AFC Playoff Chase

Rudy's Curve

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 4, 2006
2,337
Going to be awesome when Oakland knocks us out by upsetting a KC team with nothing to play for.
The Chiefs are guaranteed to have something to play for. Even if they’re eliminated from the 1-seed this week with an unspeakable home loss to Denver + Bills win in Cincy, they’ll still have to win Week 18 to hold the Bengals off for the 2. There’s zero chance they rest people.
 

Obscure Name

Member
SoSH Member
Oct 29, 2006
26,697
Western Mass
Don’t worry, I still call the Chargers “San Diego” all the time.
Haha wow.

The Chiefs are guaranteed to have something to play for. Even if they’re eliminated from the 1-seed this week with an unspeakable home loss to Denver + Bills win in Cincy, they’ll still have to win Week 18 to hold the Bengals off for the 2. There’s zero chance they rest people.
But those could be early games, no? I have no idea how the schedule is settled, I'm just imagining Pats/Bills and Bal/Cin @ 1 and KC/LV @ 4. I'm not expecting them to rest anyone, just one team having more to play for.
 

Rudy's Curve

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 4, 2006
2,337
Haha wow.


But those could be early games, no? I have no idea how the schedule is settled, I'm just imagining Pats/Bills and Bal/Cin @ 1 and KC/LV @ 4. I'm not expecting them to rest anyone, just one team having more to play for.
I’m pretty sure they’re going to put every team competing for the same thing at the same time if at all possible. If the Raiders are still alive, I can’t see how they’re going to let the Chiefs be in a spot to rest people. Plus, if the Ravens beat the Steelers Sunday then next week is a division title game regardless of what the Bengals do Monday so it’ll definitely be at 430 or 8.
 

Mooch

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
4,548
I chuckled at ESPN's Power Poll this week: They have the Pats as the worst of the 7-8 teams, #20 overall. Which feels just about right given the overall sloppiness and offensive ineptitude they've put on tape this season.

Yet, their combined record against the other teams with the same 7-8 record ranked ahead of them? 4-1. Combined score of those games is 102-61.
 

cshea

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 15, 2006
36,254
306, row 14
I’m pretty sure they’re going to put every team competing for the same thing at the same time if at all possible. If the Raiders are still alive, I can’t see how they’re going to let the Chiefs be in a spot to rest people. Plus, if the Ravens beat the Steelers Sunday then next week is a division title game regardless of what the Bengals do Monday so it’ll definitely be at 430 or 8.
I think Bengals/Ravens has a good shot at being the SNF game week 18 if it's for the AFC North. Cincy doesn't benefit a from knowing the outcome of the Chiefs and Bills games because they'd still have to beat the Ravens to win the division and finish 1, 2 or 3 and on the flip side the Bills and Chiefs will need to try to win because they won't know the outcome of the Cincy game. I think Bills/Pats and Chiefs/Raiders is a lock to be played at 4:25pm unless something crazy happens this weekend.

Jags/Titans has like a 99.9% chance to be winner take all so that's a strong SNF candidate as well. though with less star power than Ravens/Bengals. Theoretically if that game is SNF there's a long-shot scenario where an 8-8 Jags team has a WC spot locked up prior to kickoff if the needle is threaded on outside results.

Haven't looked at the NFC side of things. Lions/Packers looks like the most impactful week 18 game on that side of the bracket but they would need things to line up this week to make it a true win and in. I think if the Lions (vs. Bears) and Packers (vs. Vikings) both win this week and the Commanders (vs. Browns) and Seahawks (vs. Jets) both lose, then that game would be winner take all.
 

trekfan55

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Oct 29, 2004
11,638
Panama
So I am running the ESPN Playoff Machine thingy

If I got it right NE is in if they win this week and next. I had the Jets win this week and next as well, plus the Raiders win this week and next and NE still is the # 7 seed.

NE loss/Jets loss on week 17 and NE loss/Jets win on week 18 puts the Raiders on that spot.

