Post Game Thread: Wk1 at Miami

dcmissle

Deflatigator
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Aug 4, 2005
28,269
Stitch01 said:
This game had zero to do with the heat, the conditions, and very little to do with Brady. They have gotten clocked in Foxboro.
Then that's even more disturbing.

I was responding to comments that they wilted.
 

Norm Siebern

Member
SoSH Member
May 12, 2003
7,137
Western MD
Out scored 23-0 in the second half. Not only couldn't the offensive line pass protect, they couldn't open a hole for a running back to save their lives. Brady is going to look like Jim Plunkett half way through the season if this doesn't get fixed. I had to laugh at the calls against Jones and Mayo as they hit Tanehill. "Driving the QB to the ground with force?" Laughable. This is still football, right? Perhaps they are supposed to let him to the ground, gently.

Was the humidity any factor? A sieve for an offensive line was the only factor I saw. This is going to be a long fucking season if that problem doesn't get fixed.

That being said, I am already looking forward to payback in Foxborough in December.
 

crystalline

Member
SoSH Member
Oct 12, 2009
5,771
JP
Seels said:
LaFell is awful. A disappointing game for everyone but he was noticeably terrible. What happened on that last pass in the 4th quarter? Did he forget he was playing football?
The score is never about one play, but emotionally Lafell's OPI in the fourth was a killer. Without it the Pats had a first down at the Miami 25 down 3. Instead they had a third and
long from the 50 and ended up punting.
 

Stitch01

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
18,155
Boston
crystalline said:
The score is never about one play, but emotionally Lafell's OPI in the fourth was a killer. Without it the Pats had a first down at the Miami 25 down 3. Instead they had a third and
long from the 50 and ended up punting.
He's was a terrible player in Carolina and likely will be here. It will be very disappointing if he is getting playing time latter this year given the draft capital spent on wide receivers. Hopefully Dobson didn't have a setback.
 

Norm Siebern

Member
SoSH Member
May 12, 2003
7,137
Western MD
And why is Brandon LaFell on this team? Jesus god he is useless.

I am trying hard to think that this is Buffalo 31 New England 0; but this isn't 2003 and I don't know if the talent is there anymore. Maybe, but I it know.
 

Eric Ampersand

New Member
Apr 29, 2013
120
It looked like the gameplan on offense was to spread out the defense. Throughout the game I saw lots of empty sets with Vereen lined up wide. This tells me the team knew they needed quick throws. They knew the OL was going to be a problem. For the most part either nobody got open or Brady didn't have time. When Brady finally got time he missed his targets. If the OL gets shored up most of the problems will be fixed. Defenses won't be able to jump short routes or flood the middle of the field. In the OL thread I wrote that the young guys need to get better soon because the vets looked awful. 
 

Zenicity

New Member
Sep 23, 2012
33
twibnotes said:
Why is Edelman just a B-?
You're totally right.  Looking back on it without the lens of having just sat through the game, and also considering his 'rushing' stats as I look back at the box score, I'd say he performed about as well as one could given the passes Brady was throwing and the lack of a running game.  
 

TheoShmeo

Skrub's sympathy case
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 19, 2005
12,890
Boston, NY
Stitch01 said:
This game had zero to do with the heat, the conditions, and very little to do with Brady. They have gotten clocked in Foxboro.
I don't know.  Tom missed an open Edelman and threw at several covered receivers during the game .  Now it's true that the line sucked and probably true that his receivers just were not open.  And the running game was hardly existent.
 
But Tom contributed to the result in my book.  As I said above, if he hits Edelman near the end, the result may well have been different in that the Pats would have been in FG range down 3 and very well might have scored at TD there.
 

Stitch01

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
18,155
Boston
He played pretty well in the first half then terrible once everything turned into a mess around him. I don't disagree with your evaluation of Brady, but I don't think any QB in the league wins that game today.
 

Eric Ampersand

New Member
Apr 29, 2013
120
RedOctober3829 said:
Vellano was absolutely terrible too. Not the answer in the 3-4.
 
Did Saliga play? Miami ran for almost 200 yards. Some of that was poor tackling but a lot was bad DL and LB play.
 

Harry Hooper

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jan 4, 2002
34,638
bankshot1 said:
I was listening on radio, were the roughing the passer calls as BS/ticky-tacky as Zo, the homer, made them appear? Or were they legit?
 
 
Replay didn't have a good angle on the first one by Jones, but it appeared quite possible that Jones karate-chopped Tannehill in the neck.
 
Jones' second infraction seemed like a clear-cut helmet to the QB's facemask = legit call.
 

Dogman

Yukon Cornelius
Moderator
SoSH Member
Mar 19, 2004
15,213
Missoula, MT
Harry Hooper said:
 
 
Replay didn't have a good angle on the first one by Jones, but it appeared quite possible that Jones karate-chopped Tannehill in the neck.
 
Jones' second infraction seemed like a clear-cut helmet to the QB's facemask = legit call.
 
