Red Sox fire Dave Bush

RedOctober3829

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 19, 2005
55,519
deep inside Guido territory
Per Boston Globe.
“The Red Sox have fired pitching coach Dave Bush, according to multiple industry sources.
Bush had been the Sox pitching coach since the 2020 season, following three years as a Red Sox minor league pitching coordinator. With the Sox pitching staff having struggled to a 4.52 ERA (21st in the big leagues), the team has elected to go in a different direction.”

https://x.com/alexspeier/status/1711435298826076655?s=46&t=IVL2VrlFgLlpc3mjGGto8Q
 

moondog80

heart is two sizes two small
SoSH Member
Sep 20, 2005
8,280
I guess having a CBO/GM to make decisions is overrated.
 

JBJ_HOF

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 5, 2014
540
Players getting worse in AAA and not enough weaning off weaknesses and advancing positives in AAA and MLB the last few years have been glaring. Abbott and Bush seem like nice folks, but they were failing at their jobs.
 

LogansDad

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 15, 2006
29,823
Alamogordo
Players getting worse in AAA and not enough weaning off weaknesses and advancing positives in AAA and MLB the last few years have been glaring. Abbott and Bush seem like nice folks, but they were failing at their jobs.
Absolutely agree.
 

simplicio

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 11, 2012
5,320
Pay Kyle Snyder whatever it takes.
Snyder seems to be amazing at polishing cast-offs into diamonds, but then equally amazing at having those diamonds go down for TJ. If Bloom were still here I think it'd be a perfect fit, but if we're really going to jump into a high priced FA starter market, is Snyder the guy?
 

Rovin Romine

Johnny Rico
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 14, 2005
24,626
Miami (oh, Miami!)
Players getting worse in AAA and not enough weaning off weaknesses and advancing positives in AAA and MLB the last few years have been glaring. Abbott and Bush seem like nice folks, but they were failing at their jobs.
Abbot and Montville. . .but yes, absolutely.

What I'm really hoping for is a positive change in whatever the message and the method is - rather than someone to "more perfectly implement" whatever they're currently doing.

Because whatever they're currently doing hasn't been that great.
 

canderson

Mr. Brightside
SoSH Member
Jul 16, 2005
39,650
Harrisburg, Pa.
Seems wise. Many broken pieces of the organization.

And more proof Cora will be the defecto head of baseball ops no matter who they hire as GM.
 

simplicio

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 11, 2012
5,320
And more proof Cora will be the defecto head of baseball ops no matter who they hire as GM.
Why do you say that? If anything I think this points to the incoming PBO having more input on coaching staff, not less.
 

8slim

has trust issues
SoSH Member
Nov 6, 2001
24,970
Unreal America
Why do you say that? If anything I think this points to the incoming PBO having more input on coaching staff, not less.
If that were the case, I would think they'd hold off on letting people go until they have someone new at the helm who would conduct an organizational review. Seems like Cora may be the one doing that at the moment. Which would definitely speak to them likely bringing in a weak head of baseball ops.
 

SouthernBoSox

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 23, 2005
12,121
Seems wise. Many broken pieces of the organization.

And more proof Cora will be the defecto head of baseball ops no matter who they hire as GM.
Yea, it seems to me, right or wrong, that this is Cora's organization right now
 

lexrageorge

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2007
18,244
I think it's more likely that Cora was asked if his staff should see any changes, and he responded. Also, wouldn't the AAA coaching fall under the front office rather than Cora? Teams move on from assistants all the time.
 

Red(s)HawksFan

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 23, 2009
20,948
Maine
Why do you say that? If anything I think this points to the incoming PBO having more input on coaching staff, not less.
Also, isn't coaching staff usually the purview of the manager?

I don't understand this place sometimes. A couple weeks ago, it was malpractice to not fire Cora and give the new CBO a clean slate. Now because they're firing some coaches before the new CBO has been hired, that's malpractice too?
 

