He's going on and on about 'no SB in 10 years!!!!'
He's not really making an actual point, though.
He's not really making an actual point, though.
someone should ask his thoughts on Tom Landry and the Cowboys of the 70s and early 80s. Because they had a similar run to the Patriots of the last 13 years and they became America's Team. But 9 AFC Championships, 5 Super Bowls and 3 Super Bowl wins is apparently chump change in this salary cap erabankshot1 said:As Pat fans we are disappointed that they've not won a SB since 2004. But FF going on about how they've been in the post-season every year for 10 years and haven't won anything ('losing in every imaginable way") seems to miss the point.
That they have been in a position for the better part of 15 years to win a championship every fucking year is pretty amazing. And with a little luck, they might have had 3 more titles.
His disdain for them is so thick and obvious, but its his show.
Well, yeah. By this standard nobody is any good.redsoxcentury said:someone should ask his thoughts on Tom Landry and the Cowboys of the 70s and early 80s. Because they had a similar run to the Patriots of the last 13 years and they became America's Team. But 9 AFC Championships, 5 Super Bowls and 3 Super Bowl wins is apparently chump change in this salary cap era
dcmissle said:He's playing you, priming pump for next 2 weeks. If Pats lose, he brings dirt and shovels Monday. If they win, he trolls until SB. Trolls Pats fans, who feed the beast by calling in against better judgment. Trolls NYers by feeding their reflexive sense of resentment.
We are the fools for playing.
Bumping this from last season, since it's relevant again.Omar's Wacky Neighbor said:Years back, my wife delivered his twins. Wanna say early 05', maybe. When he found out I was a Boston fan (and that we summered in Salisbury and they summered in Rockport,) , he felt the need to bring up to her the whole Belichick issue, out of the blue and on his own. My wife couldnt have given a rat's behind about it nor was she even aware of it, but she says he felt the need to acknowledge it and bring it into the open (but he never got specific on what started the whole thing).
as he should. The Patriots game wasn't close. The Packers-Seahawks game is a better talk topicDahabenzapple2 said:Tomorrow he will spend as much time as possible on the Packers choke job
redsoxcentury said:someone should ask his thoughts on Tom Landry and the Cowboys of the 70s and early 80s. Because they had a similar run to the Patriots of the last 13 years and they became America's Team. But 9 AFC Championships, 5 Super Bowls and 3 Super Bowl wins is apparently chump change in this salary cap era
That is totally wrong. BB left for Cleveland after the Super Bowl. Parcells did not immediately step down and Handley was hired in May of 1991. BB was not going to wait for Parcells surprise resignation.Montana Fan said:Rema, one other little tidbit is that Parcells never made a Super Bowl appearance without Belichick by his side. I'm a Parcells guy but am still disappointed that the Giants went with Ray Handley over Belichick after the 1990 Super Bowl. Belichick will be making his 9th Super Bowl appearance as a DC or HC.
jsinger121 said:That is totally wrong. BB left for Cleveland after the Super Bowl. Parcells did not immediately step down and Handley was hired in May of 1991. BB was not going to wait for Parcells surprise resignation.
OF COURSE he would jump all over that. He's a troll.Dahabenzapple2 said:"This was the worst of the three Colts teams of the three years"
"They didn't belong in this game"
"The only thing that came out of this game is another accusation against the Pats"
He is nothing if not thoroughly predictable
Dahabenzapple2 said:"How come the only team that is accused in EVERY game is the Pats?"
RedOctober3829 said:"The Seahawks will have such an easy time with the Patriots' WR's that they will be able to come up with ways to stop Gronkowski"
Dahabenzapple2 said:He already came to the conclusion that the Pats deflated the balls after they were approved and marked by the referee.
How he comes to that conclusion is never explained
Dahabenzapple2 said:Bad mistake for me listening to the Fat Fuck on the way home.
He has lost his mind.
None of the three Super Bowls mean anything as everything is under suspicion. Who knows what else they have done?
No other team has ever taped a walk through or practice of another team.
Completely false of course.
He has deep seated resentments and hatred for all things Belichick.
No opposing views welcome. He agreed with one called that Belichick should be banned for life.