Offseason rumors

Status
Not open for further replies.

Max Power

thai good. you like shirt?
SoSH Member
Jul 20, 2005
8,029
Boston, MA
Early in the offseason I posted that I didn't think there was much of a difference in what you could expect from E-Rod and Montgomery going forward. They're about the same age and have similar career FIPs. It never made much sense to me that Montgomery would be getting twice what Eduardo signed for (4 years at $80m total). Maybe he gets a little extra for having a slightly lower walk rate and better recent health, but I'm guessing it ends up being much closer to E-Rod than Nola.
 

Red(s)HawksFan

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 23, 2009
20,947
Maine
It’s a new CBO and business is business, but I found Masa’s at bats in the first half of the season to be appointment viewing. I like appointment viewing. I’m bullish on his bat this season, and I really hope it’s with the Sox. A subsidized trade now would seem to be a very questionable business move, in addition to being a very disappointing one to me.
When I read that team X is "open to trading" any given player, I take it to mean they'll listen if a team calls asking about him but they're not actively trying to move him. So I don't think there's any chance that Yoshida is sent out in a subsidized trade. The intent is for him to be in the lineup on Opening Day (LF or DH) and continue to be in that lineup ~90-95% of the time in 2024. BUT if a team calls up with a compelling offer, Breslow isn't going to hang up immediately.
 

Daniel_Son

Member
SoSH Member
May 25, 2021
1,750
San Diego
Is the part about Yoshida a surprise to anyone though? The Sox gave him a monster deal and apoarently pegged his value at much higher than anyone else- and then he had a 1 win season. Of course his value is lower than it was a year ago, seems likely that they’d have to eat half that deal to move him.
It's disappointing because I think his OBP skills are really valuable but I'm not surprised if Breslow doesn't think as highly of him as Bloom did. Heck, everyone in baseball thought that contract was nuts.
 

simplicio

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 11, 2012
5,314
Early in the offseason I posted that I didn't think there was much of a difference in what you could expect from E-Rod and Montgomery going forward. They're about the same age and have similar career FIPs. It never made much sense to me that Montgomery would be getting twice what Eduardo signed for (4 years at $80m total). Maybe he gets a little extra for having a slightly lower walk rate and better recent health, but I'm guessing it ends up being much closer to E-Rod than Nola.
They both had great years, but I'd lean toward Montgomery being more likely to repeat his, as well as throwing significantly more innings. They both came back from a lost 2020 to throw 157 innings in 2021, but since then Montgomery's made 50% more starts.
 

RS2004foreever

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 15, 2022
671
Scherzer and DeGrom expected back around the trade deadline - perhaps relevant when thinking about the Rangers and Montgomery.
 

Fishy1

Head Mason
SoSH Member
Nov 10, 2006
6,158
It's disappointing because I think his OBP skills are really valuable but I'm not surprised if Breslow doesn't think as highly of him as Bloom did. Heck, everyone in baseball thought that contract was nuts.
It was really weird how his discipline basically disappeared in the second half. It had to just be mental fatigue. A guy who walked 7 or more times per month the first three months walked 7 times in TOTAL the last three months. That boggles my mind. A walk rate under 6% by the end of the year, and he still posted a OBP of .340.

If nothing improves but the plate discipline he's nearly a two win player. A bit of a drag because of the defense but definitely still capable of being a contributor on a winning squad.
 

Max Power

thai good. you like shirt?
SoSH Member
Jul 20, 2005
8,029
Boston, MA
They both had great years, but I'd lean toward Montgomery being more likely to repeat his, as well as throwing significantly more innings. They both came back from a lost 2020 to throw 157 innings in 2021, but since then Montgomery's made 50% more starts.
E-Rod missed most of that time with family issues rather than injury, so his recent health history is better than it seems. Montgomery is obviously a better bet to make all his starts, but is that worth paying him $160 million versus $80? It seems like he thought he was going to ride a playoff hot streak into a 7+ year deal at huge money, but teams aren't buying that he's a top of the rotation guy.
 

absintheofmalaise

too many flowers
Dope
SoSH Member
Mar 16, 2005
23,831
The gran facenda
Physician, you gotta heal yourself here. I DM-ed you about this in regards to my own posts several months ago and when I did you doubled down on your arrogance privately. Maybe it's worth some self-reflection, BringBackMo.
This is not the place for this. Take it to PMs. If BBM doesn't reply, move on.
 

