Listen you will all love this signing when Bill runs the Flexbone offense for the entire game in week 10 Sunday Night primetime against the Ravens.
No you are not. This is a depth / upside move. If Newton can play, then this helps ensure that Belichick can put an NFL starting-caliber QB on the field. Hoyer is replacement-level at best.Am I the only one seeing that Stidham/Newton > Stidham/Hoyer?
I posted this in the free agency thread, but thought it might be a better fit here:
I thought the same of Newton before but now I'm not so sure - if he'd sign a very team-friendly deal. His career completion of 59.6% is close to Andrew Luck's 60.8% (although, to be fair, it's also close to Blake Bortles - 59.3%) and I've always liked Luck. The interesting thing to me is that Cam posted a career high completion percentage, 67.9%, in 2018 which dwarfed his previous high of 61.7 in 2013. I'm guessing McCaffrey might have been a good-sized factor in the uptick and McC's skillset plays directly into the strength of McD's current offense. Perhaps there's some room for a mid-late career renaissance - especially with the wind of the GOAT HC and a top notch OC at your back. Cam's market is shaping up nicely for the Pats too. I'm liking the idea of adding Newton a lot more than I did a few days ago (although I may still be dazed by TB's departure). More time to evaluate Stidham too.
I'll add that I'm also perfectly fine with going forward with Stidham and let it play out that way. Brave New World.
J.D. Martinez. Of course mobility isn't much of his game.No. Has there ever been a profesional athlete to come back from a Linsfranc injury to play at a high level?
Nah, I love it.Nor Colin Kaepernick. Chad Finn will be heartbroken
According to Chris Simms' QB rankings, the Pats just added the 10th best quarterback in the NFL for league minimum salary.No you are not. This is a depth / upside move. If Newton can play, then this helps ensure that Belichick can put an NFL starting-caliber QB on the field. Hoyer is replacement-level at best.
If it's close between them, Belichick is starting Stidham.
Not just qb. The Fish rotted from the head down. That's a big difference between the 2 franchises.I suppose I don’t understand the logic. Cam isn’t a long term solution. Stidham probably isn’t, but now you’re likely relegating him to QB2, and you won’t find out if he’s any good or not.
And they likely are going to play themselves well out of range of Trevor Lawrence and probably Justin Fields.
As a long time fan of a team with mediocre QBs, this exactly where you don’t want to be.
The other issue with tanking is that players hit free agency so fast in the NFL that, unless you have no talent on hand whatsoever, or are able to tank for just one and only one year, it can quickly get counterproductive.There is no reason to think that being bad helps you get a franchise QB unless you are going to be top 3 bad (and even then you need to be lucky).
I think health is the only question mark here, but it is a significant one.So I watched Cam Newton 2018 highlights. He got hurt last year, and no idea where he's at physically now, but 2018 seems close enough to have an idea of where he'd be if he were healthy.
But if he can return to 2018 form, still a v good player.
- Impressed w his speed...always had a majestic stride and still does. Not as fast as he once was, but still very fast, esp for his 245-250lb frame.
- Strength: league of his own... Sometimes guys hit him and he just goes nowhere. In frame & mobility, seems more like a move TE
- Still ability to make some nice cuts, though you can tell they're an effort
- Arm...nearly all the passes I saw were straight shots, with very little to no arc whatsoever, so still seems like the way to beat him is to box him in the pocket.
https://www.pennmedicine.org/news/news-releases/2015/march/most-nfl-players-with-injuriesNearly 93 percent of National Football League (NFL) athletes who sustained traumatic injuries to the midfoot returned to competition less than 15 months after injury and with no statistically significant decrease in performance, according to new research from the Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania.
The findings, which focus on Lisfranc injuries – characterized by fracture of the midfoot bones and/or disruption of the midfoot ligaments – between 2000-2010, were presented today at the American Association of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) annual conference in Las Vegas.
The Pats receivers aren’t underwhelming??Cam for the minimum? Sign me up. LFG! And he’s used to throwing to an underwhelming and/or young group.
Cam also adds a running element to them that they could use. If he’s not healthy and/or he can’t fit in then he’s gone. So stoked they signed him.
If they are going to a SF style offense even ran in EP having a mobile QB like Cam is a real asset.
Cams had seasons where his best receiver was Kelvin Benjamin. Building on his short game from 2 seasons ago with James White and Julian Edelman? I think hell be solid.The Pats receivers aren’t underwhelming??
But in seriousness, while I have never liked Cam, and was all aboard the Stidham train, I am intrigued. End of the day sports is entertainment and this has potential to be highly entertaining.
I know, just pointing out that we’ve all been trashing on the skill position talent all offseason.Cams had seasons where his best receiver was Kelvin Benjamin. Building on his short game from 2 seasons ago with James White and Julian Edelman? I think hell be solid.
Not only that but the Pats offensive line looks to be much better than what he's had in Carolina. The Panthers haven't had a single good OT on either side of that line for the past 5 years or so.Cams had seasons where his best receiver was Kelvin Benjamin. Building on his short game from 2 seasons ago with James White and Julian Edelman? I think hell be solid.