 
I thought both were for "driving the QB to the turf" which is ridiculous.
 

riboflav

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 20, 2006
9,741
NOVA
So, did Hightower really call out the coaches after the game? I've tried finding it but have been unlucky.
 

SeoulSoxFan

I Want to Hit the World with Rocket Punch
Moderator
SoSH Member
Jun 27, 2006
22,106
A Scud Away from Hell
dcmissle said:
It is seldom easy at Miami, where Brady has rarely played particularly well. 1:00 o'clock at Miami on Sept 7 had trouble written all over it.

There was, "well they'll get used to the conditions in August." Never persuaded by that
 
Yup not an excuse but Brady is 6-7 I believe in his last 13. Miami is always tough. Hey remember when they looked like dog poop against the Bills in game 1 before pulling out a come back? 
 
Season is long, despite some comments on the game thread I think very, very few thought Pats were going undefeated for the season nor in the division. 
 
I'm stepping away from the ledge and moving onto Minnesota. Dome + Cassel = victory #1.
 

Morning Woodhead

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 16, 2011
967
SeoulSoxFan said:
 
Yup not an excuse but Brady is 6-7 I believe in his last 13. Miami is always tough. Hey remember when they looked like dog poop against the Bills in game 1 before pulling out a come back? 
 
Season is long, despite some comments on the game thread I think very, very few thought Pats were going undefeated for the season nor in the division. 
 
I'm stepping away from the ledge and moving onto Minnesota. Dome + Cassel = victory #1.
No dome in Minnesota this year.  But Cassel is still there, which is nice. 
 

Kliq

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 31, 2013
22,929
Make or break time for Cannon. He was consistently awful today, both in pass and run blocking, and now is the time for him to show the organization that he can be a starter for them, but today he showed nothing.
 
I didn't follow his play very closely, but I didn't really see anything wrong with Wilfork. I thought there were plenty of times where the center of the line was pushed backwards, and Moreno had to take it back outside. What frustrated me with the run defense wasn't necessarily because of these huge holes for Moreno to run through, but the inability to tackle Moreno for losses on plays that appeared to be going nowhere.
 

PedroKsBambino

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Apr 17, 2003
31,551
Smiling Joe Hesketh said:
 
We're only talking about relevant players today, thanks.
 
I stand by my assertion.
 
Vereen definitely played well.  Absent more tape, he may stand alone, though
 

Dollar

Member
SoSH Member
May 5, 2006
11,199
Dogman2 said:
 
 
I thought both were for "driving the QB to the turf" which is ridiculous.
 
The second one was.  The first one was called "illegal hit to the neck of the quarterback", which is a legit call.
 
 
 
Rule 12, Section 2, Article 9 sets forth the standards for roughing the passer.  “Referees will be particularly alert to fouls in which defenders impermissibly use the helmet and/or facemask to hit the passer, or use hands, arms or other parts of the body to hit the passer forcibly in the head or neck area.” 
 

dcmissle

Deflatigator
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Aug 4, 2005
28,269
Morning Woodhead said:
No dome in Minnesota this year.  But Cassel is still there, which is nice. 
.

Norv Turner is a new addition, and they today out 34 points on the Rams in St Louis. May not be same old Vikings.
 

Stitch01

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
18,155
Boston
SSf, This is way more worrisome than the opener last year. That team was missing guys and still outplayed Buffalo a lot outside of a couple of dumb turnovers. Today a close to healthy team got destroyed in all three phases. I was certain the 2012 team was good at 1-2 and pretty confident last years team was still going to be the division winner and figure stuff out. I can't say that right now, certainly won't be betting on them beating the Vikings next week.
 

Ed Hillel

Wants to be startin somethin
SoSH Member
Dec 12, 2007
44,455
Here
Dollar said:
 
The second one was.  The first one was called "illegal hit to the neck of the quarterback", which is a legit call.
 
Which is kind of an issue for lengthy defenders who come in with arms raised to bat down the ball. I think he just has to put his head down and drive into the QB instead

Oh wait, that's illegal, too.

I guess maybe he should cuddle him and lead him gently to the ground.

You know, I get there are legal ways left to tackle the QB, but today was a good demonstration of how difficult it's become. God forbid you "tackle someone with force," as the call went.
 

Zenicity

New Member
Sep 23, 2012
33
Stitch01 said:
SSf, This is way more worrisome than the opener last year. That team was missing guys and still outplayed Buffalo a lot outside of a couple of dumb turnovers. Today a close to healthy team got destroyed in all three phases. I was certain the 2012 team was good at 1-2 and pretty confident last years team was still going to be the division winner and figure stuff out. I can't say that right now, certainly won't be betting on them beating the Vikings next week.
Yeah, the Vikings actually looked pretty good today.  Cassel played well and AP is always a threat, especially figuring our D was little more than a damp paper bag to Moreno.  
 

JimBoSox9

will you be my friend?
SoSH Member
Nov 1, 2005
16,677
Mid-surburbia
I think Miami is a good team.  Moreno isn't a Mile High mirage, Wallace is legit, Tannehill may have graduated to good enough, and it's a talented front four and overall defense.  I think at midseason this loss will look much less embarassing in context.  They're going to knock some teams around down there.
 
