General Offseason Thread.

Mooch

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
4,631
That’s a reasonable deal for Middleton but that has to mean that Lopez is gone
 

radsoxfan

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 9, 2009
13,872
Now that would be hilarious. Followed by the Pacers attaching first round picks to Brown next summer to get off the contract.
Team option for year 2 which changes everything, not a bad deal for a team that needs to spend something.
 

BigMike

Moderator
Moderator
SoSH Member
Sep 26, 2000
23,255
Team option for year 2 which changes everything, not a bad deal for a team that needs to spend something.
really critical for teams to hit the salary floor with the new CBA. You lose a ton of money if you don't
 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
35,295
get ready for a seemingly insane deal from HOU, they're way below the floor, they supposedly are offerring FVV a huge 2 year deal, but rumor is TOR might keep him on less AAV by going 4 years.
After him basically every player worth signing to a big deal is restricted...so huge 1-2 year deal for DeAngelo Russell? Max offer to a restricted guy (Reaves, Grant, Washington?) maybe they eat a contract, but who is looking to pay to dump one that hasn't already?
 

PedroKsBambino

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Apr 17, 2003
31,852
My hatred level for Vincent somehow managed to increase…wouldn’t have guessed that could be
 

djbayko

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
26,134
Los Angeles, CA
Lol Suns visit cancelled
View: https://twitter.com/ShamsCharania/status/1674912165940146178

View: https://twitter.com/ChrisBHaynes/status/1674912756083068930



and a player option? Mark Cuban is such an immense sucker it's hillarious
I love this because you just know Kyrie didn’t want to end up here but he did this to himself - he’s out of options…for now.

I look forward to the future trade demands and other general chaos which is soon to come their way.
 

nighthob

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
12,739
get ready for a seemingly insane deal from HOU, they're way below the floor, they supposedly are offerring FVV a huge 2 year deal, but rumor is TOR might keep him on less AAV by going 4 years.
After him basically every player worth signing to a big deal is restricted...so huge 1-2 year deal for DeAngelo Russell? Max offer to a restricted guy (Reaves, Grant, Washington?) maybe they eat a contract, but who is looking to pay to dump one that hasn't already?
They’ve been linked to PJ Washington, so my guess is that’s where the money will go.
 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
35,295
They’ve been linked to PJ Washington, so my guess is that’s where the money will go.
Maybe, but... have to go so high that CHA won't match and it ties you up for 24 hours during which other guys will sign.

Honestly.... wonder if they strike out everywhere then offer to take Ben SImmons for a future 1st
 

BigMike

Moderator
Moderator
SoSH Member
Sep 26, 2000
23,255
They’ve been linked to PJ Washington, so my guess is that’s where the money will go.
They will need 2 or 3 contracts that size most likely to reach the floor. Got to be some trash contracts they can get
 

HomeRunBaker

bet squelcher
SoSH Member
Jan 15, 2004
30,740
Maybe, but... have to go so high that CHA won't match and it ties you up for 24 hours during which other guys will sign.

Honestly.... wonder if they strike out everywhere then offer to take Ben SImmons for a future 1st
Grant is hoping that everyone ahead of him in the pecking order gets matched lol.
 

nighthob

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
12,739
Maybe, but... have to go so high that CHA won't match and it ties you up for 24 hours during which other guys will sign.

Honestly.... wonder if they strike out everywhere then offer to take Ben SImmons for a future 1st
I’m not sure that $78 million is the going rate for a #1. Simmons is bench fodder at this point. He would get Houston to the floor, but if Udoka got the Rockets back on track and they became a viable player in the market, they’d be limited by that deal.
 

JM3

often quoted
SoSH Member
Dec 14, 2019
16,147
My general impression of free agency thus far is that most teams will regret most of these deals. So that's cool.

& the Suns now have enough players to play basketball.
 

HomeRunBaker

bet squelcher
SoSH Member
Jan 15, 2004
30,740
There's always a bigger idiot.

Mark Cuban is high on the list of people I thought were much smarter than they actually are.
You think letting Kyrie walk for nothing and losing the salary slot is smart? Losing Brunson was a far worse transaction for this organization.
 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
35,295
You think letting Kyrie walk for nothing and losing the salary slot is smart?
were those the 2 options.... sign Kyrie to that deal or he goes to Houston.... because I REALLY don't think they were

Edit- also, as always with Kyrie, the mistake was adding him in the first place.
 

BigMike

Moderator
Moderator
SoSH Member
Sep 26, 2000
23,255
You think letting Kyrie walk for nothing and losing the salary slot is smart?
Nope. And they spent the assets to get him. You have to actually give it a chance. I know they didn't play well together down the stretch, but they need to see what it will look like with a camp etc.
 

