2023 Jets: Hello Darkness Retreat, My Old Friend

AlNipper49

Huge Member
Dope
SoSH Member
Apr 3, 2001
44,984
Mtigawi
There is absolutely no way that hey Vikings would be open to trading Cousins. They have MVP candidate and the best WR in football talking contract. Where did this rumor start?
 

DennyDoyle'sBoil

Found no thrill on Blueberry Hill
SoSH Member
Sep 9, 2008
43,380
AZ
Brissett is also a Commander, the players cited were possible targets for acquisition, not necessarily free agents.
I’ve never seen a trade for a QB2 that was just signed. Panthers gave him $8 million guaranteed. I mean, anything is possible if the Panthers decide to tank early, but this seems in the same universe as Carr or Brady. I guess the Jets may be more motivated, but this seems unlikely to say the least.
 

rodderick

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 24, 2009
12,965
Belo Horizonte - Brazil
I’ve never seen a trade for a QB2 that was just signed. Panthers gave him $8 million guaranteed. I mean, anything is possible if the Panthers decide to tank early, but this seems in the same universe as Carr or Brady. I guess the Jets may be more motivated, but this seems unlikely to say the least.
Have you seen many teams with Super Bowl aspirations and a very talented roster lose their starter for the year in the first series? And this isn't exactly like Brady 2008 when you know you'll have a lot more shots once the guy returns either. I think everything is on the table for the Jets.
 

Brohamer of the Gods

Well-Known Member
Silver Supporter
SoSH Member
Jul 14, 2005
4,005
Warwick, RI
Not sure how the cap works out on it but Stafford probably falls into the same pipe dream category as acquiring Cousins.

The Rams just blew out the Seahawks and I doubt McVay came back to tank but they have a pretty bad roster overall that has/had bottom 5 in the league potential. McVay may squeeze 7-9 wins out of them but if it really went sideways early Stafford would be an interesting trade candidate.
According to the web, the Rams would save $1.5 million this year trading Stafford, but would be on the dead cap hook for $18.5 million each of the next three years. Which seems less than ideal.
 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
35,105
It can never happen because of the history, but I actually think Darnold would be really good in that offense.

Also, as someone who has worked in sports media on the league side, I still can't believe they let the "ghosts" video go live on air. David Stern would have had someone killed for that.
Beyond the history they're a few weeks too late. SF is a title frontrunner who has had QB injuries about 5 straight years, you needed to get Darnold before they let Lance go.


Based on where their teams are in terms of compeitiveness and other QBs, I'd guess the list of QBs actually available for trade are:
Available:
Mason Rudolph
Case Keenum
Nathan Peterman
Gardner Minshew
Brandon Allen?



If you overpay enough
Kyler
Jameis
Heinke (maybe)
 

Dogman

Yukon Cornelius
Moderator
SoSH Member
Mar 19, 2004
15,228
Missoula, MT
If it’s any consolation, the Jets are now number one all time in opening week overtime wins when their starting QB tears his achilles on the opening drive.
This is one example of many of the snide comments made on this board about Rodgers tearing his ACL without completing a pass for the Jets.

So this board isn't allowed to root for injuries (I think it was a conversation around Tyreke Hill) but this board can mock injuries because it's about the Jets? People get pissed at Miami fans because they are unrepentant trolls. But then people do the exact same things towards the Jets.

Pretty lame. Way to punch up people.
Agreed. Let's not do this. Yeah, there were many jokes in the game thread but let's not troll here.
 

Hoya81

Member
SoSH Member
Feb 3, 2010
8,507
Beyond the history they're a few weeks too late. SF is a title frontrunner who has had QB injuries about 5 straight years, you needed to get Darnold before they let Lance go.


Based on where their teams are in terms of compeitiveness and other QBs, I'd guess the list of QBs actually available for trade are:
Available:
Mason Rudolph
Case Keenum
Nathan Peterman
Gardner Minshew
Brandon Allen?



If you overpay enough
Kyler
Jameis
Heinke (maybe)
Minshew or Keenum seem like your best bets, but Indy and Houston probably would want something like a 3rd or maybe even a 2nd given how desperate the Jets are.
 

CoffeeNerdness

Member
SoSH Member
Jun 6, 2012
8,933
Jameis on the Jets would be worth it for the entertainment value.
He wouldn't win ya jack shit, but given the names put forth, I'd take a look at him. He's still under 30 and has thrown for 5000+ yards once not so long ago. Let him air it out to Garrett 15 times a game, fuck it. I doubt he fits the Hackett system- whatever that is- but every choice will be severely flawed either way. He'll throw as many picks as Wilson, but it'll be a far more entertaining brand of pick.
 

