Celtics vs. Nets, Round 1 Discussion

Who is your preferred opponent?

  • Cavs - I want an easy sweep

    Votes: 125 74.9%
  • Nets - I want to end their season / I like competitive basketball / DRAMA!!

    Votes: 42 25.1%

  • Total voters
    167
  • Poll closed .

Jed Zeppelin

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 23, 2008
51,616
I've been thinking about this. When on his game, KI dances and moves around anyone with very little opposing defenses can do to move the needle. In that moment, what is lost by using PP on KI? You lose nothing on defense, because he's not defensible. If everyone is looking like a traffic cone, put an actual traffic cone on him and see if PP can make a few buckets, trading offense essentially.

To be clear, if any other defense approach is preventing KI from going supernova then I agree with you. But as an oddball approach, PP on KI might be interesting for a short period, especially if he is hitting a couple of 3s himself to offset KI.

Or this line of thinking could be further evidence of why it was good that I decided not to coach the kids basketball team.
The difference with PP vs. any other defender the Celtics have is size/strength. Yes Kyrie is liable to go wild regardless of who is defending him but there is absolutely a difference in having the guy in front of him be someone who can challenge his shots, body him up a bit and make him work harder for it.
 

RetractableRoof

tolerates intolerance
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 1, 2003
3,836
Quincy, MA
The difference with PP vs. any other defender the Celtics have is size/strength. Yes Kyrie is liable to go wild regardless of who is defending him but there is absolutely a difference in having the guy in front of him be someone who can challenge his shots, body him up a bit and make him work harder for it.
Yes. We all know this. The point is/was... if nothing else is working (or in the face of foul trouble elsewhere), instead of trying to put PP on the court and hide him somewhere defensively, why not consider putting the person with the least defensive skill on the person who is least defensible and crossing fingers for an offsetting basket or 2.

Emphasis on the bold, yes?
 

JakeRae

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 21, 2005
8,197
New York, NY
One way to think about what PP's usage might be is that Ime might play him only when Kyrie is out, with White and Smart getting more minutes as a result.
I think you can probably get Pritchard about 12 minutes by playing him (1) when Kyrie sits and (2) when Durant sits, while minimizing the ability to hunt mismatches because when only one of those 2 is on the court there will be an ability to help him if he gets isolated. If they can exploit Pritchard, it’s reasonably likely he’s not very playable when both KD and Kyrie are on the court. It’s also possible he’s improved enough defensively that he doesn’t need to be protected, but I wouldn’t bet on that, especially considering that our other guards are among the best perimeter defenders in the league.

Setting aside switching, I do expect us to do our best to have Smart and White spend as much time as possible on Kyrie. I don’t expect us to blitz or double him much unless he’s starting to find a rhythm as our individual defense on the perimeter is strong enough we shouldn’t need to. Similarly, I’d expect Tatum to spend a significant amount of time defending Durant. Our defense is good enough to make life difficult for their stars.

On the other end, Brooklyn has really no answer for our wing depth and size. Durant is great, but after him, they lack rim protection and their next best defender, Brown, is undersized for the role they use him in. We should basically have matchup advantages at every position Durant isn’t defending at all times. (If Brown defends down in size, that could eliminate one advantage but would open up huge mismatches by having Curry/Irving defend Brown/Grant, both of whom will destroy those matchups.)

Also, setting aside health/fit issues, Simmons has the potential to transform Brooklyn’s defense by giving them a second versatile and elite wing defender to pair with Durant and shifting Brown back to his natural role as a guard/small wing defender. All our matchup advantages would disappear and we’d need to rely upon our cohesion to trump their talent advantage.
 

Euclis20

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 3, 2004
8,296
Imaginationland
What rumors are these? He isn’t even participating in on-court work with teammates yet. He hasn’t played in a year and his first pre-season game with his new team is going to be in a crucial playoff game? I’ll eat a log of Rocco’s shit if Ben Simmons takes the floor in these playoffs.
I'm not quite this certain that he doesn't play (although I'm just about there), but if he does take the court, I can't care about it. He's as good as any at slowing Tatum down, but he's a year removed from an NBA game, has to be at least as rusty as any player at the start of preseason, and back injuries can leave players super shaky when they first return. Even if he's healthy and instantly shakes off the rust, all we've heard for years when discussing Simmons' offensive shortcomings is that he needs an offense built around his strengths. Playing off ball with at least one other non-shooter on the court (be it Drummond, Brown or Claxton) is not an offense built around his strengths. Maybe they can try sticking him at center with Durant and Brown at the other forward spots for good spacing, but that team is really small and the Nets shouldn't want either Durant or Simmons banging around in paint considering their injury risk.
 

