Drafting a QB

BaseballJones

ivanvamp
SoSH Member
Oct 1, 2015
24,812
Going back to the data we've talked about in the past, using drafts from 2000-2018 (this is to allow players some time for their careers to flesh out a little, so they have a chance of meeting the standards I'm about to set), I wanted to see how drafting QBs has gone. Obviously this is going to leave out some good QBs who have been drafted since then but again, we don't really know what their careers are going to end up looking like, so I'm cutting it off at guys who were drafted in 2018.

Some data:

230 total QB drafted
1st: 53
2nd: 20
3rd: 25
4th: 26
5th: 31
6th: 40
7th: 35

Now here are some criteria I'm setting for what constitutes a good career for a QB. These are, I admit, somewhat arbitrary. It's hard to know exactly what these thresholds should be. That said, here are the thresholds:

1x All-Pro - It's really hard to be an All-Pro, so if you get there, you're doing something right!
2x Pro Bowl - One time might be a fluke. Two times and you're probably pretty good.
5 years a starter - As pro-football-reference defines a starter. Five years is pretty solid.
100 total wAV - I am figuring 10 wAV a year over a 10 year career.
90 total games played - I am figuring 9 games a year over a 10 year career, or 15 games a year over a 6 year career.

In any case, here's what we are looking at.

71480

Now to see what the average numbers are for the QB drafted in each round. So Avg AP1 means the average number of times a QB in this round made All-Pro. Avg wAV is the average total wAV a QB in that round has/had accumulated. Etc.

71472

The "-TB" categories are meant to show the numbers *taking Tom Brady out of the mix*. Just to give perspective, because he completely warps any objective look at the data. He makes it seem like sixth rounders do better than they really do, and skew what you can project out of a sixth round QB pick. So for example, the average QB drafted in the first round is going to accumulate 54.34 wAV and plays in 92.87 games in his career. Compare that to the average third rounder, who accumulates just 18.45 wAV and plays in just 43.09 games over his career. It's obvious that on the whole, guys drafted in the first round are going to be much more likely to produce good careers than third rounders are.

71476

Now this is the percentage of QB drafted in that round to meet these thresholds.

If you draft a QB in the first round, there's a 49% chance (based on this data) he will be at least a 5-year starter, and a 32% chance he will play in at least 90 games in his career. There's also a 30% chance he will be a 2-time (or more) pro bowl player.

What's interesting is that out of the 53 first round QBs drafted from 2000-2018, just 5 of them (9.4%) will ever make an All Pro team, and 16 of them (30.2%) will make 2 or more pro bowls. That means that 48 out of the 53 (90.6%) never made an All Pro team, and 37 of the 53 (69.8%) never made two pro bowls in his career.

So even drafting a QB in the first round, it's much, much more likely than not that you are NOT drafting a "franchise QB".

BUT...you've got about a 50% chance that that first round QB pick is going to start for you for at least 5 years (which is good), but that means that you're drafting a guy who will get a ton of snaps for you, but not be particularly good. But you play him because....you've picked him in the first round and you have to give him a shot. So there's a very real risk that you draft a QB in the first round and it actually sets your team back in the end. It's very risky, because (a) it's the only way, really, unless you get incredibly lucky, to get a true franchise QB, but at the same time, (b) it really can set your organization back five years if you draft a guy, commit to him, let him start and grow on the job, and he turns out to be...not very good. There's a very real chance that this is exactly what's happening with Mac Jones, by the way. Good enough to start for you, but not good enough to be a true franchise QB, and in the end, it sets you back.

Now, let's see how many guys in this list have achieved: 1x AP, 2x PB and 100 wAV for his career.

Five. Five guys: Tom Brady, Drew Brees, Aaron Rodgers, Matt Ryan, and Cam Newton.

Of these guys, only three have won Super Bowls.

Of those three, only one has won multiple Super Bowls.

Now we know that Patrick Mahomes will get to these thresholds. He's already reached some of them. He's currently at 94 career wAV, so he falls just a tick short, but obviously we can include him. And Josh Allen will get there, and others too, barring career-ending injury. But since those things can unfortunately happen, we aren't going to include them in this list because they haven't made those thresholds yet. But OBVIOUSLY guys like Mahomes and Allen are true franchise QBs.
 

Attachments

Super Nomario

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 5, 2000
14,024
Mansfield MA
Good stuff @BaseballJones. All Pro is a pretty tough standard since only one guy makes it, but your overall point makes a lot of sense.