Doing all sorts of combinations. For example, NE loss vs the Dolphins/Jets win at Seattke on Week 17 puts the winner of Jets/Dolphins on week 18 in.

It does look more and more like that game between the Jaguars and the Titans will be for the # 4 spot in the AFC.
 

Rudy's Curve

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 4, 2006
2,337
I think Bengals/Ravens has a good shot at being the SNF game week 18 if it's for the AFC North. Cincy doesn't benefit a from knowing the outcome of the Chiefs and Bills games because they'd still have to beat the Ravens to win the division and finish 1, 2 or 3 and on the flip side the Bills and Chiefs will need to try to win because they won't know the outcome of the Cincy game. I think Bills/Pats and Chiefs/Raiders is a lock to be played at 4:25pm unless something crazy happens this weekend.

Jags/Titans has like a 99.9% chance to be winner take all so that's a strong SNF candidate as well. though with less star power than Ravens/Bengals. Theoretically if that game is SNF there's a long-shot scenario where an 8-8 Jags team has a WC spot locked up prior to kickoff if the needle is threaded on outside results.

Haven't looked at the NFC side of things. Lions/Packers looks like the most impactful week 18 game on that side of the bracket but they would need things to line up this week to make it a true win and in. I think if the Lions (vs. Bears) and Packers (vs. Vikings) both win this week and the Commanders (vs. Browns) and Seahawks (vs. Jets) both lose, then that game would be winner take all.
Yeah, I generally agree. Jags-Titans is most likely a winner take all but they're two awful markets with zero starpower aside from maybe Lawrence's ascent (does anyone turn the game on to watch Henry?). That being said, they have to set the schedule by Monday afternoon before Bills-Bengals so if the Ravens lose Sunday and the Bengals can clinch Monday night, I don't think they're going to risk potentially putting the Ravens on SNF without a ton to play for - they'd still have to win to have a chance at the 5 seed and play the AFCS winner, but that doesn't really make a SNF storyline. The Bengals will be playing Week 18 regardless to either win the division and/or hold the 1-2 seed.
 

BaseballJones

ivanvamp
SoSH Member
Oct 1, 2015
24,765
Yeah, I mean, it's great that the Pats can make the playoffs by winning this and next week. Not to be Debbie downer, but just consider....

Last 3 seasons vs Miami: 1-4
Last 3 seasons vs Buffalo: 1-5, with that one win being a bizarro-world win in Buffalo in extreme weather conditions

To win ONE of these games will be a significant achievement. To win BOTH? A very, very tall order.
 

Rudy's Curve

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 4, 2006
2,337
I was assuming Lions/Packers SNF if it’s a play-in game.
That's probably the best bet. In order for it to happen though, it looks like they'd both need to win this week and have Washington and Seattle lose.

Edit: or what cshea said above
 
Last edited:

Justthetippett

New Member
Aug 9, 2015
2,491
Yeah, I mean, it's great that the Pats can make the playoffs by winning this and next week. Not to be Debbie downer, but just consider....

Last 3 seasons vs Miami: 1-4
Last 3 seasons vs Buffalo: 1-5, with that one win being a bizarro-world win in Buffalo in extreme weather conditions

To win ONE of these games will be a significant achievement. To win BOTH? A very, very tall order.
If all things were equal, I agree. But the context is pretty favorable for the Pats. Of course they’d get slaughtered again in the first round so who really cares, but I think the playoffs motivates NFL players in particular given how many risks they take with their bodies every game.
 

BaseballJones

ivanvamp
SoSH Member
Oct 1, 2015
24,765
If all things were equal, I agree. But the context is pretty favorable for the Pats. Of course they’d get slaughtered again in the first round so who really cares, but I think the playoffs motivates NFL players in particular given how many risks they take with their bodies every game.
If you don't mind me asking, what in the context of the last game is favorable for the Pats? It's likely that Buffalo will need to win that game to clinch the #1 seed and a bye in the first round of the playoffs. They will play everyone, and they will absolutely play hard to win. It will likely mean everything to them. And they're at home (the Bills, that is).