benhogan

Granite Truther
SoSH Member
Nov 2, 2007
20,461
Santa Monica
The difference with PP vs. any other defender the Celtics have is size/strength. Yes Kyrie is liable to go wild regardless of who is defending him but there is absolutely a difference in having the guy in front of him be someone who can challenge his shots, body him up a bit and make him work harder for it.
I'd like to see Tatum guard Kyrie and Smart faceguard Durant sometimes. Thought Rondo's face guarding of KD bothered him

I also want IME to go full court on Kyrie with White and Pritchard. Turn him, work him over, be physical.
 

scottyno

late Bloomer
SoSH Member
Dec 7, 2008
11,345
Yes. We all know this. The point is/was... if nothing else is working (or in the face of foul trouble elsewhere), instead of trying to put PP on the court and hide him somewhere defensively, why not consider putting the person with the least defensive skill on the person who is least defensible and crossing fingers for an offsetting basket or 2.

Emphasis on the bold, yes?
Because putting your worst defensive guard on their best offensive guard will always be a terrible idea.
 

benhogan

Granite Truther
SoSH Member
Nov 2, 2007
20,461
Santa Monica
Because putting your worst defensive guard on their best offensive guard will always be a terrible idea.
how many minutes do you think Payton Pritchard will actually play against their starters in a close game?

in the regular season PP rarely entered the game in the first quarter, I imagine IME will be careful
 

HomeRunBaker

bet squelcher
SoSH Member
Jan 15, 2004
30,469
how many minutes do you think Payton Pritchard will actually play against their starters in a close game?

in the regular season PP rarely entered the game in the first quarter, I imagine IME will be careful
I can’t imagine PP playing anything more than limited minites as Brooklyn is such a terrible matchup for him. Those minutes surely will be when Kyrie is out of the game. I don’t understand the concept of conceeding points or purposely playing one of his worst matchups against Kyrie.
 

benhogan

Granite Truther
SoSH Member
Nov 2, 2007
20,461
Santa Monica
I can’t imagine PP playing anything more than limited minites as Brooklyn is such a terrible matchup for him. Those minutes surely will be when Kyrie is out of the game. I don’t understand the concept of conceeding points or purposely playing one of his worst matchups against Kyrie.
if they overlap it may be a minute here or there. IME will be very cognizant of matchups.

Whoever guards Kyrie needs to be physical and make him work for every shot
 

Smokey Joe

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 9, 2001
1,180
What rumors are these? He isn’t even participating in on-court work with teammates yet. He hasn’t played in a year and his first pre-season game with his new team is going to be in a crucial playoff game? I’ll eat a log of Rocco’s shit if Ben Simmons takes the floor in these playoffs.
Be careful, there may be something in his contract tied to playoff appearances. They may run him out there for a few minutes as a favor to his agent.
 

scottyno

late Bloomer
SoSH Member
Dec 7, 2008
11,345
how many minutes do you think Payton Pritchard will actually play against their starters in a close game?

in the regular season PP rarely entered the game in the first quarter, I imagine IME will be careful
Unless someone gets in foul trouble or injured very few. Maybe he can cover Curry or Mills for short stretches, but he should never ever ever be out there if he's going to have to even try to cover Kyrie.
 

Euclis20

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 3, 2004
8,296
Imaginationland
I can’t imagine PP playing anything more than limited minites as Brooklyn is such a terrible matchup for him. Those minutes surely will be when Kyrie is out of the game. I don’t understand the concept of conceeding points or purposely playing one of his worst matchups against Kyrie.
Is Brooklyn that bad for him? He obviously can't guard Kyrie at all, but Brooklyn plays with two small guards all the time and I don't see why Pritchard couldn't match up with Curry or Mills while Smart/White/Brown guard Kyrie. Switches are always a worry I guess, but I'd worry more about him getting switched onto Durant than getting switched onto Kyrie.
 

TripleOT

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 4, 2007
7,796
The Celtics should go at Kyrie to get him in foul trouble. Attack him and Durant as much as possible, and make them defend. Boston has three respectable defenders they can put on KI, in Smart, JB, JT, and White. They can use AL, Tatum, JB, and Smart on KD. If they can keep the Nets under 110 points, they will win.
 

