2014 Non-Celtic Offseason News and Rumors

Devizier

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 3, 2000
19,660
Somewhere
 
 
(Lin is) ... an asset that can be re-sold for more than nothing.
 
Doubtful on this; how many teams are going to be in the market for a backup point guard during the season, will have the matching salary, and are willing to pay the extra 3-7 million in salary to make it work? Keep in mind that the Rockets are asking a team to essentially relieve them of $15 million in commitments, and Dell Demps is no longer available for a trade.
 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
35,106
Devizier said:
 
Doubtful on this; how many teams are going to be in the market for a backup point guard during the season, will have the matching salary, and are willing to pay the extra 3-7 million in salary to make it work? Keep in mind that the Rockets are asking a team to essentially relieve them of $15 million in commitments, and Dell Demps is no longer available for a trade.
Yeah true, I was thinking as part of a package, but it is probably true that the only team that actually wants him (NYK supposedly) have nothing to offer.
 

PedroKsBambino

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Apr 17, 2003
31,638
Cellar-Door said:
I'd say... Charlotte, Utah, Denver for sure,  Phoenix almost certainly not. Everyone else is a maybe, since they could either use him as a player, or just an asset that can be re-sold for more than nothing
 
Edit- some talk that they might be willing to include more value (maybe a 1st rounder) in the deal. (Parsons going out with him and a future pick coming back might be something they look at as well). That broadens who would be interested I think. Philly for example probably has no use for him, but if he comes with a 1st? They need to pay someone to make the salary floor.
 
Edit the second: Apparently Broussard thinks that they might have a deal of Lin and Parsons to GS, who would use Parsons to replace Thompson when they deal him for Love.
 
Wouldn't you need to get Parsons signed before you could realistically commit to that?
 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
35,106
PedroKsBambino said:
 
Wouldn't you need to get Parsons signed before you could realistically commit to that?
If you trade for him, you can decline his option, making him a restricted free agent and match.
 

Devizier

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 3, 2000
19,660
Somewhere
Cellar-Door said:
If you trade for him, you can decline his option, making him a restricted free agent and match.
 
Didn't the Rockets already decline Parsons' option? In other words, do they have any trade rights?
 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
35,106
Devizier said:
 
Didn't the Rockets already decline Parsons' option? In other words, do they have any trade rights?
nope, there were stories that they plan to decline it, but they haven't yet. It auto declines if you don't exercise it by July 1 as far as I know, which is what most teams do.
 

Ed Hillel

Wants to be startin somethin
SoSH Member
Dec 12, 2007
44,609
Here
RedOctober3829 said:
Nope he didn't. Would lead to Lowry/LeBron/Wade/Melo. Bosh goes to somewhere he's comfortable and the first option.
Why would he leave Miami/Lebron and that 42 million? I suppose it depends what other teams would pay him, but I'm not sold he'll opt out.
 

HomeRunBaker

bet squelcher
SoSH Member
Jan 15, 2004
30,629
Ed Hillel said:
Why would he leave Miami/Lebron and that 42 million? I suppose it depends what other teams would pay him, but I'm not sold he'll opt out.
Bosh would make more by opting out and signing a max deal with higher annual for more years. It would also take him out of LeBron's shadow as only a defensive anchor to go back to being one of the leagues best two-way frontcourt players.
 

zenter

indian sweet
SoSH Member
Oct 11, 2005
5,641
Astoria, NY
BigSoxFan said:
Enter: Houston
I'm wondering how we think they'll find the cap space now that one of the top destinations for Lin (Cs) has drafted a PG and a wing. In the absence of a Rondo move (and I'm not entirely convinced DA feels motivated to move him vs Smart), Lin has fewer destinations.
 

PedroKsBambino

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Apr 17, 2003
31,638
Cellar-Door said:
If you trade for him, you can decline his option, making him a restricted free agent and match.
 
Right, I understand that but as a RFA you have no idea what his contract will look like since you don't know what anyone will offer him. As a practical matter, you'd be a little nuts to trade for him in that situation since his value is very different as a max guy vs as a $10 mil guy.
 

Brickowski

Banned
Feb 15, 2011
3,755
Boston wouldn't be trading for Lin because they like him - they'd be trading for him because they can get an asset that makes it worthwhile. Terrence Jones would be my target.
In addition to Jones Houston has Motiejunas and of course Parsons (who becomes tradeable if Morey exercises his team option).
 

wutang112878

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 5, 2007
6,066
Ok, what am I missing here:
 
Former All-Star forward Zach Randolph has agreed to a two-year, $20 million extension with the Memphis Grizzlies, sources confirmed to ESPN.com's Marc Stein on Friday.