Sandy Leon Trotsky

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 11, 2007
6,491
E-Rod missed most of that time with family issues rather than injury, so his recent health history is better than it seems. Montgomery is obviously a better bet to make all his starts, but is that worth paying him $160 million versus $80? It seems like he thought he was going to ride a playoff hot streak into a 7+ year deal at huge money, but teams aren't buying that he's a top of the rotation guy.
Both he and Snell have deep flaws that is keeping teams away from ace level deals.
Boras is clearly holding out hoping that the remaining teams with the remaining budget space-and I really only see Boston and SF as likely partners- will cave and Boston is putting it out that that they won’t. It actually worked with JD a few years back.
I think they’ll hit at a 5 year with a player opt out after 3 and a team option at 4.
Neither guy would be smart to do a one year deal IMO…. One year older and both have potential down year issues (Montgomery just not pitching as well- higher floor, lower ceiling, and Snell- higher ceiling way lower floor)
 

simplicio

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 11, 2012
5,314
E-Rod missed most of that time with family issues rather than injury, so his recent health history is better than it seems. Montgomery is obviously a better bet to make all his starts, but is that worth paying him $160 million versus $80? It seems like he thought he was going to ride a playoff hot streak into a 7+ year deal at huge money, but teams aren't buying that he's a top of the rotation guy.
"Worth" is hard to pin down. Are the six extra 6-inning starts he made last year "worth" an extra $10m per year? Probably not by $/WAR value, no. But that assumes an infinite supply of guys that can do what he's been reliably doing for the last 3 years, when in practice it's more like 20, and probably only ~10 of those are putting up the consistency of results he has.

When it comes down to it, the team has to fill its 1400+ innings somehow, and that somehow is generally going to involve digging deeper into your depth than you'd like. An extra 36 innings last year could have bought us the "Ort+Robertson" innings, or "Bleier+Barraclough" or "almost all of Kluber's starts". WAR doesn't track that, but losing games outright cause you had to hand the ball to a kid up from AAA or fresh off the waiver wire who wasn't ready and/or good is something we've all seen way too much of the last two years.
 

johnlos

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 22, 2014
250
Both he and Snell have deep flaws that is keeping teams away from ace level deals.
Boras is clearly holding out hoping that the remaining teams with the remaining budget space-and I really only see Boston and SF as likely partners- will cave and Boston is putting it out that that they won’t. It actually worked with JD a few years back.
I think they’ll hit at a 5 year with a player opt out after 3 and a team option at 4.
Neither guy would be smart to do a one year deal IMO…. One year older and both have potential down year issues (Montgomery just not pitching as well- higher floor, lower ceiling, and Snell- higher ceiling way lower floor)
Hope it's true! Does seem like no one wants to lock in 9 figures for either of them. I for one kind of hate watching Snell pitch. Loves to throw 100 pitches in 5 innings. But I'd rather have him than not since the owners have enough money and it wouldn't be hard to sign him and stay under the tax.
 

Petagine in a Bottle

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 13, 2021
12,326
Hmmm….a RH reliever doesn’t seem like an area of need; could they be looking at any of these guys as a starter? Perhaps it means Martin is on the move?
 

nvalvo

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 16, 2005
21,700
Rogers Park
Hmmm….a RH reliever doesn’t seem like an area of need; could they be looking at any of these guys as a starter? Perhaps it means Martin is on the move?
Here's a scenario: what if everyone here is at once right and wrong and the team is both reducing payroll from last year and trying to sign Montgomery? One way to square that circle would be to get cheaper in the bullpen by dealing one or both of Jansen and Martin.