Since the Pats have shown very little ability the last few years to do anything to even impede the Bills, never mind stop them, what part of that context is favorable to the Pats?
 

Traut

lost his degree
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 20, 2005
12,786
My Desk
If you don't mind me asking, what in the context of the last game is favorable for the Pats? It's likely that Buffalo will need to win that game to clinch the #1 seed and a bye in the first round of the playoffs. They will play everyone, and they will absolutely play hard to win. It will likely mean everything to them. And they're at home (the Bills, that is).

Since the Pats have shown very little ability the last few years to do anything to even impede the Bills, never mind stop them, what part of that context is favorable to the Pats?
If you believe the Patriots are going to make the playoffs it’s a leap of faith not grounded in any evidence. Put it in the bucket of anything can happen. That’s the only argument.

If you have watched the Patriots and believe the next two games are favorable to them you need new glasses.

This is an average team playing terrible football. They should lose both these games.
 

Justthetippett

New Member
Aug 9, 2015
2,491
If you don't mind me asking, what in the context of the last game is favorable for the Pats? It's likely that Buffalo will need to win that game to clinch the #1 seed and a bye in the first round of the playoffs. They will play everyone, and they will absolutely play hard to win. It will likely mean everything to them. And they're at home (the Bills, that is).

Since the Pats have shown very little ability the last few years to do anything to even impede the Bills, never mind stop them, what part of that context is favorable to the Pats?
Was just looking at the long term forecast in Buff and it doesn’t look like it’s getting above 8 degrees with wind, weather, etc. for a while. So basically just that variable. I agree they have looked pathetic against them recently.
 

DJnVa

Dorito Dawg
SoSH Member
Dec 16, 2010
54,168
Yes but White and other players are playing for their futures, plus they may get a chance to play spoiler against a hated division rival. Teams that are out of the playoffs find strange ways to win games late in the season.
Someone out there has checked the numbers--do teams out of the playoffs in last week or 2 of season have a winning percentage substantially different from the rest of the season?
 

Deathofthebambino

Drive Carefully
SoSH Member
Apr 12, 2005
42,088
If you believe the Patriots are going to make the playoffs it’s a leap of faith not grounded in any evidence. Put it in the bucket of anything can happen. That’s the only argument.

If you have watched the Patriots and believe the next two games are favorable to them you need new glasses.

This is an average team playing terrible football. They should lose both these games.
Not with Tua out. (and honestly, I've had the Miami game marked as a win all season with Tua. I'll believe they can play up here in January when they accomplish it). The Pats are currently favored by 2.5 points (-140 money line).

I agree it's irrelevant though, because unless KC blows a shocker to Denver this week, Buffalo is going to beat the breaks off the Pats in week 18 and get the #1 seed.
 

cornwalls@6

Less observant than others
SoSH Member
Apr 23, 2010
6,296
from the wilds of western ma
Was just looking at the long term forecast in Buff and it doesn’t look like it’s getting above 8 degrees with wind, weather, etc. for a while. So basically just that variable. I agree they have looked pathetic against them recently.
Weather channel's long term Buffalo forecast for last weekend of the regular season. The Pats are likely not getting a weather assist.


59461
 
Last edited:

BaseballJones

ivanvamp
SoSH Member
Oct 1, 2015
24,765
Not with Tua out. (and honestly, I've had the Miami game marked as a win all season with Tua. I'll believe they can play up here in January when they accomplish it).
In 2019, the Dolphins beat the Pats in Foxboro on Dec 29, 27-24, FWIW. That was the game Fitzpatrick drove the Dolphins 75 yards in just under 3 minutes and hit Gesicki for the game-winning TD with just 24 seconds left. Temps were in the low to mid 40s that day.
 

