#DFG: Canceling the Noise

Is there any level of suspension that you would advise Tom to accept?


  • Total voters
    208

drbretto

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 10, 2009
12,230
Concord, NH
Section15Box113 said:
It would be something if a source in the league office leaked this to Stephen A to create a parallel between Brady and Hernandez.

/tinfoil hat
 
Ok, this is why the thread gets locked... nevermind.
 

bankshot1

Member
SoSH Member
Feb 12, 2003
24,932
where I was last at
I just heard the Stephen A Smith rationale on Brady/penalty to be upheld/cellphone destruction/Spygate/BB was going to be banned
 
Wow
 
how much additional idiocy can the NFL give him to string together?
 
this is going to get funner
 

dcdrew10

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 8, 2005
1,405
Washington, DC via Worcester

dcmissle

Deflatigator
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Aug 4, 2005
28,269
If this is going to turn on SAS, it should be locked or the posts moved.

Even if TB destroyed the phone, that would be of no legal relevance at this point. So move to food fight thread.
 

drbretto

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 10, 2009
12,230
Concord, NH
Section15Box113 said:
Oh, please. Wasn't the "tinfoil hat" enough to make it clear I was in no way serious?

Maybe I should have italicized it too?
 
Honestly, it comes off like you're trying to float an idea but are adding the tinfoil hat thing as a shield in case someone calls you out for it. I'm sure, as a reasonable person, that you are a reasonably intelligent person and you don't actually believe it, but it's also the kind of post that gets the attention of the seanberrys of the world, and they use it as fuel for the hate. 
 

drbretto

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 10, 2009
12,230
Concord, NH
dcmissle said:
If this is going to turn on SAS, it should be locked or the posts moved.

Even if TB destroyed the phone, that would be of no legal relevance at this point. So move to food fight thread.
 
Yeah, let's leave room for the lawyers to argue back and forth over semantics.
 
It's not turning on SAS. He made some dumb comments and people reacted. It's not about HIM, it's about this circus. It's always been about the circus.
 

dcmissle

Deflatigator
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Aug 4, 2005
28,269
drbretto said:
 
Yeah, let's leave room for the lawyers to argue back and forth over semantics.
 
It's not turning on SAS. He made some dumb comments and people reacted. It's not about HIM, it's about this circus. It's always been about the circus.
See "perceptions".
 

soxhop411

news aggravator
SoSH Member
Dec 4, 2009
46,621
“@DanWetzel: It’s good that the NFL is way too ethical to ever leak wild info in an attempt to smear a player just prior to a controversial decision”
 

OnWisc

Microcosmic
SoSH Member
Apr 16, 2006
7,218
Chicago, IL
All the SAS comment is going to do is draw heat on him. A few reporters may go further and question why ESPN is so willing to throw this stuff snd the Mort nonsense on the air, and so unwilling to correct themselves, but this is mostly a big nothing aside from another example of SAS's uselessness.

SAS has mistaken Onion articles for reality in the past. While I no longer think SAS himself was making a joke, I think what he heard about Brady destroying his phone was a Hernandez related joke, and he missed that completely, took it at face value, and reported it.

Even the NFL isn't stupid enough to leak something like this. A third grader running for class president would have more respect for his classmates than to leak something so absurd about his opponent.
 

Hoya81

Member
SoSH Member
Feb 3, 2010
8,517
It's good that the NFL is way too ethical to ever leak wild info in an attempt to smear a player just prior to a controversial decision
— Dan Wetzel (@DanWetzel) July 28, 2015

Using SAS to leak info may be the tipping point for some national media folks.
 

dcmissle

Deflatigator
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Aug 4, 2005
28,269
Wetzel and Florio are very formidable adversaries ... Both are entirely fed up and have been for some time.

Will be interesting to see whether Florio loses SNF duties on NBC
 

bankshot1

Member
SoSH Member
Feb 12, 2003
24,932
where I was last at
To get off the SAS track, for a moment:
 
lawyer question: if the NFL stays with a 4-game penalty to what extent in its rationale can they deviate from the original reasons? (ie how much can they pretty this up for the next round, or are they locked in as to reasons/process?)
 

soxhop411

news aggravator
SoSH Member
Dec 4, 2009
46,621
“@CharlesRobinson: #Patriots source on report Tom Brady destroyed his cell phone: ”As far as I know, that didn’t happen. Today was the first I heard of that.“”
 

Section15Box113

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 16, 2005
8,925
Inside Lou Gorman's Head
drbretto said:
 
Honestly, it comes off like you're trying to float an idea but are adding the tinfoil hat thing as a shield in case someone calls you out for it. I'm sure, as a reasonable person, that you are a reasonably intelligent person and you don't actually believe it, but it's also the kind of post that gets the attention of the seanberrys of the world, and they use it as fuel for the hate. 
 
