy. Markkanen would not look better on the Knicks than Bridges as well. Markkanen is not going to look as good with a ball dominant PG on a team that kills itself in transition defense giving no free baskets. Bridges is so much better for a Thibs team than either of those guys especially with his durability.

I don't get your obsession with Hartenstein. He is a good center however having him and Mitchell on the team now doesn't make a ton of sense. If you move Randle to the 5, start OG, Bridges, Donte, Brunson with Hart as your six man, Robinson seeing time against bigger teams, and McBride as a secondary PG you have a good rotation. So are you knocking Randle, Robinson, or Hart out of the rotation for ~20 million a year? The Knick's offense is going to be worse than that helps their D with Hartenstein. I get wanting Hartenstein over Robinson but it is going to be ridiculously hard having both in the rotation with Randle.
Yeah maybe I haven't watched enough of these guys the last couple years, but Ingram has been a slightly below average defender his entire career, and Bridges as a role player in Phoenix was excellent defensively(and I don't see why he can't go back to that when he doesn't have to carry a heavy offensive load).

Losing Hartenstein would be a major (and perhaps unavoidable) blow, starting Randle at center seems like a weird attempt to recreate the 2023 Raptors.
 

TomRicardo

rusty cohlebone
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Feb 6, 2006
21,549
Row 14
It's also why if the Knicks are able to sign OG and Hartenstein, I can see the Knicks finding a justification to ship out Randle. I don't want them to trade Randle at this point, but if they want the payroll flexibility, he's the guy.
It kills your ability to adjust to match up offensively and somewhat defensively with certain teams like the Thunder or Celtics. Without Randle, the Knicks have no hope to beat the Celtics with Brown and Tatum in a seven game series unless both Al and Porzingis are injured.
 

slamminsammya

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2006
10,535
San Francisco
the discussion about a silly cutoff like top 50 is meaningless. once you get past the top 20 guys or so their value becomes way more about situation and role than some platonic idea of absolute skill. how many examples do you need of guys struggling in the wrong role or conversely blooming with the correct situation? this is a great situation for bridges.

i strongly doubt his capability to play top tier defense declined in two years with no injuries to speak of or noticeable decline in athleticism. defensive metrics generally are bad for bad teams. and his effort was probably less because of being on a shit team and having to shoulder more offense than he should.
 

Devizier

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 3, 2000
20,364
Somewhere
Darko also doesn't seem to give a shit about durability, which is one of Bridges most attractive features. There's probably an argument to be made that no current, decent player is more underrated by Darko than Mikal Bridges.
Maybe. The counter argument would be that people were a little too high on his post trade performance with Brooklyn and last year reflected something closer to his true ability.

I agree that last year wasn’t a great showcase opportunity for him, and he’ll do better in New York. I don’t hate this trade from the Knicks perspective, but don’t love it either.
 

TomRicardo

rusty cohlebone
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Feb 6, 2006
21,549
Row 14
Maybe. The counter argument would be that people were a little too high on his post trade performance with Brooklyn and last year reflected something closer to his true ability.

I agree that last year wasn’t a great showcase opportunity for him, and he’ll do better in New York. I don’t hate this trade from the Knicks perspective, but don’t love it either.
In a vacuum 5 first round picks for Bridges is not a great trade. However when you look at the Knicks position, how he fits, other options before they go into the second apron, the fact they needed to make a trade before July 1st, what else was available, this looks like a better trade.

If the Knicks can continuously make playoff runs over the next three years, no one is going to cry about 2031 pick. Before Brunson joined the Knicks, the Knicks only one playoff series in the 21st century. The Knicks are going into the second apron they needed to build their team now. You can't sit and wait for a super star in the apron.
 

Euclis20

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 3, 2004
9,125
Imaginationland
In a vacuum 5 first round picks for Bridges is not a great trade. However when you look at the Knicks position, how he fits, other options before they go into the second apron, the fact they needed to make a trade before July 1st, what else was available, this looks like a better trade.

If the Knicks can continuously make playoff runs over the next three years, no one is going to cry about 2031 pick. Before Brunson joined the Knicks, the Knicks only one playoff series in the 21st century. The Knicks are going into the second apron they needed to build their team now. You can't sit and wait for a super star in the apron.
The bolded really depends on what constitutes a playoff run. The Bucks won the 2021 title and were 3rd (or tied for 3rd) in the preseason title odds each of the next three seasons while finishing 3rd, 1st and 3rd in the conference, and won a grand total of one playoff series over that time. People will be happy for a year or two of relevance, but if they don't look like a legit contender to win it all (that would mean at least being competitive in the conference finals) with this core, these picks will come up quite a bit. If the Knicks do crash as this core ages and their crosstown rivals end up getting multiple high lottery picks (doesn't even have to be on the level of Brown/Tatum/Kyrie), nothing short of an actual title will calm people down.
 

