Cuban OF Rusney Castillo has private showcase scheduled with Red Sox

Status
Not open for further replies.

Plympton91

bubble burster
SoSH Member
Oct 19, 2008
12,408
There would be no issue for 2014, as he'd likely go to AA or AAA like Drew did until rosters expand and even if not Betts could go back down.

For 2015 you've got all winter to evaluate Vic and Craig and explore trades of Middlebrooks (making holt the 3bman), Nava, JBJ or even Betts. If everyone is back and healthy, and Castillo wins the CF job, then JBJ and Betts go to AAA, the outfield is Craig, Castillo, and Cespedes, with Vic as the 4th outfielder, Holt as the backup infielder (unless he's starting at 3B with Middlebrooks backing up) and Nava a 5th outfielder, backup 1st (the Carp role).

In 2016, Vic and Cespedes, and Napoli could be gone making way for Betts and JBJ, with Craig moving to 1B. Or you sign one of Napoli or Cespedes, making JBJ or Betts the 4th outfielder and the other a starter.
 

ivanvamp

captain obvious
Jul 18, 2005
6,104
soxhop411 said:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r4OgGWmkb4g&feature=youtu.be
 
Honestly, that description doesn't exactly excite me.  A guy that can help somebody?  Not very good defense, he's no Cespedes or Puig (in terms of power).  I mean, what's all the fuss about?
 
And here's a recent article on him:  http://www.baseballamerica.com/international/scouts-update-reports-rusney-castillo/
 
Here's the final words from that article:  "If Castillo can give teams comparable production to [Rajai] Davis at the same age with a little extra pop, he might not be a star like Yoenis Cespedes or Jose Abreu, but that’s a very solid everyday player, with no draft picks or prospects to surrender to acquire him."
 
​Eh….I guess the Sox could use more "solid everyday players".  
 

Savin Hillbilly

loves the secret sauce
SoSH Member
Jul 10, 2007
18,783
The wrong side of the bridge....
ivanvamp said:
 
Honestly, that description doesn't exactly excite me.  A guy that can help somebody?  Not very good defense, he's no Cespedes or Puig (in terms of power).  I mean, what's all the fuss about?
 
New! Shiny! Cuban!
 
I do find it kind of funny that some of the same people who are quick to point out the fallacy of relying on minor league offense to translate to the majors are willing to bet tens of millions of dollars on the assumption that Castillo's Cuban league offense will do that. If the numbers here are correct, Alexei Ramirez was a better hitter from age 23 to 25 than Castillo has been from 24 to 26. Ramirez has a career major league wRC+ of 91, and would be more or less a replacement-level player if he was a middling defensive outfielder rather than an elite defensive shortstop.
 
Yes, there's some upside here, but I'm surprised (well, maybe not) at how willing many SoSHers are to ignore the fairly huge risks involved in giving a long-term contract to a guy who has never played a day in MLB.
 

Snodgrass'Muff

oppresses WARmongers
SoSH Member
Mar 11, 2008
27,644
Roanoke, VA
He's also been described as Brett Gardner with more power. If that's true, he'll be quite valuable and probably far more so than the average fan will appreciate. Gardner is very under appreciated, though a lot of his value does come from elite defense, which Castillo doesn't appear to have. Of course, if he can provide above average, but not spectacular defense in center, steal 25 bases a year and get on base at a .340 clip with 15-20 home runs a year, he'll be worth whatever contract he gets.
 
People need to get the idea that this guy will be another Abreu or Puig situation out of their heads. I probably set my ceiling at 5/60 and expect that to be a bit of an overpay. The outfield is currently an epic mess of under performance, injury and long term uncertainty. The back and forth here has convinced me that Castillo, even with the assumption he's not going to be a star, is worth a significant investment.
 
Stabilizing the outfield has value. Just a year ago the team showed how having average to above average players at every position can be very effective. If they think Castillo can live in that range and can lock up Cespedes this winter, it'll be a matter of getting that kind of production out of the third outfield spot with Craig, Nava, Victorino (in the short term) and one of or both of JBJ and Betts. That feels like a good bet to me.
 

jimbobim

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 14, 2012
1,558
Rudy Pemberton said:
Why are Cespedes and Abreu mentioned as "stars" in the same sentence? Cespedes makes some nice plays in the outfield and wins home run derbies, but I don't think a guy with a .300 OBP can be considered a star in this day and age, and I'm not sure why people are so quick to want to lock him up long term. Do we suddenly not give a shit about getting on base?

As far as the "Gardner with power" argument, isn't that this years version of Gardner? That's obviously a pretty great player.
 
