We're in a strange land when the head-to-head result means so little. The NCAA has managed to replace the result of competition with the result of an algorithm somewhat based on the results of competition (as one, example, I have no idea why the health of the players on a team should factor into a decision to include a team in the final tournament). The NCAA champion can now say it has a lot in common with ice skating champions. Don't piss off the Russian judge.Infield Infidel said:In that TCU/Baylor discussion on Gameday, it was very convenient that no one mentioned Baylor's loss to WVU. It's like it didn't happen. For me that's the difference between these two teams. If Baylor's loss was to a better team, like Oklahoma or KSU, it would be close, but WVU is 7-5. WVU lost to every team better than them on their schedule (Bama, TCU, KState, Texas, Oklahoma), except for Baylor.
As long as TCU blows out a very bad Iowa St team, they are in for me.
I this is the wrong thread for my reply.