You selected "Driver".So you're saying you got Lee Carvallo's Putting Challenge?
You selected "Driver".So you're saying you got Lee Carvallo's Putting Challenge?
Not how Flightaware operates. They calculate average fares only for the flight in question. No way to know if/when flyers are returning.Lol... I wonder if it's a round trip ticket?
I'm sure they were at least able redeem the air miles. They are probably diamond medallion members.
2015 they tied for fewest fumbles, but making up stuff is how DFG works.Screaming A was on ESPN this morning going on about how much of a distraction Tom's father was for the team and how it was going to negatively affect them all week. He then transitioned into a Deflategate discussion and finished by saying that before Deflategate the Pats always had the fewest fumbles and since Deflategate they are right up there leading the league, dropping the ball like crazy.
Not sure if he was trying to rile up what few NE fans actually watch that garbage, but if he was, it worked.
It really sucks. The only media coverage is the questions being asked by their own people. The rest of the time I have to listen to Kurt Warner while they answer questions from other media members.So Media Day is actually tonight. Falcons are up now and the Patriots start at 10:00 p.m.
NFL network coverage kind of sucks.
HOUSTON — Whew.
That was Kyle Shanahan’s reaction Monday night after a lost-and-found misadventure at the Super Bowl.
At the end of the Atlanta Falcons' media session, the team's star offensive coordinator — soon to become the San Francisco 49ers' new head coach — discovered that his backpack was nowhere to be found. Gone — the contents inside apparently including the team's gameplan for Super Bowl LI.
As the drama unfolded, Shanahan paced Minute Maid Park, looking for clues. A Falcons security agent, meanwhile, searched through an unattended backpack on the floor.
“I’ve got to find it,” Shanahan told USA TODAY Sports, searching more than 15 minutes after the media session ended, the players already departed.
But before you suspect the New England Patriots were behind this, lighten up.
http://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/nfl/falcons/2017/01/30/kyle-shanahan-bag-game-plan-art-spander-atlanta-super-bowl-2017/97270712/Shanahan’s bag was mistakenly lifted by San Francisco Examiner columnist Art Spander, who left his backpack at the site where reporters had gathered to interview Shanahan.
After nearly 30 minutes of searching and frantic phone calls, Spander returned with Shanahan’s bag. The coach was undeniably relieved.
“That would have been bad,” he said in a text message to USA TODAY Sports.
Spander, 78, is covering his 40th Super Bowl. He had no idea he had taken the wrong bag until contacted by a fellow writer.
Quick! Someone check that reporter's connections to Patricia... I smell conspiracy.How stupid can Shanahan be? Why the hell would you bring a backpack with your fucking gameplan to the media day? Why not just leave it in the safe in your room?
Guy must have been concussed in that Super Bowl way harder than we thought.SAS already picked the Falcons to win.
Also, Donovan McNabb said on their show this morning that the Pats will DOUBLE Sanu and keep Butler on Jones one on one. SAS and Max looked at him like he was crazy.
Guy must have been concussed in that Super Bowl way harder than we thought.
Count me as getting increasingly worried that the Falcons will feast on this defense.New England faced the easiest slate of passers in the league with their opponents compiling an NFL-low 83.1 passer rating in other games. Against the Patriots, the group actually fared better, 84.4, a difference that ranked 19th in the NFL, according to Stats, LLC.
Bill Belichick’s defense didn’t face a top-10-rated QB all year and the three highest-rated it did face in the regular season—Ryan Tannehill, Russell Wilson and Andy Dalton—combined for an impressive 106.4 rating in three games.
If Ryan improves his season-long passer rating of 117.1 at the rate of improvement the Patriots allowed this season, he would finish the Sunday’s game with a rating of 118.9. No quarterback with a rating higher than 114 has ever lost a Super Bowl (15-0).