luckiestman

Son of the Harpy
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
32,865
Right now I think Teddy is a better qb than Mac and the Fish have better weapons but the Pats D is impressive. Teddy is less likely to throw as many picks as Tua but I don’t know that he will go for as many explosives. I think the Dolphins should win but BB will have the Pats ready and have a plan. I need the Fish to win this one but life is pain and I’m used to disappointment so give me:

Pats 20
Fish 13
 

Deathofthebambino

Drive Carefully
SoSH Member
Apr 12, 2005
42,088
In 2019, the Dolphins beat the Pats in Foxboro on Dec 29, 27-24, FWIW. That was the game Fitzpatrick drove the Dolphins 75 yards in just under 3 minutes and hit Gesicki for the game-winning TD with just 24 seconds left. Temps were in the low to mid 40s that day.
Yeah, I've just blocked 2019 from my brain entirely. They'll probable get lucky again with the weather this year too, assuming the rain clears out in time. Wind should be a factor, at 15-25mph, and Teddy has always been better indoors than outdoors.

Fun fact, Teddy Bridgewater has never thrown a pass against the New England Patriots. When BB sees a QB for the first time (or more aptly, when a QB sees a BB defense for the first time), it usually doesn't go well for them. That said, the Dolphins just played the Niners, Chargers, Bills (all on the road) and the Packers. They went 0-4, but those are good football teams, so this could be the opposite of a "let down" game for them.

I'd still bet the Pats to win, even moreso if the weather becomes an issue.
 

BaseballJones

ivanvamp
SoSH Member
Oct 1, 2015
24,765
I'm semi-optimistic, but the way the Pats have been playing, it's hard to put money on them at all, no matter the opponent.
 

axx

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 16, 2005
8,139
I was assuming Lions/Packers SNF if it’s a play-in game.
As long as the Jets beat Seattle this week, Miami/Jets will be a play in game for the final WC spot. Unless the Patriots win both games. That might be a good candidate for SNF.
 

DJnVa

Dorito Dawg
SoSH Member
Dec 16, 2010
54,168
As long as the Jets beat Seattle this week, Miami/Jets will be a play in game for the final WC spot. Unless the Patriots win both games. That might be a good candidate for SNF.
I think the Titans/Jags is definitely going to be for a playoff spot no matter what happens this week, so that could be the safest.
 

axx

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 16, 2005
8,139
I think the Titans/Jags is definitely going to be for a playoff spot no matter what happens this week, so that could be the safest.
Depends on what happens this week. As mentioned the Jags still have a shot of at least the WC if enough things happen. But yes Titans/Jags will be for the AFC South.
 

bernardsamuel

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 4, 2006
197
Denver, only physically
Regarding Titans/Jags as the final week SNF game, I am wondering whether a scenario can be constructed - I've munched around for a while with the NFL Playoff Machine, but haven't achieved the scenario I'm about to describe (my colleagues here with more smarts and/or more time might do better) - in which both the Titans and the Jags would make the playoffs only in the event of a tie. In such a case, it might be better to select another game for Sunday night. The prospect of an overtime driven by tacit collusion towards a tie seems unseemly to me. For an historical reference point, please refer to you play to win the game . I do realize, however, that there is a sufficient distinction between making the playoffs as a Divisional winner as contrasted to the third wildcard slot that there still would remain a substantial incentive to play to win. Yet, would anyone believe that the risk of not making the playoffs at all might be sufficient disincentive towards going all-out (e.g. going for it on fourth down or attempting a very long field goal)?
 

trekfan55

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Oct 29, 2004
11,638
Panama
Regarding Titans/Jags as the final week SNF game, I am wondering whether a scenario can be constructed - I've munched around for a while with the NFL Playoff Machine, but haven't achieved the scenario I'm about to describe (my colleagues here with more smarts and/or more time might do better) - in which both the Titans and the Jags would make the playoffs only in the event of a tie. In such a case, it might be better to select another game for Sunday night. The prospect of an overtime driven by tacit collusion towards a tie seems unseemly to me. For an historical reference point, please refer to you play to win the game . I do realize, however, that there is a sufficient distinction between making the playoffs as a Divisional winner as contrasted to the third wildcard slot that there still would remain a substantial incentive to play to win. Yet, would anyone believe that the risk of not making the playoffs at all might be sufficient disincentive towards going all-out (e.g. going for it on fourth down or attempting a very long field goal)?
I don't think these teams will play for a tie. It is very hard to do so in the NFL.

