Thanks and fixed. Romano, Romy, Roman. . .Empire Market Inefficiency?Sal Romero is Sal Romano, the pride of Connecticut.
One of the things Bailey learned while studying Houck was that his pitch quality was excellent but he was putting himself in too many tough spots. Houck heard two words often this spring while throwing on the sun-soaked bullpens and backfields of Boston's Florida spring training complex. "I just like to say, 'Over white,'" Bailey said. "'Tanner, you just have to throw the thing over white.' His miss patterns tend to be big east-west. "I think if you look at Tanner, some of the struggles just stem from count leverage. Just recognizing how good his stuff is, and the quality of pitcher he is. Harnessing the strike zone was key." Last season, 26.7% of Houck's pitches came when the batter had the count in his favor. That ranked in the middle of the pack, 318th out of 603 pitchers who threw at least 250 pitches.
For the first time in Houck's career, he's behind batters with fewer than 20% of his offerings this season, the 11th-best rate in the majors. Houck's also tied for the fourth-best percentage of pitches in the strike zone (58%).
The Red Sox have used 19 pitchers this season. Two were Rule 5 picks, three did stints in independent ball, and one was released at the end of spring training. Seven were drafted in the 15th round or later, and two others were draft-eligible but went unselected. Only one was taken in the first round. The Red Sox’s only second-rounder got hurt after 6 1/3 innings, their only fourth-rounder got hurt after two starts and their only third-rounder arrived via the Rule 5 Draft.
No other pitching staff in baseball was built this way.
Jumps out at me that most of the staff are Bloom acquisitions/development regime.
Thanks!Zeferjahn promoted to AAA after a dominant AA start, he's probably on the pen radar now too.
Top 10 pitching staffs by ERA
[TH]TEAM[/TH] [TH]STAFF ERA[/TH] [TH]1ST ROUND PICKS[/TH] [TH]TOP 5 ROUNDS[/TH] [TH]TOP 10 ROUNDS[/TH] [TH]15TH ROUND AND LATER[/TH] Red Sox 2.61 1 4 5 9 Mariners 2.98 4 8 9 4 Yankees 2.99 4 7 9 5 Tigers 3.24 8 8 10 1 Orioles 3.31 2 7 7 3 Dodgers 3.35 3 11 13 4 Royals 3.35 5 10 12 3 Phillies 3.36 5 8 9 1 Guardians 3.41 2 8 11 4 Pirates 3.64 2 7 8 4
I also asked in the mL forums but can't find anything- what the hell is up with Mata? Wasn't he expected to start in AAA at the end of last week?Thanks!
If anyone wants to do a stats update on the MiL arms which have a realistic chance of contributing this year, that'd be great. I'll fold it into the running roster-tracking post.
For that, I (personally) usually tend to consider recent performance in the high minors most heavily, keeping in mind that Bailey is very pro-strike/anti-walk. (At this point in the year we're pretty much all recent performance, but a mid-summer option will probably not have their April stats held against them.)
I think that's right, but I don't recall where I read it. He posted on Twitter that he was healthy and ready to go at some point. But I don't know if that meant he was cleared for throwing or ready to start a rehab or what.I also asked in the mL forums but can't find anything- what the hell is up with Mata? Wasn't he expected to start in AAA at the end of last week?
Bryan Mata: IL forever and ever and ever.
Calling JM3, calling JM3...Thanks!
If anyone wants to do a stats update on the MiL arms which have a realistic chance of contributing this year, that'd be great. I'll fold it into the running roster-tracking post.
For that, I (personally) usually tend to consider recent performance in the high minors most heavily, keeping in mind that Bailey is very pro-strike/anti-walk. (At this point in the year we're pretty much all recent performance, but a mid-summer option will probably not have their April stats held against them.)
You'll have to go to the minor league board to reach him...Calling JM3, calling JM3...
Latest from redsox.comLooks like Bello should be back to make his next start…..?
So assuming no injuries the rotation will be Crawford, Pivetta, Houck, Bello and Criswell. Very solid.
Haven’t heard anything back on Whitlock for a few days but probably a month. If Criswell is still pitching… well…. I really hope Whitlock is in the pen.
There's certainly going to be a need to transition players into different roles. I don't think this pen works with 5 nominal starters and 3 dedicated long men - Criswell, Anderson, Winckowski. I expect they'll transition Whitlock back into the rotation, but there's no reason that absolutely must happen.I wonder where Criswell goes when Whitlock returns. My hope is that he stays in Boston for a bit. After tomorrow the Sox only have one more day off the rest of the month, and it would be nice especially for Houck and Crawford to get in a bit of extra rest. I can see a six man rotation being a good idea for a few weeks.
Per NESN post game, Winck going to WOOstah to make room for Bello.There's certainly going to be a need to transition players into different roles. I don't think this pen works with 5 nominal starters and 3 dedicated long men - Criswell, Anderson, Winckowski. I expect they'll transition Whitlock back into the rotation, but there's no reason that absolutely must happen.
