Farrell Fails Again

Status
Not open for further replies.

Byrdbrain

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
8,588
Z has a pretty big split and Farrell knew that there were a string of lefties coming up later in the inning. He could have had Abad or Ross warming as soon as the first guy got on - not necessarily with the intent of pulling him right away, but certainly at least in time for Ellsbury should it come to that. But he does not like to play matchups with this 8th inning guy.
I've been pushing back on many of what I feel are dumb kneejerk anti-Farrell posts but this seems pretty right on to me. I mean it isn't like those guys are lights out but they are better options than keeping Ziegler in there.

I doubt getting rid of Farrell does anything but it's getting to the point that they may end up doing it.
 

soxhop411

news aggravator
SoSH Member
Dec 4, 2009
46,591
He could, you know, get Ziegler the hell out of there when he's stinking up the joint. Just a thought. His inning started single, K, single, single. He clearly had nothing. Where was the goddamn hook?

A manager is not a helpless bystander.

He kicked away the game tonight. It was a must-win situation given the slump they're in, and he kicked it away by sitting on his hands and watching Ziegler blow up. Absolutely unacceptable.

Name one BP arm in the sox pen you can trust on a consistent basis
 

nothumb

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 27, 2006
7,065
yammer's favorite poster
I'm well past the point where I'm interested in defending Farrell or care if they decide to go in another direction, but let's try and keep a little perspective here. Tazawa is toast, Kimbrel's knee is still balky, Barnes got lit up last night, as did Abad and Robbie Ross even coughed up a run last night. The pen would have to improve by several orders of magnitude to be upgraded to dumpster fire right now.

There is no "unacceptable" decision. All of the options suck. You want to make the argument that Farrell needs to go, be my guest. But tonight's or even last night's bullpen issues are on the players.
Last night there was nothing he could do. Tonight he did the classic "get Abad up too late to face a lefty with the game still close" that shows a complete lack of foresight, even if the options were all marginal.
 

Soxfan in Fla

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 30, 2001
7,187
Now we are complaining that Farrell isn't pitching Buchholz enough???

Yesterday was his throwing day and since he didn't throw prior to the game he was available for one inning max. He's our Saturday starter and Farrell wasn't to have him get up again for a second in jog regardless of results in the 6th.
I wasn't complaining. I was looking for a reasonable explanation. You just gave it. Thanks. Snark could have been avoided, but whatever.
 

Papelbon's Poutine

Homeland Security
SoSH Member
Dec 4, 2005
19,615
Portsmouth, NH
Is there a reason he pulled ERod to begin with? I only watch a few innings but 93 pitches seems and lefties coming up seems like a time to ride the starter for a bit more.
 

DennyDoyle'sBoil

Found no thrill on Blueberry Hill
SoSH Member
Sep 9, 2008
43,396
AZ
Willis needs to go. I don't know what a pitching coach does, but Willis clearly isn't doing it.
 

richgedman'sghost

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
May 13, 2006
1,897
ct
Plus you get Erod to leave with a "good feeling" after a clean inning and you give Zeigler a clean slate in the 8th. It did not work out though.
 

nothumb

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 27, 2006
7,065
yammer's favorite poster
You trust Abad? What has he done to earn your trust? Did you see the Cano at bat?
This whole trope of "nobody out there can be trusted" is tired - yes many have under-performed but many have also been used in sub-optimal ways. Giving up one HR to a first ballot HOF stud is the definition of SSS. Here are two guys' season splits vs. LHB, you tell me which one you want in the game and quit being a baby. Management is sometimes about choosing from a variety of mediocre options, you don't always have a clear path to victory.

Pitcher A: .182 / .207 / .327 / .534
Pitcher B: .256 / .367 /.317 / .684

Take a wild guess which is which.