We should also note that a lot of QB first round success rate is driven by #1 overall picks. I'm using a different time frame and success criteria, but it tells a pretty clear story (this chart appeared in my book, which you can still buy on Amazon). This is pretty relevant if we're thinking about the Pats moving on from Mac Jones; they're unlikely to be bad enough to get Caleb Williams or Drake Maye so we're looking at a lower hit rate with QB3/4/5/whatever.
71481
 

BaseballJones

ivanvamp
SoSH Member
Oct 1, 2015
24,812
Good stuff @BaseballJones. All Pro is a pretty tough standard since only one guy makes it, but your overall point makes a lot of sense.

We should also note that a lot of QB first round success rate is driven by #1 overall picks. I'm using a different time frame and success criteria, but it tells a pretty clear story (this chart appeared in my book, which you can still buy on Amazon). This is pretty relevant if we're thinking about the Pats moving on from Mac Jones; they're unlikely to be bad enough to get Caleb Williams or Drake Maye so we're looking at a lower hit rate with QB3/4/5/whatever.
View attachment 71481
Yep, agreed. (and people should buy his book - it's outstanding!!!!)

This is what I mean when I say that going for the franchise QB in the draft is risky - you are much, much more likely than not to fail, but you're also likely to give the guy a chance, so you'll probably draft a guy in the first round, play him a few years with minimal success, maybe win a handful of games but not be bad enough to suck for a top 2-3 draft pick, and then have to do it all over again, probably ending up with the same results. This is how teams get in this vicious cycle.
 

Oil Can Dan

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2003
8,052
0-3 to 4-3
Good stuff! Is there a way to take in to account the vast difference in value of a 1st round pick? As in, the value of the #1 pick is tremendously more than the value of the #32 pick. I have no idea how to incorporate that in to this but it seems pretty relevant to the overall conclusions.
 

BaseballJones

ivanvamp
SoSH Member
Oct 1, 2015
24,812
Good stuff! Is there a way to take in to account the vast difference in value of a 1st round pick? As in, the value of the #1 pick is tremendously more than the value of the #32 pick. I have no idea how to incorporate that in to this but it seems pretty relevant to the overall conclusions.
That's part of what @Super Nomario is getting at in his chart. If you're referring to the "draft value chart" that guys like Jimmy Johnson made famous, yes, that can be done. It will take me a little time, but yes it can be done.
 

BaseballJones

ivanvamp
SoSH Member
Oct 1, 2015
24,812
Going back to the data from the OP... I broke down the list of QBs drafted in the first round from 2000-2018 and now am looking at their wAV (before 2022, when I compiled this data). Here's the averages when these QBs are broken up into smaller groups:

Pick #1: 76.3 wAV
Pick #2: 46.3 wAV
Pick #3: 55.8 wAV
Picks #4-7: 70.5 wAV
Picks #8-10: 36.5 wAV
Picks #11-14: 73.5 wAV
Picks #15-17: 23.5 wAV
Picks #18-20: 54.7 wAV
Picks #21-24: 37.3 wAV
Picks #25-28: 20.7 wAV
Picks #29-32: 44.0 wAV

To bunch it close to #15 where Mac was taken: picks #13-17: 23.5 wAV

To group it into basically thirds:
Picks #1-10: 61.2 wAV
Picks #11-20: 56.1 wAV
Picks #21-32: 34.8 wAV

Looking at that middle group, the group in which Mac would fall, here's the full list of guys from 2000-2018 (not counting 2023 in these averages because active players have only played a partial year):

72054
 

Devizier

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 3, 2000
19,607
Somewhere
Good stuff! Is there a way to take in to account the vast difference in value of a 1st round pick? As in, the value of the #1 pick is tremendously more than the value of the #32 pick. I have no idea how to incorporate that in to this but it seems pretty relevant to the overall conclusions.
Probably applying some sort of exponential decay function attached to whatever valuation method you want to use. Pick number, not round, as the independent variable.
 

BaseballJones

ivanvamp
SoSH Member
Oct 1, 2015
24,812
Great stuff!


is that really the same?
Yes because there were no QBs picked (in this sample) #13 or #14, so grouping them as #15-17 is the same as grouping them #13-17. The only reason I redid it as #13-17 was to give picks +2 through -2 of pick #15 and I didn't want to give the impression that I was grouping #15 only with picks that came AFTER it.
 