That said, this squad is short 1 coverage linebacker and possibly an offensive line.  My greatest fear at this moment is that Belichick's deal wasn't with the Devil, but with Dante.
 

PedroKsBambino

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Apr 17, 2003
31,551
Getting beat badly inside on both lines (and outside on both as well) was horrible to watch...felt like the Ravens playoff loss, only this time the competition wasn't as accomplished.  Hard not to be a little worried about that, because while both units probably need more reps they are healthy right now.
 
I agree with the comment I think by DOTB, that the lack of a downfield threat really hurts them against teams who get pressure out of the base defense...if those safeties can push up and take away the mid range, it's just tough for them to get going.    Today the problem deep was Brady's arm moreso than the receivers (who were, of course, awful too).   So, we'll see...these guys always have a lot of adjustments and I'm sure they are working on all of the ugliness we saw.
 

Ed Hillel

Wants to be startin somethin
SoSH Member
Dec 12, 2007
44,455
Here
Harry Hooper said:
 
Wan't that Hightower's?
Yes.

Speaking of, you may want to throw his post-game quote in here. He may not be seeing the field much next week.
 

Eddie Jurak

canderson-lite
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 12, 2002
44,888
Melrose, MA
This performance was so bad that for me the blame has to fall primarily on the coaching staff. In no phase of the game were the Patriots ready to play this one.

Even the stupid dicking around with long snappers seemed to burn them.
 

Leather

given himself a skunk spot
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
28,451
Ed Hillel said:
Yes.

Speaking of, you may want to throw his post-game quote in here. He may not be seeing the field much next week.
?
 

Stitch01

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
18,155
Boston
Said the sideline adjustments weren't good enough to counter the Dolphins run game. He's not wrong, but he played terrible and should keep his mouth shut.
 

Eddie Jurak

canderson-lite
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 12, 2002
44,888
Melrose, MA
Ed Hillel said:
Yes.

Speaking of, you may want to throw his post-game quote in here. He may not be seeing the field much next week.
They don't have enough linebackers to bench him though.
 

ScubaSteveAvery

Master of the Senate
SoSH Member
Jul 29, 2007
8,329
Everywhere
I also hate to shit on McDaniel, but his play calling was really uninspired today.  Maybe he couldn't do much because just rushing 4 disrupted everything, but by the end of the 3rd quarter, there seemed to be a lot of Bradey 3 step drop and throw to receiver over the middle, or the classic RB wheel route.  I expected to see some attempt at misdirection to keep the defense guessing, but it seemed like the defense knew they could rush 4 and get to Brady, or rush 5 and take the easy sack.  The personnel may suck, but I feel that McDaniel needs to be able to design some plays that mask the weaknesses a bit. 
 

ifmanis5

Member
SoSH Member
Sep 29, 2007
64,118
Rotten Apple
To quote the great Taylor Swift, Shake It Off.
 
What surprised me was that the Dolphins defense was on the field the ENTIRE first half yet they went to the next level in the 2nd half- as if they were fresh and rested. Peter King would call that 'weird.'
 

Dollar

Member
SoSH Member
May 5, 2006
11,199
RoyHobbs said:
what is this Hightower quote people are speaking of...
 
According to Tom Jackson, Hightower hates his coach.
 
And apparently he said this:
 
 

shawnrbu said:
On handling the Dolphins offensive scheme:
 
"The adjustments on the sideline weren't good enough."
 
~Hightower

 
 

RoyHobbs

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 13, 2005
1,800
Pg. 35 of "Win it For"
Dollar said:
 
 
According to Tom Jackson, Hightower hates his coach.
 
And apparently he said this:
 
 
 
thank you.
 
and hopefully that is momentary frustration rather than an inkling of some deep-seated 2009 kind of crap.
 

twibnotes

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 16, 2005
20,397
Given how slow he is, Hightower needs a call from the sideline that tells him where the ball is going to be in 2-3 minutes
 

pdaj

Fantasy Maven
SoSH Member
Dec 15, 2002
3,388
From Springfield to Providence
I thought both Ridley and Vereen looked good today. They both ran hard, hit the hole (when it was there), and created a lot of missed tackles when out in space. I thought that 10 yard run in the 2nd quarter (can't recall exactly who it was) was a back-breaker at the time. In the 2nd half, the Miami d-line penetration was ridiculous. Can't put that on the HB. 
 

Tony C

Moderator
Moderator
SoSH Member
Apr 13, 2000
13,729
In case Hightower didn't hear it yet from his coaches, his job is to seal the edge, stuff the run, and not rough the passer the only time he gets to the QB. Pisses me off that the coaches never told him that, poor guy. No wonder he looked terrible.
 

j44thor

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
11,161
Hightower should absolutely STFU but that one roughing the QB penalty he got was terrible.  All he did was tackle Tannehill about .5 seconds after he got rid of the ball.  The Jones roughing penalties were legit as they were both clear hit to head but the Hightower one was a very weak call, something that could be called on virtually every QB sack.