Yes. And if it's a bad snap, fall on it and kick it againOK, you don't let Osweiler fuck this up any more, right? Kick the FG now?
As long as he's able to walk his daughters down the aisle, all's good.Suck it Pagano.
It's amazing that one division has at least 3, maybe 4 of the 5 worst coaches in the league.Only a few NFL coaches could have pulled that off. You just have to tip your cap to Chuck Pagano.
So what.
Excellent.Now what.
Grigson and Pagano both got four-year extensions in JANUARY. Hard to see them going anywhere this offseason.Colts are a terriblly constructed roster and they've failed to develop the one asset that could save their ass properly. 5-11 time. Everyone is getting fired and frankly its a year too late.
That makes me giddy, but I still think they'll be gone after the train wreck this season is going to become.Grigson and Pagano both got four-year extensions in JANUARY. Hard to see them going anywhere this offseason.
Hard to gauge. As I've detailed in the main Colts thread, they have a terrible roster, which has steadily worse over the course of the Luck era. Not sure that Brady's ever had a team with a lousy offensive line AND an awful defense that consistently has the offense in catch up mode.The thing is Luck is being asked to carry this subpar Colts team as if he's prime Manning/Brady. He's a lot further from that level than that FO/fanbase seem to realize.
Does anyone remember this with a side-by-side video of a cat pouncing on a kitten that was messing with him? It was hilarious, but I just spent 5 minutes trying to find it and have come up blank.
Maybe if Luck didn't have a career passer rating of 80 in the first half of games, he wouldn't have to play catch up as much. He's done his part in putting his, admitteldy bad, team in early holes. To his credit, he manages to climb out of them with some regularity, but he's reached a point in his career where he needs to be more consistent.Hard to gauge. As I've detailed in the main Colts thread, they have a terrible roster, which has steadily worse over the course of the Luck era. Not sure that Brady's ever had a team with a lousy offensive line AND an awful defense that consistently has the offense in catch up mode.
He's actually having a pretty nice season under tough circumstances.
It's really difficult to be consistent at Quarterback when your offensive line is below replacement level.Maybe if Luck didn't have a career passer rating of 80 in the first half of games, he wouldn't have to play catch up as much. He's done his part in putting his, admitteldy bad, team in early holes. To his credit, he manages to climb out of them with some regularity, but he's reached a point in his career where he needs to be more consistent.
Thank you for that. I had a sustained belly-laugh of a good 40 seconds. Hilarious!Does anyone remember this with a side-by-side video of a cat pouncing on a kitten that was messing with him? It was hilarious, but I just spent 5 minutes trying to find it and have come up blank.
I think it was on ITP.
Edit: Found it!!!!
http://insidethepylon.com/blog/2015/11/26/indianapolis-colts-fake-punt-or-something/
Brady's OL has been pretty bad the past two or three seasons. Hell, I'm not sure the NE OL this year is worse than Indy's.It's really difficult to be consistent at Quarterback when your offensive line is below replacement level.
The worst offensive line Brady has played behind is better than what Andrew Luck has spent most of his career behind. It's almost a miracle that he's still physically able to play, let alone put up above average production.
More than Arians himself?Somehow the pink just helps emphasize the abject dumbness of Arians' stupid fucking hat.
He was actually pretty good last year. I was actually worried he would end up on Denver during the offseason. Seems like a ridiculous worry at this point.Fitzy is so, so bad. I'm can't believe that scrub held out this offseason.
Tight ends?Who do the Cardinals save the 80-s for if their receivers are numbered 11, 12, 13, 14?
That's a lot of tight ends for a team that uses 4 WR setsTight ends?
Believe it or not, they have 5 TE on the roster.That's a lot of tight ends for a team that uses 4 WR sets
True. Pats use their tight ends thoughTight ends?
FWIW, this isn't weird anymore. Pats have four WR in 11-19 and only one 80+.
Fitzy is so, so bad. I'm can't believe that scrub held out this offseason.