Celtics trade Rondo to Dallas

Fishy1

Head Mason
SoSH Member
Nov 10, 2006
6,184
Let the Jameer Nelson era begin..
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q1UaOZ4QGYo
 

tbrown_01923

Member
SoSH Member
Sep 29, 2006
784
thank god. I haven't seen him put it all on the floor in years.  Appreciated him during the runs, but it was time
 

crystalline

Member
SoSH Member
Oct 12, 2009
5,771
JP
If the first is 2018 or later its a good deal. If it is much earlier it illustrates how little Rondo is worth.

My guess: 2018 first.

I hope Rondo blows the doors off this year and leads the Mavs to a title. Could be fun to watch.
 

tbrown_01923

Member
SoSH Member
Sep 29, 2006
784
crystalline said:
If the first is 2018 or later its a good deal. If it is much earlier it illustrates how little Rondo is worth.

My guess: 2018 first.

I hope Rondo blows the doors off this year and leads the Mavs to a title. Could be fun to watch.
 
I can get behind this...Go mavs
 

JCizzle

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 11, 2006
20,814
Despite his flaws, I really loved watching rondo. Some great memories of playing the heat and Bulls
 
M

MentalDisabldLst

Guest
I think that clip is a fake.  "Perkins" supposedly makes both his free throws.
 

Statman

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 23, 2005
1,057
Los Angeles, CA
The Celtics got fucking robbed.  I'd rather keep Rondo and let him walk at the end of the year for nothing in return than accept that shit platter that Cuban just served us.
 
The fact that we are including a promising rookie (Powell) in the deal just infuriates me. 
 

bball831

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 14, 2005
4,965
Better than nothing but holy hell did Rondo's stock fall far.  What a fit for him though -- there's a good chance he thrives back with 3 proven scorers/shooters and end up getting paid. 
 
Fun NBA season -- the West Playoffs are going to be nuts.
 

The Social Chair

Member
SoSH Member
Feb 17, 2010
6,132
Rudy Pemberton said:
Had to do it, but it's hard to see the C's being anywhere close to good anytime soon. Building around nothing but hope. Keep on acquring picks and kick the can down the road.
 
Celtics are couple of lucky ping pong balls away from at least being a fun team with upside (not good but fun!). Think the Bucks before Parker went down. 
 

bball831

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 14, 2005
4,965
I wonder if this is the start of Ainge starting the fire sale for the other "valuable" but not part of the future pieces.  Could Green and Bass be gone for expiring contracts and 2nd round picks? 
 

Ed Hillel

Wants to be startin somethin
SoSH Member
Dec 12, 2007
44,453
Here
Why don't you give it two months to see if someone gets hurt, if this is the value? I don't know about this, and have no idea why they're throwing in Powell. Come on, Danny.
 

JCizzle

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 11, 2006
20,814
Ed Hillel said:
Why don't you give it two months to see if someone gets hurt, if this is the value? I don't know about this, and have no idea why they're throwing in Powell. Come on, Danny.
 
Yeah, you and Statman make a good point - this seems kind of weird unless they intend to flip some of these guys at the deadline. What they expect to get for any of them is beyond me though. 
 

Jed Zeppelin

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 23, 2008
51,632
Statman said:
The Celtics got fucking robbed.  I'd rather keep Rondo and let him walk at the end of the year for nothing in return than accept that shit platter that Cuban just served us.
 
The fact that we are including a promising rookie (Powell) in the deal just infuriates me. 
 
You would rather have nothing than something? Why? His trade value was clearly destroyed with the horrific timing of his knee injury. His lack of any shooting ability makes him a weird fit with contenders and it wouldn't be worth it for any pretenders to give up real value. He's just not at the same level as the kind of players who bring back legits assets in NBA trades.
 
It's also pretty easy to find a decent point guard these days. Paying Rondo wouldn't have made much sense.
 
The chance that Powell ends up moving the needle on this deal one way or the other is probably <1%. Chances are they'll be able to bring him in again for nothing within the next two seasons if they want to.
 

The Mort Report

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 5, 2007
7,223
Concord
Statman said:
The Celtics got fucking robbed.  I'd rather keep Rondo and let him walk at the end of the year for nothing in return than accept that shit platter that Cuban just served us.
 
