Dismiss Notice
Guest, I have a big favor to ask you. We've been working very hard to establish ourselves on social media. If you like/follow our pages it would be a HUGE help to us. SoSH on Facebook and Inside the Pylon Thanks! Nip

Resting the stars on National TV

Discussion in 'Mark Blount's Port Cellar: Celtics Forum' started by Van Everyman, Mar 18, 2017.

  1. Van Everyman

    Van Everyman Member SoSH Member

    Messages:
    13,195
    Cavs sitting LeBron, Love and Irving in prime time against the Clippers tonight. ABC must be absolutely livid.
     
  2. ifmanis5

    ifmanis5 Member SoSH Member

    Messages:
    23,904
    Totally. They just got over the Spurs/Warriors Restening game. I think ABC/ESPN complains (again?) to Silver and something gets done at least with National TV games with rest rules.. This is bad for everyone.
     
  3. JakeRae

    JakeRae Member SoSH Member

    Messages:
    5,783
    It would be awful for the league to pass rules governing teams resting players. Especially if they only impacted national broadcasts. If the networks have a problem with it, let them flex in games featuring teams fighting to get into the playoffs instead of those resting in advance of them. (If the rest rule is simply one requiring sufficient notification for the flexing to happen, I am ok with that.)
     
  4. joe dokes

    joe dokes Member SoSH Member

    Messages:
    7,793
    As Pop would likely say, "too fucking bad."
     
  5. luckiestman

    luckiestman Son of the Harpy SoSH Member

    Messages:
    5,552
    It's bullshit. The networks and the fans pay to watch the best players. If ownership wants to rest their players let them charge exhibition game prices and give the networks and their advertisers a refund.
     
  6. ifmanis5

    ifmanis5 Member SoSH Member

    Messages:
    23,904
    The owners, advertisers, networks, sponsors, etc. run the show in any sport and this is losing them money. They will be heard from and they have way more power than Pop if they decide to put a foot down.
     
  7. sezwho

    sezwho Member SoSH Member

    Messages:
    175
    That sounds good but try to imagine what that resting rule would look like and how to enforce it. Not so simple.
     
  8. HomeRunBaker

    HomeRunBaker bet squelcher SoSH Member

    Messages:
    14,019
    Sounds great and tough and all but these networks are your business partners. If you don't formulate a plan to correct this soon you are shooting yourself in the foot. Tweaking the schedule to eliminate these featured teams having their 3rd game in 4 nights, 4 in 5 or the dreaded 5 in 7 on that day over the second half of the season fixes this issue. It literally is only a small handful of games we are talking about here.
     
  9. ifmanis5

    ifmanis5 Member SoSH Member

    Messages:
    23,904
    The fix plan is one that all parties should want- fix the terrible schedule. Too many games, too many back to backs. Fewer games would mean better rested players and a better quality product.
     
  10. BigSoxFan

    BigSoxFan Member SoSH Member

    Messages:
    22,727
    The Cavs' next game after tonight is Wednesday. I don't see why they needed to rest guys last night as they didn't play Friday night. You rest your guys against the much better Clippers team and intend to play them against a garbage Lakers squad? That doesn't even make strategic sense.
     
  11. JCizzle

    JCizzle Member SoSH Member

    Messages:
    4,051
    I haven't seen whether or not this is a done deal, but they're looking to cut preseason games to help with this.

    http://www.sbnation.com/nba/2016/12/2/13821216/nba-regular-season-schedule-2017-preseason-cba

     
  12. coremiller

    coremiller Member SoSH Member

    Messages:
    2,708
    They'll never cut games, because fewer games means lower revenue. The easiest fix to the national TV problem is just not to schedule marquee TV games when one of the teams is on a B2B. That wouldn't address the bigger schedule issues, but it would at least avoid a lot of the PR mess.
     
  13. BigSoxFan

    BigSoxFan Member SoSH Member

    Messages:
    22,727
    What about just stretching out the NBA calendar by 2-3 weeks? Instead of being done in mid-April, you go until the end of April. Obviously would have to move the draft, FA, etc. back but would players really complain about losing a couple weeks of their already-long offseason?
     
