Celtics Sign Tacko Fall

DeJesus Built My Hotrod

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 24, 2002
28,691
I can't quite tell if you are trolling or not - you are focused on this year when numerous posters have made the obvious point that the 15th slot is generally a developmental slot that a team doesn't expect to get any actual production out of in that year but hopes the player will improve in future years. If you assume the 15th player is going to contribute virtually nothing to the team this year, which is highly likely to be the case regardless of who they signed, why would you want a veteran retread instead of a player that still has a chance to develop and improve?
Furthermore, the idea that a Faried, Jerebko or anyone else on the street at present will be able to come in and effectively guard players like Embiid, Horford, Gasol, Ibaka etc seems a stretch at best. Faried isn't a horrible defender but he is too small to slow any of those guys on a sustained basis. And Jerebko is horrific defensively - not Kanter bad but that's simply because Golden State never asked him to play the minutes/match-ups that Kanter had to play for the Knicks and Blazers.

I believe few people would argue that the Celtics have good answers to the East's elite bigs. I don't believe that the answer to that as well as the delta between a first or second round exit and the finals is a Faried or Jerebko. Again, if anyone has data to the contrary, please post it because I could easily be wrong about that.
 

Big John

lurker
Dec 9, 2016
1,751
It's not the 15th roster slot. Roster slots don't have preassigned numbers. Where the player filling that slot falls in the pecking order is up to the coach.
Faried, ZaZa, Nene and Noah are all big bodies with NBA experience. Would one of them make a difference? Probably not. But Tacko certainly won't.
 

DrewDawg

Dorito Dink
SoSH Member
Dec 16, 2010
35,282
We really need the season to come soon. This used to be one of my favorite Port Cellar threads.

Yeah, let's all agree to disagree, or at least move this talk to a new thread that I can not click on.
 

HomeRunBaker

bet squelcher
SoSH Member
Jan 15, 2004
17,934
It's not the 15th roster slot. Roster slots don't have preassigned numbers. Where the player filling that slot falls in the pecking order is up to the coach.
Faried, ZaZa, Nene and Noah are all big bodies with NBA experience. Would one of them make a difference? Probably not. But Tacko certainly won't.
You began this sideshow by repeatedly referring to the 15th man slot and why a vet is better choice than Tacko.

Please don’t backoff now.
 

wade boggs chicken dinner

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 26, 2005
16,736
To get back to the original point of the thread, Tacko went on a Basketball without Borders tour and got to meet and speak to Dikembe and work out against Embiid. Joel is going to regret that when Tacko becomes our very own "Embiid-stopper".

 

JakeRae

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 21, 2005
6,375
New York, NY
I have 100% confidence in Kanter NOT being a 30-35 mpg player in this league. I also have 100% confidence that Ainge and Brad feel same as I do.

If he can give us 20-25 quality minutes a night that is about as good as we can expect.
I am confident Kanter will play 15-25 MPG. I have no confidence that any of those minutes will be quality. I actually think both Jerebko and Faried are better players than Kanter and remain mystified by our decision to sign him. I also don’t understand how either can’t find an NBA contract. All that said, I don’t want that type of player. Ainge and Stevens clearly disagree with me about Kanter and maybe they see something in him they can change to get value out of him. It’s possible that adding a 3 could vault his offensive value up enough to compensate for his defense. Either way, he’s going to play, so we still don’t need a mediocre vet clogging our roster at a position that already is occupied by 4 of our 14 players.
 

