jacklamabe65 said:A pipe dream but sign Lester AND trade for Hamels. It is doable.
I'd rather sign Lester and trade for a RHP, as there's a glutton of southpaws in the upper minors.
jacklamabe65 said:A pipe dream but sign Lester AND trade for Hamels. It is doable.
Well get him the hell away from the Boston minor league system and send him to New York's.foulkehampshire said:there's a glutton of southpaws in the upper minors.
A deal starting with Walker or Paxton might make more sense for Seattle if they want to win in 2015, but as they've been incredibly reticent to move any of their young pitchers for offensive help, sure, it would make a lot more sense to trade something form their pitching depth to get some offensive assistance.ArgentinaSOXfan said:Would a deal that starts with Iwakuma and Cespedes make sense for Seattle and us?
arzjake said:Call Atlanta while the phone is still hot. Is Justin Upton on the market (?) and I'd take a portion of BJUpton's contract to get him.. You cannot argue Upton's power numbers and the LF CF flexibility. Upton, Betts, Castillo OF all under age 27 sets you up for a good long time.
Plus if you talk BJUpton, maybe you can dump a Craig, Victorino contract by equaling out a fair money swap. Then, Cespedes becomes trade bait for SP or a LH Bat at 3b or 1B...
Possibilities are endless with an OF of the above..
If Heyward had more than one year of team control, this would not have been the deal they made. Cardinals gambling they can extend him, which in their case is a decent gamble. They seem to have a good record of retaining guys of this caliber.opes said:Terrible trade imo. Heyward has way more long-term value than shelby Miller.
Huh! As a part-time Mariner fan (when they're not playing the Sox), I think Craig is a pretty good suggestion for the Ms. They certainly have nothing to lose and nobody blocking him from a comeback performance, if he has it in him.Drek717 said:A deal starting with Walker or Paxton might make more sense for Seattle if they want to win in 2015, but as they've been incredibly reticent to move any of their young pitchers for offensive help, sure, it would make a lot more sense to trade something form their pitching depth to get some offensive assistance.
In another thread I'd suggested the viability of an Iwakuma for Cespedes + Craig deal, as Craig would be an ideal 1B/DH option for Seattle as a rebound candidate. Comparatively cheap, they have the money to spare because until Cano FAs haven't been taking their money, and Craig is a high BA, high OBP guy who hits line drives to all fields when right, not your usual middle of the lineup bat who sees a lot of HRs turn into loud fly outs in Seattle's stadium.
I'd up the ante to include Napoli to bring back a Walker or Paxton. Napoli is the power RH bat they're looking for, while Craig is more of a crapshoot and reminds me of their Justin Smoak scenario waiting to pan out. Sox can take a look at La Roche (LH bat) to replace Napoli.ArgentinaSOXfan said:Would a deal that starts with Iwakuma and Cespedes make sense for Seattle and us?
The sports talk around St. Louis at he deadline was that the Cards front office was split on Miller. It is entirely possible that those still advocating for him, when faced with a pressing need for immediate OF help in the wake of Taveras' death, have wavered following a lucky end of season and a very disappointing final start when he had a real shot against SF's weakest starter and instead couldn't make it through 4 innings.chrisfont9 said:If Heyward had more than one year of team control, this would not have been the deal they made. Cardinals gambling they can extend him, which in their case is a decent gamble. They seem to have a good record of retaining guys of this caliber.
No chance the Mariners bite on one year of Napoli and one year of Cespedes for one of their future aces. No way.RochesterSamHorn said:I'd up the ante to include Napoli to bring back a Walker or Paxton. Napoli is the power RH bat they're looking for, while Craig is more of a crapshoot and reminds me of their Justin Smoak scenario waiting to pan out. Sox can take a look at La Roche (LH bat) to replace Napoli.
chrisfont9 said:No chance the Mariners bite on one year of Napoli and one year of Cespedes for one of their future aces. No way.
The dude is 23 and signed cheaply through like 29. There is literally no way that happens. Might as well see if we can get Freddie freeman for cheap. They traded an OF with one year left on his deal. If se trade cespedes should teams start calling us about bogaerts due to our "firesale"?Curll said:One pitcher I'd love to kick the tires on is Julio Teheran. Something like JBJ, Escobar, Barnes, and Ball for Teheran and Chris Johnson could tempt the Braves if they're in full firesale mode.
Never happen. It's not a fire sale mode at all. The Braves however know that this roster as constructed isn't going anywhere and Heyward and Upton were free agents that were probably signing somewhere else. They also have lots of issues with pitching between the injuries and Santana as a free agent. Teheran is the one guy they would probably hold onto with a kung fu grip. I really like the prospects for the Braves moving on with John Hart in charge, smart evaluator with a track record.Curll said:One pitcher I'd love to kick the tires on is Julio Teheran. Something like JBJ, Escobar, Barnes, and Ball for Teheran and Chris Johnson could tempt the Braves if they're in full firesale mode.
http://www.foxsports.com/mlb/story/mariners-phillies-red-sox-cole-hamels-nelson-cruz-matt-kemp-nick-markakis-hot-stove-111814The Red Sox seem disinclined to move Christian Vazquez or Blake Swihart, but teams routinely ask about both catching prospects.
*Speaking of Vazquez, the Phillies are doing background work on his makeup, as well as on the makeups of right-hander Matt Barnes and outfielder Mookie Betts.