Is there a reason he pulled ERod to begin with? I only watch a few innings but 93 pitches seems and lefties coming up seems like a time to ride the starter for a bit more.
I think it could go either way, but to be honest I didn't have a problem with it. It is fucking hot and gross out there, Edro has not thrown more than 102 pitches all season (and topped 100 only three times), and, SSS and all but he is giving up a 1.040 OPS on pitches 75-100 this year. And the inning actually started with 3 righties (they PH Horseface for Romine, who did not make an out against Edro).
 

dcmissle

Deflatigator
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Aug 4, 2005
28,269
The team is 12-13 since the All-Star Break.

In that time, they've:

- blown an 8-5 lead in the 7th at home against the terrible Twins
- gotten swept at home by Detroit, one of the games another bullpen loss
- thrown away a game in the 9th in LAA
- thrown away a game in the 8th in SEA
- thrown away a game in the 7th last night against NYY

I don't know if this is Farrell's fault, or a function of the talent in the pen, or both. I suspect that like in all things, the answer is nuanced, complicated and not easily sussed out. All that being said, this team is in a deep slump that they cannot afford, and they are throwing away games all over the place with sloppy, uninspired play, poor situational hitting, and a shaky bullpen. At some point things need to turn around or the manager goes, fair or not.

It's infuriating to see the team kick away another late lead last night. At some point the results need to improve.
And now add dropping 2 of 3 to the out-of-it Yankees, at home, to this big picture.

That Minnesota series during the last home stand seemed to mark a turning point of sorts, which if they don't reverse soon, will mark the end of the season. You don't make the post-season this way.

Barring a surprise cameo appearance by Lou Lamoriello, I expect no changes this year. But expect a house cleaning the day after the regular season at this clip. Fair or not, that's the way these things usually work.
 

Sampo Gida

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 7, 2010
5,044
I can't blame Farrell for this Loss, nor last nights, at least not directly. The ineffectiveness of the bullpen may be a result of something Farrell is doing or has done (eg. usage) and / or Willis, I can't say for sure. You can't blame him for the offense, although one has to wonder if some more rest earlier in the season would have done some of the kids some good at this point. They have been plodding along since the end of May, and despite some better SPing the wheels look to be coming off. Not much you can do with the roster at this point. Maybe they turn it around with Farrell and Willis, maybe they don't. There are 2 positions, change or no change. The only guy whose opinion counts is DD of course, but if he is going to make a change, now would be a good time.
 

Buzzkill Pauley

Member
SoSH Member
Jun 30, 2006
10,569
And now add dropping 2 of 3 to the out-of-it Yankees, at home, to this big picture.
MFYs have 7 games remaining against the Sox at the end of September and are only 3.5 back in the 2nd Wild Card.

It's too soon to call them out-of-it.
 

czar

fanboy
SoSH Member
Jul 16, 2005
4,318
Ann Arbor
And a lot of people hated him leaving Porcello in the other night too.
We're way past the point of rationality with Farrell.

He takes ERod out, Sox lose, everyone complains. He leaves ERod in, ERod walks a couple guys, this whole thread is full of "SLOW HOOK!!!11"

I'm far from a Farrell defender but how it is his fault that the many of the players have completely faceplanted the past few weeks confuses me. We all love Barnes when he fans Tex to end the game. Barnes sucks yesterday and it's on the manager.
 

twibnotes

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 16, 2005
20,420
We're way past the point of rationality with Farrell.

He takes ERod out, Sox lose, everyone complains. He leaves ERod in, ERod walks a couple guys, this whole thread is full of "SLOW HOOK!!!11"

I'm far from a Farrell defender but how it is his fault that the many of the players have completely faceplanted the past few weeks confuses me. We all love Barnes when he fans Tex to end the game. Barnes sucks yesterday and it's on the manager.

Nitpicking every move with a such a bad pen is unfair to Farrell...but there are more than a few big picture issues. Team has been sub 500 since May 25, has had very poor performance from its pitchers (relative to past performance) and is coming off two terrible years with high payrolls. Something is missing, and Farrell may be the problem. It's a results business.
 

nothumb

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 27, 2006
7,065
yammer's favorite poster
We're way past the point of rationality with Farrell.