ManicCompression

Member
SoSH Member
May 14, 2015
1,510
Do people think that picks have more value under the new cap? The way I’m looking at it, if your a second apron team like the Knicks, you can’t use your first round picks anyway because they’ll cost so much in comparison to their production. Like I can’t imagine the Celtics actually use the 30th pick on a player tonight because he’ll be paid almost like a mid level veteran. If you’re just going to have to eventually turn those first round picks into seconds to save money, you might as well pay extra to get a guy like bridges on your team while you’re competitive.

If it doesn’t work out, you trade bridges on his next contract to recoup those picks. There’s always an out from these big trades.
 

Jimbodandy

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 31, 2006
12,561
around the way
The bolded really depends on what constitutes a playoff run. The Bucks won the 2021 title and were 3rd (or tied for 3rd) in the preseason title odds each of the next three seasons while finishing 3rd, 1st and 3rd in the conference, and won a grand total of one playoff series over that time. People will be happy for a year or two of relevance, but if they don't look like a legit contender to win it all (that would mean at least being competitive in the conference finals) with this core, these picks will come up quite a bit. If the Knicks do crash as this core ages and their crosstown rivals end up getting multiple high lottery picks (doesn't even have to be on the level of Brown/Tatum/Kyrie), nothing short of an actual title will calm people down.
I think that being a legit contender to make the finals for a few years is such a step up from what the Knick fanbase under 50 is used to that they will be ecstatic, even if they don't win a title. Remember where they're coming from.
 

Murderer's Crow

Dragon Wangler 216
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
24,829
Garden City
Just point of clarification...The Knicks are only a 1st or 2nd apron team if they resign IH, OG, AND keep Robinson & Randle. If they trade Robinson, they likely are under the 2nd apron even if they have to pay OG $40m. If they strike out on OG, they are way under both aprons with no other moves.
 

nighthob

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
12,878
I get these positions but I don’t know. The Knicks’ best player is a kind of stocky 6’1 guard who turns 28 this month and has some pretty high usage recently. Losing the picks and potential flexibility does hurt but I like the Knicks being aggressive here given where their roster currently sits and the risk of having your best guy be a small guard.

Bridges is a 20ppg guy who shoots the 3 well, plays good defense, and will obviously fit in seamlessly from a chemistry standpoint. I think he has more value to the Knicks than other teams.
Yeah, right now Boston is in a class of its own compared to the rest of the league, the road to the title travels straight through the Garden, the Knicks just added the NBA's apex 3&D wing. With OGA, Josh Hart, DiVincenzo, and Alec Burks (if he returns) they now have a pretty endless supply of wings to throw at Tatum and Brown. If anything they just moved to the top of the pecking order in terms of being able to beat Boston. The risk, of course, is the Minnesota one. The T'wolves built a roster to beat the Nuggets, and succeeded. But fell on their face after. But, from NY's standpoint, having all those 3&D wings is pretty much always a positive.
 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
36,205
Just point of clarification...The Knicks are only a 1st or 2nd apron team if they resign IH, OG, AND keep Robinson & Randle. If they trade Robinson, they likely are under the 2nd apron even if they have to pay OG $40m. If they strike out on OG, they are way under both aprons with no other moves.
Still capped either way, but yes they don't have to spend into the aprons, just prohibited from going above them (which one depends on deal structure).
 

benhogan

Granite Truther
SoSH Member
Nov 2, 2007
21,407
Santa Monica
Do people think that picks have more value under the new cap?

The way I’m looking at it, if your a second apron team like the Knicks, you can’t use your first round picks anyway because they’ll cost so much in comparison to their production. Like I can’t imagine the Celtics actually use the 30th pick on a player tonight because he’ll be paid almost like a mid level veteran. If you’re just going to have to eventually turn those first round picks into seconds to save money, you might as well pay extra to get a guy like bridges on your team while you’re competitive.