Cornboy14

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 26, 2001
993
I’ve never seen a trade for a QB2 that was just signed.
Sam Bradford being traded to Minnesota after Teddy Bridgewater gets hurt. Slightly different situation - the Eagles signed Bradford before they made the trade for the pick to draft Wentz. Bradford didn’t sign on to be the #2, and Philly was likely glad to get off the contract once they had Wentz.
 

radsoxfan

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 9, 2009
13,811
I guess my question is, with all the resources available to him, do you think it's possible Rogers may be able to come back some time in late December/early January?
Glad you made it back quickly!

I suppose there is a very small chance they try for 3-4 months (late Dec/early Jan) depending how the season goes for the Jets. Cam Akers was the fastest NFL return I know of, and he was injured mid July and was cleared to return Dec 23rd, slightly over 5 months. Rodgers is almost 2 months behind Akers given his injury date.

There is a big difference between jogging and the movements needed to play NFL football so hard to compare timelines to that. I'm sure Rodgers will push the envelope if he can, and look for whatever Joe-Rogan esque med to shrink that timeline down as much as possible. But it would be very difficult to make it back for the playoffs this season.
 

DennyDoyle'sBoil

Found no thrill on Blueberry Hill
SoSH Member
Sep 9, 2008
43,380
AZ
Have you seen many teams with Super Bowl aspirations and a very talented roster lose their starter for the year in the first series? And this isn't exactly like Brady 2008 when you know you'll have a lot more shots once the guy returns either. I think everything is on the table for the Jets.
Sure, anything is possible. But the Panthers signed Dalton for a decent backup contract to have a playable vet behind their rookie. I just don’t see what happens on the timetable the Jets need to make the Panthers scrap the plan they chose to try to support their hopeful QB of the future. If the Jets can wait things out a bit maybe guys shake loose, but if they feel the need to do something now, this seems unlikely to me, as do many of the ideas here. None of these guys is plug and play.
 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
35,105
Kyler makes sense to trade. Aren't the Cards tanking?
Maybe?
Problem is I think they're smart enough to realize that it's really hard to control a tank, and while Kyler isn't perfect, having him is a lot better than missing out on Williams and not having him.
That team is pretty bad, they can bring Kyler back slowly and still have a real chance of losing enough to have the worst record.
 

rodderick

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 24, 2009
12,965
Belo Horizonte - Brazil
Sure, anything is possible. But the Panthers signed Dalton for a decent backup contract to have a playable vet behind their rookie. I just don’t see what happens on the timetable the Jets need to make the Panthers scrap the plan they chose to try to support their hopeful QB of the future. If the Jets can wait things out a bit maybe guys shake loose, but if they feel the need to do something now, this seems unlikely to me, as do many of the ideas here. None of these guys is plug and play.
Oh for sure, even if they bring someone else in we're talking a month before the guy is acclimated enough to perform adequately, I just think the Jets are likely desperate enough to overpay for guys.
 

luckiestman

Son of the Harpy
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
32,956
I don’t think any major trade will be made. No one is good enough that is available. It will be for a fringe/old guy trade/FA to backup at first and eventually start if Zach looks as bad as last year. Need a Trent Dilfer type guy and probably can’t get it.
 

cshea

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 15, 2006
36,298
306, row 14
Saleh was just quoted as saying Wilson's gonna be the guy for the rest of the year. Maybe it's to keep the price down on any QB acquisition but it's something, anyway.
It was like 20 minutes after the game ended. I don't think he was going to say we're in the market for a QB. Saleh has no choice at the moment and has to manage Wilson, hence the comment, but I'd be stunned if Douglas wasn't making phone calls already.
 

Jimbodandy

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 31, 2006
11,654
around the way
Glad you made it back quickly!

I suppose there is a very small chance they try for 3-4 months (late Dec/early Jan) depending how the season goes for the Jets. Cam Akers was the fastest NFL return I know of, and he was injured mid July and was cleared to return Dec 23rd, slightly over 5 months. Rodgers is almost 2 months behind Akers given his injury date.