He takes ERod out, Sox lose, everyone complains. He leaves ERod in, ERod walks a couple guys, this whole thread is full of "SLOW HOOK!!!11"

I'm far from a Farrell defender but how it is his fault that the many of the players have completely faceplanted the past few weeks confuses me. We all love Barnes when he fans Tex to end the game. Barnes sucks yesterday and it's on the manager.
There is a middle ground. I was fine with the move and I would launch Farrell into the sun personally if given the chance. And yesterday was on the players.

In baseball, getting it right 6 times in 10 instead of 4 in 10 is the difference between first and last place. It's the same with managers. Even the best have moves blow up in their face; even the worst get it right pretty often.
 

mr_smith02

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 29, 2003
4,370
Upstate NY
Statement one is arguable statement two is dumb.
They decided not to trade him or jettison him, he came in for Pomeranz and looked just fine in the sixth inning, he's a starter by nature; thus used to going multiple innings, the Red Sox were leading 4-1.

Why not have Barnes ready to go while sending Buchholz back out there at the start of the seventh, especially given how shaky the bullpen has been? If he gets in any trouble, you put in Barnes. Whatever his woes were as a starter, Buchholz had good stuff last night and has not been any worse than Tazawa coming out of the pen of late. So, what do you lose by having Buchholz possibly get the mental side of his game back on track by holding onto a three-run lead? If they're not going to use him any more than they have why didn't they just trade him?
 

czar

fanboy
SoSH Member
Jul 16, 2005
4,318
Ann Arbor
Nitpicking every move with a such a bad pen is unfair to Farrell...but there are more than a few big picture issues. Team has been sub 500 since May 25, has had very poor performance from its pitchers (relative to past performance) and is coming off two terrible years with high payrolls. Something is missing, and Farrell may be the problem. It's a results business.
Hey, maybe there is something to shaking up a team and maybe Farrell is most expendable (they certainly can't DFA their whole bullpen).

But then everyone calling for his head just needs to call a spade a spade instead of saying "man, Farrell's an idiot for not pitching Fernando Abad" or "why can't he get the offense to hit better when Price starts?" It'd be one thing if he was making patently atrocious moves but his multi-million players (who had earlier this season been fine) have been awful the last couple weeks. Fire him because you think it'll spark everyone -- don't pretend this is all about pitching Brad Ziegler instead of Roenis Elias.
 

nothumb

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 27, 2006
7,065
yammer's favorite poster
They decided not to trade him or jettison him, he came in for Pomeranz and looked just fine in the sixth inning, he's a starter by nature; thus used to going multiple innings, the Red Sox were leading 4-1.

Why not have Barnes ready to go while sending Buchholz back out there at the start of the seventh, especially given how shaky the bullpen has been? If he gets in any trouble, you put in Barnes. Whatever his woes were as a starter, Buchholz had good stuff last night and has not been any worse than Tazawa coming out of the pen of late. So, what do you lose by having Buchholz possibly get the mental side of his game back on track by holding onto a three-run lead? If they're not going to use him any more than they have why didn't they just trade him?
BECAUSE HE IS STARTING ON SATURDAY. If anything, give Farrell credit for getting out of the 6th by letting him do his side work during the game. At that point between warmups and the actual inning, he had probably thrown the equivalent of a typical side; if you're not going to let him throw 20 pitches the following inning, then it makes no sense to start the inning with him only to bring in someone else to put out the fire if he walks the leadoff guy.
 

nothumb

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 27, 2006
7,065
yammer's favorite poster
Hey, maybe there is something to shaking up a team and maybe Farrell is most expendable (they certainly can't DFA their whole bullpen).