It was a joke.  The tinfoil hat should have made that clear. 
 
Unless we think that wearing tinfoil hats no longer signify the lunatic fringe - in which case, may god help us all.
 

Ed Hillel

Wants to be startin somethin
SoSH Member
Dec 12, 2007
45,002
Here
dcmissle said:
Wetzel and Florio are very formidable adversaries ... Both are entirely fed up and have been for some time.

Will be interesting to see whether Florio loses SNF duties on NBC
 
What about Peter King? King and Florio were the 2 main "guests" on their SNF show. Maybe we'll get SAS and Ashley Fox this year?
 

PedroKsBambino

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Apr 17, 2003
31,899
Simmons tweeted that Goodell never turned over his personal cell phone during the Mueller investigation (Goodell and other league officials only gave over 'work' devices).
 
Not directly relevant, but worth noting given that there is no CBA-negotiated penalty around cell phone disclosure
 

Eddie Jurak

canderson-lite
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 12, 2002
45,025
Melrose, MA
soxhop411 said:
“@CharlesRobinson: #Patriots source on report Tom Brady destroyed his cell phone: ”As far as I know, that didn’t happen. Today was the first I heard of that.“”
This is probably a violation of some sort of league gag order.
 

Omar's Wacky Neighbor

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 14, 2005
16,801
Leaving in a bit to the studio :)
OnWisc said:
SAS has mistaken Onion articles for reality in the past. While I no longer think SAS himself was making a joke, I think what he heard about Brady destroying his phone was a Hernandez related joke, and he missed that completely, took it at face value, and reported it.
Once heard SAS open his NYC radio show with a 3-4 minute monologue of why a particular baseball trade/signing shouldn't or wouldn't take place.  Problem is, the trade/signing had already been completed, announced, and reported the night before.
 

drbretto

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 10, 2009
12,230
Concord, NH
Section15Box113 said:
 
It was a joke.  The tinfoil hat should have made that clear. 
 
Unless we think that wearing tinfoil hats no longer signify the lunatic fringe - in which case, may god help us all.
FTR, I got that it was a joke. But ever since Seanberry started mocking these threads, it's like they want these to be some kind of beacon of seriousness. It's a crazy situation that's going to draw some crazy posts. Those crazy posts provide the entertainment between lawyer arguments. I never had a problem with it. But /tinfoil hat posts are the kinds of things people are latching onto to make the case that these threads are bad to begin with. 
 

dcmissle

Deflatigator
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Aug 4, 2005
28,269
We are familiar with this, of course. But when John Harrington -- or Bill Parcells -- wanted somebody roughed up, Will McDonough at least wielded the baseball bat with skill and often elegance. This is embarrassing. Standards have fallen.
 

DJnVa

Dorito Dawg
SoSH Member
Dec 16, 2010
54,340
drbretto said:
FTR, I got that it was a joke. But ever since Seanberry started mocking these threads, it's like they want these to be some kind of beacon of seriousness. It's a crazy situation that's going to draw some crazy posts. Those crazy posts provide the entertainment between lawyer arguments. I never had a problem with it. But /tinfoil hat posts are the kinds of things people are latching onto to make the case that these threads are bad to begin with. 
 

Guys, we get it. Take this to PM if you want to figure it all out, because it's boring everyone else.
 

MuppetAsteriskTalk

Member
SoSH Member
Feb 19, 2015
5,460
Brady's phone just called me and apologized for its role in the matter.
 
 
 
 
(I know the joke has been recycled more than once.)
 

Omar's Wacky Neighbor

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 14, 2005
16,801
Leaving in a bit to the studio :)
Section15Box113 said:
SAS on WEEI:
 
Source says league will keep 4 games in place.  And league expects that TB will ultimately end up serving all 4 games (following NFL's victory in court).
SAS:  Kraft caved to save BB.  Dragging it out would have implicated BB.
 
(sorry, thought it was clear that it was SAS saying it, since I replied to "SAS on WEEI"))
 

Smiling Joe Hesketh

Throw Momma From the Train
Moderator
SoSH Member
May 20, 2003
36,124
Deep inside Muppet Labs
Omar's Wacky Neighbor said:
Kraft caved to save BB.
 
No he didn't. He caved because all the other owners were mad at him and he decided he wanted to be pals with them instead of protecting the interests of his team. Which was contemptible.
 
SAS is clearly being used here as the league's mouthpiece. What a tool.
 

DJnVa

Dorito Dawg
SoSH Member
Dec 16, 2010
54,340
Section15Box113 said:
SAS on WEEI:
 
Source says league will keep 4 games in place.  And league expects that TB will ultimately end up serving all 4 games (following NFL's victory in court).
 
Of course they're going to say that.
 
