Just What is Apex Mountain: Rewatchables discussion thread

Marciano490

Urological Expert
SoSH Member
Nov 4, 2007
55,157
I should just start listening to this, but what was Wesley’s problem with Bernthal? He’s fucking amazing.
 

Spelunker

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 17, 2005
9,661
Maybe Im wrong but I really do thanks that Bill was annoyed with Wesley. Let’s see how long after naughty November ends before we see him again and if it’s not too long then I’ll readily stand corrected
If my quick scan is correct, he hadn't been on before this since April (The Player). It's not like he works at The Ringer: it's pretty random and occasional as it is.
 

Shelterdog

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Feb 19, 2002
14,551
New York City
I should just start listening to this, but what was Wesley’s problem with Bernthal? He’s fucking amazing.
Honestly Wesley didn’t seem to understand the bit and was trying to seriously address whether Bernthal would improve Blowout-his view seemed to be that Bernthal is great but maybe not great in everything and wouldn’t really have a place in blow out.
 

Spelunker

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 17, 2005
9,661
Honestly Wesley didn’t seem to understand the bit and was trying to seriously address whether Bernthal would improve Blowout-his view seemed to be that Bernthal is great but maybe not great in everything and wouldn’t really have a place in blow out.
Exactly. Last week it was Morris that suggested Bernthal for a Cruising re-make: he obviously thinks highly of him. This was just another Apex Mountain of not knowing the running gag.
 

kenneycb

Hates Goose Island Beer; Loves Backdoor Play
SoSH Member
Dec 2, 2006
15,157
Tuukka's refugee camp
If my quick scan is correct, he hadn't been on before this since April (The Player). It's not like he works at The Ringer: it's pretty random and occasional as it is.
He comes in for a week and does like 10 pods. This last run he’s done a Simmons pod, several Hottest Takes, and a couple Rewatchables.
 

Remagellan

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Exactly. Last week it was Morris that suggested Bernthal for a Cruising re-make: he obviously thinks highly of him. This was just another Apex Mountain of not knowing the running gag.
Bravo! (Like Simmons, I am often tickled when someone mentions the title during the movie. Keeping the discussion in the Malle, Bill might think more of him if ever he watches Malle's classic Au revoir les enfants and discovers that the last line of dialogue before the closing voiceover by Malle is a character saying the movie's title...although more likely it would be the Candice Bergen thing.)
 

Remagellan

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Two laugh out loud moments for me while listening to the pod on Body Heat:

When Bill brought up Sydney Sweeney and Mallory said he hit the under in her own generated over/under for how many minutes into the pod would Bill go before bringing up Sydney Sweeney in a potential remake.

The following exchange (paraphrasing);

Bill: Why didn't J.A. Preston get more roles in movies?

Wesley: That's racism in Hollywood.

Bill: But how do you know it wasn't just that they didn't write roles for him?

Wesley: THAT'S THE RACISM!
 

The Filthy One

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 11, 2005
3,133
Los Angeles
The stretch of the Body Heat podcast where Bill just rattled off who was his "most bangable actress in hollywood" belt was pretty cringe. And fwiw, Sydney Sweeney does not have whatever the fuck Kathleen Turner was bringing to the table in Body Heat. Sydney Sweeney as Rollergirl? Sure, that makes sense. Sydney Sweeney in Body Heat? Uh, no. Total misreading of the type of actress required for the part. Sweeney seems to still be playing down 5 years (she's 25 now). Turner emerged from the womb as a sexed up 30 year old.
 

Leather

given himself a skunk spot
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
28,431
Planes Trains & Automobiles with Van Lathan.

Not all the way through, but I think they miss Chris and/or Sean to give some context to the movie and the stars.

For one thing, I think Sean would have noted that the 80s/modern Road Trip Movie originated with the 1970s trucker movies like Convoy and Smokey and the Bandit that exploited a 70s counter culture trend that that celebrated CB radios and long-distance trucking. Those were big hits, and led the way to more straight up comedy (Cannonball Run) and family-centric takes on "Life on the Open Road" like National Lampoon's Vacation.
 

luckiestman

Son of the Harpy
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
25,960
Planes Trains & Automobiles with Van Lathan.

