The 2023 Injury Thread

Red(s)HawksFan

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 23, 2009
20,935
Maine
Thanks for doing this. And while it looks feasible on paper, it depends on -- among other things -- 18 starts from Bello, Paxton, Crawford where none of then gets knocked out early, necessitating extra wear on the bullpen arms, and countless other factors over a 26-game stretch that would throw this out of whack.

While Whitlock returning, successfully, sooner rather than later could make this moot ... pencilling it out is not the same of having it work.
I think something to keep in mind here is they've got 10 pitchers in the bullpen right now, which obviously is more than normal. Even if you count Pivetta as a starter because he's going to be a bulk guy every 5 days, that's 9 relievers they can mix and match. Some of which can be optioned for fresh arms if need be (Schreiber's return brings a fresh arm all by itself).

I looked into this the other day and over the last 10 games (11 calendar days), which included Whitlock's injury shortened outing, they only went to guys on back to back days three times (Martin x 2, Jacques x 1). So the distribution of innings worked out fairly well and no one was overly taxed. Now with four days off for everyone except Jansen, they could probably swing another 10 game stretch in similar fashion. After that, they can re-evaluate everything...if anyone has been over-used, where are the injured pitchers on their return, and what is available on the trade market with <10 days to go to the deadline.
 

TFisNEXT

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 21, 2005
12,537
I think Bloom and company are probably going to wait and see how the trio of potential spot starters in Worcester look before seeing if they need to go outside the organization.

If one of Bear Claw, Lamet, or Drohan looks good, they could use them as either a spot starter or in the post-opener Pivetta role.

If Whitlock makes a quick return in the next couple weeks too, that would change the picture in terms of needing to trade for a starter.

They probably want to avoid trading for a starter as much as possible given the market. A lot of teams are still in it and of the teams that aren’t like Oakland, the type of starter the Red Sox would want like a JP Sears is the type of pitcher Oakland isn’t going to trade (cost-controlled for years and competent).
 

YTF

Member
SoSH Member
July 14 @ Cubs Bello
July 15 @ Cubs Paxton
July 16 @ Cubs Crawford
July 17 @ A’s Bullpen/Pivetta
July 18 @ A’s Bullpen
July 19 @ A’s Bello
July 21 vs NYM Paxton
July 22 vs NYM Crawford
July 23 vs NYM Bullpen/Pivetta
July 25 vs ATL Bello
July 26 vs ATL Paxton
July 28 @ SF Crawford
July 29 @ SF Bullpen/Pivetta
July 30 @ SF Bello
Aug 1 @ SEA Paxton
Aug 2 @ SEA Crawford
Aug 4 vs TOR Bullpen/Pivetta
Aug 5 vs TOR Bello
Aug 6 vs TOR Paxton
Aug 7 vs KC Crawford
Aug 8 vs KC Bullpen
Aug 9 vs KC Bullpen/Pivetta
Aug 10 vs KC Bello
Aug 11 vs DET Paxton
Aug 12 vs DET Crawford
Aug 13 vs DET Bullpen/Pivetta

Bello, Paxton, Crawford, Pivetta/Bullpen each get 6 starts, straight bullpen only gets 2
Then we are at mid August and hopefully we get 2-3 starting arms back before the road trip vs NAT, MFY, HOU
Thanks for laying this all out and I'm guessing this is similar to what we may see. There is a double edge to this sword though. Off days are being used to avoid those extra bullpen starts while keeping the others in their normal 4 days of rest which works OK. However those days off also would have provided a 5th day of rest in between starts which is usually as welcomed as the summer wears on.
 

Bob Montgomerys Helmet Hat

has big, douchey shoulders
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Thanks for laying this all out and I'm guessing this is similar to what we may see. There is a double edge to this sword though. Off days are being used to avoid those extra bullpen starts while keeping the others in their normal 4 days of rest which works OK. However those days off also would have provided a 5th day of rest in between starts which is usually as welcomed as the summer wears on.
I have trouble seeing Bello, being so valuable and young, not being given an extra day off now and then.
 

TFisNEXT

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 21, 2005
12,537
I have trouble seeing Bello, being so valuable and young, not being given an extra day off now and then.
Yeah I don’t love the idea of pushing Bello too hard. Though thankfully, he did get stretched out decently last season with a total of 152 IP between all levels which means he should be good for 175-180ish this season using the standard 25-30 IP increase YoY for young major league starters.

They were pretty careful with him early on so he only has 86 IP so far (6 of those at AAA). Hopefully that means he won’t tire as much as other young starters down the stretch.
 