There is a big difference between jogging and the movements needed to play NFL football so hard to compare timelines to that. I'm sure Rodgers will push the envelope if he can, and look for whatever Joe-Rogan esque med to shrink that timeline down as much as possible. But it would be very difficult to make it back for the playoffs this season.
On one hand, he can be almost completely immobile at that position with the other abilities that he has. On the other hand, he's really freaking old to bounce back from a traumatic injury like this.

Funny thing is when you say Joe Rogan-esque med, I'm thinking more HGH than Ivermectin.
 

Saints Rest

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Maybe?
Problem is I think they're smart enough to realize that it's really hard to control a tank, and while Kyler isn't perfect, having him is a lot better than missing out on Williams and not having him.
That team is pretty bad, they can bring Kyler back slowly and still have a real chance of losing enough to have the worst record.
If I’m reading Spotrac correctly, Kyler has $97M in dead cap. Not sure what changes if he’s traded.
 

MikeM

Member
SoSH Member
May 27, 2010
3,136
Florida
The difference between Carson Wentz and Zach Wilson is about 7 million dollars.
Wentz has a pretty large sample size of success to go with his failures at the NFL level. He was an above average level full season QB as recent as 2 years ago, and which at the core is something we desperately need this year to make any realistic playoff push in a stacked AFC. Zach Wilson has none of that going for him. Zach hasn't even put together 1 single "great" game in NFL yet, and with absolutely nothing at this point but sunk cost fallacy to suggest he's capable of even making the jump from talented immature frat boy beating up teams on the college level to adequate starting quarterback you can depend on in the NFL.

The Jets are coming off the worst GM'd offseasons in my 30 years of following the team. Infinite amounts of koolaid was drunk to justify a lot of that away, and ultimately in the name of giving this once in a generation (for us) type of defense a shot carrying a team to a playoff win or 2. If we did all that just to punt the ball away when the 40yo declining QB name value gets hurt...jesus. We've gone this far with it. Even now being stuck behind the 8-ball with the literal worst OC hire in NFL history you might as well go the distance and throw up the hail mary pass with Wentz.

You need to get the ball rolling on that transition now though. As in today. Waiting a week to "first see how Zach does against one of the best defensive fronts in the NFL" is just piling on more fail imo. We already know how that story ends without seeing it. It's why we abandoned all that common sense this past off-season in the first place.
 

BigJimEd

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 4, 2002
4,474
If I’m reading Spotrac correctly, Kyler has $97M in dead cap. Not sure what changes if he’s traded.
Spotrac shows it by clicking on the "x" in the last column on the contract details tab.

POST-6/1 TRADE
2023 Dead Cap: $13,007,000
2024 Dead Cap: $46,221,000
2023 Cap Savings: $3,000,000
 
Last edited:

joe dokes

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
30,716
On one hand, he can be almost completely immobile at that position with the other abilities that he has. On the other hand, he's really freaking old to bounce back from a traumatic injury like this.
IANAQB, but I think that sort of transition is likely easier said than done.
 

Frisbetarian

♫ ♫ ♫ ♫ ♫ ♫
Moderator
SoSH Member
Dec 3, 2003
5,285
Off the beaten track
Bro. Even at YOUR geriatric age, you run circles around AR with your fitness, let alone your pitbull mentality. AR has been flirting with retirement for a bit. Who knows how interested he is in this type of recovery process.

(Love you, miss you)
Thanks, hermano. Miss you, too. I'm in Gloucester until mid October before heading south of the border again. If you're in the area let me know.

Glad you made it back quickly!

I suppose there is a very small chance they try for 3-4 months (late Dec/early Jan) depending how the season goes for the Jets. Cam Akers was the fastest NFL return I know of, and he was injured mid July and was cleared to return Dec 23rd, slightly over 5 months. Rodgers is almost 2 months behind Akers given his injury date.

There is a big difference between jogging and the movements needed to play NFL football so hard to compare timelines to that. I'm sure Rodgers will push the envelope if he can, and look for whatever Joe-Rogan esque med to shrink that timeline down as much as possible. But it would be very difficult to make it back for the playoffs this season.
This makes perfect sense. Thanks.
 

jarules1185

New Member
Jul 14, 2005
622
What's tough about this as a Jets fan is that I was excited to watch a good quarterback play, and I actually personally didn't even see a single snap.

I think most NFL fans with a functional brain know that even if you're a top 5 contender, your chances of making / winning a Super Bowl are pretty low, and that the Jets were almost certainly not a top 5 contender anyway. I honestly didn't get invested at all in a Super Bowl or deep playoff run. I was just excited to watch good quarterback play, which we've literally never had. What we HAVE had is back to back AFC title games with Sanchez, and those were only so entertaining, because the exercise of constantly covering for his giant weaknesses and hoping for luck was exhausting and doomed and everyone knew it.