Pivetta, Bello, Houck, Crawford, OTOH - those four spots are pretty much locked in at this point. If any of those guys go on the IL they will always get a chance to return to the rotation.
That's somewhat surprising. It's not outlandish, but he's not at the bottom of the talent totem-pole. So it's either resource-conservation driven (keep, say, Anderson, and option Winck.) And/or his ankle is bothering him.Per NESN post game, Winck going to WOOstah to make room for Bello.
I'm guessing it would be both. I'm curious with this long stretch of games coming up if there is any thought of swapping Criswell and Winck once or twice to in effect have a quasi 6 man rotation working where the other four would get the benefit of an extra day in between starts like they might if the team actually had a scheduled day off.That's somewhat surprising. It's not outlandish, but he's not at the bottom of the talent totem-pole. So it's either resource-conservation driven (keep, say, Anderson, and option Winck.) And/or his ankle is bothering him.
But if they keep him stretched out as a starter, what's the next move? Wait till there's an issue with Bello/Houck/Pivetta/Crawford/Whitlock/Criswell? Or get him fully stretched out and swap him with Criswell?
Boy, do I hope this is winner winner, chicken dinner because in a vacuum, a team that’s one game over .500 optioning a Josh Winckowski to AAA kinda makes my head explode.I'm guessing it would be both. I'm curious with this long stretch of games coming up if there is any thought of swapping Criswell and Winck once or twice to in effect have a quasi 6 man rotation working where the other four would get the benefit of an extra day in between starts like they might if the team actually had a scheduled day off.
Total aside here, but I used this phrase the other day with a bunch (20+) of full grown, college-educated adults. Not one of them had ever heard of the phrase and thought I made it up. I had to show it to them on google for them to believe me, but I was stunned that not a single one of them had any knowledge of it. I mean, I know it's not a common phrase but...really?Chris Martin back from the IL for Criswell. . .other moves in the offing?
They should be embarrassed...Total aside here, but I used this phrase the other day with a bunch (20+) of full grown, college-educated adults. Not one of them had ever heard of the phrase and thought I made it up. I had to show it to them on google for them to believe me, but I was stunned that not a single one of them had any knowledge of it. I mean, I know it's not a common phrase but...really?
I'd start to sprinkle in obscure 1920s lingo - then claim it's more contemporary than it is. Perhaps something like this might result:Total aside here, but I used this phrase the other day with a bunch (20+) of full grown, college-educated adults. Not one of them had ever heard of the phrase and thought I made it up. I had to show it to them on google for them to believe me, but I was stunned that not a single one of them had any knowledge of it. I mean, I know it's not a common phrase but...really?
What Ho! Clearly this signals a wasted youth.They should be embarrassed...
for never having read the great P.G. Wodehouse.
George Costanza used that phraseTotal aside here, but I used this phrase the other day with a bunch (20+) of full grown, college-educated adults. Not one of them had ever heard of the phrase and thought I made it up. I had to show it to them on google for them to believe me, but I was stunned that not a single one of them had any knowledge of it. I mean, I know it's not a common phrase but...really?
NevermindI'm looking forward to seeing how Campbell is throwing. He seemed like the real deal in ST
My guess is no and that they're managing his innings by giving him this break. Not a huge reduction but it's something and perhaps just a little break will help. Both Pivetta and Bello had some down time (sorta....) so just Crawford and Houck are really the two that haven't missed a start so farSo the rotation going forward is Pivetta tomorrow, Houck Saturday and Wink on Sunday. Kutter only threw a few pitches last night before the game was suspended, so will he just miss his turn altogether or be used out of the bullpen in the SD series this weekend? Cora has already said Bello will be pitching the middle game of the Miami series on Wednesday. Assume Crawford goes Tuesday on 6 days of rest after his short stint last night. Couldn't he throw an inning or two if needed Friday or Saturday?
Tough to throw a gopher ball that traveled further than the one he threw.Surely Campbell is healthy again... but holy hell he cost so much WPA tonight.
Agreed. We've already seen them do little things to sneak an extra day or two of rest for these guys (e.g. the two recent bullpen games) so we know they're consciously trying some type of load management. Giving Crawford essentially a skipped start will likely have some benefit later in the season. Barring an emergency, 15th inning and we're out of relievers kind of situation, no sense in working Crawford between scheduled starts.My guess is no and that they're managing his innings by giving him this break. Not a huge reduction but it's something and perhaps just a little break will help. Both Pivetta and Bello had some down time (sorta....) so just Crawford and Houck are really the two that haven't missed a start so far
Yeah all of that makes a ton of sense. I just wondered if they'd maybe treat it like his bullpen day since yesterday was so weird. Games don't usually start and then get delayed that quickly. The weathermen and radar watchers were all fooled.Agreed. We've already seen them do little things to sneak an extra day or two of rest for these guys (e.g. the two recent bullpen games) so we know they're consciously trying some type of load management. Giving Crawford essentially a skipped start will likely have some benefit later in the season. Barring an emergency, 15th inning and we're out of relievers kind of situation, no sense in working Crawford between scheduled starts.
Is he an ACTUAL son of…..?!?!!!!!!