TripleOT

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 4, 2007
7,796
Is Brooklyn that bad for him? He obviously can't guard Kyrie at all, but Brooklyn plays with two small guards all the time and I don't see why Pritchard couldn't match up with Curry or Mills while Smart/White/Brown guard Kyrie. Switches are always a worry I guess, but I'd worry more about him getting switched onto Durant than getting switched onto Kyrie.
HRB can’t miss an opportunity to point out any perceived flaw of Pritchard.

PP has shown improvement defensively, even on switches that he is no match for physically. He has been getting better at presenting more lower body resistance when getting backed in, and has been better at ball hawking. I expect Ime to play him similarly as he has the past few months. The PP, White, Grant, Tatum, and Theis line up has been a bomb squad that has busted open a lot of games.
 

benhogan

Granite Truther
SoSH Member
Nov 2, 2007
20,461
Santa Monica
The PP, White, Grant, Tatum, and Theis line up has been a bomb squad that has busted open a lot of games.
Agreed, we'll mostly see that group at the start of Q2/Q4 when the opposing stars like Kyrie/KD are resting. BUT IME will be on top of any potential mismatch on D. IME has done a great job with rotations

With multiple days rest between games to start the series I expect big minutes from the starting 5/White
 

joe dokes

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
30,618
HRB can’t miss an opportunity to point out any perceived flaw of Pritchard.

PP has shown improvement defensively, even on switches that he is no match for physically. He has been getting better at presenting more lower body resistance when getting backed in, and has been better at ball hawking. I expect Ime to play him similarly as he has the past few months. The PP, White, Grant, Tatum, and Theis line up has been a bomb squad that has busted open a lot of games.
Ive always thought Pritchard looked pretty strong. Let him beat the crap out of kyrie a few times if he's forced to guard him at all.
 

HomeRunBaker

bet squelcher
SoSH Member
Jan 15, 2004
30,469
Is Brooklyn that bad for him? He obviously can't guard Kyrie at all, but Brooklyn plays with two small guards all the time and I don't see why Pritchard couldn't match up with Curry or Mills while Smart/White/Brown guard Kyrie. Switches are always a worry I guess, but I'd worry more about him getting switched onto Durant than getting switched onto Kyrie.
Nobody works switches and matchups like Kyrie and Durant. If PP is on the floor with either he’s going to be hunted. That’s what the Nets offense is all about especially in the playoffs…….this isn’t a end of year regular season game anymore.
 
Last edited:

Jakarta

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 18, 2020
244
On the other end, I expect JT and JB to make Drummond unplayable for the Nets. They should hunt this matchup relentlessly by running pick and rolls with whoever of Al/Theis he starts out guarding. For a team with very little big man depth, Drummond may be forced to play a bunch a minutes anyway (unlike PP who doesn’t need to play as Smart and White can take all the PG minutes) which seems to be a big advantage for the Celts, and one of several reasons why I expect the Celts to average about 125 a game.
 

lovegtm

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 30, 2013
12,373
When the Celtics are on offense, I don't see what the Nets can do to make them uncomfortable, and when the Celtics are comfortable, there's a lot of cutting, paint buckets, and open 3s.

I expect some turnovers/rust as the Cs figure out how to attack. Once they have that groove, Brooklyn only has a couple options. They'll probably blitz/double Tatum, which he'll figure out quickly. Maybe a zone, but I don't see them having the personnel or defensive commitment to maintain that.

tldr; probably a feeling-out period of 1-5 quarters for the Cs, followed by a LOT of offense without many answers by Brooklyn on that end.
 

k-factory

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 22, 2005
1,866
seattle, wa
What rumors are these? He isn’t even participating in on-court work with teammates yet. He hasn’t played in a year and his first pre-season game with his new team is going to be in a crucial playoff game? I’ll eat a log of Rocco’s shit if Ben Simmons takes the floor in these playoffs.
It’s the Shams story.
https://nypost.com/2022/04/13/ben-simmons-may-play-for-nets-against-celtics-in-nba-playoffs/
It’s an unknown and there are likely more negative outcomes than positive ones. But it does loom as a possibility. Just saying the longer the series goes the more ramp up time he’s going to get. His offense will be rusty and his endurance suspect but his defense is what the team needs and should be a factor. But the trade offs may be too great for it to matter.