If you could get Montgomery at 5/$120m ($24m AAV), shed Jansen and Martin's contracts (combined AAV: $25m), and replace them with lower-cost veterans (for the combined cost, say, of Martin's AAV), you could arguably improve the team while only raising AAV slightly or so and perhaps net a worthwhile prospect or three in the process.
 

Timduhda

New Member
Feb 14, 2015
16
I”ve been sitting here wondering, like everyone else, what the Sox were attempting to accomplish (besides keeping their salary cap down) this off season. Could they be trying to build like the DBacks? Arizona had an abundance of good young players, in the minors, that played up the middle and slowly let them develop. they were able to to strike a deal for a young 23 year old pitcher who just made the majors (Zac Gallen) for the number 25/26 ranked prospect ( SS Jazz Chisholm). AZ still had Geraldo Perdomo and Blaze Alexander along with a couple of OF Alek Thomas and Jake McCarthy Coming up..AZ also had a young P Merrill Kelly who was expected to be a regular SP, but not the up and coming stud he is now. Boston has the same young talent that plays up the middle and Bello as a SP. AZ didn’t really spend the money for FA until they needed to fill in a few spots.

I”m hoping that now Boston has a GM that knows pitching, he can find that young starter and make a trade to give Boston a second quality starter.

I”m not backing this theory up with numbers or stats, but it is just a thought that crossed my mind. The Sox seem to have a start with Casas and Devers and hopefully they can fill in the rest within the next couple of years.

im sure you won’t see a trade like in 2017 when StL traded Gallen, Sandy Alcantara Magneuris Sierra and Daniel Costano to Miami for Marcel Ozuna, but I”m sure Breslin and Bailey have their sights on some pitchers outside of our purview.

Regarding Yoshida, I wouldn't” trade him just yet. Last year was his first in MLB. The MLB season is longer (162-143) than the Japanese league and he will not be going through stressful game situations by playing in he WBC during spring training, so hopefully he won’t burn out the last couple of months.

Just my thoughts.
 

Petagine in a Bottle

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 13, 2021
12,326
Here's a scenario: what if everyone here is at once right and wrong and the team is both reducing payroll from last year and trying to sign Montgomery? One way to square that circle would be to get cheaper in the bullpen by dealing one or both of Jansen and Martin.

If you could get Montgomery at 5/$120m ($24m AAV), shed Jansen and Martin's contracts (combined AAV: $25m), and replace them with lower-cost veterans (for the combined cost, say, of Martin's AAV), you could arguably improve the team while only raising AAV slightly or so and perhaps net a worthwhile prospect or three in the process.
Sounds ideal, but is shedding Jansen and Martin’s contracts realistic?
 

TonyPenaNeverJuiced

Member
SoSH Member
Jun 7, 2015
321
Ryne Stanek used to start and wasn’t bad. Any chance they could be thinking to use him in the rotation?
Stanek was an opener, hence the GS stat. His limit was 2.0ip. Since leaving the Rays and "converting" to a normal, non-opening reliever, he's almost exclusively 1ip/appearance.
 

nvalvo

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 16, 2005
21,700
Rogers Park
Sounds ideal, but is shedding Jansen and Martin’s contracts realistic?
I think so, yes.

Both are coming off great seasons, and the contracts aren't unreasonable at all. Hader just got $95m, and was rumored to have a number of interested teams. Texas just gave David Robertson the same money Martin is owed, who — believe it or not — is *even older* than Martin and has worse recent results. The Rangers and Astros are probably out after those signings, but I'd imagine the Padres, Phillies, and Cubs would likely be interested, maybe Arizona.
 

loneredseat

New Member
Dec 8, 2023
81
I think so, yes.

Both are coming off great seasons, and the contracts aren't unreasonable at all. Hader just got $95m, and was rumored to have a number of interested teams. Texas just gave David Robertson the same money Martin is owed, who — believe it or not — is *even older* than Martin and has worse recent results. The Rangers and Astros are probably out after those signings, but I'd imagine the Padres, Phillies, and Cubs would likely be interested, maybe Arizona.
I like the idea of trading Jansen and Martin if it means signing Montgomery but I don't think you're getting anything for them without paying for some of their salary (especially Jansen's).
The trade simulator has both of their values as slightly negative.
 