Sandy Leon Trotsky

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 11, 2007
6,488
I still think Bloom could and should leverage Yorke and some others to bring in a decent no.3 type starter with control for another season. Immediate need is obvious but long term too. I think they need 2 starters from outside the organization-one preferably being Yamamoto- the other being someone to also help ASAP.
 

bosockboy

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
20,048
St. Louis, MO
I still think Bloom could and should leverage Yorke and some others to bring in a decent no.3 type starter with control for another season. Immediate need is obvious but long term too. I think they need 2 starters from outside the organization-one preferably being Yamamoto- the other being someone to also help ASAP.
Total spitball but if the Mets start selling, wonder if we could take Verlander’s contract for a modest return. He’d be a perfect 1.5 season gap filler.
 

TFisNEXT

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 21, 2005
12,537
I still think Bloom could and should leverage Yorke and some others to bring in a decent no.3 type starter with control for another season. Immediate need is obvious but long term too. I think they need 2 starters from outside the organization-one preferably being Yamamoto- the other being someone to also help ASAP.
A decent #3 with control for 2024 is going to cost a lot more than Yorke is my guess in this market.
 

Sandy Leon Trotsky

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 11, 2007
6,488
I’d actually look to add someone like tonight’s opposition pitcher:signed thru 2023, 2 yrs/$50M (22-23) & 24 player option.
I’d offer Yorke, Drohan and Dalbec…..
 

JM3

often quoted
SoSH Member
Dec 14, 2019
15,260
I’d actually look to add someone like tonight’s opposition pitcher:signed thru 2023, 2 yrs/$50M (22-23) & 24 player option.
I’d offer Yorke, Drohan and Dalbec…..
This would be an amazingly bad trade considering it's currently 2023...

All you'd be buying beyond this season is the chance that if Stroman blows out his arm, you can pay him next season.

I have a soft spot in my heart for Stroman & wanted the Sox to sign him last time he was a free agent, but I don't think his remaining contract is worth either of Yorke or Drohan - let alone both. They can absolutely have Dalbec, though...
 

Sandy Leon Trotsky

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 11, 2007
6,488
This would be an amazingly bad trade considering it's currently 2023...

All you'd be buying beyond this season is the chance that if Stroman blows out his arm, you can pay him next season.

I have a soft spot in my heart for Stroman & wanted the Sox to sign him last time he was a free agent, but I don't think his remaining contact is worth either of Yorke or Drohan - let alone both. They can absolutely have Dalbec, though...
Im pretty bad at making trade suggestions….But he’s be at least a great rental.
 

Sandy Leon Trotsky

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 11, 2007
6,488
Just out of curiosity, do you have any trade scenario, in any thread, that doesn't include trading Yorke?
No.
edit- to add more… I suspect he’s at peak value. I don’t like his general game from all Ive read and suspect that Meidroth has a better future.
Out of all the guys in the mL MI “logjam”, I also think he’d be the best to bring the most return
 

JM3

often quoted
SoSH Member
Dec 14, 2019
15,260
Im pretty bad at making trade suggestions….But he’s be at least a great rental.
Stroman actually looks pretty primed for a regression. His BABIP & HR/FB rates are super low for him, while his BB rates are super high.

Hopefully the regression starts today :)
 

JM3

often quoted
SoSH Member
Dec 14, 2019
15,260
No.
edit- to add more… I suspect he’s at peak value. I don’t like his general game from all Ive read and suspect that Meidroth has a better future.
Out of all the guys in the mL MI “logjam”, I also think he’d be the best to bring the most return
I feel pretty confident that Yorke is going to be a better pro than Meidroth... of course there won't be room for either at 2B with Mayer/Cespedes.
 

Bob Montgomerys Helmet Hat

has big, douchey shoulders
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
No.
edit- to add more… I suspect he’s at peak value. I don’t like his general game from all Ive read and suspect that Meidroth has a better future.
Out of all the guys in the mL MI “logjam”, I also think he’d be the best to bring the most return
I'm honestly trying to figure this out. From all that you've read, you don't like his general game, but you think he'd bring the most return. What are others reading that you aren't, or vice versa, because this seems to be somewhat in conflict.
 

joe dokes

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
30,614
I still think Bloom could and should leverage Yorke and some others to bring in a decent no.3 type starter with control for another season. Immediate need is obvious but long term too. I think they need 2 starters from outside the organization-one preferably being Yamamoto- the other being someone to also help ASAP.
This may be where the current plan may prevent much leveraging. Giving a up top prospect and more for possible short term starter because they have 5 starting pitchers not starting (hurt/shitty) seems unlikely to me. The plan for the year had 8 possible starting pitchers. If all healthy and good they win 95 games. if they all suck they win 65. I just don't see Bloom trying to patch over an injury run like that. He may pick up a nominal starter, but I think its close to ride or die with the starters.
 

bosockboy

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
20,048
St. Louis, MO
This may be where the current plan may prevent much leveraging. Giving a up top prospect and more for possible short term starter because they have 5 starting pitchers not starting (hurt/shitty) seems unlikely to me. The plan for the year had 8 possible starting pitchers. If all healthy and good they win 95 games. if they all suck they win 65. I just don't see Bloom trying to patch over an injury run like that. He may pick up a nominal starter, but I think its close to ride or die with the starters.
I think Paxton being healthy and a legit #1 might have changed their outlook on this season. If they get in the postseason, if you squint this team could steal a championship.