Those are the kinds of prospects that the Phillies likely would request for Cole Hamels. Doesn't mean they would get them -- Betts, in particular, seems untouchable -- but the Phillies have scouted the Red Sox extensively, according to Nick Cafardo of The Boston Globe.
Hamels included the Red Sox on his latest no-trade list, and likely would grant his approval for a deal only if they exercised his $20 million option for 2019. At that point, his contract would become less attractive - $110 million over five years.
Would the Sox part with major prospects and take all of that money? Sounds like the Phillies might need to include cash if they want a strong return.
If Hamels' option is required (which it looks like it will be) Lester is a reasonable bet to get similar AAV for one more year. Given Lester's proven track record in Boston that isn't something you give up much of anything for.grimshaw said:If Lester signs for a lot more than Hamels, that just ups Hamels trade value even more. I don't see the Phillies moving Hamels before Lester or Scherzer sets the market. It doesn't help that teams are handing out really long FA contracts right now.
I'd like to see the Sox pounce on a #2 or #3 via trade or FA on the market first so they have something locked up.
Rudy Pemberton said:This doesn't bode well for Victorino's chances to help the team, does it- if they were so adamant about Cespedes playing RF?
Rudy Pemberton said:This doesn't bode well for Victorino's chances to help the team, does it- if they were so adamant about Cespedes playing RF?
Tyrone Biggums said:Never happen. It's not a fire sale mode at all. The Braves however know that this roster as constructed isn't going anywhere and Heyward and Upton were free agents that were probably signing somewhere else. They also have lots of issues with pitching between the injuries and Santana as a free agent. Teheran is the one guy they would probably hold onto with a kung fu grip. I really like the prospects for the Braves moving on with John Hart in charge, smart evaluator with a track record.
That being said this might be the right way to go concerning the 2nd starter in terms of getting a young cost controlled ace. Just be ready to pay out the nose for it.
In what world is Julio Teheran not clearly in their top 3 pitchers? I mean, I get that their new GM is looking to wheel and deal, but when the source you're citing specifically says he's on the "safe" list it doesn't make a lot of sense to speculate about his availability.Curll said:
May seem ridiculous, but can't hurt to ask. The only reason I brought it up was (okay, reading comprehension needs work. I overlooked the "top 3 pitchers" part):
https://twitter.com/ZachKleinWSB/status/534398258848612352
Zach KleinVerified account@ZachKleinWSB
MLB source - This is just the beginning. Only players safe are top-3 pitchers, Kimbrel, Freddie and Simmons"
Is there anything more hilarious than the Phillies upping their investment at 1B another hundred million? I hope we don't do any deals for Hamels. Amaro wants someone to save his shitty roster from him, and it shouldn't be us.TOleary25 said:Gammo on D&C:
-Phillies are still asking for too much for Hamels, 2-3 top prospects. Price will likely come down at some point. Phils want to sign Tomas but need to clear money to do so.
Gattis solves some problems for the future and is good Papi insurance. They'd probably need to move Napoli though.Curll said:I like Gattis, but where does he fit? LF/Backup C/1B/DH? Upton would be more appealing, but then there's still too many OF on the roster. Not sure if getting Upton would increase or decrease Cespedes' trade value. Takes another OF off the trade block, but essentially forces the Sox to trade Cespedes.
Minor would be a nice snag. Hell, Brandon Beachy could be a nice recovery project.
and most of Scherzer, right? Adding $60M gives them PLENTY for both Lester ($23-24) and Sandoval ($17-18) with close to $20M for another stud like Scherzer.jimbobim said:McAdam on High Heat with Russo today got rather chatty and illuminating
Russo - Will the Red Sox go all out for Sandoval and give him the extra year ?
McAdam - They value him a lot left handed and projects nicely defensively and middle of the order bat. Support Ortiz
Russo What is the level of desire for the Red Sox to erase the basement
McAdam- Red Sox realize boston market has changed and they can't throw open ticket window and they need to spend and make moves to be relevant and competitive
McAdam - Other target is Lester who is the guy they want and it's a question if they are going to be competitive with the market. Lowballing hurt in ST.
Bidding war for Sandoval ?
McAdam- I believe so . This is a team that could probably add almost 60 mill which would enable them to afford both Lester and Sandoval
More likely it would get them some bullpen help, a decent backup catcher, a mid-tier SP, and some money left over for a mid-season move.Yaz4Ever said:and most of Scherzer, right? Adding $60M gives them PLENTY for both Lester and Sandoval with (I hope) close to $20M for another stud.
grimshaw said:I'm still wondering what the Nats would want for Jordan Zimmerman assuming that wasn't just bogus. I'd prefer him times a billion.
They've got to use some chips on an impact player.
Possibly SS in 2016 if they don't extend Desmond and he reportedly wants a huge payday.sean1562 said:they really only have holes at 2b or 3b. they have plenty of outfielders and pitching.
ehaz said:Possibly SS in 2016 if they don't extend Desmond and he reportedly wants a huge payday.
Does Marrero, Cecchini and Johnson get it done for a year of Zim?
ehaz said:Possibly SS in 2016 if they don't extend Desmond and he reportedly wants a huge payday.
Does Marrero, Cecchini and Johnson get it done for a year of Zim?