Daniel_Son

Member
SoSH Member
May 25, 2021
1,750
San Diego
If we do sign Monty, that means we're probably competing in 2024, which means we'd want to hang onto Jansen and Martin, right?

Quite the conundrum...
 

YTF

Member
SoSH Member
Early in the offseason I posted that I didn't think there was much of a difference in what you could expect from E-Rod and Montgomery going forward. They're about the same age and have similar career FIPs. It never made much sense to me that Montgomery would be getting twice what Eduardo signed for (4 years at $80m total). Maybe he gets a little extra for having a slightly lower walk rate and better recent health, but I'm guessing it ends up being much closer to E-Rod than Nola.
IMO, Montgomery won't get twice what Rodriguez got. One thing we have to remember is that while it is fun to compare players, in this case E-Rod signed early to play where he felt comfortable playing. No way to tell how much or if he would have gotten more had he waited, but I think it's something to consider in this particular off season.
 

DennyDoyle'sBoil

Found no thrill on Blueberry Hill
SoSH Member
Sep 9, 2008
43,045
AZ
What does “industry officials” even mean here?” I guess I read it as “Boras.”

It seems like weird reporting. Like some front office guy in the White Sox looks at the list of free agents and tells a reporter that it seems like the Red Sox need starting pitching?

I’m not trying to wade into the debate being had on the board. I’m more just trying to understand the mechanics of the reporting. Are reporters and “industry officials” just talking baseball at lunch? This all seems so agenda driven.

I said it a month ago, but it feels to me like there is a media game of chicken being played by Boras and one or more clubs, and we seem to get caught up in each of mini dramas as we fit it into narratives. “Industry officials opine” a player is a fit for a team is such an absurd concept to even contemplate as actually reporting actual information.
 

chawson

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
4,678
Nightengale saying now that Snell is looking for 9 years, $270 million.

Two-time Cy Young award winner Blake Snell’s lone offer was a six-year, $150 million deal from the New York Yankees after Snell requested $270 million over nine years.

Also that Bellinger and J.D. Martinez haven’t received contract offers at all (as of Saturday night).
 

Yaz4Ever

MemBer
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 10, 2004
11,292
MA-CA-RI-AZ-NC
IF I was interested in Snell (I'm not), I'd offer him 4/130 with no opt-outs and see if he bit. Higher AAV and gives him 1 more shot for a payday. This is assuming the only offer he's received so far really is the Yankees offer.

I would not mind JD Martinez back as our RHH bat. IF we decide to move Duran and Bellinger would accept a 2-3 year deal, get him to bridge to the youngsters.

Once we sign/trade for a number 1 starter, we can try to kick the tires on deals like those, though.
 

HfxBob

New Member
Nov 13, 2005
634
Nightengale saying now that Snell is looking for 9 years, $270 million.

Two-time Cy Young award winner Blake Snell’s lone offer was a six-year, $150 million deal from the New York Yankees after Snell requested $270 million over nine years.

Also that Bellinger and J.D. Martinez haven’t received contract offers at all (as of Saturday night).
At this point it seems fair to question if Boras seriously misread the market this year, considering how many of his big name guys remaining unsigned, and looking at that obviously unrealistic ask by Snell.
 

sezwho

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 20, 2005
2,020
Isle of Plum
He didn't misread the market so much as he's had trouble creating one. You could read the whole "I want to pitch in this location" idea as an attempt to add interest from a team that otherwise would not have been bidding on that particular player.
I think it’s possible he may have overplayed his hand. Much like the Sox offseason, it’s clearly still in the balance.

He needs to show up for all his clients, or maybe the next one thinks he’s overextended. Playing four dimensional chess/chicken with multiple pitchers may actually force teams to plan without you.
 