But we probably need a starter to get us there.
 

TFisNEXT

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 21, 2005
12,537
I think Paxton being healthy and a legit #1 might have changed their outlook on this season. If they get in the postseason, if you squint this team could steal a championship.

But we probably need a starter to get us there.
I agree that it’s probably going to take an inning eater starter to get us there…but if they can get in the dance, they have a path if they can get some guys healthy. Unless Whitlock comes back all of the sudden in the next 10 days but it doesn’t sound like he’s that close. Sale and Houck sound at least 3 weeks out too.

The way to making a playoff run is having Paxton/Bello/Sale/Houck all healthy…especially the first 3.
 

bosockboy

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
20,048
St. Louis, MO
I agree that it’s probably going to take an inning eater starter to get us there…but if they can get in the dance, they have a path if they can get some guys healthy. Unless Whitlock comes back all of the sudden in the next 10 days but it doesn’t sound like he’s that close. Sale and Houck sound at least 3 weeks out too.

The way to making a playoff run is having Paxton/Bello/Sale/Houck all healthy…especially the first 3.
Jordan Montgomery is perfect.
 

Rovin Romine

Johnny Rico
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 14, 2005
24,608
Miami (oh, Miami!)
July 14 @ Cubs Bello
July 15 @ Cubs Paxton
July 16 @ Cubs Crawford
July 17 @ A’s Bullpen/Pivetta
July 18 @ A’s Bullpen
July 19 @ A’s Bello
July 21 vs NYM Paxton
July 22 vs NYM Crawford
July 23 vs NYM Bullpen/Pivetta
July 25 vs ATL Bello
July 26 vs ATL Paxton
July 28 @ SF Crawford
July 29 @ SF Bullpen/Pivetta
July 30 @ SF Bello
Aug 1 @ SEA Paxton
Aug 2 @ SEA Crawford
Aug 4 vs TOR Bullpen/Pivetta
Aug 5 vs TOR Bello
Aug 6 vs TOR Paxton
Aug 7 vs KC Crawford
Aug 8 vs KC Bullpen
Aug 9 vs KC Bullpen/Pivetta
Aug 10 vs KC Bello
Aug 11 vs DET Paxton
Aug 12 vs DET Crawford
Aug 13 vs DET Bullpen/Pivetta

Bello, Paxton, Crawford, Pivetta/Bullpen each get 6 starts, straight bullpen only gets 2
Then we are at mid August and hopefully we get 2-3 starting arms back before the road trip vs NAT, MFY, HOU
Thanks also! This is doubly useful when looking at the potential effects of a game like todays. To expand a bit on it with some recent information on injuries hidden amongst the trade speculation.

July 14 @ Cubs Bello - Bello (6), Winckowski, Bernardino, Scott, Jansen (.1).
July 15 @ Cubs Paxton - Paxton (3), Scott, Rodriguez, Jaques, Walter (2).
July 16 @ Cubs Crawford
July 17 @ A’s Bullpen/Pivetta
July 18 @ A’s Bullpen
July 19 @ A’s Bello
July 21 vs NYM Paxton
(Schreiber and Bleier possible return?)​
July 22 vs NYM Crawford
July 23 vs NYM Bullpen/Pivetta
July 25 vs ATL Bello
July 26 vs ATL Paxton
July 28 @ SF Crawford
July 29 @ SF Bullpen/Pivetta
July 30 @ SF Bello
Aug 1 @ SEA Paxton
(Trade Deadline)​
Aug 2 @ SEA Crawford
Aug 4 vs TOR Bullpen/Pivetta
Aug 5 vs TOR Bello
Aug 6 vs TOR Paxton
Aug 7 vs KC Crawford
Aug 8 vs KC Bullpen
Aug 9 vs KC Bullpen/Pivetta
Aug 10 vs KC Bello
Aug 11 vs DET Paxton
Aug 12 vs DET Crawford
Aug 13 vs DET Bullpen/Pivetta
(Story, Sale, Houck in "mid august" possible return?)​
Aug 15 @ WSN
Aug 16 @ WSN
Aug 17 @ WSN
(the Gauntlet starts)​
Aug 18 @ NYY
Aug 19 @ NYY
Aug 20 @ NYY
Aug 21 @ HOU
Aug 22 @ HOU
Aug 23 @ HOU
Aug 24 @ HOU
Aug 25 vs LAD
Aug 26 vs LAD
Aug 27 vs LAD
Aug 28 vs HOU
Aug 29 vs HOU
Aug 30 vs HOU

So. . .much hangs on Whitlock, including any August 1 moves for pitching heading into the remainder of the year.

