And the offseason has begun for the Miami Dolphins.
Atleast our tears were delicious last week. Or something like that.
And the offseason has begun for the Miami Dolphins.
Well, someone said they're gonna "cause fits" the rest of the way.It's definitely not Baltimore.
Catch the ball Jimmy Graham though.And also for the Packers.
I smell a new bannerThe Colts are the team nobody wants to play if they make the playoffs.
Throw was behind Graham and he was well covered. That's the risk you run when you have to make a play and can't just throw the ball away when the windows are tight.Catch the ball Jimmy Graham though.
Went back, maybe it was also deflected by a Bear defender.Throw was behind Graham and he was well covered. That's the risk you run when you have to make a play and can't just throw the ball away when the windows are tight.
Rodgers also has double the throw aways than the QB who has the second most. Meh.The 402 attempt with out a pick streak may be the most meaningless “impressive” streak in NFL history. Packers are 4-7 in the 11 games.
Or maybe that knee is not quite right?I know the Bears are good but Rodgers is definitely missing a ton of passes. He's either checked out or just not the same. But he's bad.
When people bring up Miami as the worst loss of the year, they should remember the Jags just lost to Josh Jackson (Johnson?), who lost at home to the Giants by 40 last week.Washington kicks a FG to win. It barely makes it through the left upright. Announcer, "And it goes right down the middle." OK.
Losing Martin is a killer.Dallas has chance to clinch NFC East and instead is shutout for first time in 15 years.
Well, sure, but the Jags' season is over and the Patriots are trying for a #1 seed. In summary, that loss to Miami is WAY worse and it's not even in the same league.When people bring up Miami as the worst loss of the year, they should remember the Jags just lost to Josh Jackson (Johnson?), who lost at home to the Giants by 40 last week.
He's not saying the Jags loss to Skins is worse, he's saying Pats loss to Jags is worse.Well, sure, but the Jags' season is over and the Patriots are trying for a #1 seed. In summary, that loss to Miami is WAY worse and it's not even in the same league.
It was that Super Bowl win hangover. It’s gotta be tough for the Dolphins considering they play two Super Bowls every season and Brady has only ever been to 8.The AFC East is WIDE OPEN
Well close. Josh played only the second half last week, and played well in 40-16 defeat.When people bring up Miami as the worst loss of the year, they should remember the Jags just lost to Josh Jackson (Johnson?), who lost at home to the Giants by 40 last week.
I would submit that with only 2 games to show, Red Zone will likely show almost all of both the Pats and the Seahawk games, only because there is nothing else to show and the commercials are constant. That's a very, very grim situation for the Red Zone.I'm sure that I'm the only one that will give a shit about this, but...
There are 2 late afternoon games: Steelers/Pats & Seahawks/49ers. I realize the Steelers/Pats is a much better game. Everyone in the country can see that game on CBS (except the bay area). The only people watching Hawks/Niners are in the Pacific NW, Northern California and the NYC metro area because the Giants played the early game on CBS. I will guarantee Red Zone will show the Pats game 90% of the time, just because they can. This routinely happens with the late games every week and it just makes no sense. Show more of the games most of the people CAN'T see instead of the one just about everyone can see.
My point was with both games going at the same time, the Pats/Steelers will get 90% of the screen time. And it's been true so far. It should be the other way around.I would submit that with only 2 games to show, Red Zone will likely show almost all of both the Pats and the Seahawk games, only because there is nothing else to show and the commercials are constant. That's a very, very grim situation for the Red Zone.