But SAS accomplished his goal.
 
 

DJnVa

Dorito Dawg
SoSH Member
Dec 16, 2010
54,340
Omar's Wacky Neighbor said:
Kraft caved to save BB.  Dragging it out would have implicated BB.
 

So, you think the Pats did something nefarious then?
 
What?
 

Gambler7

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 11, 2003
3,755
It's pretty clear he is being used by the NFL as a last resort to make the NFLPA cave some before announcing the penalty. The NFL is sure they will win, will keep the suspension, want to go to court, blah blah blah. Straight from the offices in NY. 
 

Shelterdog

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Feb 19, 2002
15,375
New York City
Smiling Joe Hesketh said:
 
No he didn't. He caved because all the other owners were mad at him and he decided he wanted to be pals with them instead of protecting the interests of his team. Which was contemptible.
 
SAS is clearly being used here as the league's mouthpiece. What a tool.
 
No he didn't.  He caved because he had no reasonable recourse against the NFL, and once it became clear he wasn't going to get a backdoor change to the suspension he walked away from a zillion dollar litigation that would distract the team and that he would lose. Which was smart.
 

Marbleheader

Moderator
Moderator
SoSH Member
Sep 27, 2004
11,782
If the NFL really wanted a mouthpiece, why SAS? Most people expect this is going to be handed down before Wednesday. This is him trying to make himself feel important with half assed information from a hack of a 'source'
 

Ed Hillel

Wants to be startin somethin
SoSH Member
Dec 12, 2007
45,002
Here
Omar's Wacky Neighbor said:
SAS:  Kraft caved to save BB.  Dragging it out would have implicated BB.
 
(sorry, thought it was clear that it was SAS saying it, since I replied to "SAS on WEEI"))
 
lol wtf is going on?
 
He "caved" after the fucking Wells Report, which explicitly said BB had nothing to do with it. How would BB have been implicated???
 
The NFL FO is full of 10 year olds.
 

Hoya81

Member
SoSH Member
Feb 3, 2010
8,517
Omar's Wacky Neighbor said:
SAS:  Kraft caved to save BB.  Dragging it out would have implicated BB.
 
(sorry, thought it was clear that it was SAS saying it, since I replied to "SAS on WEEI"))
Implicated in what? Wells Report actually went out of its way to clear BB and coaching staff of involvement.
 

TomTerrific

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
2,709
Wayland, MA
For what it's worth, spoke to my friend this morning and the word from his brother is that the NFL's wedge offer was rejected late yesterday by Brady and the NFLPA, and they now expect the suspension to be upheld in full (I realize this last is no big surprise).
 

bankshot1

Member
SoSH Member
Feb 12, 2003
24,932
where I was last at
Omar's Wacky Neighbor said:
SAS:  Kraft caved to save BB.  Dragging it out would have implicated BB.
 
(sorry, thought it was clear that it was SAS saying it, since I replied to "SAS on WEEI"))
Kraft and BB were cleared in the Wells Report.
Kraft caved after that, and presumably to keep his seat at the Billionaire's Boys Club.
 

Section15Box113

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 16, 2005
8,925
Inside Lou Gorman's Head
Gambler7 said:
It's pretty clear he is being used by the NFL as a last resort to make the NFLPA cave some before announcing the penalty. The NFL is sure they will win, will keep the suspension, want to go to court, blah blah blah. Straight from the offices in NY. 
 
Yep.  I mean, if they're going to keep any suspension in place, what else are they going to say?  We know we won't win, but we're keeping it anyway?  No chance.
 
Then the part about opting not to implicate BB part was very curious.  Why would the league protect him if they had the goods?  Because they didn't want to sully his reputation further?  Because they didn't want to have to suspend him?  I'd think they either had evidence or they didn't.  Not that they'd let him skate and go after TB and the draft picks instead.
 
As with much of this, the narrative being put forward makes very little sense.
 

soxhop411

news aggravator
SoSH Member
Dec 4, 2009
46,621
Marbleheader said:
If the NFL really wanted a mouthpiece, why SAS? Most people expect this is going to be handed down before Wednesday. This is him trying to make himself feel important with half assed information from a hack of a 'source'
Because of his big mouth and who would do anything for a scoop
 

Smiling Joe Hesketh

Throw Momma From the Train
Moderator
SoSH Member
May 20, 2003
36,124
Deep inside Muppet Labs
Shelterdog said:
 
No he didn't.  He caved because he had no reasonable recourse against the NFL, and once it became clear he wasn't going to get a backdoor change to the suspension he walked away from a zillion dollar litigation that would distract the team and that he would lose. Which was smart.
 
Completely disagree. He could have and should have sued the shit out of them. He should have taken on that litigation because his team was getting royally screwed and he should have stood up for it. Gone all Al Davis on them.