There could be a scenario where if they tie they both get in but even in that case, the difference is a home game and a better opponent.
 

axx

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 16, 2005
8,139
There could be a scenario where if they tie they both get in but even in that case, the difference is a home game and a better opponent.
That's fair. IIRC the Jags can only be #4 or #7, and #7 is likely playing either Buffalo or KC.. which doesn't sound very favorable.
 

bernardsamuel

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 4, 2006
197
Denver, only physically
I don't think these teams will play for a tie. It is very hard to do so in the NFL.

There could be a scenario where if they tie they both get in but even in that case, the difference is a home game and a better opponent.
Just to expand on your point about a scenario in which a tie gets both the Jags and the Titans into the playoffs, here is a version (may or may not be the only one) that reaches such a conclusion. In Week 17: Titans over Cowboys, Jags over Texans, Patriots over Dolphins, Steelers over Ravens, Seahawks over Jets, Raiders over 49'ers. In Week 18: Bills over Patriots, Jets over Dolphins, Chiefs over Raiders. Rolling forward to the imagined SNF game: If the Titans win, they get the 4 slot and the Jags get the 7 slot. If the Jags win, they get the 4 slot and the Patriots get the 7 slot ( I pause to tip my cap to Baseball Jones Post #139 and Rudy's Curve Post 143, as I've replicated their original works). If the Jags and Titans tie, the Jags get the 4 slot and the Titans get the 7 slot.

As regards the prospect of either (...and I can't come up with a scenario for both teams) team to play for a tie, since the Jags are in the playoffs with a win or a tie, they might be satisfied with a tie, if towards the end of OT, they have the ball at their own 10 yard line, with 4th down and 20 yards to go. Unless it literally is going to be the last play of the game (and they can be sure that the Patriots/Raiders final play won't happen to them), the Jags might play for a tie. And so, Patriots fans might find ourselves as the biggest Jags fans on such a Sunday night, which again is perfectly consistent with Baseball Jones's analysis that began with postulating that the Titans would lose their last two games.

Of course, life would be simpler though worse if the Patriots lose to the Dolphins, and life would be simpler and much better if the Patriots beat both the Dolphins and the Bills (though I should pay respect to those posters who take the longer view and would prefer the Patriots to have a better drafting position if it is assured in their minds that the Patriots would be slaughtered in their playoff game).
 

DJnVa

Dorito Dawg
SoSH Member
Dec 16, 2010
54,168
Okay folks, what do we want for the game to be meaningless to Buffalo next week?
 

tims4wins

PN23's replacement
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
37,527
Hingham, MA
If the Bills lose, I believe they’d need both a KC and Cincy loss next week to regain the 1 seed. I could see them sitting Allen in that scenario
 

Ferm Sheller

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 5, 2007
20,918
Won’t be, but if the Jets lose today and beat Miami next week, Pats are in no matter what. I think.
Would be awesome if Brady and BB both got into the playoffs with losing records and met in the SB. Never happen, of course, but crazy that it's at least possible.
 

Rudy's Curve

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 4, 2006
2,337
If the Bills lose, I believe they’d need both a KC and Cincy loss next week to regain the 1 seed. I could see them sitting Allen in that scenario
The 2 is still really important though and they'd only need a win and a Bengals loss to Baltimore. I can't see the Bills sitting.
 

johnmd20

mad dog
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 30, 2003
62,087
New York City
Would be awesome if Brady and BB both got into the playoffs with losing records and met in the SB. Never happen, of course, but crazy that it's at least possible.
If that happens, I will officially be convinced we are living in a simulation. I'm at about 46% now and that would take me to 100%.