Auger34

used to be tbb
SoSH Member
Apr 23, 2010
9,704
Didn't Cora explicitly say that they would bring back the entire staff? To me, this seems like Cora has LESS power than we thought not more
 

E5 Yaz

polka king
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Apr 25, 2002
90,688
Oregon
Didn't Cora explicitly say that they would bring back the entire staff? To me, this seems like Cora has LESS power than we thought not more
He said that right as the season was ending and, in the moment, it's the right thing to say to avoid providing a real answer. Evaluating things after a week or so, he's decided to change course.
I don't see any problem with his statements
 

Auger34

used to be tbb
SoSH Member
Apr 23, 2010
9,704
He said that right as the season was ending and, in the moment, it's the right thing to say to avoid providing a real answer. Evaluating things after a week or so, he's decided to change course.
I don't see any problem with his statements
To be clear, I don't either...I also don't believe that he's running the organization by himself unopposed. That's the impetus behind my original post
 

Rovin Romine

Johnny Rico
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 14, 2005
24,626
Miami (oh, Miami!)
He said that right as the season was ending and, in the moment, it's the right thing to say to avoid providing a real answer. Evaluating things after a week or so, he's decided to change course.
I don't see any problem with his statements
It's kind of weird overall though. He could have made another chipper non-statement (which is fine) rather than flatly saying everyone would be back.

Some of this could just be resignation-type turnovers, I suppose. But let's suppose Cora's effectively pulling the strings.

That would mean a week after the season ended, he decided to ax Bush/Febles. That could speak to a sort of deeper disconnect. Like what's changed between spring training and now? Or the ASB and now? Or even between the end of the season and now? They're both Cora guys - or at least were endorsed by Cora in 21, 22, and 23.

Bush was a former ML pitcher, an analytics guy, but didn't have a huge depth of experience coaching ML pitchers. Febles pre-dated Cora and has been a coach or a manager in the system since 2007.
 

E5 Yaz

polka king
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Apr 25, 2002
90,688
Oregon
It's kind of weird overall though. He could have made another chipper non-statement (which is fine) rather than flatly saying everyone would be back.

Some of this could just be resignation-type turnovers, I suppose. But let's suppose Cora's effectively pulling the strings.

That would mean a week after the season ended, he decided to ax Bush/Febles. That could speak to a sort of deeper disconnect. Like what's changed between spring training and now? Or the ASB and now? Or even between the end of the season and now? They're both Cora guys - or at least were endorsed by Cora in 21, 22, and 23.
It's basically the Pitino Doctrine: "What was true then is not true now ... so I wasn't lying"
 

DennyDoyle'sBoil

Found no thrill on Blueberry Hill
SoSH Member
Sep 9, 2008
43,049
AZ
I'm having trouble understanding what this means about Cora. There's no Occam's razor explanation here to me.

It's definitely weird timing, and it's hard to believe it happened without his input. Whether it means it was his decision, or it was with his grudging acquiescence, or something in between, seems unknowable at this point. I sort of think we're in Rorschach test land with Cora. If you squint, you can kind of see what you want to see.

I agree that if they fill the positions before they have a CBO, that would be some new interesting information.

Just throwing this out there -- is there any possibility they actually have settled on a CBO, or a likely CBO, and are communicating with him, but just can't or won't announce it yet?
 

InsideTheParker

persists in error
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
40,570
Pioneer Valley
Just throwing this out there -- is there any possibility they actually have settled on a CBO, or a likely CBO, and are communicating with him, but just can't or won't announce it yet?
I can only imagine that being the case if the man or woman is associated with one of the contending teams. I know there's sort of an unwritten rule against announcing big signings during the playoffs, but I don't know if that's only w/r/t players.
 

Yelling At Clouds

Post-darwinian
SoSH Member
Jul 19, 2005
3,446
It's kind of weird overall though. He could have made another chipper non-statement (which is fine) rather than flatly saying everyone would be back.
I'm not certain he did say that? The belief that he wanted everyone back seems to have stemmed from this quote from the press conference, via Boston.com:

Alex Cora said:
[We] as a coaching staff, we got to get better,” Cora said. “We got to push these guys to be a lot better and it’s on us to do this in the offseason. Do that in spring training and do it throughout the season next year. That’s my challenge this year. Me and the coaching staff, we have to be better.
That doesn't seem all that definitive to me. If he said something else in the press conference, then I haven't seen it, maybe someone else who has an hour on their hands can watch it all the way through and confirm.
 

grimshaw

Member
SoSH Member
May 16, 2007
4,231
Portland
Snyder seems to be amazing at polishing cast-offs into diamonds, but then equally amazing at having those diamonds go down for TJ. If Bloom were still here I think it'd be a perfect fit, but if we're really going to jump into a high priced FA starter market, is Snyder the guy?
I don't recall the source, but I do remember reading that the Rays understand that a lot of guys they acquire or draft have a fairly high risk of arm injuries, but because they are trying to save pennies, they roll the dice on guys who may fall in their lap.
 