Since the half season of Favre where he was pretty solid until he got hurt, it's been Sanchez to Geno to Darnold to Wilson, with significant runs with backups / journeymen sprinkled in. And for decades before that, it was mediocrity at best.

I think watching the NFL as a fan in the current era has a ceiling on how fun it is, and that ceiling is pretty much directly tied to QB play level. Just being able to enjoy competence and maybe even excellence at QB was all I really wanted out of the year. I figured he'd get hurt in week 8 but that we'd have had some fun times before then.
 

Return of the Dewey

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 17, 2001
3,136
Pants Party
Wentz has a pretty large sample size of success to go with his failures at the NFL level. He was an above average level full season QB as recent as 2 years ago, and which at the core is something we desperately need this year to make any realistic playoff push in a stacked AFC. Zach Wilson has none of that going for him. Zach hasn't even put together 1 single "great" game in NFL yet, and with absolutely nothing at this point but sunk cost fallacy to suggest he's capable of even making the jump from talented immature frat boy beating up teams on the college level to adequate starting quarterback you can depend on in the NFL.

The Jets are coming off the worst GM'd offseasons in my 30 years of following the team. Infinite amounts of koolaid was drunk to justify a lot of that away, and ultimately in the name of giving this once in a generation (for us) type of defense a shot carrying a team to a playoff win or 2. If we did all that just to punt the ball away when the 40yo declining QB name value gets hurt...jesus. We've gone this far with it. Even now being stuck behind the 8-ball with the literal worst OC hire in NFL history you might as well go the distance and throw up the hail mary pass with Wentz.

You need to get the ball rolling on that transition now though. As in today. Waiting a week to "first see how Zach does against one of the best defensive fronts in the NFL" is just piling on more fail imo. We already know how that story ends without seeing it. It's why we abandoned all that common sense this past off-season in the first place.
Even if their plan is to go with Wilson, and even if Wilson is average, I expect him to get injured at some point. The state of OL, along with Wilson's penchant for running/taking hits, almost makes it a certainty. There were a couple times last night when Wilson got flushed out of the pocket because of bad protection, and then exposed himself to some really bad hits that I thought would knock him out of the game. It's just another indication of the lack of football smarts by Wilson...he should've known that there was no backup QB last night, and stopped trying to hero-ball it.

Personally, I'd see if you could coax Matt Ryan to come out of retirement, as I see him as the one with the best chance to "game manage" this offense into a playoff position. That being said, I wouldn't be surprised if Wentz is the FA that they sign.
 

MikeM

Member
SoSH Member
May 27, 2010
3,136
Florida
Jameis on the Jets would be worth it for the entertainment value.
Jameis has shown flashes of improvement the last few years (when he's managed to actually avoid injury) from his gung slinging days in Tampa. I was potentially interested in taking an asset free flyer on him this past winter before we went completely off the rails chasing after Rodgers, and would be so today if the acquisition cost happened to be minimal.

That said the majority of trade targets being discussed here so far are fairly unrealistic atm/imo. As far as non free agents go you have maybe Tannehill out there i could see being traded, but that's likely it and I that is a lot of money involved to make it work.
 

amfox1

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Aug 6, 2003
6,839
The back of your computer
Rodgers made $18.75mm per play in his Jets career.

Cap hits:
2023: $8,888,888
2024 $17,161,112 ($66,161,112 if he retires, which presumably can be spread over two years if he retires after June 1, 2024)
 

joe dokes

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
30,716
Last edited:

doc

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 14, 2005
4,501
Hey Ryan Fitzpatrick was in those Draftkings commercials all night, maybe he has something left in the tank
 

luckiestman

Son of the Harpy
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
32,956
One of the worst things about this is that it didn’t have to happen. Some of this is on the man himself. The LT cut block and the ball is supposed to come out, why didn’t he throw it. What a disaster

70756
 

Kenny F'ing Powers

posts way less than 18% useful shit
SoSH Member
Nov 17, 2010
14,511
According to the web, the Rams would save $1.5 million this year trading Stafford, but would be on the dead cap hook for $18.5 million each of the next three years. Which seems less than ideal.
Is it only $18.5? I'm seeing a dead cap hit of $86.5M next season and $37M the season after on Sportrac.
 

rodderick

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 24, 2009
12,965
Belo Horizonte - Brazil
One of the worst things about this is that it didn’t have to happen. Some of this is on the man himself. The LT cut block and the ball is supposed to come out, why didn’t he throw it. What a disaster

View attachment 70756
That play was so weird. Not just that he didn't throw the ball, but he stood there completely static, like Cowboys-era Drew Bledsoe just waiting on the rush to arrive.
 