Not all the way through, but I think they miss Chris and/or Sean to give some context to the movie and the stars.

For one thing, I think Sean would have noted that the 80s/modern Road Trip Movie originated with the 1970s trucker movies like Convoy and Smokey and the Bandit that exploited a 70s counter culture trend that that celebrated CB radios and long-distance trucking. Those were big hits, and led the way to more straight up comedy (Cannonball Run) and family-centric takes on "Life on the Open Road" like National Lampoon's Vacation.
The Eastwood movies Every Which Way But Loose “right turn Clyde” would be in this genre. Those were always on TV in the 80s.
 

Bongorific

Thinks he’s clever
SoSH Member
Jul 16, 2005
7,882
Balboa Towers
Planes Trains & Automobiles with Van Lathan.

Not all the way through, but I think they miss Chris and/or Sean to give some context to the movie and the stars.

For one thing, I think Sean would have noted that the 80s/modern Road Trip Movie originated with the 1970s trucker movies like Convoy and Smokey and the Bandit that exploited a 70s counter culture trend that that celebrated CB radios and long-distance trucking. Those were big hits, and led the way to more straight up comedy (Cannonball Run) and family-centric takes on "Life on the Open Road" like National Lampoon's Vacation.
I can never decide if this or Ferris Bueller is my all time favorite movie. Both are really special to me.
So I was really looking forward to this one and then disappointed when I saw it wasn’t Sean and Chris.

While I still wish there was a version with them, VL was great. Like him, John Candy always had a special place in my heart. I thought his analogy to Santa Claus was the perfect way to describe it. I saw PTaA, Uncle Buck, Home Alone, Great Outdoors, etc. from 8 - 10 years old with my dad, uncles, and cousins. These movies will never get old to me because of the memories they evoke. I distinctly remember where everyone was sitting in our family room, during Christmas break, when I was 9 and saw Steve Martin go off on the rental car lady for the first time. Two drops of pee came out. It was the first time I peed myself from laughing so hard.
 

Leather

given himself a skunk spot
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
28,431
I can never decide if this or Ferris Bueller is my all time favorite movie. Both are really special to me.
So I was really looking forward to this one and then disappointed when I saw it wasn’t Sean and Chris.

While I still wish there was a version with them, VL was great. Like him, John Candy always had a special place in my heart. I thought his analogy to Santa Claus was the perfect way to describe it. I saw PTaA, Uncle Buck, Home Alone, Great Outdoors, etc. from 8 - 10 years old with my dad, uncles, and cousins. These movies will never get old to me because of the memories they evoke. I distinctly remember where everyone was sitting in our family room, during Christmas break, when I was 9 and saw Steve Martin go off on the rental car lady for the first time. Two drops of pee came out. It was the first time I peed myself from laughing so hard.
Yeah, John Hughes was an era-defining director. I’m partial to Vacation just because I’m more than a little Clark Griswold and because it’s one of the first movies I remember watching with my family as a kid. “Holiday Road” is pure joy, and now I associate it both with being 5 and getting ready to go on a family trip and being 40, doing the same with my kids.

VL was great. But Simmons is just…man. He can’t do justice to certain things, like articulating why stories and characters work. “Hughes has villains…not like James Bond villains or anything but uh….” “I mean Bender is a bad guy but by the end you’re kind of pro Bender!” He’s like a little kid trying to explain why they like Fruit Loops. “They’re uh…fruity! And they’re loops!”

Also he really leaned heavily into the “Those aren’t pillows” bit pretty heavy. He and his buddies said that…multiple times a year? It’s a top line of the 80s? Um.

EDIT: Final comments:

1) Am I the only one that thinks the original Vacation is the best one? Maybe it's because I actually go on long road trips a lot...

2) Suggesting Ben Affleck for a remake of P, T, & A had to have been a joke, right? He has almost no comedic ability; he scowls and broods. I think the correct answer is Jon Hamm or Ewen McGregor but I'm sure others will come up with better ideas. But Ben Affleck in the Steve Martin role? Christ. It was like self parody (also self parody: when Bill mentioned the "play with your balls a lot" scene purely so he could insert the Larry Bird reference).
 