To me this is a big plus with Cam versus, say, Andy Dalton. Cam has helmed offenses that were average or better with suspect receivers. Dalton's play dips a lot if he doesn't have a good supporting cast. I think both of them ended up in situations that make sense.I know, just pointing out that we’ve all been trashing on the skill position talent all offseason.
Not even a game into the post-Brady era and this? It’s been a long 20 years for you, hUnh?Where are the Stidham truthers?
Soden is a bum. He should be ignored and considered a troll. He's never been anything but a troll. Maybe 2020 is Miami's year, though.Not even a game into the post-Brady era and this? It’s been a long 20 years for you, hUnh?
Yeah, BB really hates it when people are pissy with the media after a loss.I can't wait to see BB's reaction after a loss and Cam's pouty press conference. I can't see how they are going to get along unless Cam had a humility implant put in.
Most of the quotes from the Panthers in the offseason last year said that his deep ball and shoulder seemed to be in great shape. Bill Barnwell highlighted that he seemed to be airing the ball deep over peoples heads during the season because he was hesitant to land on his foot, but his shoulder seemed fine. I don't remember a single snap of Newtons, so just relaying what Barnwell wrote.Hopefully Cam can throw the ball. Last year, it looked like he was throwing an anvil. The foot is secondary to the shoulder.
That said, I love this signing. Cam, if healthy, is fantastic. If he's not healthy, it will be pretty obvious. This is an awesome move, for almost nothing.
Im just quoting you because you're the last person to discuss it.In Stidham/Newton vs. Stidham/Hoyer debate, I also consider the playing styles and offensive packages. Stidham and Newton have a much similar physical styles than Stidham/Hoyer, so there is a lot less change in package if they switch QB mid-stream. Also, Newton might have more to contribute in mentoring Stidham.
From what I can recall, people were saying in training camp the zip on his throws was back and he was pushing the ball down field. Then he had the foot injury and clearly wasn’t fully planting his foot and was sailing all of his throws.Hopefully Cam can throw the ball. Last year, it looked like he was throwing an anvil. The foot is secondary to the shoulder.
That said, I love this signing. Cam, if healthy, is fantastic. If he's not healthy, it will be pretty obvious. This is an awesome move, for almost nothing.
I get the point that's being made here about opportunity cost as it relates to Stidham. But for most franchises, what the future holds at the QB position is... mediocre QB play. Whatever a team can do to hedge on that purgatory is worth doing, if it's affordable. There seems to be a heighted expectation in this thread that starting Stidham this year would yield a tidy binary outcome, where either he's great and the QB position is solved for the next decade, or he's terrible and the team cuts bait and drafts someone new. What's much more likely is that he flashes some skills, shows some weaknesses... and then we spend the next several seasons watching him address some of those weaknesses but fail to address others and basically evolve into another adequate-but-not-great QB. It's not a knock on Stidham, it's just what generally happens.I was anxious for the Stidham era for the same reason as everyone else. It would be good to know what the future held at the QB position.
And the part that is getting lost is that Bill pulled this off with $680,000 in cap space and without making any other moves. If Cam is great it sounds like it will cost up to $7.5 million in cap space but deferred to next year because it is NLTBE. We have the room next year. This was an incredible coup. People are in denial about the Patriots’ cap situation.Most of the quotes from the Panthers in the offseason last year said that his deep ball and shoulder seemed to be in great shape. Bill Barnwell highlighted that he seemed to be airing the ball deep over peoples heads during the season because he was hesitant to land on his foot, but his shoulder seemed fine. I don't remember a single snap of Newtons, so just relaying what Barnwell wrote.
Im just quoting you because you're the last person to discuss it.
With the full knowledge that teams haven't been able to give Cam a physical, IF Cam is healthy, he will be the starting QB for the Patriots this coming season. Full stop.
Both his ceiling and floor are significantly higher than Stidhams. He's proven he can run an NFL offense with: a shitty offensive line, no skill players, and poor offensive ideology. All at the same time. If his injuries are not a concern - and again, I seem to be more confident in that than the rest of the board (also IANAD, so WTF do I know) - this puts the team somewhere between borderline playoff contender to serious SB contender. I feel like the Patriots have been burned so frequently as of late with signings like this, that alot of fans are choosing to view this glass as half empty. Im more optimistic.
I was anxious for the Stidham era for the same reason as everyone else. It would be good to know what the future held at the QB position. But the only thing we Patriots fans were hanging onto as a barometer of Stidhams success was the vote of confidence that BB was giving him as the starter. We can pretend this signing doesnt change that, but it does. Because if Cam is healthy, he will be tabbed as the starter for this team. Its why Cam signed here, and its why BB signed him.
And the upside he provides makes it so worth it.
SB or bust, baby!