6-5 Sadler

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
218
We’ll see I guess but Boras has a pretty good track record that I wouldn’t bet against. I think a scenario that’s just as plausible is that Monty/Snell already have homes and Boras is just trying to extract the most he can before signing. The value in having both Monty/Snell as clients is that he knows what offers are out there for both. There is no chance for the interested teams to pivot to someone else as all the other quality free agent SPs are signed and the trade market seems frozen.
 

Red(s)HawksFan

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 23, 2009
20,947
Maine
We’ll see I guess but Boras has a pretty good track record that I wouldn’t bet against. I think a scenario that’s just as plausible is that Monty/Snell already have homes and Boras is just trying to extract the most he can before signing. The value in having both Monty/Snell as clients is that he knows what offers are out there for both. There is no chance for the interested teams to pivot to someone else as all the other quality free agent SPs are signed and the trade market seems frozen.
It's possible, if not likely, that the trade market for pitching is "frozen" because Montgomery and Snell are still unsigned. If there are four teams that might want to trade for Cease (for example), and three of them are also in on Montgomery and/or Snell, it would be more beneficial for the White Sox to wait until those guys sign and then pit the remaining teams against one another.
 

chawson

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
4,678
Both he and Snell have deep flaws that is keeping teams away from ace level deals.
Boras is clearly holding out hoping that the remaining teams with the remaining budget space-and I really only see Boston and SF as likely partners- will cave and Boston is putting it out that that they won’t. It actually worked with JD a few years back.
I think they’ll hit at a 5 year with a player opt out after 3 and a team option at 4.
Neither guy would be smart to do a one year deal IMO…. One year older and both have potential down year issues (Montgomery just not pitching as well- higher floor, lower ceiling, and Snell- higher ceiling way lower floor)
This is an interesting thought and seems like a common Boras pivot when he doesn’t find the right long-term deal. But I wonder how useful it would be with someone like Montgomery, a 31-year-old with no QO attached coming off a career year.

A five year deal with an opt out after three years doesn’t seem especially valuable to him. It’s an uphill bet he’d find a great market again in three years, and he’d potentially have a QO attached then (unlike now).

I suppose if he really, really wants Texas above all other options, he could do some sort of one-year deal, or creatively structured lengthier deal with an opt out after one, and then Texas could revisit him after Scherzer, Heaney and (maybe) Eovaldi are off the books and their tv deal is settled. But that’d be risky for him, and I don’t see a team agreeing to more than two years on the back end.

In any case, he’ll be fine.
 

chawson

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
4,678
It's possible, if not likely, that the trade market for pitching is "frozen" because Montgomery and Snell are still unsigned. If there are four teams that might want to trade for Cease (for example), and three of them are also in on Montgomery and/or Snell, it would be more beneficial for the White Sox to wait until those guys sign and then pit the remaining teams against one another.
I’m not a big Bob guy but he also had a note about Cease in the piece that ran late last night:

The Seattle Mariners have quietly entered trade talks with the Chicago White Sox for ace Dylan Cease, with the White Sox seeking a package centered around young starter Bryce Miller or Bryan Woo.

Seems odd, from the M’s side.
 

LogansDad

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 15, 2006
29,814
Alamogordo
We’ll see I guess but Boras has a pretty good track record that I wouldn’t bet against. I think a scenario that’s just as plausible is that Monty/Snell already have homes and Boras is just trying to extract the most he can before signing. The value in having both Monty/Snell as clients is that he knows what offers are out there for both. There is no chance for the interested teams to pivot to someone else as all the other quality free agent SPs are signed and the trade market seems frozen.
Do you mean, like, they have a handshake agreement with some team and Boras is just waiting to see how much more he can get from them? This just doesn't make sense to me. Why would any team just wait around thinking, but not knowing, they could be putting $20M+ over multiple years on their books, but it isn't a done deal yet? I am sure there are offers from multiple teams, but I highly doubt that either of them have an offer that Boras has said, "Yeah, we will sign that, but give me time". Maybe I am reading your post wrong, but I just don't think any team would let Boras hold them hostage like that, and if they are, then whoever is in charge should probably be fired.