With the overwhelming lack of power in the game today I think its an interesting discussion whether someone who can hit say 250-260 with 25-30 bombs is worth what he sells out for in the OBP department. Also having a superior glove and arm are not things to be scoffed at. Mike Napoli is the exception not the norm for not quite star middle of the order hitters. In fact I've found him and Cespedes to be ideally matched so far this year. 
 
As for Castillo I'm all for adding talent. We can choose what scouts or sources we want to believe but if I remember correctly the rap on Abreu was they weren't sure whether he'd be able to to hit ML pitching because Cuban pitching had gone down quality wise in the last couple of years. Clearly that was a bogus claim put out to dampen his market. 
 
In short the Red Sox scouts clearly believe a bit in his ability to be ready to contribute at a consistent level next year. Given the lack of FA bats I would be very interested. 
 

Snodgrass'Muff

oppresses WARmongers
SoSH Member
Mar 11, 2008
27,644
Roanoke, VA
I didn't call Cespedes a star. I pointed to Abreu and Puig. I did argue for locking Cespedes up, and yes, his OBP is low. However, he provides a significant power boost to the lineup. I don't think it's a coincidence that they are scoring more runs per game with him in the lineup than they did before he was here. The offense is still only averaging a touch over 4 per game since trading for him, but it's an improvement over the 3.85 season long figure by a significant amount. With power, specifically right handed hitting power becoming more and more scarce, locking it up when you have it is probably a good idea. The Red Sox proved that you can win without above average power last year, but I don't think you can do it when you are below average. At some point, you need a certain amount of power to capitalize on the base runners you have.
 

mfried

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 23, 2005
1,680
I'm a bit concerned about the potential outfield logjam if Castillo projects much more effectively in the outfield: Cespedes, Castillo, Betts, Nava, Holt, Bradley, Craig.  If Holt turns out to be a super utility player and Betts is the 2015 leadoff man - that still points to six.  If Nava plays only against RH pitching, does that make for a platoon with Castillo?  Or are we accumulating trade chips?
 

ArgentinaSOXfan

New Member
Jul 16, 2005
167
BueNoS AiReS
mfried said:
I'm a bit concerned about the potential outfield logjam if Castillo projects much more effectively in the outfield: Cespedes, Castillo, Betts, Nava, Holt, Bradley, Craig.  If Holt turns out to be a super utility player and Betts is the 2015 leadoff man - that still points to six.  If Nava plays only against RH pitching, does that make for a platoon with Castillo?  Or are we accumulating trade chips?
Victorino.
 

TomRicardo

rusty cohlebone
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Feb 6, 2006
20,687
Row 14
mfried said:
I'm a bit concerned about the potential outfield logjam if Castillo projects much more effectively in the outfield: Cespedes, Castillo, Betts, Nava, Holt, Bradley, Craig.  If Holt turns out to be a super utility player and Betts is the 2015 leadoff man - that still points to six.  If Nava plays only against RH pitching, does that make for a platoon with Castillo?  Or are we accumulating trade chips?
 
I wouldn't be.
 
People are going this winter. 
 
I mean if Philly is going to have a CF that doesn't hit they might as well get one that could field.  Bradley even in his terrible can't hit form is a huge step up from Ben Revere.  Hell he is being mentioned in Philly with the likes of Bogaerts and Vasquez.
 
I would imagine Philly would demand one of Bogaerts, Vasquez, or Bradley. Two starting pitchers from (De La Rosa, Webster, Workman, Barnes, Johnson, Owens, Kelly, Escobar, Ranuado) and Marrero or a young guy.
 
If Philly will take Bradley, Webster, Workman, and Marrero, you jump at it.
 

Auger34

used to be tbb
SoSH Member
Apr 23, 2010
9,684
TomRicardo said:
 
I wouldn't be.
 
People are going this winter. 
 
I mean if Philly is going to have a CF that doesn't hit they might as well get one that could field.  Bradley even in his terrible can't hit form is a huge step up from Ben Revere.  Hell he is being mentioned in Philly with the likes of Bogaerts and Vasquez.
 
I would imagine Philly would demand one of Bogaerts, Vasquez, or Bradley. Two starting pitchers from (De La Rosa, Webster, Workman, Barnes, Johnson, Owens, Kelly, Escobar, Ranuado) and Marrero or a young guy.
 
If Philly will take Bradley, Webster, Workman, and Marrero, you jump at it.
 