Last edited:

DJnVa

Dorito Dawg
SoSH Member
Dec 16, 2010
49,201
Die Hard 2 pod (yes it was like 8 months ago, I just missed it):

Simmons said he has to see Die Hard With a Vengeance again because he's not really sure about it but that it's not on as much as others. About 2 minutes later "I think that's why (Die Hard 2) isn't on as much as 1 and 3" when referencing the plane crash.
 

8slim

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 6, 2001
19,600
Unreal America
I have to admit, I haven’t listened to an episode since Glengarry Glen Ross. And 7 of the past 8 episodes I have no interest in. I’ll check out Planes, Trains & Automobiles soon. The rest? A big meh.
 

LastTripleCrown

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 22, 2006
251
It was great during the Man On Fire episode when Simmons made a joke about his wife mispronouncing an actor's name. Chris Ryan said something like who are you to give someone a hard time for not being able to pronounce a word correctly.
 

Leather

given himself a skunk spot
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
28,431
Yeah the choices have been pretty lackluster lately, PT&A aside.

I've only listened to the first 15 minutes of the Man on Fire one but already we have Simmons wondering why Man on Fire wasn't a BIG MOVIE two minutes after talking about how at one point Denzel sticks an explosive up some guy's ass. I dunno, Bill, maybe it's hard to market that kind of movie to a large audience? Speaking personally, I never had any interest in Man on Fire exactly because it looked like a generic "Over the Top Denzel" movie, which is its own subgenre.

And on a broader point, I have nothing against Denzel but you have to be kidding me with the idea his filmography from 1987 to 2012 was some unimpeachable run. There's a TON of dogshit in there. John Q? The Siege? Fallen? He's chased paychecks as much as anybody.
 

luckiestman

Son of the Harpy
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
25,960
Yeah the choices have been pretty lackluster lately, PT&A aside.

I've only listened to the first 15 minutes of the Man on Fire one but already we have Simmons wondering why Man on Fire wasn't a BIG MOVIE two minutes after talking about how at one point Denzel sticks an explosive up some guy's ass. I dunno, Bill, maybe it's hard to market that kind of movie to a large audience? Speaking personally, I never had any interest in Man on Fire exactly because it looked like a generic "Over the Top Denzel" movie, which is its own subgenre.

And on a broader point, I have nothing against Denzel but you have to be kidding me with the idea his filmography from 1987 to 2012 was some unimpeachable run. There's a TON of dogshit in there. John Q? The Siege? Fallen? He's chased paychecks as much as anybody.

Man on Fire is really good man. Not at all like those other three movies you listed.
 

Leather

given himself a skunk spot
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
28,431
Man on Fire is really good man. Not at all like those other three movies you listed.
That's not my point, though (although I will say the view that it's a great movie seems like its in the minority, based on its reviews). They brought up his career and stated his 1987-2012 run is an all-timer and ran through a bunch of movies while conspicuously leaving out a whole bunch of stinkers. That's not normally how they do it.

Bill has a boner for Denzel and that's fine, he's done a lot of great work, but there's no need to BS it.
 

Marciano490

Urological Expert
SoSH Member
Nov 4, 2007
55,157
Yeah the choices have been pretty lackluster lately, PT&A aside.

I've only listened to the first 15 minutes of the Man on Fire one but already we have Simmons wondering why Man on Fire wasn't a BIG MOVIE two minutes after talking about how at one point Denzel sticks an explosive up some guy's ass. I dunno, Bill, maybe it's hard to market that kind of movie to a large audience? Speaking personally, I never had any interest in Man on Fire exactly because it looked like a generic "Over the Top Denzel" movie, which is its own subgenre.

And on a broader point, I have nothing against Denzel but you have to be kidding me with the idea his filmography from 1987 to 2012 was some unimpeachable run. There's a TON of dogshit in there. John Q? The Siege? Fallen? He's chased paychecks as much as anybody.
It’s a great movie, but there’s also a bunch of Spanish (with really cool subtitle effects, but still). That might’ve been a turnoff too. Plus, yeah, it’s really violent. Dynamite suppositories. Fingers getting shot off, etc.
 