I think more likely is that most teams are actually really smart and see what a lot of people here see, that these are two very good, but flawed pitchers. You are signing peak Verlander or Scherzer here, where if there is a small decline you are still looking at a borderline Hall of Famer instead of a sure thing. If Montgomery's HR rate ticks back up to what it was pre-Cardinals, and his K-rate drops from his already rather pedestrian 7.9 per 9, all of a sudden you have a good (and maybe even mediocre) pitcher instead of a very good one. Likewise, if Snell gets out of San Diego and his HR rate climbs back up to 1.1 or 1.2 like it was in his Rays days, those walks are going to start hurting that much more. And if his control gets worse and that 11.5+ K rate starts turning into a 6+ BB rate (he was already at 5 this year)? That' scary to think about, and it isn't my money.

I still really hope the Sox find a way to sign Montgomery, I think he instantly makes them a Wild Card contender in 2024, and my hope as a fan is to simply see meaningful baseball in September, as championships every season simply aren't a reasonable expectation, though one can hope. I think Montgomery makes important games in September and October more likely (I am not as convinced on Snell, his profile scares the bejesus out of me in Fenway and in front of the Red Sox defense). I also won't think it is the end of the world if they don't sign him, because I think they can still be competitive into September with what they already have, and would likely add a pitcher from the next tier if they do fail to sign Montgomery.
 

Sandy Leon Trotsky

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 11, 2007
6,491
I’m not a big Bob guy but he also had a note about Cease in the piece that ran late last night:

The Seattle Mariners have quietly entered trade talks with the Chicago White Sox for ace Dylan Cease, with the White Sox seeking a package centered around young starter Bryce Miller or Bryan Woo.

Seems odd, from the M’s side.
Yeah that makes little sense
 

6-5 Sadler

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
218
Do you mean, like, they have a handshake agreement with some team and Boras is just waiting to see how much more he can get from them?
Not a handshake agreement and maybe not even a standing offer. It’s more like an understanding of where teams are and a confidence he can get an offer that is both sufficient (i.e. within the general ballpark of years/dollars that people are anticipating) and in a location the player would like to play.

Take Snell for example. Maybe the Angels are the highest bidder now and they check Snell’s box for being on the west coast. Why not wait them out? The only other place they have to pivot is Monty and Boras represents him as well. They have no assets to trade. The only risk to Boras is them completely pulling out of the bidding but that’s fairly unlikely.
 

LogansDad

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 15, 2006
29,814
Alamogordo
Not a handshake agreement and maybe not even a standing offer. It’s more like an understanding of where teams are and a confidence he can get an offer that is both sufficient (i.e. within the general ballpark of years/dollars that people are anticipating) and in a location the player would like to play.

Take Snell for example. Maybe the Angels are the highest bidder now and they check Snell’s box for being on the west coast. Why not wait them out? The only other place they have to pivot is Monty and Boras represents him as well. They have no assets to trade. The only risk to Boras is them completely pulling out of the bidding but that’s fairly unlikely.
Ah, that makes more sense. Thanks for clarifying and sorry for misreading.
 

YTF

Member
SoSH Member
At this point it seems fair to question if Boras seriously misread the market this year, considering how many of his big name guys remaining unsigned, and looking at that obviously unrealistic ask by Snell.
We can certainly ask, but we might not get a good indication until/unless Montgomery signs first and we see what sort of deal he took as I think he likely sets the market for Snell if that happens. The idea that from what we're reading and hearing that there are just a couple of suitors ATM for either certainly seems to suggest the asking prices are too high, but all Boras needs is two teams with one that is willing to cave in.
 

moondog80

heart is two sizes two small
SoSH Member
Sep 20, 2005
8,277
David Robertson's 11 mil deal with Texas contains 5 mil in deferred money.

I'm firmly on Team Boras. I once again remind everyone (and myself) that he got an 8 year, 144 million dollar deal for Eric Hosmer from the 71 win Padres on February 19 (for which the Padres will still be paying for this year and next, for a grand total of 3.7 bWAR). But if the Rangers are really being that frugal, and the Sox truly are not going long on anyone, it's really hard for me to see where all 4 of his guys are going to get their asking price.
 

