Damon Huard on WEEI saying he did his own little experiment today and he thought that balls inflated at 11 psi felt just like they should. Couldn't tell the difference and he is an ex QB.
H78 said:This is where I'm at, too. I don't think Walt actually checked them before the game and was trying to save his job by saying that he did check them, probably not thinking the whole story would get this far out of control.
The balls have to be made available for testing.snowmanny said:Do the refs actually measure the psi of each ball?
snowmanny said:If the refs don't actually check the ball pressure before the game then I don't understand this story.
Yes but didn't we hear some were at 10.5, and that's all the difference in the world. Kidding.scotian1 said:Damon Huard on WEEI saying he did his own little experiment today and he thought that balls inflated at 11 psi felt just like they should. Couldn't tell the difference and he is an ex QB.
Mark Brunell was a superstar and he can tell the difference!!MAl Zarilla said:Yes but didn't we hear some were at 10.5, and that's all the difference in the world. Kidding.
If a national writer were tracking me while I do my job I'd follow the letter of the law when it comes to the rulebook too.Byrdbrain said:The balls have to be made available for testing.
There is a story that Peter King did when he trailed a referee for a day and that guy did test each ball and they made it seem like that was SOP.
It is unclear to my knowledge if all these balls were tested with a gauge.
LuckyBen said:Mark Brunell was a superstar and he can tell the difference!!M
drleather2001 said:
I'll add a wrinkle: They "checked" one with a gauge, got it up to spec, and then did the rest by "feel". Of course, 10.5 and 12.5 feel the same, so....
Yeah, so either the refs didn't check the balls OR someone deflated them for some reason OR they spontaneously deflated for some reason. Ummmmm. OKByrdbrain said:The balls have to be made available for testing.
There is a story that Peter King did when he trailed a referee for a day and that guy did test each ball and they made it seem like that was SOP.
It is unclear to my knowledge if all these balls were tested with a gauge.
Nightslyr said:So, wait... did Borges actually ask Brady why he didn't notice a 15% reduction in weight?
ifmanis5 said:Hopefully the 'referees need to be questioned' will get some momentum now.
The idea that someone being covered on their process by a reporter might be extra careful when the reporter is there to dot every I and cross every T, then act like it's standard operating procedure might, just might, not be that farfetchedByrdbrain said:The balls have to be made available for testing.
There is a story that Peter King did when he trailed a referee for a day and that guy did test each ball and they made it seem like that was SOP.
It is unclear to my knowledge if all these balls were tested with a gauge.
He said baseball players notice when their bat doesn't weigh the right amount and Basketball players notice when the rim is six inches high so how can he not notice it but the Colts did? Brady said he just gets the ball and throws it, he doesn't squeeze it like the Colts do.Nightslyr said:So, wait... did Borges actually ask Brady why he didn't notice a 15% reduction in weight?
If you're sure that "someone fucked up," you haven't been paying attention.fairlee76 said:Well, someone fucked up. Either the refs did not properly check the balls pre-game or someone in the employ of the Pats monkeyed with them. Maybe we'll find out what happened, more than likely, we won't. Another one of life's great mysteries that will torment us forever! Or for another day or two.
Right. I need to shut up until all the information is out there. But this story keeps sucking me back in. Is this what realty TV junkies feel like?!DrewDawg said:Or, Mort fucked up his initial tweet, balls were not 2 lbs lower and it's all accounted for in the fact that Pats inflate to lowest level and any loss puts it under that.
Well essentially "a rule is a rule", no other reason that I can see.Comfortably Lomb said:
Which kind of gets us back to why does the PSI actually matter, if at all in this range?
drleather2001 said:
I'll add a wrinkle: They "checked" one with a gauge, got it up to spec, and then did the rest by "feel". Of course, 10.5 and 12.5 feel the same, so....