If playoff nerves aren’t a factor and this squad has been to the playoffs a few times now C’s should make this all moot
 
Last edited:

wade boggs chicken dinner

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 26, 2005
30,887
When the Celtics are on offense, I don't see what the Nets can do to make them uncomfortable, and when the Celtics are comfortable, there's a lot of cutting, paint buckets, and open 3s.

I expect some turnovers/rust as the Cs figure out how to attack. Once they have that groove, Brooklyn only has a couple options. They'll probably blitz/double Tatum, which he'll figure out quickly. Maybe a zone, but I don't see them having the personnel or defensive commitment to maintain that.

tldr; probably a feeling-out period of 1-5 quarters for the Cs, followed by a LOT of offense without many answers by Brooklyn on that end.
IIRC, BRK blitzed JT a lot in March and he shredded them.

I imagine BRK is going to zone a lot when JT isn't on the floor since that was the MO of most NBA teams down the stretch. But if Theis continues shooting like he has, it's going to be a long series for BRK.

On the other side, you have to figure that if anyone can figure out how to defend KD and KI, it's Udoka who has seen them up close and personal.
 

wade boggs chicken dinner

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 26, 2005
30,887
NY Post reporting that the Cs weren't thinking about seeding at all - just doing what they thought they needed to do to be the best versions of themselves. https://nypost.com/2022/04/13/celtics-werent-going-to-manipulating-nba-playoffs-to-avoid-nets/

“Our thing was to worry about ourselves,” first-year Celtics coach Ime Udoka said Wednesday, as formal preparations began for their opening-round series against the Nets that starts Sunday afternoon in Boston. “To be the best version of ourselves. We weren’t concerned about anything else. We didn’t want to get involved in trying to manipulate matchups or standings or anything like that. We just wanted to focus on ourselves.
“We aren’t running from anybody.”
 

Jakarta

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 18, 2020
244
When the Celtics are on offense, I don't see what the Nets can do to make them uncomfortable, and when the Celtics are comfortable, there's a lot of cutting, paint buckets, and open 3s.

I expect some turnovers/rust as the Cs figure out how to attack. Once they have that groove, Brooklyn only has a couple options. They'll probably blitz/double Tatum, which he'll figure out quickly. Maybe a zone, but I don't see them having the personnel or defensive commitment to maintain that.

tldr; probably a feeling-out period of 1-5 quarters for the Cs, followed by a LOT of offense without many answers by Brooklyn on that end.
Agree with this. And if the Nets struggle to defend, I wonder if the Nets might lean into playing really small with something like Durant, Kyrie, Mills, Curry, and Brown/Edwards, and try to get the games into the 130s or even 140s. I think the Cs are too good defensively for this to work for an hour extended period of time, but I expect to see the Nets try some unconventional strategies if things aren’t going well in the first couple of games.
 

Auger34

used to be tbb
SoSH Member
Apr 23, 2010
9,726
As I responded, how were those options excellent?

To me, you're making a difference out of the order of operations, which I don't really find persuasive. I don't see the difference between the Warriors already having a core in place vs. Lebron assembling a core with Bosh and Wade (and in a city where they could easily attract FAs) or George doing the same - are we supposed to want or expect players to be GMs now?

I just think isolating KD as a "pansy ass" because he didn't assemble a team in the preferred order is kind of strange. It's a distinction without a difference. If he paired up with Lebron and went to the Knicks that summer, is that all of a sudden better? If not, look at the rest of this FA class: https://www.cbssports.com/nba/news/2016-nba-free-agent-tracker-where-players-are-going-whos-still-available/ So now it's KDs fault that he didn't become a FA at the same time as other great players to assemble a super team? A better option was to team up with Andre Drummond and Nick Batum? Or go to the Heat (seriously, the nationally beloved Heat) and strong-arm them to trade for Damiam Lillard or some other disgruntled small market player? The narrow lane for what's acceptable seems to change with the narrative - what kind of competitive human would want to stay with an OKC franchise that wouldn't pay for talent?
Is this discussion being broken out into another thread?

If it is, please move this post…but I have to respond to this.