  14. bosox79

    bosox79 Member SoSH Member

    Messages:
    4,646
    The NBA season is already too long as it is.
     
  15. BigSoxFan

    BigSoxFan Member SoSH Member

    Messages:
    22,727
    Then what exactly is everybody (players/coaches, not people here) whining about? The number of games aren't going to be reduced for the obvious financial reasons. Cutting preseason games doesn't really do anything because the good players hardly play in those anyways. Back to back games consist of around 20% of an NBA team's schedule. Sure you could reduce that a bit with creative scheduling but other than that, not sure what else can be done if you don't touch the calendar.

    Guys like MJ, Bird, and Magic used to play 38-40mpg without much rest in a much more physical era and would be making deep playoff runs every year. Why is this such a big issue now?
     
  16. DeJesus Built My Hotrod

    DeJesus Built My Hotrod Well-Known Member Lifetime Member SoSH Member

    Messages:
    17,651
    The only solution that doesn't hit the owners and players in their wallets is to extend the season an make the playoffs end at the end of June rather than the start.
     
  17. ifmanis5

    ifmanis5 Member SoSH Member

    Messages:
    23,904
    Less games doesn't automatically mean less revenue. Fenway park generates more revenue than Coors Field. The league can figure this out if they really want to without losing money.
     
  18. jon abbey

    jon abbey Shanghai Warrior Dope SoSH Member

    Messages:
    27,804
    This would be crazy, the too long season has already sapped a lot of my interest, and I am a hardcore NBA fan going back decades.
     
  19. bosox79

    bosox79 Member SoSH Member

    Messages:
    4,646
    They broke down earlier too.
     
  20. Lose Remerswaal

    Lose Remerswaal Leaves after the 8th inning Lifetime Member SoSH Member

    Messages:
    28,352
    Cutting preseason games by a week means you can spread the regular season out over 1 week longer without playing into July. It's a good step towards reducing b2b games without any other losses
     
  21. BigSoxFan

    BigSoxFan Member SoSH Member

    Messages:
    22,727
    Did they? Obviously Bird had his back problems but they may have been part genetic and part his maniacal training. Guys like Malone and Stockton played in that era and played forever. Guys today have access to much better technology, travel accommodations, etc. I don't think the schedule is causing any early retirements. Elite guys are still playing into their mid-to-late 30s. They're also getting longer all-star breaks now. I think the league has been more than accommodating, particularly since Silver took over.
     
  22. ifmanis5

    ifmanis5 Member SoSH Member

    Messages:
    23,904
  23. bowiac

    bowiac I've been living a lie. Lifetime Member SoSH Member

    Messages:
    11,602
    With some back of the envelope math, about 9.5% of minutes in the last five seasons have been played by guys 33 or older. That's up from about 7.3% from 1989 to 1993 (picked because there was no expansion during this time). So it does look like the league is getting a bit older.

    Looking at BPM, there's also a slight uptick in the quality of play from older players recently, but that's a pretty small effect.
     
  24. bosox79

    bosox79 Member SoSH Member

    Messages:
    4,646
    Plus the league didn't get super physical until the late 80's with the Pistons and they were traveling to less locations for parts of their careers due to expansion.

    Also just because players did something before doesn't mean players should be doing it now. I don't see anyone pining for Rick Porcello to throw 400 innings this year.
     
  25. BigSoxFan

    BigSoxFan Member SoSH Member

    Messages:
    22,727
    So, what exactly is your solution then? The games just aren't getting cut and we all know that.
     
  26. bosox79

    bosox79 Member SoSH Member

    Messages:
    4,646
    Nothing. I don't think it's that big a problem. Or just make preseason shorter.
     