The Gray Eagle

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2001
16,906
The Glob article seems like it's been updated.
Here is what Cora said about the coaches and when he said it:

Last Monday, before any changes to the staff were announced, manager Alex Cora made clear that the Sox expected to raise the bar in terms of their coaching work with players.
“We just had a meeting an hour ago with our coaching staff, and the tone of our conversation was we have to find ways to improve our players,” said Cora. “You have to be willing to adjust what we have tried to do the last few years for them to be better.”
Cora was asked if the need for improved methods meant a need to alter the coaching staff.
“I don’t think so,”
he said. “I think we just have to be better. We have to be willing to go and talk to people and adjust our routines. That’s something we’ve been talking about the whole season.
“I know people talk about the coaching staff, but the people that followed us the whole time, you guys saw it, we did a lot of things we don’t usually do. It didn’t work. It’s not lack of trying, lack of effort, lack of knowledge. You’ve just got to keep trying to find ways to be better and it’s on us.”
One week later, however, it appears that the Sox decided to alter their staff in pursuit of that change in methodology.
The coaching staff has been "altered" a week after he said that he didn't think they needed to be.
 

lexrageorge

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2007
18,244
It seems to me it would be a massive disservice to the coaches if Cora said "We are evaluating our coaching staff and plan to make changes". Assistants know they have limited job security, and reminding them of that in a public press conference seems like rubbing that fact in their faces. If he said "no comment" or "I don't know" or "we'll see" in response to the question about the staff, he would still have been criticized here for being non-committal or giving non-answers to the press.

Certainly, if he told the staff in private that everyone would be back, then it would be a bit of a bad look for Cora. But there's no reason for him to give the press any insight into the team's internal personnel decisions prior to those decisions being made.
 

Red(s)HawksFan

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 23, 2009
20,948
Maine
It seems to me it would be a massive disservice to the coaches if Cora said "We are evaluating our coaching staff and plan to make changes". Assistants know they have limited job security, and reminding them of that in a public press conference seems like rubbing that fact in their faces. If he said "no comment" or "I don't know" or "we'll see" in response to the question about the staff, he would still have been criticized here for being non-committal or giving non-answers to the press.

Certainly, if he told the staff in private that everyone would be back, then it would be a bit of a bad look for Cora. But there's no reason for him to give the press any insight into the team's internal personnel decisions prior to those decisions being made.
And I think there's also a difference between him saying "I don't think so" in response to a press question about changing the coaching staff and the organization making a different decision a week later. Maybe he wanted to keep Bush and Febles and was out-voted (or out-ranked). Or perhaps after further analysis and discussions, he simply changed his mind. That doesn't mean he was wrong at the press conference or that he lied during the press conference. Things can change.
 

YTF

Member
SoSH Member
And I think there's also a difference between him saying "I don't think so" in response to a press question about changing the coaching staff and the organization making a different decision a week later. Maybe he wanted to keep Bush and Febles and was out-voted (or out-ranked). Or perhaps after further analysis and discussions, he simply changed his mind. That doesn't mean he was wrong at the press conference or that he lied during the press conference. Things can change.
Yeah, it could be any of the above. I have to say that I would be curious as to who might out rank or out vote Cora at this point in time. IIRC , Henry is pretty hands of when it comes to on field personnel decisions. BOH perhaps?
 

Red(s)HawksFan

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 23, 2009
20,948
Maine
Yeah, it could be any of the above. I have to say that I would be curious as to who might out rank or out vote Cora at this point in time. IIRC , Henry is pretty hands of when it comes to on field personnel decisions. BOH perhaps?
BOH probably has input. As does Romero. And Kennedy. Probably others as well depending on what decisions are being made.