I don't see a lot of position player movement if they have solid info that Story is due back in mid-August. SS is the one glaring hole at this point. Maybe the move Dalbec, Hernandez, Duvall, with the "change of scenery" argument?

SP appears to be the thing. If Whitlock has a super positive report in the next 12 days, I can see them standing pat, hoping to get one of Sale or Houck back into action before the Aug. 18 Gauntlet. I could also see a 2020 Pivetta "project pitcher" type trade, rather than a true rental. But who knows? It will all likely hinge on how the injured players are progressing. If Whitlock and Sale and Houck all suffer serious setbacks between now and Aug. 1. . .
 

Petagine in a Bottle

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 13, 2021
12,320
At this point I'd rather just pick up some random ~1 WAR pitcher on an expiring contract who can be had for cheap. Just need someone to soak up a few innings in the next 30 days.
Steven Matz, Drew Smyly, Rich Hill, Paul Blackburn, Joey Lucchesi, Carlos Carrasco seem like the best kind of fits. There really aren’t a lot of these kinds of guys floating around anymore though- a combination of openers / younger players taking more rotation slots and parity, I think (and the fact that the only teams clearly out of it…are out of it because they don’t have any pitching).
 

moondog80

heart is two sizes two small
SoSH Member
Sep 20, 2005
8,276
How much rope does Kluber get before he's not worth a roster spot? I don't know exactly what xERA/xwOBA is, but I think 5th %ile isn't very good.
 

chrisfont9

Member
SoSH Member
How much rope does Kluber get before he's not worth a roster spot? I don't know exactly what xERA/xwOBA is, but I think 5th %ile isn't very good.
It doesn't make total sense that he's been as terrible as he has this year, so I would think they would let him try to recover what's left of his ability one last time. If they can save a few prospects from a trade because Kluber is ready to eat some competent innings, that's a big development, particularly in the context of a season which you might not want to invest in.
 

Rovin Romine

Johnny Rico
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 14, 2005
24,608
Miami (oh, Miami!)
The big KLUBER update everyone has been waiting for...


More seriously. . .his numbers on Savant show a bit of a velocity jump when he's in the bullpen, but out of his 7 appearances from the pen, he's only had 3 decent showings. The rest were disastrous.

I mean, take a look, see if he can maybe contribute as the last man in the pen. Maybe he can replicate those 3 out of 7 more consistently. Maybe he's figured something out. But, absent that I think he's likely just done for the Sox, if not overall.

This is who we have on the 26 man now:

Brayan Bello​
Kutter Crawford​
James Paxton​
Kenley Jansen​
Chris Martin​
Nick Pivetta​
Josh Winckowski​
Richard Bleier​
Joely Rodríguez​
Brennan Bernardino​
Chris Murphy​
Brandon Walter​
Joe Jacques​

Schreiber, Kluber, Whitlock, Sale, and Houck are due back, probably in that order. The most fungible bullpen pieces (i.e., who have options as far as I know) are Winckowski, Bernardino, Murphy, Walter, and Jacques. Jacques will likely go for Schreiber. But unless someone else implodes or Kluber finds the fountain of competence, we hit a roadbump - do we really want Kluber over Walter? Maybe? Then if Whitlock returns, do we really want Kluber over Murphy? And if Sale returns, do we want Kluber over Bernardino? And if Houck returns, do we want Kluber over. . .Winckowski?

I mean, I'm not entirely sure he can outpitch Walter to begin with.
 

moondog80

heart is two sizes two small
SoSH Member
Sep 20, 2005
8,276
It doesn't make total sense that he's been as terrible as he has this year, so I would think they would let him try to recover what's left of his ability one last time. If they can save a few prospects from a trade because Kluber is ready to eat some competent innings, that's a big development, particularly in the context of a season which you might not want to invest in.
Well, he's 37 and everyone loses it at some point. I'm all for giving him a shot, but given what we've seen so far and the fact that they're in a playoff race, he'd better show something fairly quickly.
 

grimshaw

Member
SoSH Member
May 16, 2007
4,231
Portland
If he were theoretically available today, I'd replace him with Jacques but no one else since he can at least pitch multiple innings in blowouts. If they add something and have Schreiber back and everyone else healthy, maybe they eat his entire salary and see if any team bites. He should beat Whitlock, Sale, and Houck back, but his days are numbered regardless.