It's easier to catch if you're a receiver and throw if you're a QB with small hands.rodderick said:Once again, can anyone explain to me why these limits even exist when teams are allowed to bring their own balls? If I want to play with a 4.5 psi football, who is hurt by that?
snowmanny said:Yeah, so either the refs didn't check the balls OR someone deflated them for some reason OR they spontaneously deflated for some reason. Ummmmm. OK
Shelterdog said:
Another theory. The refs lied when first asked if they checked them all and now the NFL is trying to figure what to do. [This is why they can't show tampering--you could argue that the ball went from 12.5-10.5 because of tampering just because it's too much of a drop even if you're not sure how the tampering occurred, but if you've got no baseline how do you show anything?]
QFTAl Zarilla said:Don't watch Around the Horn unless it's on an old TV you don't mind destroying. Click.
H78 said:It's easier to catch if you're a receiver and throw if you're a QB with small hands.
I think the real headline to come out of this is the NFL hates people with small hands.
snowmanny said:He said baseball players notice when their bat doesn't weigh the right amount and Basketball players notice when the rim is six inches high so how can he not notice it but the Colts did? Brady said he just gets the ball and throws it, he doesn't squeeze it like the Colts do.
Yes. Because Ron Borges has been waiting for this for 15 years because he hates Belichick and the Pats.Nightslyr said:So, wait... did Borges actually ask Brady why he didn't notice a 15% reduction in weight?
Yes that's the story.BostonFan23 said:Someone told me the refs test the balls hours before the games, then they go back into the team's possession, leaving time for tampering. True? Source?
reggiecleveland said:Doesn't everybody?
Matt Barkley's receivers will have an easier time catching the ball than Aaron Rodgers' receivers would. Inflating ABOVE 13.5 doesn't seem to offer any advantage. At least that's the argument.rodderick said:
So? Aren't QBs already allowed to scrub, rub and prep the balls to their liking? If Rodgers has huge hands and likes the ball with 15 psi, let him, if Matt Barkley wants 8.5, go ahead. I fail to see what's the problem here, if everyone has the option, there's no competitive advantage to be gained.
My hands are tiny but I have a penis like a French bread so I like disproving that old sawH78 said:It's easier to catch if you're a receiver and throw if you're a QB with small hands.
I think the real headline to come out of this is the NFL hates people with small hands.
snowmanny said:He said baseball players notice when their bat doesn't weigh the right amount and Basketball players notice when the rim is six inches high so how can he not notice it but the Colts did? Brady said he just gets the ball and throws it, he doesn't squeeze it like the Colts do.
Great use of one of the best poems in existence.singaporesoxfan said:
Oh, that reminds me:
I have drunk
the whisky
that was in
the liquor cabinet
and which
you were probably
saving
for breakfast
Forgive me
it was delicious
so sweet
and so cold
I think this is starting to sound like what happened. There is no way the refs actually stuck a needle in every one of those footballs and tested them before the game when the reality of the difference between what is "legal" and what isn't something that would have an impact on the game. Unless the refs have some kind of severe OCD they just gave them a squeeze and then didn't measure them until halftime. And since they never measure them, no one on any NFL teams really worries about the exact pressure of the footballs when they fill them up. They too just do it by feel. So the problem is really that the refs said they "checked" them before the game but they really didn't. Assuming that the coach and the QB know that if they tell the truth about under inflating the footballs they won't get more than a fine, there is no reason for them to lie about this. So we can assume they are telling the truth. And if they are, then the most logical answer to all of this is that the refs either didn't check or they checked without really checking or they, like everyone else before Monday, just didn't think it was that important an issue.Shelterdog said:
Another theory. The refs lied when first asked if they checked them all and now the NFL is trying to figure what to do. [This is why they can't show tampering--you could argue that the ball went from 12.5-10.5 because of tampering just because it's too much of a drop even if you're not sure how the tampering occurred, but if you've got no baseline how do you show anything?]
H78 said:This whole thing is stupid.
But, if they were off by only .2 PSI, don't you think the NFL would have mentioned this by now and not dragged one of their SB contenders through all of this?
I'm sure the Tweet is accurate.
NFL <<< NBA <<< Italian football <<< pro wrestlingsoxhop411 said:NFL is worse than the NBA. Which I never thought was possible.