HomeRunBaker

bet squelcher
SoSH Member
Jan 15, 2004
17,934
I am confident Kanter will play 15-25 MPG. I have no confidence that any of those minutes will be quality. I actually think both Jerebko and Faried are better players than Kanter and remain mystified by our decision to sign him. I also don’t understand how either can’t find an NBA contract. All that said, I don’t want that type of player. Ainge and Stevens clearly disagree with me about Kanter and maybe they see something in him they can change to get value out of him. It’s possible that adding a 3 could vault his offensive value up enough to compensate for his defense. Either way, he’s going to play, so we still don’t need a mediocre vet clogging our roster at a position that already is occupied by 4 of our 14 players.
I mean it’s pretty obvious what Ainge sees. He sees a player he can get on a stop-gap deal who can compete at that position because we don’t have the bodies to do so. Jerebko is not going to matchup against starting 5’s and neither is Faried so they really don’t have anything to do with his signing.
 

JakeRae

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 21, 2005
6,375
New York, NY
I mean it’s pretty obvious what Ainge sees. He sees a player he can get on a stop-gap deal who can compete at that position because we don’t have the bodies to do so. Jerebko is not going to matchup against starting 5’s and neither is Faried so they really don’t have anything to do with his signing.
But Ed Davis, Cousins, and Looney all signed similar deals and are all significantly better players. And a guy like Cauley-Stein signed for less. I’m not confused why we signed Kanter instead of Jerebko. I’m confused why we signed Kanter instead of the multiple better options that were available when we signed him. I’m also separately confused why solid depth guys like Jerebko and Faried didn’t get picked up by contenders to fill out their benches.
 

Koufax

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
4,305
To get back to the original point of the thread, Tacko went on a Basketball without Borders tour and got to meet and speak to Dikembe and work out against Embiid. Joel is going to regret that when Tacko becomes our very own "Embiid-stopper".

Honestly, that article is fabulous and it give me chills to think that it all started with a bunch of guys in Springfield MA and a peach basket.
 

HomeRunBaker

bet squelcher
SoSH Member
Jan 15, 2004
17,934
But Ed Davis, Cousins, and Looney all signed similar deals and are all significantly better players. And a guy like Cauley-Stein signed for less. I’m not confused why we signed Kanter instead of Jerebko. I’m confused why we signed Kanter instead of the multiple better options that were available when we signed him. I’m also separately confused why solid depth guys like Jerebko and Faried didn’t get picked up by contenders to fill out their benches.
If anyones opinion is that Ed Davis, a 16 mpg second unit player, is a significantly better player than I have to believe that the only thing the person is looking at are flawed metrics of a player whose limited usage is designed to hide his liabilities. I’ve said my piece on Looney who is a great fit for his role playing off the scorers in Golden State but limited in his overall game. At least Looney is significantly better on one side of the ball than Kanter but why in the world would be agree to a one-year deal with Boston?

I agree Cousins could have been an option. It’s reasonable however that Ainge did not want to deal with all the issues surrounding Boogie.
 

benhogan

Baynes Hogan (pending trade)
SoSH Member
Nov 2, 2007
6,635
Santa Monica
If anyones opinion is that Ed Davis, a 16 mpg second unit player, is a significantly better player than I have to believe that the only thing the person is looking at are flawed metrics of a player whose limited usage is designed to hide his liabilities. I’ve said my piece on Looney who is a great fit for his role playing off the scorers in Golden State but limited in his overall game. At least Looney is significantly better on one side of the ball than Kanter but why in the world would be agree to a one-year deal with Boston?

I agree Cousins could have been an option. It’s reasonable however that Ainge did not want to deal with all the issues surrounding Boogie.
I don't think those guys are significantly better BUT
I'm curious to see what Brad has cooked up defensively to hide Kanter's PnR defense for his ~20mpg.

Having your #4 or 5 offensive option Enis Kanter, develop his 3pt shot, w/Kemba, Brown, Tatum and Hayward on the floor while massively downgrading on defense is questionable roster construction at best.
Not having a defense-first 5, after signing Kemba, is a head scratcher, unless Vincent Poirier is that guy...
 

Jimbodandy

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 31, 2006
2,916
around the way
I don't think those guys are significantly better BUT
I'm curious to see what Brad has cooked up defensively to hide Kanter's PnR defense for his ~20mpg.