Sandy Leon Trotsky

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 11, 2007
6,491
Also- to be clear even if Snell gets 6/150 I seriously doubt that it was Boras misreading the market as much as a slight dip in market expectations. That’s not even a close to failure on his part.
 

Dewey'sCannon

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
871
Maryland
If anyone gives Snell a nine year deal they are insane. To give that kind of deal to a 30+ pitcher, they'd have to be a no doubt first ballot HOF-caliber type, and Snell is not that guy. I think Boras is asking for 9 years in the hope he gets 7. I think he can probably get more than the 6/150 the Yankees apparently offered - maybe 6/175 or even 7/200 if there's a team desperate/dumb enough (maybe the Angels). But I wouldn't want the Red Sox to be that team.

I suspect that the ask for Montgomery is a tad lower. Boras is probably asking for 7/210, but won't get that. Maybe he gets 7/175, but 5 or 6 years seems more likely with the AAV going up slightly for a shorter deal. I expect somebody will go at least 5 years for Monty, and I'd be ok if that was the Red Sox because I don't see think that will hamper or cripple them going forward and barring injury, should make them a lot better for at least the next 2-3 years.

What's hard to know is what teams are really in the market at these prices. These guys will get paid, and I doubt it will come at any sort of discount, but I don't see either of these guys getting a crazy deal unless some GM loses his mind.
 

chawson

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
4,678
What’s hard to know is what teams are really in the market at these prices. These guys will get paid, and I doubt it will come at any sort of discount, but I don't see either of these guys getting a crazy deal unless some GM loses his mind.
Plus, the teams that have lost their minds in recent years are the Padres, Rangers, Phillies and Mets (and Dodgers and Yankees, in a sense). The Padres, Rangers and Mets seem to have changed course a bit, and the Dodgers really appear to have a full roster.

Not saying that’s predictive and that only those teams are the ones that will spend. But exorbitant spending isn’t a universal trait among GMs and the ones who do can’t spend with the same fervency every year. (If not for financial reasons then for roster flexibility ones).
 

HfxBob

New Member
Nov 13, 2005
634
Plus, the teams that have lost their minds in recent years are the Padres, Rangers, Phillies and Mets (and Dodgers and Yankees, in a sense). The Padres, Rangers and Mets seem to have changed course a bit, and the Dodgers really appear to have a full roster.

Not saying that’s predictive and that only those teams are the ones that will spend. But exorbitant spending isn’t a universal trait among GMs and the ones who do can’t spend with the same fervency every year. (If not for financial reasons then for roster flexibility ones).
All true, and maybe this time Boras has walked into a perfect crapstorm of bad market conditions.

I thought there were credible rumors that the Blue Jays made a serious bid for Ohtani, which would suggest they still have money to spend. There's also the Giants, but they have already spent some lately.

I keep reading that Bellinger is "expected to return to the Cubs", but I haven't seen anything resembling a guess on the contract he's going to get. The MLBTR projection for his contract (12/264) was possibly the wildest I've ever seen from them.
 

E5 Yaz

polka king
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Apr 25, 2002
90,688
Oregon
The Sox not spending has to be a real problem for Boras. A normal top 5 payroll eliminated for his clientele really shortens his options.
So, in other words, he needs us as much as we need him.
I don't know the answer to this offhand, but what was the most recent big money deal the Red Sox made with a Boras free agent client? I don't think he considers them any more than a stalking horse at this point, and not a good one at that -- since most MLB teams have taken notice of the Red Sox recent spending tendencies as well
 

JCizzle

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 11, 2006
20,683
I don't know the answer to this offhand, but what was the most recent big money deal the Red Sox made with a Boras free agent client? I don't think he considers them any more than a stalking horse at this point, and not a good one at that -- since most MLB teams have taken notice of the Red Sox recent spending tendencies as well
JD maybe? He doesn't represent either Story or Devers.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.