You can come up with reasons to back what Durant did..comfort, wanting to get a ring to silence any potential narrative of not winning it all, business opportunities in San Francisco, whatever. I don’t agree with those but at least they have some basis in reality.

but you really want to defend Durant by throwing out “competitive human” and acting like the decision was made out of some need to satisfy competitive juices? I mean, I think it would be more appropriate to argue the complete opposite. Durant was tired of too much competition and too much pressure and wanted to settle in on a team where he could do less, face less scrutiny and still win.

I mean if we were playing pick-up and you said okay I get the 4 best players and you get the leftovers, could you really say with a straight face that it was all about competition? You’d be laughed out of any gym if you tried that
 

HomeRunBaker

bet squelcher
SoSH Member
Jan 15, 2004
30,469
Agree with this. And if the Nets struggle to defend, I wonder if the Nets might lean into playing really small with something like Durant, Kyrie, Mills, Curry, and Brown/Edwards, and try to get the games into the 130s or even 140s. I think the Cs are too good defensively for this to work for an hour extended period of time, but I expect to see the Nets try some unconventional strategies if things aren’t going well in the first couple of games.
I expect to see more Claxton than Drummond especially down the stretch of games. The Nets have played a small lineup with Durant acting as the 5 for some stretches since his return so I don’t think they’d have any trouble doing so against Boston while TL is out.
 

benhogan

Granite Truther
SoSH Member
Nov 2, 2007
20,461
Santa Monica
I expect to see more Claxton than Drummond especially down the stretch of games. The Nets have played a small lineup with Durant acting as the 5 for some stretches since his return so I don’t think they’d have any trouble doing so against Boston while TL is out.
when Durant is your rim protector and Kyrie is one of your best perimeter defenders count me as not worried

Celebrate your Cleveland victory Ky cause life is going to be hell with clamps coming

Gentlemen sweep in 5 ;)
 

Jimbodandy

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 31, 2006
11,599
around the way
With how much the Celtics switch, I am not sure how much it matters whether Smart is on Curry or Kyrie, or whether Tatum or Horford are on KD.
In principle, I agree with you. However, without TL I think that the Cs are going to be implementing more drop coverage on 1/5 picks so as to not expose Al to Kyrie (nevermind Theis). So who that 1 is is kinda important IMO. I could be wrong on this, but I'd expect them to mix it up and give Kyrie some Brown, some Smart, and a bunch of White. Also expect them to vary the hedge and drop actions and even switch everything from time to time. Best bet is to keep Kyrie guessing. And he probably doesn't like the physicality of Smart, combined with Smart being smarter about not getting in foul trouble.
 

reggiecleveland

sublime
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Mar 5, 2004
28,017
Saskatoon Canada
The Celtics should go at Kyrie to get him in foul trouble. Attack him and Durant as much as possible, and make them defend. Boston has three respectable defenders they can put on KI, in Smart, JB, JT, and White. They can use AL, Tatum, JB, and Smart on KD. If they can keep the Nets under 110 points, they will win.
That presumes refs will call fouls on them. TV viewers don't tune in to see Kyrie and Kd sit.
 

Eddie Jurak

canderson-lite
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 12, 2002
44,860
Melrose, MA
I think this series looks good for the Celtics if they stick with their systems on both ends of the floor, look to push the pace when they can, and have the philosophy that Kyrie and KD are not enough to win by themselves.

The series looks bad for the Celtics if it becomes a Kyrie/KD vs Brown/Tatum duel with both sides playing slow my turn, your turn iso ball and Brooklyn defenders just collpasing on and swallowing up Tatum and Brown every time they try to drive.

I expect Brooklyn is going to prefer an extremely slow paced half court game while the Celtics would be better off plying with some tempo.
 

HomeRunBaker

bet squelcher
SoSH Member
Jan 15, 2004
30,469
They should attack them to make them work in the defensive end, without counting on foul trouble.
Specifically targeting Durant doesn’t seem like a good idea. He’s a real good defender and long as heck so he’s contesting nearly every shot without fouling. The Nets backcourt defense is suspect but their real issue is in defensive transition. The way to attack Brooklyn’s defense is to push tempo with numbers advantages but this doesn’t occur as much in the playoffs due to game planning, urgency, valuing possessions, and etc. Every playoff quarter seems to be played closer to a regular season 4Q with slower pace and iso which favors Brooklyn.
 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
35,010
yeah, KD is a good defender, you don't want to attack him. You want to attack Kyrie, Mills, Curry, Dragic, Edwards, etc. and try to pull Drummond/Claxton out of the paint with your shooting bigs
 

Fishy1

Head Mason
SoSH Member
Nov 10, 2006
6,175
Yeah... attack literally anyone but KD.