Having your #4 or 5 offensive option Enis Kanter, develop his 3pt shot, w/Kemba, Brown, Tatum and Hayward on the floor while massively downgrading on defense is questionable roster construction at best.
Not having a defense-first 5, after signing Kemba, is a head scratcher, unless Vincent Poirier is that guy...
Stevens won't simply roll that particular lineup out there against teams that can abuse it. He's going to have to work his ass off to protect a weak defensive guard AND center now, and I suspect that he will as much as humanly possible.
 
Last edited:

Saints Rest

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Can Faried do this? If not, start a thread about him.

In a desperate attempt to get this thread back to its titular subject,...
Although Fall’s standing reach is impressive, what is his reach at max vertical leap? The NBA may not have many players who can grab the rim while standing flat-footed, it does have many players who can leap and reach MUCH higher than that. So if you put an Embiid or Giannis on Fall in the low post and try an alley oop, who can jump and reach higher?
 

lovegtm

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 30, 2013
4,540
Kiev, Ukraine
In a desperate attempt to get this thread back to its titular subject,...
Although Fall’s standing reach is impressive, what is his reach at max vertical leap? The NBA may not have many players who can grab the rim while standing flat-footed, it does have many players who can leap and reach MUCH higher than that. So if you put an Embiid or Giannis on Fall in the low post and try an alley oop, who can jump and reach higher?
The reason that raw standing reach matters so much is that your opponents are allowed to do lots of things to throw off your jumping and timing. Guards can do layups off the wrong foot or switch hands to finish. People can throw their body into to you to stop you from jumping. And so on.

This is a big difference between basketball and a sport like ultimate frisbee, where you’re not allowed to body opponents, and the location of the thing to jump for is known, so raw max vertical + timing beats standing reach.

Of course being able to jump in basketball is awesome, but there are reasons that standing reach is such a massive factor.
 

Jimbodandy

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 31, 2006
2,916
around the way
In a desperate attempt to get this thread back to its titular subject,...
Although Fall’s standing reach is impressive, what is his reach at max vertical leap? The NBA may not have many players who can grab the rim while standing flat-footed, it does have many players who can leap and reach MUCH higher than that. So if you put an Embiid or Giannis on Fall in the low post and try an alley oop, who can jump and reach higher?
26.5" vert, according to lord google. So yeah, someone will have to do the standing reach/vert math to see who can high point him. There's likely some that can.

Imo, with Tacko it's about the second and third jump, those that he actually doesn't have to make.

Edit: lovegtm said it better
 

Imbricus

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 26, 2017
1,464
I was initially concerned when Tacko was cut from his Senegal squad for the FIBA World Cup -- surely, he must be one of the best 16 players from Senegal, no? But looks like he's focusing his energies on making the Celtics 15-man roster. Maybe a long shot, but I'm rooting for him.
 

nighthob

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
7,756
26.5" vert, according to lord google. So yeah, someone will have to do the standing reach/vert math to see who can high point him. There's likely some that can.
The max vertical isn’t the important number, he’s pretty much never going to be taking a running start before jumping. It’s the standing vertical that’s important, but even there he’s at 22”, which makes him a pretty imposing barrier with that standing reach.
 

Jimbodandy

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 31, 2006
2,916
around the way
I'm kind of amazed that Canobie Lake not only survived but thrived once Six Flags took over Riverside.
If you live inside 128, especially north of Boston, Canobie lake is a million times more convenient. It's a bigtime hike to Six Flags. Unless you're a coaster connoisseur, why bother.
 
Last edited:

drleather2001

given himself a skunk spot
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
25,512
If you love inside 128, especially north of Boston, Canobie lake is a million times more convenient. It's a bigtime hike to Six Flags. Unless you're a coaster connoisseur, why bother.
There was no goddamn way my parents were shlepping me 2.5 hours to Riverside Park when Canobie was 25 minutes away.