But then everyone calling for his head just needs to call a spade a spade instead of saying "man, Farrell's an idiot for not pitching Fernando Abad" or "why can't he get the offense to hit better when Price starts?" It'd be one thing if he was making patently atrocious moves but his multi-million players (who had earlier this season been fine) have been awful the last couple weeks. Fire him because you think it'll spark everyone -- don't pretend this is all about pitching Brad Ziegler instead of Roenis Elias.
Farrell's not an idiot for leaving in Ziegler over Abad. I disagree with that call but it's at least within the realm of debate.

Farrell's an idiot because he clearly wanted to have the option of using Abad, but got him up two batters too late. It's consistent with a season-long trend of being rigid, idiosyncratic, and short-sighted in his bullpen usage.
 

soxhop411

news aggravator
SoSH Member
Dec 4, 2009
46,591
“@alexspeier: Consider: They had 5 leads in 7th or later since 7/23 that became losses. Lose just 2 - still a lot in a 20-game span - and they’re in 1st.

As I said. BP is a mess.
 

Bob Montgomerys Helmet Hat

has big, douchey shoulders
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Z has a pretty big split and Farrell knew that there were a string of lefties coming up later in the inning. He could have had Abad or Ross warming as soon as the first guy got on - not necessarily with the intent of pulling him right away, but certainly at least in time for Ellsbury should it come to that. But he does not like to play matchups with this 8th inning guy.
Unless I'm reading the numbers wrong, Z has almost no split
 
Last edited:

Reggie's Racquet

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2009
7,276
Florida/Montana
Farrell's not an idiot for leaving in Ziegler over Abad. I disagree with that call but it's at least within the realm of debate.

Farrell's an idiot because he clearly wanted to have the option of using Abad, but got him up two batters too late. It's consistent with a season-long trend of being rigid, idiosyncratic, and short-sighted in his bullpen usage.
And his overall in game management and in the management of the entire pitching staff...and....

He should have been fired a month ago. This team needs a shakeup. It's long past time.
 

Stanley Steamer

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 11, 2012
1,439
Rossland, BC
Regarding Farrell, it's getting almost too late to bother firing him this season. I know the team is far from out of it, but the writing has been on the wall for weeks now, yet no change has been made. It tells me that management doesn't want to install Lovullo back as manager as a short-term fix, which further suggests they will look elsewhere come the end of the season.
The bullpen clearly needs to be reconstructed for next year. There's really not much they can do about it now. As such, it's unlikely bringing in a new manager now can have the desired effect.
Going forward, the positional core is almost set, and the rotation holds some promise. I think 2016 is now, or will soon be, the focus for management.
 

Remagellan

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Regarding Farrell, it's getting almost too late to bother firing him this season. I know the team is far from out of it, but the writing has been on the wall for weeks now, yet no change has been made. It tells me that management doesn't want to install Lovullo back as manager as a short-term fix, which further suggests they will look elsewhere come the end of the season.
The bullpen clearly needs to be reconstructed for next year. There's really not much they can do about it now. As such, it's unlikely bringing in a new manager now can have the desired effect.
Going forward, the positional core is almost set, and the rotation holds some promise. I think 2016 is now, or will soon be, the focus for management.
We're far out of nothing, so if the team could be improved by canning Farrell, the time is now. But you're right about one thing, "2016 is now...the focus for management." Check your calendar.
 

Papelbon's Poutine

Homeland Security
SoSH Member
Dec 4, 2005
19,615
Portsmouth, NH
If they decide he's the problem - which is up for debate, but I lean towards he's at least not helping - there's plenty of time for a new manager to make a difference. Either promote Lovullo or call Bud Black. Actually call Bud Black either way and bring him in to replace Willis and have ready to replace Farrell.
 

Papelbon's Poutine

Homeland Security
SoSH Member
Dec 4, 2005
19,615
Portsmouth, NH
To add, I think firing a manager adds an intangible effect beyond actual decisions you can point to. Or at least it can. I'm at the point where I consider him at best replacement level and if canning him to shake things up is enough to make a game or two difference than so be it.
 