The fact that we are including a promising rookie (Powell) in the deal just infuriates me. 
 
I think everyone is over valuing Rondo.  Look at all the point guards I would rank ahead of him: Curry, Westbrook, Paul, Wall, Lillard, Irving, Lowry are easy, and I could argue Conley, Dragic, Rose, Bledsoe, Williams and Teague are above or at his level.  Obviously that second group people could argue he is better than some of those guys, but he is basically not a top 10 PG anyone.  He also has major holes in his game.  No one was going to give what many on this board value him because instead of looking at the fact that this is only a partial season rental, everyone has the Rondo from the championship team as his value.  No one would like this trade if they are looking at it through green colored glasses.
 
And who cares about Powell?  He has very little chance to be anything, and I cant imagine his ceiling being higher than that of Sully or the like.  There is a reason he went late in the second round
 

Brickowski

Banned
Feb 15, 2011
3,755
Eddie Jurak said:
And this deal improves their own pick...
Not really, the way Rondo has been playing (and if Smart can stay healthy).
 
Rondo has convinced me, with his erratic play, that it would be a losing proposition to attempt to build a winner around him.  Too many turnovers, too much indifferent defense.  He may become a nice complementary piece to what Dallas already has, but he'll never be a centerpiece of a contending team.  Let Dallas overpay him to be the 3rd or 4th fiddle.
 
The only downside to this deal is that Nelson has a player option for next year-- but it's only for 3.2M.
 
One down, two to go (Green and Bass). I'm not hopeful that Ainge can move Wallace.
 

HomeRunBaker

bet squelcher
SoSH Member
Jan 15, 2004
30,503
Rudy Pemberton said:
They are a better team without Rondo, I thought?
 
Rondo is 14-44 in his last 58 games as a Celtic. We are 7-5 in the 12 games post-ACL Rondo when he's been in street clothes or at birthday parties. I'm pretty sure we will find a way to withstand this "loss."
 
This day should have came 3 years ago. The return is about what I expected.....salary filler with a low 1st/high 2nd. Time to move on. 
 

Morgan's Magic Snowplow

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 2, 2006
22,457
Philadelphia
Variations of this same conversation have been going on at least since he hurt his knee.
 
Poster1: Maybe they can get a low 1st for Rondo from team X?
 
Poster2: A low first??? Are you fucking kidding??? Danny should wait and see what he can get at ____ (the 2013 summer, the 2014 deadline, the 2014 summer, the 2015 deadline).
 
At some point you have to accept what the market has been telling you for almost two years: Rondo doesn't have much value and won't have much value.  We would have been better off trading him last year if you ask me.
 

Jed Zeppelin

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 23, 2008
51,632
Dwight Powell is basically this trade's version of including Alex Wilson in the Porcello trade. The guy is a year older than Sully and barely younger than Olynyk.
 

ZMart100

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 15, 2008
3,226
They would have had to make 2 moves to get to the roster limit anyway, Powell probably would have been one of them if Dallas didn't want him. As it is, they still need to make one cut.
 

Kliq

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 31, 2013
22,924
Considering the market for contending teams that needed a PG might have included exactly one team, I don't have that big of an issue with the haul. Brandon Wright was someone who I wanted the Celtics to consider going after in 2013 when he was a FA. It took him a while to figure out what he can do in the NBA, but right now I like what he brings to the table. He is a rangy big that can defend the rim, run the floor, work the pick and roll and cleans up the offensive glass. His per 36 minutes are 17-8 with 3 blocks per game. He is also leading the league in FG% shooting a silly 75% from the field.
 
Crowder is a wing player that can guard multiple positions and shoots about league average from deep. With a little bit more development he could be an actual asset. Nelson has had a good career, and will either be bought out or released (correct me if his contract prohibits that) or mentor Smart and Pressey, because IIRC he is supposed to be a really good teammate.
 

luckiestman

Son of the Harpy
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
32,921
I like the trade. Wish rondo the best. Think we make playoffs for sure unless Danny does more. We gave up the best player but I don't think Nelson is that big of a drop off given the cast of characters we have. And I think Wright is an upgrade to what we have.
 