Smiling Joe Hesketh

Throw Momma From the Train
Moderator
SoSH Member
May 20, 2003
36,030
Deep inside Muppet Labs
That play was so weird. Not just that he didn't throw the ball, but he stood there completely static, like Cowboys-era Drew Bledsoe just waiting on the rush to arrive.
IIRC he did that a lot in his final GB years, he was always trying for the long play.

The man is open. No idea why he didn't throw it. It's like he's been immunized to short passes.
 

Jinhocho

Moderator
Moderator
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2001
10,297
Durham, NC
Thanks, hermano. Miss you, too. I'm in Gloucester until mid October before heading south of the border again. If you're in the area let me know.



This makes perfect sense. Thanks.
It also opens the door to a possible Ray Lewis retirement scenario if the Jets are in the mix. Whatever voodoo you can do to come back and retire at the end of the year before you can get called out on it.
 

cshea

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 15, 2006
36,298
306, row 14
One of the worst things about this is that it didn’t have to happen. Some of this is on the man himself. The LT cut block and the ball is supposed to come out, why didn’t he throw it. What a disaster

View attachment 70756
He did the same thing on one of the earlier snaps too and Aikman called out that the tackles cut so the ball was supposed to come out quick but he held on to it.
 

Patriot_Reign

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 21, 2011
1,170
What's tough about this as a Jets fan is that I was excited to watch a good quarterback play, and I actually personally didn't even see a single snap.
Rogers is a narcissistic dummy and I have no love for the Jets but this news sucks. Him joining the team was going to make for a fascinating story to watch all season. Can't imagine what it's like to be a Jets fan :/
 

mcpickl

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 23, 2007
4,557
According to the web, the Rams would save $1.5 million this year trading Stafford, but would be on the dead cap hook for $18.5 million each of the next three years. Which seems less than ideal.
Stafford was the first guy I thought of, but those dead cap hits wouldn't get paid out over the next three years if traded. They'd all accelerate on to this years cap.

His cap hit now is 20M, would jump to 74M if traded.

They can't do it.
 

luckiestman

Son of the Harpy
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
32,956
He did the same thing on one of the earlier snaps too and Aikman called out that the tackles cut so the ball was supposed to come out quick but he held on to it.
Yeah, Becton cut on the right side and the ball didn’t come out.
 

luckiestman

Son of the Harpy
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
32,956
Stafford is like a pipe dream or something. I’m thinking more like Wentz or Jacoby (if he can be had for a draft pick with upside on it)
 

Brohamer of the Gods

Well-Known Member
Silver Supporter
SoSH Member
Jul 14, 2005
4,005
Warwick, RI
Is it only $18.5? I'm seeing a dead cap hit of $86.5M next season and $37M the season after on Sportrac.
As always, these things are tough to figure out. When you click for more info on Spotrac for a trade post 6/1 2023 it says this so it looks like the 3x $18.5 million would hit next year.

2023 Dead Cap: $18,500,000
2024 Dead Cap: $55,500,000
2023 Cap Savings: $1,500,000
 

Euclis20

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 3, 2004
8,374
Imaginationland
The Jets were 7th in super bowl odds (+1600), basically a punchers chance, and large chunk of that is based on the idea that Rodgers could provide them with pro-bowl level QB play. Other than Tom Brady, there is no one in the entire world not already on an NFL team who can provide that for them this year. Any move they make has to be with an eye towards the future. If that means giving Zach Wilson one more try, so be it. If they actually like one of the free agents or backups under 30 somewhere else with upside, go for it. Giving up future assets (or killing future cap space) for an older QB in a win now move would be just terrible.
 

wade boggs chicken dinner

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 26, 2005
31,012
Based on where their teams are in terms of compeitiveness and other QBs, I'd guess the list of QBs actually available for trade are:
Available:
Mason Rudolph
Case Keenum
Nathan Peterman
Gardner Minshew
Brandon Allen?



If you overpay enough
Kyler
Jameis
Heinke (maybe)
Josh Johnson is available. Has he played for the Jets? He seems like he's played on every other team.