If they keep the ball moving and Tatum continues his passing out of double-teams, they'll torch the Nets.

Hot shooting has been a major contributor to this hot stretch. Would be tough if Pritchard, Horford, Theis , and Grant Williams suddenly went cold.
 

Kliq

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 31, 2013
22,903
Brooklyn's problem is they lack versatile role players that can play at both ends. Either they have to play strong-defensive players that lack shooting range, or they play shooters that are undersized and can't defend. Losing Joe Harris and having Curry hobble around is a big blow since those are two guys that would otherwise be feasting on open looks. Bruce Brown can play defense but can't really shoot; Dragic and Mills can shoot but can't play any defense. They haven't been able to play defense all season because of that and that isn't going to suddenly change in the playoffs.

I don't expect Simmons coming back, but even if he did I don't think that would change the calculus all that much. He'd slide in for the Claxton/Drummond minutes and would theoretically improve their defense substantially; but he would also be totally useless on offense since he can't play off-the-ball and I would relish the chance for him to handle the ball while KD and Kyrie are forced to play exclusively off-ball because Simmons can't do anything else.
 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
35,010
Brooklyn's problem is they lack versatile role players that can play at both ends. Either they have to play strong-defensive players that lack shooting range, or they play shooters that are undersized and can't defend. Losing Joe Harris and having Curry hobble around is a big blow since those are two guys that would otherwise be feasting on open looks. Bruce Brown can play defense but can't really shoot; Dragic and Mills can shoot but can't play any defense. They haven't been able to play defense all season because of that and that isn't going to suddenly change in the playoffs.

I don't expect Simmons coming back, but even if he did I don't think that would change the calculus all that much. He'd slide in for the Claxton/Drummond minutes and would theoretically improve their defense substantially; but he would also be totally useless on offense since he can't play off-the-ball and I would relish the chance for him to handle the ball while KD and Kyrie are forced to play exclusively off-ball because Simmons can't do anything else.
I think Simmons will help the D quite a bit if he's anywhere near 100%, and probably the offense too, because he's a much better passer than Drummons/Claxton and can beat guys off the dribble. However... I can't imagine him being 100%, and the Celtics will definitely send him to the line to break up the Nets' rhythm any time KD or Kyrie goes into their mode of just hitting hard shots with a hand in their face.
 

ManicCompression

Member
SoSH Member
May 14, 2015
1,411
but you really want to defend Durant by throwing out “competitive human” and acting like the decision was made out of some need to satisfy competitive juices? I mean, I think it would be more appropriate to argue the complete opposite. Durant was tired of too much competition and too much pressure and wanted to settle in on a team where he could do less, face less scrutiny and still win.

I mean if we were playing pick-up and you said okay I get the 4 best players and you get the leftovers, could you really say with a straight face that it was all about competition? You’d be laughed out of any gym if you tried that
TL;DR - sorry for continuing to take this thread off topic, but had to respond to this post. Please skip if you don't care about Durant's legacy.

The above isn't true though. GSW had lost the finals the previous year. GSW did not proceed to go undefeated in the finals even with Durant. He stacked the deck in his favor - like every star does when they get the opportunity! - and was the best player on a team that won a couple of championships. Is Lebron less competitive because he left the Cavs for a stacked Miami team that everyone presumed would win four straight finals? No - competitive people like winning and they try to put themselves in positions to win as much as possible. An NBA player's goal is not to make it as hard as possible to win a championship, it's actually the opposite - it's why we saw teams ducking the Nets in the playoffs. And as Lebron just saw, there's no glory in watching Russell Westbrook clank three pointers off the side of the backboard.

Did you watch KD vs. the Bucks last year? With no good teammates? Are you telling me he's not competitive? Or that he had that switch turned off in GSW, but it's all of a sudden set to on now?

I guess you're saying that Durant took the easy way out by joining GSW, but it would have been honorable for him meet up with Lebron at Nobu Malibu and decide to assemble a superteam in LA or wherever that summer. No, that's ridiculous, it's all the same. Durant was unlucky in that his free agent class stunk (unlike Lebron in 2010) but he was lucky in that there was a really good team with cap space already assembled. So he joined it. It's an order of operations thing - I don't see why it matters to a player's legacy.
 