Are you talking about a hypothetical trade for Cole Hamels here? I assume it is but don't see a name mentioned anywhere
 

Auger34

used to be tbb
SoSH Member
Apr 23, 2010
9,684
It's an obvious assumption but just wanted to make sure. Still seems like a lot to give up to get a guy when we just turned down the opportunity to sign a guy, who is probably better, for just cash. 
But Hamles is locked in for a certain amount of years and money the FO seems comfortable with
 

TomRicardo

rusty cohlebone
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Feb 6, 2006
20,687
Row 14
tbb345 said:
 
Are you talking about a hypothetical trade for Cole Hamels here? I assume it is but don't see a name mentioned anywhere
 
Basically the articles from Philly papers continuously mention Vasquez, Bogaerts, and Bradley as well as the Phillies desperate need for pitching.
 

Corsi

isn't shy about blowing his wad early
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 3, 2010
12,955
Boston, MA
Sahadev Sharma @sahadevsharma  ·  18m
Hearing bidding for Rusney Castillo is wild, above $55M. Cubs don't appear to see value in that. May be battle between Detroit & Boston.
 
 

glennhoffmania

meat puppet
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 25, 2005
8,411,697
NY
Cuban star Rusney Castillo is sifting through offers from multiple teams, and officials with interested teams say they expect a decision soon, perhaps by the end of the week.
 
One of a half-dozen teams -- the Red Sox, Tigers, Phillies, Cubs, Yankees and Mariners -- who all worked out Castillo privately -- is expected to win the services of the compact and powerful Castillo who is generally viewed as an outfielder by most but is apparently being considered as a possible second baseman by the Yankees.
 
 
Heyman
 

ivanvamp

captain obvious
Jul 18, 2005
6,104
The good news with signing Castillo is that he won't cost a draft pick or any prospects.  Just straight cash.  Which the Red Sox have plenty of.
 

Snodgrass'Muff

oppresses WARmongers
SoSH Member
Mar 11, 2008
27,644
Roanoke, VA
mt8thsw9th said:
That's just a reporter recycling old info from last week. Nearly the same text is in this thread from a few days ago.
 
Yeah, we can probably expect to see him sign with the Diamondbacks or something on Friday.
 

strek1

Run, Forrest, run!
SoSH Member
Jun 13, 2006
31,965
Hartford area
mt8thsw9th said:
That's just a reporter recycling old info from last week. Nearly the same text is in this thread from a few days ago.
 I just don't trust these Sox/Tigers/Phillies reports.  Cashman has a habit of swooping in.  They certainly have offensive needs too.
 

mt8thsw9th

anti-SoSHal
SoSH Member
Jul 17, 2005
17,121
Brooklyn
strek1 said:
 I just don't trust these Sox/Tigers/Phillies reports.  Cashman has a habit of swooping in.  They certainly have offensive needs too.
Like when? Tanaka was the one big international signing they've had in the past decade, and before that was Contreras, who they were in on the entire time.
 

maxotaur

Member
SoSH Member
Oct 31, 2013
429
Pittsburgh PA
mt8thsw9th said:
Like when? Tanaka was the one big international signing they've had in the past decade, and before that was Contreras, who they were in on the entire time.
I don't think they were just referring to international players. Think Tex, A-Rod...
 

bosockboy

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
20,048
St. Louis, MO
mt8thsw9th said:
Like when? Tanaka was the one big international signing they've had in the past decade, and before that was Contreras, who they were in on the entire time.
 
Swooping in?  Try Teixeira for one.
 

snowmanny

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 8, 2005
15,776
That was all part of an elaborate plan to sucker Boston into overpaying for Crawford.
 

mt8thsw9th

anti-SoSHal
SoSH Member
Jul 17, 2005
17,121
Brooklyn
bosockboy said:
 
Swooping in?  Try Teixeira for one.
It's not really comparable. "Swoop in" has meaning. Unless you think Rusney's wife and Rusney have already made up their mind and are just raising the price for NYY, then I don't know what to say. On relevant-to-this-scenario-terms, when did they out of nowhere bid on international players? And just to entertain the whole FA thing, when did they swoop in out of nowhere when they weren't considered a candidate to land a domestic player? To do some of the legwork, Johnny Damon is probably the closest example, but the Yankees have let a metric fuckton of talent slip by them in the past 10 years without swooping in, and if you're Rusney Castillo's agents, the Yankees having more than a lukewarm interest is only going to increase your payout. It's really just paranoia of the Yankees.
 

ArgentinaSOXfan

New Member
Jul 16, 2005
167
BueNoS AiReS
I thought teams made their bids and now they would just be waiting for the player/agent to pick the best one (not the highest necessarily). Why is it that it seems to be an open bidding, with some reports saying that X team dropped out of the pursuit, and different reporters saying different things regarding teams/offers?
Can anyone explain? Can teams negotiate and elevate their offers, etc?
 

