2023 NBA Playoffs

lars10

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2007
11,875
Lakers did what the C's should've done last night.. doubled Curry out deep and forced him to give it up.
 

Kliq

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 31, 2013
22,861
Lakers played great defense on the final possessions, funneling everything towards the paint where Davis was waiting, and he was a monster in there.
 

TripleOT

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 4, 2007
7,783
The Lakers have been among the best teams since the trade deadline, if not the best. If healthy, they are going to be a difficult out.
 

lars10

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2007
11,875
The Lakers have been among the best teams since the trade deadline, if not the best. If healthy, they are going to be a difficult out.
Denver vs LA would be a pretty great series I think.

edit: Reaves and Russell stepping up to help LeBron and Davis is a pretty big shot in the arm for them.. along with Schroder. With all the help LeBron basically can coast for most of the game and put in spurts of energy when he has to make a play... it's not all on him.
 

Euclis20

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 3, 2004
8,256
Imaginationland
Why were the Lakers allowed to advance it? They didn’t call time immediately.
Do you have to call it immediately, or do you just have to call it before you dribble/pass/shoot? It was a BS decision to give him the timeout, but I get why it was advanced.

Lakers offense ran out of gas big-time down the stretch. Lebron hit a deep 2 with 5:58 left, and LA scored just 3 points over the next 5:56, when Schroeder was fouled intentionally. That contested 3 by Lebron at the end was a desperation shot, he and AD (who I believe played the entire 2nd half) were just dead by the end. We'll see how this goes moving forward with no more than one days rest in between games going forward.
 

Brand Name

make hers mark
Moderator
SoSH Member
Oct 6, 2010
4,424
Moving the Line
Poole could have stepped up and taken a closer shot
At least then he'd have a puncher's chance.

Golden State made 21 three pointers. The Lakers only made 6. Got to be rare to be +15 in 3 pointers made and lose.
First game in NBA history, playoffs or otherwise, to have 21+ 3 pointers made, 6 or fewer 3s allowed and lose. 19 and 4 happened though earlier this season: Wizards loss in Denver on December 14.
 

Euclis20

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 3, 2004
8,256
Imaginationland
Yeah.. not trying to relive it either. Just sort of shocked to see Curry not get any help there.. no pick, etc.
I think they planned for no pick because they didn't want him doubled, but that was already happening. Kerr should've called timeout and regrouped once Curry was pushed back and it was apparent that the Lakers weren't going to let him go 1v1. 14 seconds left and two timeouts, hindsight is 20-20 but it would've been the right move.
 

OurF'ingCity

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 22, 2016
8,469
New York City
I think they planned for no pick because they didn't want him doubled, but that was already happening. Kerr should've called timeout and regrouped once Curry was pushed back and it was apparent that the Lakers weren't going to let him go 1v1. 14 seconds left and two timeouts, hindsight is 20-20 but it would've been the right move.
Yeah, I thought for sure Kerr was going to call a TO once Curry got trapped.
 

radsoxfan

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 9, 2009
13,749
Anyone else think that Poole shot was a decent one in that situation?
For sure, don't get the Poole criticism at all.

Curry was double teamed and Poole had wide open 3 down 3 with under 10 seconds. The chances of him not shooting that shot and them getting a better look were low. Plus, still enough time for a potential rebound on a miss.

Ideally he would have been a few feet closer but overall the right play for Poole to make.
 

HomeRunBaker

bet squelcher
SoSH Member
Jan 15, 2004
30,391
Anyone else think that Poole shot was a decent one in that situation?
Yes 100%. Curry is being denied by two players so unlikely he even touches the ball again and Poole has a clean look. If anything the problem I saw is that he wasn’t expecting the ball to swing to him so he wasn’t in shooting rhythm on receipt so bad on him there….but once he gets it that’s a shot he has to take.
 

jon abbey

Shanghai Warrior
Moderator
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
71,226
Yeah, all four game 3s are Friday/Saturday and then every other day from there.
 

HomeRunBaker

bet squelcher
SoSH Member
Jan 15, 2004
30,391
What I don't get.. why is Boston/Philly on Friday and Knicks/Heat on Saturday? Scheduling issue with the venues?
There have been presentations on NBA/NHL scheduling in the past at MIT Sloan if anyone has either been or knows people who have attended. The first thing to recognize is that the networks are essentially partners with the leagues and control the scheduling while working together with the leagues and arenas.

In the case of this weekend you have the two road teams who share arenas with NHL teams who were in the playoffs and the NBA series schedule was made prior to the Bruins and Rangers being eliminated. I’d have to imagine that this would have something to do with it when you follow the greatest rule of thumb advice ever given, “If something doesn’t make sense all you have to do is follow the money and you’ll get your answer.”
 

Euclis20

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 3, 2004
8,256
Imaginationland
Obviously it hasn't hurt the Nuggets so far in the playoffs, but I found this contrast interesting:

Jokic's 2023 on/off in the regular season: +21.9 per 100 possessions
Jokic's 2023 on/off in the playoffs: -19.1 per 100 possessions
 

Tony C

Moderator
Moderator
SoSH Member
Apr 13, 2000
13,719
Yes 100%. Curry is being denied by two players so unlikely he even touches the ball again and Poole has a clean look. If anything the problem I saw is that he wasn’t expecting the ball to swing to him so he wasn’t in shooting rhythm on receipt so bad on him there….but once he gets it that’s a shot he has to take.
A lot of the criticism I've been reading is that he had space (and time) to move forward 3-5 feet and still take the 3 pointer. I think that's silly. Yes he was wide open but Vanderbilt covers ground quickly and was moving toward him. In the same time it would have taken Poole to move forward Vanderbilt would have had time to get there to contest.

The other point being made is he should have passed to Wiggins under the basket for an easy 2 and then try fouling. I don't see that either.
 

slamminsammya

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2006
9,428
San Francisco
A lot of the criticism I've been reading is that he had space (and time) to move forward 3-5 feet and still take the 3 pointer. I think that's silly. Yes he was wide open but Vanderbilt covers ground quickly and was moving toward him. In the same time it would have taken Poole to move forward Vanderbilt would have had time to get there to contest.

The other point being made is he should have passed to Wiggins under the basket for an easy 2 and then try fouling. I don't see that either.
Taking a dribble forward also breaks the rhythm of catch and shoot which is a thing.
 

TripleOT

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 4, 2007
7,783
I was just going to say this. Between the unnatural rhythm and giving the Lakers time to close out the take a dribble in option wasn’t an option.
I watched the play live, and I haven’t seen the replay, but my thought at the time was Poole could have set up a little closer to the line in anticipation of the swing of the ball once the Curry double team was being implemented
 

HomeRunBaker

bet squelcher
SoSH Member
Jan 15, 2004
30,391
I watched the play live, and I haven’t seen the replay, but my thought at the time was Poole could have set up a little closer to the line in anticipation of the swing of the ball once the Curry double team was being implemented
Yes absolutely and I mentioned that yesterday. It was almost like he was shocked that the ball swung to him which is inexcusable in that situation.