Edit to add: according to redsox.com, Raquel Ferreira (EVP, assistant GM) and Ben Crockett (SVP of baseball operations) are probably in the loop as well.
 
Last edited:

mauf

Anderson Cooper × Mr. Rogers
Moderator
SoSH Member
Jun 22, 2008
36,123
There aren’t many organizations where managers, and even executives, are free to hire and fire subordinates without some degree of oversight and consent (either from more senior executives, or from ownership). I think most of us live this at work, but sometimes forget when it comes to sports teams because their public statements usually portray every decision as having been made unilaterally by the appropriate person in the chain of command.

It’s notable that the dismissals of Bush, Febles, and the two AAA coaches appear to have come from outside the chain of command. Cora said a week ago that he didn’t see the need for changes on the staff, so I can’t imagine he drove this. But I wouldn’t be surprised at all if he is going along willingly. He’d hardly be the first manager who needed a push from above to make needed changes on his team.

I don’t share the view of some here that this move should have awaited the appointment of a new CBO. The new CBO is going to need a few months to assess the situation; if coaching changes are needed this offseason, the people to be replaced will, as a practical matter, need to be identified by ownership or by holdovers from the old regime, including Cora.

I do expect that any new hires on the major-league coaching staff will be put on hold so the new CBO can weigh in.
 

joe dokes

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
30,614
I think it's more likely that Cora was asked if his staff should see any changes, and he responded. Also, wouldn't the AAA coaching fall under the front office rather than Cora? Teams move on from assistants all the time.
I have a hard time squaring that with his previous "no changes needed" (at the MLB level) comment. Although that could have been a too-positive attempt to keep his thoughts ("they suck") private.
That said . . . .
IF we assume that there's lots of coaching that gets delegated to coaches, I find it hard to believe that a manager of a team that made "the same mistakes" repeatedly would think very highly of some of those coaches. (Even accounting for some immutable (IMO-YMMV) characteristics like "can't un-coach stupid.)
 

jon abbey

Shanghai Warrior
Moderator
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
71,224
BOS will hire him this winter, fire him in June and replace him with Koji Uehara who will be the best pitching coach any of us has ever seen.
 

JM3

often quoted
SoSH Member
Dec 14, 2019
15,307
The Bailey thing does make a lot of sense, once we have a CBO.

According to Slusser, it’s believed Bailey wants to work closer to his home in Connecticut. It’s unclear if the Red Sox have contacted him about their open pitching coach position.
“Bailey is extremely well regarded but his family is on the East Coast and he’s believed to want to work closer to home. Bailey has been highly sought after around the majors, with multiple teams making inquiries, though there is the potential he could remain with San Francisco as the director of pitching or bench coach.”
https://www.masslive.com/redsox/2023/10/could-red-sox-hire-2013-world-series-champion-as-their-pitching-coach.html
 

JM3

often quoted
SoSH Member
Dec 14, 2019
15,307
Maybe Bailey could take the job and Koji could take over for him in May.
Too soon...

(Koji didn't take over until June).

Another possibility is that some of the Cubs pitching people who Breslow worked with, like their pitching coach Tommy Hottovy, another former Red Sox pitcher, might be available after the Counsell hire.
 

Pablo's TB Lover

Member
SoSH Member
Sep 10, 2017
6,016
Sorry all, I didn't see this post previously and suggest "Red Sox shave Bush" as a headline.

Andrew Bailey's teams seem to have performed better than the relatively average arms that have been on the Giants the past several years. So I would not be opposed to adding him as pitching coach. The Giants featured Logan Webb, flotsam and jetsam and finished well into the top half in pitching this past season. Their BRef page shows only 3 starting pitchers for the Giants this past year which is a bit unusual.
 

The Gray Eagle

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2001
16,906
Bailey has interviewed for the NYY bench coach job.
https://www.bostonglobe.com/2023/11/13/sports/potential-new-red-sox-pitching-coach-andrew-bailey-talks-yankees-about-bench-role/

Presumably if he is offered that job, he would want that over being Red Sox pitching coach.

Bailey reportedly interviewed for the Yankees’ bench coach position Monday, a bigger job that puts him just a seat away from New York manager Aaron Boone.
Along with a pitching coach, the Red Sox still need to hire a third-base coach following the dismissal of Carlos Febles.