If it doesn’t work out, you trade bridges on his next contract to recoup those picks. There’s always an out from these big trades.
Depends on the team. I think you answered a lot of your question, for the Celtics a bunch of 2nds has more value than #30 BUT for the vast majority of non-contenders (22/30 teams IMO) a 1st has plenty of value.
 

PedroKsBambino

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Apr 17, 2003
32,991
Do people think that picks have more value under the new cap? The way I’m looking at it, if your a second apron team like the Knicks, you can’t use your first round picks anyway because they’ll cost so much in comparison to their production. Like I can’t imagine the Celtics actually use the 30th pick on a player tonight because he’ll be paid almost like a mid level veteran. If you’re just going to have to eventually turn those first round picks into seconds to save money, you might as well pay extra to get a guy like bridges on your team while you’re competitive.

If it doesn’t work out, you trade bridges on his next contract to recoup those picks. There’s always an out from these big trades.
I would personally believe most of the time, the cost-controlled 4 years of a 1st make it a value play for a team who is already very expensive.

The other thing to remember about pick valuation is that, projecting 7 years out like Knick's trade did, you really have little idea whether you'll be good, bad, in the tax, apron, etc. So even if they are marginal today, seven years out they could be completely different value for you
 

the moops

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 19, 2016
5,217
Saint Paul, MN
I would personally believe most of the time, the cost-controlled 4 years of a 1st make it a value play for a team who is already very expensive.

The other thing to remember about pick valuation is that, projecting 7 years out like Knick's trade did, you really have little idea whether you'll be good, bad, in the tax, apron, etc. So even if they are marginal today, seven years out they could be completely different value for you
7 years ago the Knicks won 28 games and the Mavericks won 24. It really is an eternity in the NBA
 

ManicCompression

Member
SoSH Member
May 14, 2015
1,510
I would personally believe most of the time, the cost-controlled 4 years of a 1st make it a value play for a team who is already very expensive.

The other thing to remember about pick valuation is that, projecting 7 years out like Knick's trade did, you really have little idea whether you'll be good, bad, in the tax, apron, etc. So even if they are marginal today, seven years out they could be completely different value for you
They're not really that cost-controlled if you're in the second apron, though. The Celtics' first round pick this year - if they use it - will cost them $9 million after the tax, about as much as a six year vet minimum, and that's for a four year guaranteed contract for a player who you don't know how they're going to perform in the NBA. It's really expensive to draft as a tax team in the new salary cap era.

And the 7 year out pick - that's the cost of doing business. The Knicks are going to be drafting in the 20s over the near future, the upside is the far out one. Why would the Nets make the trade without it included? If it's a great pick, it's a great pick and you have to let go of it.
 

PedroKsBambino

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Apr 17, 2003
32,991
They're not really that cost-controlled if you're in the second apron, though. The Celtics' first round pick this year - if they use it - will cost them $9 million after the tax, about as much as a six year vet minimum, and that's for a four year guaranteed contract for a player who you don't know how they're going to perform in the NBA. It's really expensive to draft as a tax team in the new salary cap era.

And the 7 year out pick - that's the cost of doing business. The Knicks are going to be drafting in the 20s over the near future, the upside is the far out one. Why would the Nets make the trade without it included? If it's a great pick, it's a great pick and you have to let go of it.
again, it’s relative to what. They cost about same as a vet minimum - as you note. So you can save a little, became you could go two way or a very low end vet (the only kind under the six year vet min, which is cost neutral) but some first round picks greatly exceed their value, too…so you are either a little behind or well ahead. And you get more years, plus more favorable extension options if they hit.
 

ManicCompression

Member
SoSH Member
May 14, 2015
1,510
again, it’s relative to what. They cost about same as a vet minimum - as you note. So you can save a little, became you could go two way or a very low end vet (the only kind under the six year vet min, which is cost neutral) but some first round picks greatly exceed their value, too…so you are either a little behind or well ahead. And you get more years, plus more favorable extension options if they hit.
Relative to a:
- Second rounder
- UDFA
- Vet minimum guy who you know can play NBA minutes

If you're a contending team who's over the apron or apron adjacent, first round picks can be really expensive and high risk. The Knicks - who are about to be in that group shortly with that OG extension and possible IH extension - are better served dumping the late first rounders to get a player like Bridges than pearl-clutching them on the off-chance they can find an 8th man role player one of those years.
 

jon abbey

Shanghai Warrior
Moderator
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
73,492
I'm going to lock this thread so I can stop moving posts to the main Knicks thread, further discussion of this move should go there.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.