Yaz4Ever

MemBer
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 10, 2004
11,292
MA-CA-RI-AZ-NC
ArgentinaSOXfan said:
I thought teams made their bids and now they would just be waiting for the player/agent to pick the best one (not the highest necessarily). Why is it that it seems to be an open bidding, with some reports saying that X team dropped out of the pursuit, and different reporters saying different things regarding teams/offers?
Can anyone explain? Can teams negotiate and elevate their offers, etc?
My guess is that anything we're reading along those lines comes from unnamed sources tipping off the Tweeter or whomever.  We'll know more soon and it will likely not shake out exactly as we've read.  Some of these people might also just be pulling things from their ass so they look brilliant in calling him going to a team others had discounted.
 

ArgentinaSOXfan

New Member
Jul 16, 2005
167
BueNoS AiReS
Rosenthal just tweeted that Boston, Giants and Tigers still in the mix.
Philliees, Yankees, Cubs not expected to place high bid.

So, again, I come back to my question: didnt teams submit their offers this past weekend? Why is he talking about teams still bidding for him and making offers?
 

strek1

Run, Forrest, run!
SoSH Member
Jun 13, 2006
31,965
Hartford area
ArgentinaSOXfan said:
Rosenthal just tweeted that Boston, Giants and Tigers still in the mix.
Philliees, Yankees, Cubs not expected to place high bid.

So, again, I come back to my question: didnt teams submit their offers this past weekend? Why is he talking about teams still bidding for him and making offers?
 Yes 'm confused by that too.  As for the teams favored - It seems to change every 5 minutes. (Now the GIANTS)
 

snowmanny

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 8, 2005
15,776
My thought was they did a round of blind bidding to gather general interest. Then teams would be invited to improve their bids in more of an auction style.

There is no reason for the agent to stick with the highest blind bid if some team that was just behind is willing to top that offer.
 

benhogan

Granite Truther
SoSH Member
Nov 2, 2007
20,391
Santa Monica
snowmanny said:
My thought was they did a round of blind bidding to gather general interest. Then teams would be invited to improve their bids in more of an auction style.

There is no reason for the agent to stick with the highest blind bid if some team that was just behind is willing to top that offer.
Exactly. The agent will shop everyones bid, thats how agents roll...
 

snowmanny

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 8, 2005
15,776
Just a guess:

If one team way outbids the others, you take it.
If a few teams are in the same general range you run a mini-auction with those teams.
 

LondonSox

Robert the Deuce
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
8,956
North Bay California
It seems as though the teams have a significantly worse handle on this process and where they stand than normal free agency.
 
I've seen that sugegsted several times, but of course baseball writers aren't paid to wait, so WILD SPECULATION continues.
 

mabrowndog

Ask me about total zone...or paint
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 23, 2003
39,676
Falmouth, MA
"Ze continuing parade uv conzhecture und indecizhion vit zis drama queen has become tiresome..."
 
 

Minneapolis Millers

Wants you to please think of the Twins fans!
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
4,753
Twin Cities
Cubs could and should get aggressive.  Sign Castillo and deal some of their surplus position prospects and/or Castro for SP (Hamels).  Then sign Lester.  They're only on the hook for $31M next year, so they could spend big on the rotation and still have a payroll south of $100M.
 

67WasBest

Concierge
SoSH Member
Mar 17, 2004
2,442
Music City USA
 
Earlier this week, sources identified the Red Sox, Tigers and Giants as the teams still in the mix. Negotiations, however, remain fluid, and the possibility exists that other clubs could jump into the bidding.
Fox Sports Rosenthal
 
The final 3 teams seems to be newsworthy, but nothing really new because of the qualifier at the end of this line.
 

SouthernBoSox

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 23, 2005
12,119
These reporters are reporting non information.
 
"It's three teams, but not really." They basically have no idea where he is going.
 

TomRicardo

rusty cohlebone
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Feb 6, 2006
20,687
Row 14
Minneapolis Millers said:
Cubs could and should get aggressive.  Sign Castillo and deal some of their surplus position prospects and/or Castro for SP (Hamels).  Then sign Lester.  They're only on the hook for $31M next year, so they could spend big on the rotation and still have a payroll south of $100M.
 
Castro would be a really weird get for Phillies for Hamels.  First off it doesn't solve their pitching problems at all.  Secondly it would mean they would have to put Rollins or Utley at 3B next year.
 
If Castro is moved next year (I don't think he will), they can get more putting him on the open market and the Phillies can do better putting Hamels on the open market.
 
Castro would be a piece for Stanton.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.