It's obviously not impossible but it's harder. As Lex says, maybe there's a team with an asset that (1) is paid more than the trade exception the Cs have and (2) that would be willing to trade 1 for 4 and end up cutting all 4 but it's hard to see that player right now.I don't expect Brad to do a Brogdon-style deal, headlined by PP + deep bench minimums, BUT why does it matter if other NBA rosters are full?
The minimums would be filler & cut by the receiving team, right? Or if JDD or Walsh was included (& seen as an asset) the receiving team would cut some of their end-of-bench fodder.
OR is there some new CBA rule in play here?
There have been some Celtic/Isaiah Stewart rumors which is Detroit's feeble efforts to quickly unload that extension. He would have been a nice in-season pick-up if he wasn't gtd $64MM this past summer.
The other point is that if the Cs trade 4 guys off their roster, whoever they bring in to the replace them will likely be less talented than who they have now. Maybe the Cs can get rid of Svi and Walsh along with a re-signed Griffin and some team willing to take Davison on without hurting their present squad but after that, we're starting to talk about guys who have actually made contributions at one point or another - Banton / Stevens / Brisset / Kornet / Queeta.
But if anyone can pull this off I suppose its POBOBS.