  27. moly99

    moly99 Member SoSH Member

    Messages:
    754
    The problem is not with individual players resting or guys being rotated/given reduced minutes, but rather with teams resting 3+ starters. If I were a coach I would rotate players on road trips: leave Lebron at home for one away trip, then Kyrie, then Love, etc. That still gives you enough firepower to beat the Knicks, Kings, etc while giving your guys enough rest. Sitting all of them at once against another contending team seems to be something other than a strategy for keeping stars fit for the playoffs.

    One potential solution for intra-conference games would be to use head to head record to determine which team gets to host the deciding game. That would provide a bit of a carrot for teams to try to win against their conference rivals. It wouldn't help Cleveland vs LAC, though.
     
  28. jon abbey

    jon abbey Shanghai Warrior Dope SoSH Member

    Messages:
    27,804
    Do you mean superseding overall record? So if Denver is the #8 seed but they win the season series against Golden State, they get home court advantage even though their record was 20+ games worse? I hope you don't mean that, because that is ridiculous. If you mean use head-to-head as a tiebreaker if teams have the same record, pretty sure they already do that.

    Some of these 'solutions' are way worse than the problem.
     
  29. moly99

    moly99 Member SoSH Member

    Messages:
    754
    It's ridiculous in the sense that it gets rid of seeding, but it would fulfill the NBA's objective of getting teams to play their starters against other contenders within the same conference. Teams would rest their starters against the crap teams that people aren't watching on TV instead of the marquee television games.

    I am not even saying that they should do it, but it is an option for the NBA beyond fining teams cash.
     
  30. ifmanis5

    ifmanis5 Member SoSH Member

    Messages:
    23,904
    Silver memo: resting players sucks as currently configured and will end: http://www.espn.com/nba/story/_/id/18962901/resting-star-players-significant-issue-league
     
  31. DeJesus Built My Hotrod

    DeJesus Built My Hotrod Well-Known Member Lifetime Member SoSH Member

    Messages:
    17,651
  32. scottyno

    scottyno lurker

    Messages:
    3,281
  33. tims4wins

    tims4wins PN23's replacement SoSH Member

    Messages:
    14,571
    Does ESPN complain if the Sox sit Papi on Sunday Night Baseball vs. the MFY? Or if Kris Bryant sits vs. the Cards?
     
  34. bsj

    bsj Renegade Crazed Genius SoSH Member

    Messages:
    15,971
    There is a diff between sitting Ortiz and sitting Ortiz, pedroia, Betts, and Bogaerts on The same night.

    Give every player as many games off as you want. Just use common sense, be discrete, and rotate them. Don't do all your stats on the same night. That is the problem
     
  35. tims4wins

    tims4wins PN23's replacement SoSH Member

    Messages:
    14,571
    AKA the "Tito Sunday/Getaway Day Lineup"
     
  36. BigSoxFan

    BigSoxFan Member SoSH Member

    Messages:
    22,727
    This might need to be its own thread. Seems to be a major issue that Silver is going to try to address in the off-season.
     
  37. ifmanis5

    ifmanis5 Member SoSH Member

    Messages:
    23,904
    Ha! Nice one.
    The Knicks (and Lakers) have been on national tv quite a bit this year. The league knew what they would get- garbage games. They can't help themselves scheduling NY/LA teams.
     
  38. ifmanis5

    ifmanis5 Member SoSH Member

    Messages:
    23,904
    The most interesting thing about Silver's memo was that he not only called out the players but he put the owners on notice as well. He's calling on the owners to be more involved and making them accountable for stars who sit. Behind the scenes this either already is or is on its way to becoming the most fractious topic in the league across all parties on and off the court.
     
  39. the moops

    the moops Member SoSH Member

    Messages:
    540
    I think nothing comes of this. They will talk it up in the offeason, mainly as a way of keeping the NBA in the news, but next year same thing will happen.
     
  40. Jeff Van GULLY

    Jeff Van GULLY Member SoSH Member

    Messages:
    3,038
    I think I read part of this idea here before but I really believe the NBA (like MLB) needs to shrink its season.

    I understand the economic realities of the TV contract make this infeasible but moving to a 62 game schedule would solve the 'star players getting rest' issue.