Plympton91

bubble burster
SoSH Member
Oct 19, 2008
12,408
Hey, maybe there is something to shaking up a team and maybe Farrell is most expendable (they certainly can't DFA their whole bullpen).

But then everyone calling for his head just needs to call a spade a spade instead of saying "man, Farrell's an idiot for not pitching Fernando Abad" or "why can't he get the offense to hit better when Price starts?" It'd be one thing if he was making patently atrocious moves but his multi-million players (who had earlier this season been fine) have been awful the last couple weeks. Fire him because you think it'll spark everyone -- don't pretend this is all about pitching Brad Ziegler instead of Roenis Elias.
I think we have to start asking about big picture moves. Did Steven Wright become an all-star caliber pitcher this spring training but suck last year? How many wins would we have had in 2015 if Steven Wright had been in the rotation instead od Justin Masterson?

Same with Elias. Look at his splits against left handed hitters prior to 2016. Suppose in spring training Farrell had definitively groomed him as a lefty reliever. Would we be better off now? Who knows but it couldn't be worse.

Look at general usage. Who decided Abad was better than Layne? Why?

I can't really nitpick any of the moves with relievers the past two nights. But other teams regularly turn up good bullpens from mediocre players. The Red Sox haven't done that. Where's John Farrell's Rich Garces and Rheal.Cormier like Williams/Kerrigan found in '99
 

Al Zarilla

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 8, 2005
59,630
San Andreas Fault
The problem with national league managers, oh, never mind, Tito, Sparky Anderson, Torre, yeah, they did or are doing well in the AL. Bud Black seemed to be a good manager, manager of the year one year. He seemed to be all lined for the Nats job this year but they called Dusty at the last minute. Kind of strange.

Decided to "get another opinion" so I went over to the MLB.com Red Sox message board. Yeah, unwashed masses, no comparison to SOSH in quality of posts, all that, but every single person that had anything to say wants Farrell gone or thinks he's on the way out. Who cares? Results are paramount of course, but if Henry, Dombrowski, etc, ever commission a climate survey to be done about Farrell, it probably comes back very negative. Actually, there is probably enough front office staff to do their own.
 

FanSinceBoggs

seantwo
SoSH Member
Jan 12, 2009
937
New York
Sox haven't won a series in 3 weeks. Its probably time.
I can't think of a manager who was fired this late in the season while his team was contending for a playoff spot. To be sure, that kind of move must not happen very often, but I can't think of even one example. I'm generally in the fire Farrell camp, but removing him now would be highly unusual, no? I would be curious to hear other examples. The Red Sox will probably give Farrell the rest of the season to sink or swim.
 
Last edited:

FanSinceBoggs

seantwo
SoSH Member
Jan 12, 2009
937
New York
However, in the AL the Sox are ranked 13th in RA/G and 11th in ERA. Meanwhile they're 6th in FIP and 5th in ERA+. That's called underperformance, and it's not a meme.
I wasn't aware that a huge ERA/FIP gap pointed to underperformance via managerial influence. I thought we called that bad luck. We should notify the SABR community.
When there is a gap between ERA/FIP with ERA consistently higher than FIP, doesn't that point to the possibility of poor defense?

I've been wondering about the Red Sox's defense this year but don't always know how to interpret defensive metrics. Is the defense helping or hurting the Red Sox pitching staff?
 

j44thor

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
11,177
If they decide he's the problem - which is up for debate, but I lean towards he's at least not helping - there's plenty of time for a new manager to make a difference. Either promote Lovullo or call Bud Black. Actually call Bud Black either way and bring him in to replace Willis and have ready to replace Farrell.
The same Bud Black that has never had any interest in Boston or leaving the west coast for that matter? What's next we bring in Billy Beane as well?
 

j44thor

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
11,177
When are the players going to take some accountability? Why have we not had any "closed door meetings" with the players? There seems to be a lack of leadership in the clubhouse and sure Farrell may be part of it but I'd like to see the vets speak up as well.
This team seems to miss a Johnny Gomes type right about now.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.