Yeah some examples that come to mind are actually first round picks - guys like Tannehill, Mariota, and Winston. Guys that were all taken in the top 10, and yet they all got through their first contracts without anyone really knowing if they were good or not. Hell I STILL don't know if Tannehill is good!I get the point that's being made here about opportunity cost as it relates to Stidham. But for most franchises, what the future holds at the QB position is... mediocre QB play. Whatever a team can do to hedge on that purgatory is worth doing, if it's affordable. There seems to be a heighted expectation in this thread that starting Stidham this year would yield a tidy binary outcome, where either he's great and the QB position is solved for the next decade, or he's terrible and the team cuts bait and drafts someone new. What's much more likely is that he flashes some skills, shows some weaknesses... and then we spend the next several seasons watching him address some of those weaknesses but fail to address others and basically evolve into another adequate-but-not-great QB. It's not a knock on Stidham, it's just what generally happens.
It's so hard to find elite QB play that anything you can do to possibly steal a year of it— at a discount, no less— is worth a shot, IMO.
If Cam has a great year, he'll be looking for $30M+ annually on the open market. I guess I could see the Pats giving him a decent deal, but the more likely scenario is he signs somewhere else.Wildly optimistic take, but the cap situation for '21 and beyond is such that if this works out (health + skill + likes it here) there's really no reason an extension is completely out of the question. Certainly not the most likely scenario, but is that really any less likely than coming out of this year convinced you have the guy in Stidham? No matter how you slice it, the team's chances of good QB play for this year have increased significantly with this move, and I'd argue it gives a similar bump to the chances of good QB play for the next few years.
This is exactly it. If Stidham went 9-7 and showed promise, it doesnt really mean anything for 3 years down the line.Yeah some examples that come to mind are actually first round picks - guys like Tannehill, Mariota, and Winston. Guys that were all taken in the top 10, and yet they all got through their first contracts without anyone really knowing if they were good or not. Hell I STILL don't know if Tannehill is good!
Franchise tag is an option, with the Pats projected to have a ton of 2021 space. Franchise-and-trade not out of the question, either.If Cam has a great year, he'll be looking for $30M+ annually on the open market. I guess I could see the Pats giving him a decent deal, but the more likely scenario is he signs somewhere else.
I was watching the 28-3 game and following along with the SoSH game thread. He popped in a few times to say things like “Maybe Next Year.” It was divine.Soden is a bum. He should be ignored and considered a troll. He's never been anything but a troll. Maybe 2020 is Miami's year, though.
No. It will be for a 3rd round near the beginning of the round and Goodell will rule that THIS is the draft choice that the Pats lose for StupidFilmGateFast forward to mid-season when Belichick trades his backup QB, a semi-healthy Newton, to a contender who's just lost their starting QB for the season, for a conditional 2nd rounder, hearken back to this run on sentence for an I told you so.
Even if they did think Stidham is clearly their franchise QB going forward, is there any actual evidence that him serving as a backup for one more year would harm his development (not saying EJ is suggesting this)? In the absolute best-case scenario, Cam returns to something approximating his former glory and Stidham gets to learn from another former MVP QB (one that, as others have pointed out, is probably closer to Stidham's style than Brady was) before taking the reigns next year. Sure, that would mean his in-game experience would be relatively limited, but another year of NFL seasoning even on the practice field/in the locker room before being the team leader is not nothing.I don't think they are sold on Stidham as heir apparent to Brady, and so I don;t think they are overly concerned about harming Stidham's development.
I agree with this point.Even if they did think Stidham is clearly their franchise QB going forward, is there any actual evidence that him serving as a backup for one more year would harm his development (not saying EJ is suggesting this)? In the absolute best-case scenario, Cam returns to something approximating his former glory and Stidham gets to learn from another former MVP QB (one that, as others have pointed out, is probably closer to Stidham's style than Brady was) before taking the reigns next year. Sure, that would mean his in-game experience would be relatively limited, but another year of NFL seasoning even on the practice field/in the locker room before being the team leader is not nothing.
QFT, with extreme prejudice.Also, rookie QBs are a crapshoot, the idea that tanking (they won't get to 1) to get higher in the first is worth it is dubious when there might not be a single QB drafted next year who is as good as Cam Newton.
2017- Trubisky (2), Mahomes (10), Watson (12)
Mahomes with the 10th pick of the draft is going to go down as one of the greatest draft picks in NFL history.They signed a 32 year old former MVP QB who can potentially be a gigantic mobile play-maker when protection breaks down with an absolute artillery piece for an arm. They did with with only 6 figures worth of cap space. The very worst case scenario is an Albert Haynesworth type exit.
QFT, with extreme prejudice.
Just seeing this in print makes me want to vomit. I can't imagine the sports induced trauma this causes Bears fans.
Yup. And coming at it from the other angle, while those Panthers teams had a good coaching staff, who isn't at least a little bit fascinated by what Cam will look like under BB and JM?It seems that every negative scenario requires as a starting point that the Patriots have a Bengals or Jets-level front office and coaching staff.
Especially for how much they are paying him. If he stinks or is a problem in the locker room, Bill will cut him and roll with Stidham and we're back to where we were a week ago, hoping and praying the kid has what it takes. As OFC said above, one more year on the bench isn't the end of the world for Stidham.The Pats are essentially buying a 3rd round comp pick, with a chance they cut him and get nothing and a chance that they get not only that pick, but pretty good QB play. That's a gamble worth taking in late June.