    Schedule would break down as follows (using Celtics as an example):

    Home/Away against all Western Conference teams (15x2 = 30 games)
    Home/Away against all non-divisional Eastern Conference teams (10x2 = 20 games)
    Three games against all division opponents (4x3= 12 games)
    Total = 62 games

    This schedule would allow all fan bases (season ticket holders) to see each team at least one each year. The downside is each team only plays divisional opponents three times so there is an imbalance in home/away but personally, I don't care much about divisions in the NBA and with a de-emphasis on the importance of divisions for home court in the playoffs back in 2015, I think this is a logical step if the NBA were to shrink the schedule.

    Also there is practically an even split in terms of Western/Eastern Conference games (30 vs. 32) but I really think it's important that there is a home/home between all teams in the conferences for the fans.


    Edit: or increase the schedule to 66 games and have one more set of games against divisional opponents. Then there is equity in terms of home/away.
     
    #41 Jeff Van GULLY, Mar 21, 2017
    Last edited: Mar 21, 2017
  41. bsj

    bsj Renegade Crazed Genius SoSH Member

    Messages:
    15,971
    Sometimes we overthink this. No one is saying that players can't rest. But don't rest them all the same game. Every player can have 5-10-15 games off, just, in rotation
     
  42. tims4wins

    tims4wins PN23's replacement SoSH Member

    Messages:
    14,571
    But unlike in baseball, resting one player significantly decreases your chances of winning. I think teams prefer to give their best 3-4 players the same game off, effectively tank the game, but go 100% in the other games.
     
  43. bowiac

    bowiac I've been living a lie. Lifetime Member SoSH Member

    Messages:
    11,602
    I bet you Silver can put a lot of soft pressure on owners to reign in their coaches. I agree any kind of rigid rule is essentially impossible to implement, but I bet if every time this happens, the owner gets an earful from the commissioners office, it would have some real impact. With only 30 teams, that sort of hectoring approach can work, even without any enforcement mechanism.

    I am also curious if it would be possible to schedule fewer back to backs for teams in prime-time TV spots, but that's easier said than done given the inherent difficulties in scheduling.

    As someone who likes basketball, I hate ideas to reduce the season length.
     
  44. tims4wins

    tims4wins PN23's replacement SoSH Member

    Messages:
    14,571
    I think I saw that the NBA is going to start the season a week earlier next year, and reduce the preseason. What is the practical effect of the extra week? How many 4 games in 5 night stretches will it remove? I'd love to see an analysis
     
  45. BigJimEd

    BigJimEd Member SoSH Member

    Messages:
    2,209
    This plus they don't want their stars working harder because another is resting.
     
  46. Van Everyman

    Van Everyman Member SoSH Member

    Messages:
    13,195
    Given that Irving/LeBron/Love all played a night later against the Lakers and had monster games, it's hard to look at the Cavs' decision to rest them in prime time as anything other than selfish and also kind of stupid.

    The NBA is a business not an artistic expression -- and part of what makes that business successful is the huge dollars business partners like ABC pay for marquee match-ups. Those partners have every right to insist that the league do what it can to ensure that teams aren't materially undermining the value of those events it has paid to broadcast.

    This isn't that hard.
     
  47. Jeff Van GULLY

    Jeff Van GULLY Member SoSH Member

    Messages:
    3,038

    I like basketball too. You really would miss October/November games from the slate? Going from 82 to 66 games would be a month's worth of games.
     
  48. the moops

    the moops Member SoSH Member

    Messages:
    540
    I don't follow. They had to play hard, very hard to beat LA that game. They were down 10 points going into the 4th quarter. Seems as though the rest may have helped them eek out that win in the 4th.
     
  49. bowiac

    bowiac I've been living a lie. Lifetime Member SoSH Member

    Messages:
    11,602
    I would miss these games, yes. I like the grind of the NBA season, and I don't see what benefit as a fan I get out of a shorter season.
     

Share This Page