Mystic Merlin

Member
SoSH Member
Sep 21, 2007
42,183
Hartford, CT
I like the movie, but…..fuck me sideways did Scott and his cinematographer really need to triple down on what I guess I would call the shaky cam aesthetic? I’m not even talking about a handheld camera, mind you. These are, from what I can tell, fixed/static camera shots where the frame is then jerked around for effect in editing/post and overlaid with pivots from brief slo mo frame rate to real time speed and brief flashes of discoloration. It was literally hurting my eyes the last time I saw it on cable.

I don’t think I’m doing the aesthetic justice in my description, but fair warning.
 

Marciano490

Urological Expert
SoSH Member
Nov 4, 2007
55,157
I like the movie, but…..fuck me sideways did Scott and his cinematographer really need to triple down on what I guess I would call the shaky cam aesthetic? I’m not even talking about a handheld camera, mind you. These are, from what I can tell, fixed/static camera shots where the frame is then jerked around for effect in editing/post and overlaid with pivots from brief slo mo frame rate to real time speed and brief flashes of discoloration. It was literally hurting my eyes the last time I saw it on cable.

I don’t think I’m doing the aesthetic justice in my description, but fair warning.
Yeah, Scott definitely pulls out a lot of “cool” director tricks. I liked it, in that it brought some newness and disorientation to a movie that was ultra violent and shot in pretty varied locations, but I can also see finding it annoying and film schooly.
 

tbb345

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 23, 2010
4,410
It’s a great movie, but there’s also a bunch of Spanish (with really cool subtitle effects, but still). That might’ve been a turnoff too. Plus, yeah, it’s really violent. Dynamite suppositories. Fingers getting shot off, etc.
If the question is why it wasn’t a box office hit, it’s because it was rated R and ultra violent. During that time movies like that didn’t make a ton of money at the box office.

(I love Man On Fire BTW; thought it was awesome)
 

Spelunker

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 17, 2005
9,661
If the question is why it wasn’t a box office hit, it’s because it was rated R and ultra violent. During that time movies like that didn’t make a ton of money at the box office.

(I love Man On Fire BTW; thought it was awesome)
Adding to this, it wasn't a huge hit, but it's not like it was a bomb or anything. It made 130m on a 60m production. Even assuming a 2x marketing budget (which I find unlikely) it made money, and that's back when DVD sales were still a thing.
 

Remagellan

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
I had never watched Man on Fire until I did before listening to the pod, and thoroughly enjoyed it, although I was disappointed that Bill, Chris, and Craig didn't pick up on one of my nitpicks on the movie: Walken provides Denzel a warehouse full of weapons for his revenge mission, and neither one of them think of getting the guy who is already nursing three shots to the chest some body armor? Might have come in handy as things worked out.

It is not really my kind of film, but it is a masterpiece.
 

Hoya81

Member
SoSH Member
Feb 3, 2010
6,944
I like the movie, but…..fuck me sideways did Scott and his cinematographer really need to triple down on what I guess I would call the shaky cam aesthetic? I’m not even talking about a handheld camera, mind you. These are, from what I can tell, fixed/static camera shots where the frame is then jerked around for effect in editing/post and overlaid with pivots from brief slo mo frame rate to real time speed and brief flashes of discoloration. It was literally hurting my eyes the last time I saw it on cable.

I don’t think I’m doing the aesthetic justice in my description, but fair warning.
Late period Scott did that a lot, especially in Domino, Déjà Vu and the Pelham 1 2 3 remake, before settling down a bit with Unstoppable.
 

serotonin

Member
SoSH Member
Sep 23, 2007
582
Western MA
I like the movie, but…..fuck me sideways did Scott and his cinematographer really need to triple down on what I guess I would call the shaky cam aesthetic? I’m not even talking about a handheld camera, mind you. These are, from what I can tell, fixed/static camera shots where the frame is then jerked around for effect in editing/post and overlaid with pivots from brief slo mo frame rate to real time speed and brief flashes of discoloration. It was literally hurting my eyes the last time I saw it on cable.

I don’t think I’m doing the aesthetic justice in my description, but fair warning.
Yeah, I love Man on Fire, but it has absolutely given me a headache before.