HomeRunBaker

bet squelcher
SoSH Member
Jan 15, 2004
30,469
Brooklyn's problem is they lack versatile role players that can play at both ends. Either they have to play strong-defensive players that lack shooting range, or they play shooters that are undersized and can't defend. Losing Joe Harris and having Curry hobble around is a big blow since those are two guys that would otherwise be feasting on open looks. Bruce Brown can play defense but can't really shoot; Dragic and Mills can shoot but can't play any defense. They haven't been able to play defense all season because of that and that isn't going to suddenly change in the playoffs.
Curry should be fine with the playoff scheduling of this series with no B2B and two days off between each game prior to G4. Brown has been shooting well of late, 14-24 three’s in his last 7 games but as we know our close outs in the playoffs project to be much harder than those of teams that the Nets faced over the last two weeks.

I agree with the market that opened with the Celtics an Underdog in the series only to quickly flip. We should be able to handle the Nets with all of their holes. As you say it’s the role players being one-dimensional that makes this team easier to play. It’s only Durant and Kyrie that makes them so difficult but you’re relying on one (or both) players to carry them to 4 wins. Hard to do against a defense like the Celtics.


I think Simmons will help the D quite a bit if he's anywhere near 100%, and probably the offense too, because he's a much better passer than Drummons/Claxton and can beat guys off the dribble. However... I can't imagine him being 100%, and the Celtics will definitely send him to the line to break up the Nets' rhythm any time KD or Kyrie goes into their mode of just hitting hard shots with a hand in their face.
Fortunately he’s zero percent so we won’t have to worry about him this year. ;)
 

Kliq

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 31, 2013
22,903
TL;DR - sorry for continuing to take this thread off topic, but had to respond to this post. Please skip if you don't care about Durant's legacy.

The above isn't true though. GSW had lost the finals the previous year. GSW did not proceed to go undefeated in the finals even with Durant. He stacked the deck in his favor - like every star does when they get the opportunity! - and was the best player on a team that won a couple of championships. Is Lebron less competitive because he left the Cavs for a stacked Miami team that everyone presumed would win four straight finals? No - competitive people like winning and they try to put themselves in positions to win as much as possible. An NBA player's goal is not to make it as hard as possible to win a championship, it's actually the opposite - it's why we saw teams ducking the Nets in the playoffs. And as Lebron just saw, there's no glory in watching Russell Westbrook clank three pointers off the side of the backboard.

Did you watch KD vs. the Bucks last year? With no good teammates? Are you telling me he's not competitive? Or that he had that switch turned off in GSW, but it's all of a sudden set to on now?

I guess you're saying that Durant took the easy way out by joining GSW, but it would have been honorable for him meet up with Lebron at Nobu Malibu and decide to assemble a superteam in LA or wherever that summer. No, that's ridiculous, it's all the same. Durant was unlucky in that his free agent class stunk (unlike Lebron in 2010) but he was lucky in that there was a really good team with cap space already assembled. So he joined it. It's an order of operations thing - I don't see why it matters to a player's legacy.
This is a strawman argument because LeBron took a ton of shit for forming a super team in Miami and his hopping around the league trying to create the best possible chance for him to win a title will have an impact on his legacy. It's not as if Durant has this black mark on his career while LeBron got off scott-free.
 

CreedBratton

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 6, 2009
3,753
Curry should be fine with the playoff scheduling of this series with no B2B and two days off between each game prior to G4. Brown has been shooting well of late, 14-24 three’s in his last 7 games but as we know our close outs in the playoffs project to be much harder than those of teams that the Nets faced over the last two weeks.

I agree with the market that opened with the Celtics an Underdog in the series only to quickly flip. We should be able to handle the Nets with all of their holes. As you say it’s the role players being one-dimensional that makes this team easier to play. It’s only Durant and Kyrie that makes them so difficult but you’re relying on one (or both) players to carry them to 4 wins. Hard to do against a defense like the Celtics.



Fortunately he’s zero percent so we won’t have to worry about him this year. ;)
A lot of talk Simmons will be good to play by game 4.

A lot of talk Timelord will be good to play by game 4 too.
 

Kliq

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 31, 2013
22,903
Curry should be fine with the playoff scheduling of this series with no B2B and two days off between each game prior to G4. Brown has been shooting well of late, 14-24 three’s in his last 7 games but as we know our close outs in the playoffs project to be much harder than those of teams that the Nets faced over the last two weeks.

