The only way it isn't a goal is if it went in off his hands or he kicked it .. Neither of these applied .. Obvious goal.Salem's Lot said:If this is Sweden-Switzerland it's no goal.
The only way it isn't a goal is if it went in off his hands or he kicked it .. Neither of these applied .. Obvious goal.Salem's Lot said:If this is Sweden-Switzerland it's no goal.
It landed in the goalies glove and the player entered the crease and propelled the puck out of his glove and into the net. It's goalie interference. No goal.BCsMightyJoeYoung said:Looked like he tried to bunt it and missed .. It hits his thigh and bounced into the net. No way it's not a goal.
He definitely bumped the goalie .. But that's not reviewable ..kenneycb said:It also looked like Demko saved it and then he ran Demko over into the net while having the puck hit his body.
That's simply not true. You are ignoring the goalie interference factor. He can't cause the goal by bowling into the goalieBCsMightyJoeYoung said:The only way it isn't a goal is if it went in off his hands or he kicked it .. Neither of these applied .. Obvious goal.
It did as the puck was going into the net. Watch the goal cam.BCsMightyJoeYoung said:The only way it isn't a goal is if it went in off his hands or he kicked it .. Neither of these applied .. Obvious goal.
He's entitled to the crease, but he's not allowed to move the goalie with his bodyBCsMightyJoeYoung said:He definitely bumped the goalie .. But that's not reviewable ..
Edit : and it's not like he bowled him over. The forward is entitled to be in the crease as that's where the puck was.
It doesn't matter once it went to video review. If there was any goalie interference it was pretty mild .. But they can't review that.twibnotes said:That's simply not true. You are ignoring the goalie interference factor. He can't cause the goal by bowling into the goalie
There was contact with the goaltender that jarred the puck out of his glove and into the net. It's goalie interference. The goalie doesn't have to be bowled over.BCsMightyJoeYoung said:He definitely bumped the goalie .. But that's not reviewable ..
Edit : and it's not like he bowled him over. The forward is entitled to be in the crease as that's where the puck was.
Since when can you not review goalie interference? Did I miss something?BCsMightyJoeYoung said:It doesn't matter once it went to video review. If there was any goalie interference it was pretty mild .. But they can't review that.
Silly that goalie interference is not reviewable. The zebras are staring at a call they missed with no recourseBCsMightyJoeYoung said:It doesn't matter once it went to video review. If there was any goalie interference it was pretty mild .. But they can't review that.
We must be looking at different plays. Mcdavids shot bounced off the goalie and up into the air. The Canadian forward tried to bunt it and , from any view I saw, missed, it his his upper thigh and into the net.Salem's Lot said:There was contact with the goaltender that jarred the puck out of his glove and into the net. It's goalie interference. The goalie doesn't have to be bowled over.
Can you not review goalie interference in this tournament? That's bullshit.twibnotes said:Silly that goalie interference is not reviewable. The zebras are staring at a call they missed with no recourse
I saw it in the glove and then knocked out. We'll agree to disagree.BCsMightyJoeYoung said:We must be looking at different plays. Mcdavids shot bounced off the goalie and up into the air. The Canadian forward tried to bunt it and , from any view I saw, missed, it his his upper thigh and into the net.
They are playing under International rules. The video review is strictly to determine whether the goal was kicked in or batted in with a hand.Salem's Lot said:Since when can you not review goalie interference? Did I miss something?
I assume that's the Canadian BC. I'm a fan of the good BC and America.twibnotes said:Bc and Canada fan? Ugh
Duh.kenneycb said:I assume that's the Canadian BC. I'm a fan of the good BC and America.
What a great observation.Lupe Whalewatch said:I can't fathom how boring the Bruins game will be after this
I dunno, we won the whole damn thing two years ago.twibnotes said:Well that sucks.
USA Hockey in need of some changes? Not great results of late.
Doesn't USA Hockey also have a role in the Olympics? I recall some odd choices for that team (Orpik).kenneycb said:I dunno, we won the whole damn thing two years ago.