Arroyoyo

New Member
Dec 13, 2021
835
Going back to the data we've talked about in the past, using drafts from 2000-2018 (this is to allow players some time for their careers to flesh out a little, so they have a chance of meeting the standards I'm about to set), I wanted to see how drafting QBs has gone. Obviously this is going to leave out some good QBs who have been drafted since then but again, we don't really know what their careers are going to end up looking like, so I'm cutting it off at guys who were drafted in 2018.

Some data:

230 total QB drafted
1st: 53
2nd: 20
3rd: 25
4th: 26
5th: 31
6th: 40
7th: 35

Now here are some criteria I'm setting for what constitutes a good career for a QB. These are, I admit, somewhat arbitrary. It's hard to know exactly what these thresholds should be. That said, here are the thresholds:

1x All-Pro - It's really hard to be an All-Pro, so if you get there, you're doing something right!
2x Pro Bowl - One time might be a fluke. Two times and you're probably pretty good.
5 years a starter - As pro-football-reference defines a starter. Five years is pretty solid.
100 total wAV - I am figuring 10 wAV a year over a 10 year career.
90 total games played - I am figuring 9 games a year over a 10 year career, or 15 games a year over a 6 year career.

In any case, here's what we are looking at.

View attachment 71480

Now to see what the average numbers are for the QB drafted in each round. So Avg AP1 means the average number of times a QB in this round made All-Pro. Avg wAV is the average total wAV a QB in that round has/had accumulated. Etc.

View attachment 71472

The "-TB" categories are meant to show the numbers *taking Tom Brady out of the mix*. Just to give perspective, because he completely warps any objective look at the data. He makes it seem like sixth rounders do better than they really do, and skew what you can project out of a sixth round QB pick. So for example, the average QB drafted in the first round is going to accumulate 54.34 wAV and plays in 92.87 games in his career. Compare that to the average third rounder, who accumulates just 18.45 wAV and plays in just 43.09 games over his career. It's obvious that on the whole, guys drafted in the first round are going to be much more likely to produce good careers than third rounders are.

View attachment 71476

Now this is the percentage of QB drafted in that round to meet these thresholds.

If you draft a QB in the first round, there's a 49% chance (based on this data) he will be at least a 5-year starter, and a 32% chance he will play in at least 90 games in his career. There's also a 30% chance he will be a 2-time (or more) pro bowl player.

What's interesting is that out of the 53 first round QBs drafted from 2000-2018, just 5 of them (9.4%) will ever make an All Pro team, and 16 of them (30.2%) will make 2 or more pro bowls. That means that 48 out of the 53 (90.6%) never made an All Pro team, and 37 of the 53 (69.8%) never made two pro bowls in his career.

So even drafting a QB in the first round, it's much, much more likely than not that you are NOT drafting a "franchise QB".

BUT...you've got about a 50% chance that that first round QB pick is going to start for you for at least 5 years (which is good), but that means that you're drafting a guy who will get a ton of snaps for you, but not be particularly good. But you play him because....you've picked him in the first round and you have to give him a shot. So there's a very real risk that you draft a QB in the first round and it actually sets your team back in the end. It's very risky, because (a) it's the only way, really, unless you get incredibly lucky, to get a true franchise QB, but at the same time, (b) it really can set your organization back five years if you draft a guy, commit to him, let him start and grow on the job, and he turns out to be...not very good. There's a very real chance that this is exactly what's happening with Mac Jones, by the way. Good enough to start for you, but not good enough to be a true franchise QB, and in the end, it sets you back.

Now, let's see how many guys in this list have achieved: 1x AP, 2x PB and 100 wAV for his career.

Five. Five guys: Tom Brady, Drew Brees, Aaron Rodgers, Matt Ryan, and Cam Newton.

Of these guys, only three have won Super Bowls.

Of those three, only one has won multiple Super Bowls.

Now we know that Patrick Mahomes will get to these thresholds. He's already reached some of them. He's currently at 94 career wAV, so he falls just a tick short, but obviously we can include him. And Josh Allen will get there, and others too, barring career-ending injury. But since those things can unfortunately happen, we aren't going to include them in this list because they haven't made those thresholds yet. But OBVIOUSLY guys like Mahomes and Allen are true franchise QBs.
This is a great post. It makes you question what makes someone “great” at scouting talent. With an ever-shifting league, it’s becoming harder to gauge success in the college game yesterday vs. the direction of the pro game tomorrow.