With the agreement, Randolph has opted in for next season at $16.5 million. The new two-year extension will keep him with Memphis through the 2016-17 season.
 
Why extend him now?  He is 32, his play certainly isnt going to get better next year so I dont understand why Memphis would think he would command more on the open market than $10M a season.  To the best of my knowledge having him under contract for the next 2 years doesnt allow them to like spread the $36.5M total amongst 3 years.  Wasnt there any value whatsoever in them handing this deal out?  I think the most plausible explanation is that Chris Wallace is their GM.
 

bowiac

Caveat: I know nothing about what I speak
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 18, 2003
12,945
New York, NY
 
@ZachLowe_NBA

That Z-Bo extension, reported by @WojYahooNBA, is a home run for the Grizz.
 
@ZachLowe_NBA

Z-Bo won't produce $16.5M of value next season, but getting him at $10M per over '15-16 and '16-17 is best MEM could do w/o losing him
 
@ZachLowe_NBA

MEM is still taking most of the downside risk here -- Z-Bo is nearly 33. But some team would have offered something like this in free agency
 
@DannyLeroux

@NerdNumbers It could also help retain Marc Gasol, which is more important than whatever Z-Bo does.
Basically, my sense is simply that the market for any kind of decent big man is $10M+. I don't love Randolph, but if you disagree and thin he's like the 5th best PF or something, then this is fine.
 

wutang112878

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 5, 2007
6,066
I really misjudged the big man market, yeah any half way competent big is in the $10M range.  I do still think its a little silly to hand this out now since his value is only going down, I mean he could have opted for free agency and took the 1yr$16.5M instead so in a way thats sort of saying something about his long-term value.  But they did have an alternative play which was to get under the cap, they are at $26M for 15/16 and even if Gasol gets the max at $17M they would still have just about enough room for another max so you could try to replace Randolph and actually get younger.  I'd probably roll the dice on that because either you have 2 shots at improving your situation with either getting Randolph at something less than $10M or replacing Randolph with possibly a better/younger guy. 
 

HomeRunBaker

bet squelcher
SoSH Member
Jan 15, 2004
30,629
wutang112878 said:
Ok, what am I missing here:
 
 
Why extend him now?  He is 32, his play certainly isnt going to get better next year so I dont understand why Memphis would think he would command more on the open market than $10M a season.  To the best of my knowledge having him under contract for the next 2 years doesnt allow them to like spread the $36.5M total amongst 3 years.  Wasnt there any value whatsoever in them handing this deal out?  I think the most plausible explanation is that Chris Wallace is their GM.
I don't know if Wallace is back calling all the shots but he is arguably the best in the game at manipulating the salary cap for the financial benefit of the team. He did is for Gaston in Boston then again in Memphis for Heisley. It's what he does.
 

Don Buddin's GS

Member
SoSH Member
Devin Oliver who helped lead The University of Dayton Flyers to an Elite 8 run this year (that's him in my avatar) tweeted today that he will be joining fellow UD alum Chris Johnson on the Celt's Summer League team in Orlando. He's a long shot at best but you're gonna love this kid's heart.
 

bankshot1

Member
SoSH Member
Suspended
Feb 12, 2003
24,895
where I was last at
So how much financial sacrifice do the South Beach boys make, to make room for Melo? If the opts-outs free up $66 million, is that enough for The Big-3 and Melo?
 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
35,106
bankshot1 said:
So how much financial sacrifice do the South Beach boys make, to make room for Melo? If the opts-outs free up $66 million, is that enough for The Big-3 and Melo?
only if they take an average under $14M each. Possible, but I'm not sure Melo for one takes that, Chicago and Houston will offer him significantly more.
 

Blacken

Robespierre in a Cape
SoSH Member
Jul 24, 2007
12,152
Don Buddin's GS said:
Devin Oliver who helped lead The University of Dayton Flyers to an Elite 8 run this year (that's him in my avatar) tweeted today that he will be joining fellow UD alum Chris Johnson on the Celt's Summer League team in Orlando. He's a long shot at best but you're gonna love this kid's heart.
I saw him play a little and I did like his game. Nothing stands out, but not a bad bench guy with a little upside for an UDFA.
 

ishmael

Member
SoSH Member
Sep 3, 2006
640
knucklecup said:
The Lakers have more to offer as well.

Realistically, it only works if Wade is willing to take one for the team.
 