Blacken

Robespierre in a Cape
SoSH Member
Jul 24, 2007
12,152
Wright is probably a starter-quality big in this league, and of all the backup centers in the league I'd put him only behind Kosta Koufos. Crowder has had flashes of real competence and has a lot more upside than Dwight Powell, posters' irrational hyperventilating aside. Plus, even more picks.

Danny played this about as well as it was going to be played. Some of you are insane.
 

DeJesus Built My Hotrod

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 24, 2002
48,871
The more I think about this, the more I don't like it for the Mavs.  Rondo's passing and ball-handling is an upgrade vs Nelson but Nelson is clearly a better scorer than Rondo.  And the Mavs cost  themselves some wing and front-court depth (not that the C's value Wright and Crowder like the Mavs did).  This reeks of Dallas doing something to do something.  That said, unless Rondo regains his defensive form (and I am not buying that he will), its a bad trade for Dallas.  
 
The C's get more assets which is the coin of Danny's realm.
 

triniSox

Member
SoSH Member
Oct 27, 2008
1,255
DJBMH - I agree about the cons but I think Dallas desperately needed backcourt defense and hopefully Rondo can be that guy.
 

Brickowski

Banned
Feb 15, 2011
3,755
triniSox said:
DJBMH - I agree about the cons but I think Dallas desperately needed backcourt defense and hopefully Rondo can be that guy.
If backcourt defense is what Dallas was seeking, they will be sorely disappointed in this deal.  Lucky for them they still have Harris and Barea.
 

Brickowski

Banned
Feb 15, 2011
3,755
Devizier said:
I'm going to miss HRB's irrational vitriolic hatred towards Rondo.
Irrational?  Rondo played himself out of town and got himself dealt to a contender.  IMHO Jackie M. was right all along.
 

fairlee76

Member
SoSH Member
Oct 9, 2005
3,637
jp
Eddie Jurak said:
And this deal improves their own pick...
Yeah, I like it from that perspective.  I like it for Rondo as well.  Going into a situation that plays to his offensive strengths and hides his offensive weaknesses.
 
His inability to develop as a legit scoring threat kept him as a great complementary piece and kept him from entering superstar territory.  Once they lost out in the Love sweepstakes, this day was inevitable.
 
Watching him in the 2010 and 2012 playoffs was a treat.  Fingers crossed he returns to that form in Dallas.
 

wade boggs chicken dinner

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 26, 2005
30,933
The more I think about this, the more I don't like it for the Mavs.  Rondo's passing and ball-handling is an upgrade vs Nelson but Nelson is clearly a better scorer than Rondo.  And the Mavs cost  themselves some wing and front-court depth (not that the C's value Wright and Crowder like the Mavs did).  This reeks of Dallas doing something to do something.  That said, unless Rondo regains his defensive form (and I am not buying that he will), its a bad trade for Dallas.
I have not seen anything to verify, but from what I've read, Nelson hasn't been scoring very well this year. He's only shooting .374 from the field (was under .400 last year too). He's had some injuries so that could be the cause but at this point, it would seem that Rondo is a clear upgrade from Nelson.

Also, it will be interesting to see how Rondo fits in.

On the plus side for the Mavs, because they are contenders, they're going to be on national TV much more often than the Cs so maybe the Mavs get motivated Rondo much more often than the Cs would.
 

oumbi

Member
SoSH Member
Jun 15, 2006
4,197
luckiestman said:
How soon do Cs need to cut someone or do a trade?
Maybe not long at all.
 
Jonathan Feigen: Don't be surprised if Celtics look to flip Wright. One of the reasons Celtics needed a deal done by Friday. Twitter @Jonathan_Feigen
 

ZMart100

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 15, 2008
3,226
luckiestman said:
How soon do Cs need to cut someone or do a trade?
Before the trade is finalized. From Larry Coon's Cap FAQ
 
However, there must be enough roster spots for the incoming players. A team with a full roster of 15 players cannot trade one player for two players without first waiving a player on its roster (or sending him away in another trade). This team could not acquire two players and simultaneously waive one of the incoming players.