Everetts Dinosaurs

New Member
Jan 22, 2006
227
You think letting Kyrie walk for nothing and losing the salary slot is smart? Losing Brunson was a far worse transaction for this organization.
Lots of dumb decisions going back a long time.
Re: Kyrie, of course not, but they were bidding against themselves. There was no market for Kyrie. It was so barren they had to pretend to schedule a meeting with Phoenix.
 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
35,295
What was the other option other than retaining the asset and slot?
What were Kyrie's options is my point. They gave him a huge deal with a player option. The only other place that could give him a significant offer was HOU, and neither side showed even the slightest interest in that. Kyrie's flirtations were all with S&T destinations like PHX... the Mavs SHOULD have leverage there. Instead they gave him a very player friendly offer 5 seconds into FA. I would expect a more team friendly deal to have been their intial offer, and to explore S&T if Kyrie won't sign it.

Of course all of this stems from trading for him in the first place on the idea of:
66742
 

HomeRunBaker

bet squelcher
SoSH Member
Jan 15, 2004
30,740
Nope. And they spent the assets to get him. You have to actually give it a chance. I know they didn't play well together down the stretch, but they need to see what it will look like with a camp etc.
If they can figure out the end of game sequences they are a pretty good team. All those 4Q leads then neither knew who was supposed to be the aggressive shot maker. Every game ended with uncertainty....they didn't really play bad aside from that.
 

HomeRunBaker

bet squelcher
SoSH Member
Jan 15, 2004
30,740
What were Kyrie's options is my point. They gave him a huge deal with a player option. The only other place that could give him a significant offer was HOU, and neither side showed even the slightest interest in that. Kyrie's flirtations were all with S&T destinations like PHX... the Mavs SHOULD have leverage there. Instead they gave him a very player friendly offer 5 seconds into FA
I doubt this was decided 5 seconds into FA but rather agreed upon last winter prior to the trade being completed. It was already done once Dallas decided to make the deal.
 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
35,295
I doubt this was decided 5 seconds into FA but rather agreed upon last winter prior to the trade being completed. It was already done once Dallas decided to make the deal.
I mean possible (though they could have always pulled a Morey), but yeah to me it seems like a terrible idea, I thought it was a bad trade, and then you're bidding against yourself, then you're giving a guy like Kyrie extra control on the 3rd year.... it's just not at all a well thought out plan. Which is almost always the case with Cuban, who is sneakily one of the worst owners in the league, no plan, just vibes and twitter fights
 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
35,295
That seems like a HUGE bargain looking at some of the other contracts signed today and the murky future in NO.
Yeah I assume it was a package deal... We turn down your super-cheap option and you give us a solid discount, like baseball teams buying out arbitration years
 

Euclis20

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 3, 2004
8,453
Imaginationland
Portland saw the Tobias Harris deal from a few years ago and said yeah, that's 100% the way to go.

I'm glad they did it, it means they really don't want to trade Dame (this is a terrible deal with Lillard on the roster, but twice as bad if they trade him and spend the next couple years rebuilding around Scoot), which makes it less likely that Dame ends up in Miami. Not sorry at all to see Vincent/Strus leave, with Martin being the only one left at a reasonable rate.
 

PedroKsBambino

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Apr 17, 2003
31,852
That seems like a HUGE bargain looking at some of the other contracts signed today and the murky future in NO.
consensus was they had agreement on the deal before turning down the option, which is how these things go.

a comp lower than Grant aspires to, though some real differences in how they fit/play
 

PedroKsBambino

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Apr 17, 2003
31,852
Kyrie is the Bill Russell of franchise destruction—it’s only a matter of when
 

Euclis20

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 3, 2004
8,453
Imaginationland
I doubt this was decided 5 seconds into FA but rather agreed upon last winter prior to the trade being completed. It was already done once Dallas decided to make the deal.
Might as well be talking about the Luka era in Dallas here. If they lost Kyrie, as you note that's a ton of value walking out the door that they just can't recoup, which will make Luka want to leave. Since they've re-signed Kyrie at big money, he will inevitably blow it all up, which will make Luka want to leave.

The Mavs are in a deep, deep hole of their own making. I don't know the way out for them.
 

HomeRunBaker

bet squelcher
SoSH Member
Jan 15, 2004
30,740
I mean possible (though they could have always pulled a Morey), but yeah to me it seems like a terrible idea, I thought it was a bad trade, and then you're bidding against yourself, then you're giving a guy like Kyrie extra control on the 3rd year.... it's just not at all a well thought out plan. Which is almost always the case with Cuban, who is sneakily one of the worst owners in the league, no plan, just vibes and twitter fights
They weren't bidding against themselves if Kyrie's people don't give Dallas that assurance at an agreed upon number.