The tidbit about Tannehill, Wilson and Dalton is a little disingenuous, though. First, why limit to the regular season? To avoid having to account for Big Ben, who's better than any of those three and who had an 81 QBR? Also, Tannehill stunk in the first half and didn't get going until after the Pats built a big lead and their D had to keep taking the field after they were forced to start their rookie QB. Dalton was 21-31 for 254 yards--good, but not great. And neither Cincy or Miami exactly ran all over the Pats' D.Aside from the headline, this WSJ article makes a lot of sense. It's short and this is the jist:
Count me as getting increasingly worried that the Falcons will feast on this defense.
Well, it's kind of a lazy article in that it seems to exclude Roethlisberger which is the most recent game, doesn't it? While the larger point (Patriots played a somewhat weak group of QB) is undeniable, I'm not sure how to think about a four game sample like this.Aside from the headline, this WSJ article makes a lot of sense. It's short and this is the jist:
Count me as getting increasingly worried that the Falcons will feast on this defense.
Yeah. I think this is what it will come down to.There's no doubt in my mind they will move the ball fairly easily. The question will be whether or not we can keep them out of the end zone (and turnovers, of course).
San Francisco Examiner? Guy probably has Tom on his speed dial.Quick! Someone check that reporter's connections to Patricia... I smell conspiracy.
Why the hell would you bring your playbook to Super Bowl media day and then leave it in your bag unattended? That's unbelievable.
And facing the Pats? I'd hire a Brinks security truck to drive that playbook around.
The loss to the Bills may have been the worst but of course Brady did not play in that game. And one could make the point that the Pats D played reasonably well in that game. So in general I agree with your comment in the context of the current Pats roster.The Seattle game was also our worst game by far from an Offense and Defense standpoint.
Obviously, Brady keeps him listed under the name "San Francisco Acquirer" in order to avoid any suspicion.San Francisco Examiner? Guy probably has Tom on his speed dial.
Which owner is actually working for Trump?I'm already sick of the Brady/Belichick are Trump supporters, ergo Fuck the Patriots theme.
Nobody is talking about politics right now, from either of the two teams.
If Kyle Shanahan is the strategic genius he's supposed to be, the backpack would have a fake game plan.Why the hell would you bring your playbook to Super Bowl media day and then leave it in your bag unattended? That's unbelievable.
And facing the Pats? I'd hire a Brinks security truck to drive that playbook around.
Wanna bet it's because the entire team was told not to let it leave their sight because #Cheatriots?Why the hell would you bring your playbook to Super Bowl media day and then leave it in your bag unattended? That's unbelievable.
And facing the Pats? I'd hire a Brinks security truck to drive that playbook around.
Yes but with cubic zirconiaJust a thought, if the Pats win SB51, does Jamie Collins get a Super Bowl ring since he played a half season?
They should send it to Putin and tell him he can keep it if he can get his and Kraft's rings back .Yes but with cubic zirconia
“Jealousy and envy are incurable diseases,” the 75-year-old billionaire said.
It is completely irrational but I'm a little concerned about Brady being a little too hyped to start given how much we know he wants the #5/Suck it, Roger moment. I thought he was too wound up to start the second Giants SB.I remember how pissed I was at Parcells in '96 for ruining the pre-SB buildup with his Jets nonsense.
And in the past, I have really enjoyed the hype, media day and all the rest that goes on in the days ahead of the game.
This year, none of it interests me. There are no stories that are particularly riveting. I respect the Falcons but they are hardly a classic villain. No NY team angle, no Richard Sherman, no natural rival.
Just bring on the damn game. It can't get here fast enough.
Maybe it's because the Pats have been here so many times before and, as a result, I have too. But I suspect it's more about the intense desire I have to see Tom get his ultimate FU moment. Everything else kind of pales in comparison.
I'm not a big fan of Albert Breer but he pretty much nails it in here.
http://mmqb.si.com/mmqb/2017/01/31
Just as long as they don't come out and run any long developing plays that immediately put Brady under tremendous pressure.It is completely irrational but I'm a little concerned about Brady being a little too hyped to start given how much we know he wants the #5/Suck it, Roger moment. I thought he was too wound up to start the second Giants SB.
What's the last line the google talkbox says?I got a good chuckle out of this... its ok to laugh at ourselves from time to time.