Wade is owed $42 million over the next two years. If they pay him $12.5 million to start next year, he could get 4 years $55.6 million total. Then Miami buys him out whenever he is finished playing (wink, nod agreement) and since Wade is only 32 right now, they would avoid the dreaded "Over 36 rule".
 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
35,106
ishmael said:
 
Wade is owed $42 million over the next two years. If they pay him $12.5 million to start next year, he could get 4 years $55.6 million total. Then Miami buys him out whenever he is finished playing (wink, nod agreement) and since Wade is only 32 right now, they would avoid the dreaded "Over 36 rule".
You think Wade is only playing 2 more years, why else is a buyout? That deal is him taking one for the team big time. Not only taking a massive salary cut, but tying himself in long term at that cut price?
 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
35,106
RedOctober3829 said:
After Jason Kidd's demand to run basketball ops, was denied, the Nets have given Milwaukee permission to speak to Kidd about a position within the organization.
Why would Milwaukee want him. He's shown no competence at any job other than being a player, and he's had conflict with everyone in the Nets organization because he's a paranoid control freak.
 

PedroKsBambino

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Apr 17, 2003
31,638
Cellar-Door said:
Why would Milwaukee want him. He's shown no competence at any job other than being a player, and he's had conflict with everyone in the Nets organization because he's a paranoid control freak.
 
Agreed---the only thing worse than Kidd as a coach this season is the fact he made a power play after it.   Just amazing---have to wonder if Prokorov is paying enough attention to tell his GM to find a legitimate coach
 

PedroKsBambino

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Apr 17, 2003
31,638
Hey, I'm the guy who posted they'd still win the division even when they were in the cellar...I know they played better.  I do not think Kidd showed anything as a coach, however.  They had a lot more talent and experience than most teams in the east, and they ended up with a record a little below where they probably should have, in my mind.
 
I would agree that after a beginning so bad he could easily have been fired Kidd improved---but I don't think he's even back to 'average' and don't see a lot of reason to think he'll get there.  We'll see
 

mabrowndog

Ask me about total zone...or paint
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 23, 2003
39,676
Falmouth, MA
Cellar-Door said:
Why would Milwaukee want him. He's shown no competence at any job other than being a player, and he's had conflict with everyone in the Nets organization because he's a paranoid control freak.
 
Mark Lasry, one of the new co-owners of the Bucks, was a former Nets partner and is reportedly super-tight with Kidd. That's where all this is coming from.
 
Never mind that Jason Kidd finished 6 games over .500 in his one and only season as a head coach, and now feels entitled to make all basketball decisions. He's a fucking idiot.
 
EDIT - Make that 4 games, including playoffs. He's an even bigger fucking idiot.
 

the1andonly3003

New Member
Jul 15, 2005
4,473
Chicago
well, it must be a slow news cycle on a Saturday night...Jason Kidd...so Lawrence Frank becomes new head coach (and an apology from management)?
 

radsoxfan

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 9, 2009
13,814
What a gift for the Nets if this turns out to really happen. They get rid of Kidd, and don't even have to fire him or pay the rest of his contract.  Maybe they can even weasel a 2nd round pick from the Bucks or something.
 
I would have loved to be a fly on the wall in the room when Kidd or his agent made demands for more power.  I wonder how long it took the Nets management to start laughing uncontrollably.  
 

RedOctober3829

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 19, 2005
55,654
deep inside Guido territory
radsoxfan said:
What a gift for the Nets if this turns out to really happen. They get rid of Kidd, and don't even have to fire him or pay the rest of his contract.  Maybe they can even weasel a 2nd round pick from the Bucks or something.
 
I would have loved to be a fly on the wall in the room when Kidd or his agent made demands for more power.  I wonder how long it took the Nets management to start laughing uncontrollably.  
Kidd better be careful starting his car the next few days. Don't piss off a Russian
 

radsoxfan

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 9, 2009
13,814
From a Celtics perspective, this is potentially bad news.  I was excited to watch Kidd coach the Nets into the lottery in a couple years.  
 

radsoxfan

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 9, 2009
13,814
Just saw a Marc Stein tweet floating Mark Jackson as a potential replacement.  Our future lottery picks are in safe hands…. phew
 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
35,106
I really don't get this. Lasry and Edens seemed like they had a good plan for Milwaukee. Jason Kidd has zero qualifications to be President of an NBA team, and he's been brutally unprofessional in his 1 year with the Nets. This seems like a Dolan and Thomas type thing where Lasry is so excited to be friends with a former great player that he fucks everything up. Even Thomas had experience, sure he ran everything into the ground, but it was experience.
 

HomeRunBaker

bet squelcher
SoSH Member
Jan 15, 2004
30,629
swingin val said:
After an initial rough going, Kidd and the Net's were one of the best teams in the league.
Kidd never lost a team that was waiting to roll over and die. He was in my short group of Coach of the Year with Popovich, Hornacek, and Steve Clifford. What he did with that Nets team not only keeping them together but having the best record in the league over the last 50 games was nothing short of brilliant with such a flawed team that had so many egos and injuries.