I often wonder whether some players that burn out today would have been great 20 years ago, and if there were players 20 years ago that burned out that would have been great in today’s game.
 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
34,948
To me it's as easy as: most of the good QBs in the league were picked in the first round, so if you want to have one of those, your best bet is the first round.
Yep, there are 32 QB spots, it's both the most important and hardest position in the league, it's going to have the lowest hit rate of any position, but also a hit at QB is worth more than a dozen hits in other positions
 

Ed Hillel

Wants to be startin somethin
SoSH Member
Dec 12, 2007
44,231
Here
I think if you're a team basically completely starting over, you should always draft 2, one in the first round and another in the 4th-6th range, a la the Redskins with RG3 and Cousins. Of course it usually does not work out that way, but getting as many lottery tickets as you can, with a fallback of perhaps drafting both a starter and a competent backup learning the same system at the same time, seems ideal. You just can't seriously compete without good QB play and it's worth loading up on. Even for teams with many needs like the Pats right now.
 

BaseballJones

ivanvamp
SoSH Member
Oct 1, 2015
24,812
I’m in favor of it.
Yep. 100%. And I’ve been a big Mac supporter here. Go for a QB this draft please, in the first round. And trade for a WR1. And draft OL help.

And oh by the way… suddenly the defense absolutely sucks now too. So that’ll have to be fixed.
 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
34,948
Yep. 100%. And I’ve been a big Mac supporter here. Go for a QB this draft please, in the first round. And trade for a WR1. And draft OL help.

And oh by the way… suddenly the defense absolutely sucks now too. So that’ll have to be fixed.
The defense will be fine, half the starters are hurt and they're playing opposite an offense that is putting up sub-2 minute drives before giving it back in good field position.
 

BaseballJones

ivanvamp
SoSH Member
Oct 1, 2015
24,812
Just going off the current starting QBs (I'm going to go with Mac instead of Zappe here, just for the purposes of this exercise)....

Buf - Josh Allen - 1st round, #7
Mia - Tua Tagovailoa - 1st round, #5
NYJ - Aaron Rodgers - 1st round, #24
NE - Mac Jones - 1st round, #15
Bal - Lamar Jackson - 1st round, #32
Cle - Deshaun Watson - 1st round, #12
Pit - Kenny Pickett - 1st round, #20
Cin - Joe Burrow - 1st round, #1
Hou - CJ Stroud - 1st round, #2
Jax - Trevor Lawrence - 1st round, #1
Ind - Anthony Richardson - 1st round, #4
Ten - Ryan Tannehill - 1st round, #8
KC - Patrick Mahomes - 1st round, #10
LV - Aidan O'Connell - 4th round, #135
Den - Russell Wilson - 3rd round, #75
LAC - Justin Herbert - 1st round, #6
Dal - Dak Prescott - 4th round, #135
Phi - Jalen Hurts - 2nd round, #53
NYG - Daniel Jones - 1st round, #6
Was - Sam Howell - 5th round, #144
Det - Jared Goff - 1st round, #1
GB - Jordan Love - 1st round, #26
Min - Kirk Cousins - 4th round, #102
Chi - Justin Fields - 1st round, #11
TB - Baker Mayfield - 1st round, #1
NO - Derek Carr - 2nd round, #36
Atl - Desmond Ridder - 3rd round, #74
Car - Bryce Young - 1st round, #1
SF - Brock Purdy - 7th round, #262
LAR - Matthew Stafford - 1st round, #1
Sea - Geno Smith - 2nd round, #39
Ari - Kyler Murray - 1st round, #1

So of the 32 "starting" QBs in the NFL:
- 1st round: 22 (68.9%)
- 2nd round: 3 (9.4%) - so 25/32 (78.1%) were 1st or 2nd round picks
- 3rd round: 2 (6.3%)
- 4th round: 3 (9.4%)
- 5th round: 1 (3.1%)
- 6th round: 0 (0.0%)
- 7th round: 1 (3.1%)

- 1st round: 22 (68.9%)
- 2/3 round: 5 (15.6%)
- 4/5/6/7 round: 5 (15.6%)

- #1 pick: 7 (21.9%)
- top 5 pick: 9 (28.1%)
- top 10 pick: 14 (43.8%)
- top 20 pick: 18 (56.3%)