I agree with the market that opened with the Celtics an Underdog in the series only to quickly flip. We should be able to handle the Nets with all of their holes. As you say it’s the role players being one-dimensional that makes this team easier to play. It’s only Durant and Kyrie that makes them so difficult but you’re relying on one (or both) players to carry them to 4 wins. Hard to do against a defense like the Celtics.
Losing Harris makes a big difference. He's not a good defender by any means but at least has typical wing size; and if you had him + Mills/Curry out there, it would be tough to stop Brooklyn on offense because they would make a ton of threes with Kyrie/Durant drawing so much attention. Without him they have been throwing spaghetti at the wall with Edwards/Thomas/Brown. Brown is easily the best of that bunch but isn't much of a shooter; if he can actually make threes that would be huge.

It's really hard to win in the playoffs when you have players on the floor that just can't do anything on offense outside of setting screens. It's also really hard to win when you are undersized at the 2-3 spots. The Celtics playing big, even without TL, is going to make it really hard because you are asking one of Kyrie/Mills/Dragic/Curry to guard Jaylen Brown, or sticking them on Theis.
 

ManicCompression

Member
SoSH Member
May 14, 2015
1,411
This is a strawman argument because LeBron took a ton of shit for forming a super team in Miami and his hopping around the league trying to create the best possible chance for him to win a title will have an impact on his legacy. It's not as if Durant has this black mark on his career while LeBron got off scott-free.
Not a strawman because the original post I was responding to called Durant a "pansy ass" and the posters I've been going b/f with have been directly pointing to Lebron assembling his own super teams as somehow different and more "competitive" than Durant joining the Warriors.
 

Mooch

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
4,574
How in the world is Simmons going to be ready to play meaningful playoff minutes anytime soon when, according to Nash two days ago, "he hasn’t been running full speed or playing against anybody" and hasn't played in almost a full calendar year?
 

reggiecleveland

sublime
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Mar 5, 2004
28,017
Saskatoon Canada
Specifically targeting Durant doesn’t seem like a good idea. He’s a real good defender and long as heck so he’s contesting nearly every shot without fouling. The Nets backcourt defense is suspect but their real issue is in defensive transition. The way to attack Brooklyn’s defense is to push tempo with numbers advantages but this doesn’t occur as much in the playoffs due to game planning, urgency, valuing possessions, and etc. Every playoff quarter seems to be played closer to a regular season 4Q with slower pace and iso which favors Brooklyn.
This will seem like a "get off my lawn" thing, but not that long ago every team would have at least one guy who would physically destroy KD in the low post. The "nobody can stop" Shaq post up reffing needs to switch to the way FIBA allows the Offensive player more contact.

Your point about pace is the most important point. If the Cs get tempo up they get easy hoops, but especially they get hoops from more guys. I don't like all the rest days, since the benefit to Kyrie and KD, who will be doing more than their share each game, is greater than the chance of a TL return. I would like them to play every 2nd day.
 

NomarsFool

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 21, 2001
8,290
I think Simmons at half speed is probably a better player than whomever's minutes he'd be replacing, though.
 

Smokey Joe

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 9, 2001
1,180
How in the world is Simmons going to be ready to play meaningful playoff minutes anytime soon when, according to Nash two days ago, "he hasn’t been running full speed or playing against anybody" and hasn't played in almost a full calendar year?
Simmons playing in the first round is the new clickbait topic. This makes me happy because it’s replacing the “Celtics stars aren’t vaccinated” one.
 

PedroKsBambino

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Apr 17, 2003
31,529
How in the world is Simmons going to be ready to play meaningful playoff minutes anytime soon when, according to Nash two days ago, "he hasn’t been running full speed or playing against anybody" and hasn't played in almost a full calendar year?
Agreed---I have no idea whether his back is bothing him still or not but I cannot imagine he is good for more than 15 minutes a game, and those will be very rusty minutes at best. I am not all the way to the HRB "we won't see him" but it would be truly shocking if he were able to play enough, and well enough, to impact the series at all.
 

HomeRunBaker

bet squelcher
SoSH Member
Jan 15, 2004
30,469
A lot of talk Simmons will be good to play by game 4.

A lot of talk Timelord will be good to play by game 4 too.
If you or anyone else can find wagering action on anything to do with Simmons playing in these playoffs, in this series or by G4 please PM me I’ll share 50% of profit risk-free. No joke.