It would be like judging Tatum going forward for his NBA Finals Series.Yeah, he was bad. Whatever the excuses are. I don't think that's who he is as a player, though.
It would be like judging Tatum going forward for his NBA Finals Series.Yeah, he was bad. Whatever the excuses are. I don't think that's who he is as a player, though.
You can't lose worse than 4-0. The national polling was like 60-40 Celtics before that series. Not even a gentleman's sweep.I mean... the Celtics won by 18 points total in a 4 game series in which still recovering KD had to play 44 minutes per game & Bruce Brown was literally the only actual wing in the rotation.
Smoked is kind of revisionist history.
I thought KD was playing at an MVP level before his injury & I would be surprised if he went to the Celtics & was remotely healthy if his Darko wasn't 6+.
Yeah agreed completely. I totally get those who want to go get Durant. He's fucking Durant, and he has four years left. You're gonna get two of those guaranteed and maybe he stays for all four. Guy is a stud. But there are also some concerning question marks. I think that anyone who is disregarding those is whistling past the graveyard (the behavioral ones, not skill or injury stuff), but they very well may be right. This is one time where I'm honestly glad not to be having to make this call.This is entirely fair and to further clarify my position, which is constantly evolving, given all of the factors to consider, this isn't an easy deal to make, even if you are 100% on board with Boston receiving the best player.
If Stevens can get Durant for Brown+White+draft capital but decides against it, LFG. At this point, the trade vs a run-it-back season each offers its own appeal, even if the former makes the Cs more of a contender for the upcoming season.
That's fair. I don't care who you are, it's hard to perform at a high level with such a weird culture/chemistry thing going on. I think that having an coach in the infancy of his career didn't do much to help right the ship. There weren't a hell of a lot of adjustments, and basically how do you ego manage Kyrie and Ben Simmons. The best defense in the league was able to throw the kitchen sink and a few Buicks at Durant. Of course he looked less. Tatum looked less in the finals for a similar reason (also gas).I don't think that's who he is as a player, though.
https://www.statmuse.com/nba/ask/nba-players-with-most-total-minutes-played-this-playoffFair position although I think it was kind of both. As good as the Dubs’ bench was, the biggest issue was that our top guy, Tatum, got severely outplayed by theirs in the finals. Durant gives you another guy who can help shoulder that load if Tatum is off for whatever reason. Brown has it in him as well but it doesn’t always come out.
So one thing I'm not sure I agree on is that Brown isn't Peak Brown..... he might be. On DARKO age and games comparisons, he's right about at the point Durant started his peak (Durant was miles ahead of Brown.I agree that it's unlikely that Brown passes Durant in the next couple of years, but the data doesn't say that it's impossible. People keep thinking that Durant is Peak Durant. He isn't. And frankly, Brown isn't Peak Brown yet either. And it's a 25% difference between them.
I have no beef with people disregarding all-in-one metrics for reasons. I was a hardo about the way that RPM was being thrown around here a few years ago (RPM is trash), nevermind when PER is brought up (super trash). But when CD calls out DARKO as an outlier on Brown's defense, that's an argument that DARKO perhaps overrates Brown (I disagree, but it's a good argument). When people (not you in particular) say "yeah but it's Durant and Brown, man. Doesn't match the eye test.", that's not an argument really. I say that because people still think that Durant is on Giannis's level, top-MVP type guy. That's not even the eye test. That's comparing the numbers against our collective memory of what Durant used to be. A Durant-led team just got smoked by us. Not just beaten, smoked. Peak Lebron took teams like that to the finals on the regular. Peak Durant probably could too.
JT was also probably legitimately injured as well. I’m just saying that it’s draining for JT to always be “the guy”. Jaylen sometimes takes the load off of him. KD is more likely to be able to, if healthy. The health concerns are valid but the upside when he’s in there is worth it to me. I’m not convinced that KD is now an injury concern for the rest of his career based off of the last 2 years.https://www.statmuse.com/nba/ask/nba-players-with-most-total-minutes-played-this-playoff
JT averaged just under 40 minutes/game for 24 games during the playoffs. Even for a 24 year old in as good a shape as he is, it's probably too much to ask out of him given the ridiculous pace games are played at nowadays. Now, how much fatigue played a factor in his poor performance is up for debate (Wiggins played excellent D on him, can't forget that either) but it absolutely was a factor. Curry and Klay, for example, played 6-7 minutes less per game over the playoffs.
The current squad, with the exception of the 3rd big spot, is unquestionably deeper (assuming fairly good injury luck, of course) and I find it too risky to gut that for a player, however good he is, who might be sitting on the bench in street clothes for half the season or playoffs.
Aside from a minor quibble that they don't all agree that Durant has bounced back a lot (DARKO doesn't think so), this is a great post.So one thing I'm not sure I agree on is that Brown isn't Peak Brown..... he might be. On DARKO age and games comparisons, he's right about at the point Durant started his peak (Durant was miles ahead of Brown.
View attachment 54124
Also, while Durant may not be Peak Durant, he bounced back nicely from a major injury (and a poor season post-injury by his standards).
LeBron had him at 3.95, which isn't near his peak (5.2-5.3) but up near his "off-year" during his peak, and compared to Jaylen's 1.63, a much larger gap than DARKO would indicate.
RAPTOR also sees a bigger gap (4.5 for Durant, 2.7 for Jaylen).
None of the all-in ones is perfect, but they all seem to agree, Durant last year was below his absolute peak, but had bounced back a lot, and was significantly better than Jaylen.
I also think Durant is a guy who is set up to age well, especially if he's coming to a team that has another guy who can carry a heavy load, and more defenders. His offensive production and skill is still staggering. Moving to not being expected to be the best or 2nd best defender will be big, as will reducing wear and tear.
Jaylen sometimes acts as primary scorer but he doesn't really "take the load" off JT because the non-JT lineups weren't really able to sustain any production (as seen by the often-quoted on/off numbers for JT).I’m just saying that it’s draining for JT to always be “the guy”. Jaylen sometimes takes the load off of him. KD is more likely to be able to, if healthy.
I see the valley in this chart around the injury and a decent bounce back.Aside from a minor quibble that they don't all agree that Durant has bounced back a lot (DARKO doesn't think so), this is a great post.
And I'd say that it's possible that Brown has peaked. Tough to say with a curve like that, which shows no dip or flattening lately, but it is without question a possibility.
edit: Frankly, Crespo's ears must be ringing with the "after age 25" stuff, which is generally accurate.
LEBRON basically has this for Jaylen's last 3 years:Looking at not all-in one stats, it seems like basically Jaylen's entire jump last year was on defense.
Does DARKO agree with that?
I think for as good as Jaylen is, he’s still a guy who takes what the defense gives him. He doesn’t really put a ton of pressure on defenses. Other teams may throw some traps his way, but he got blitzed by defenses at the same rate that Gary Trent Jr does (a little lower actually). At least to my eye, it seems like defenses are kind of content letting Jaylen go 1 on 1 and doing his thing.Jaylen sometimes acts as primary scorer but he doesn't really "take the load" off JT because the non-JT lineups weren't really able to sustain any production (as seen by the often-quoted on/off numbers for JT).
That's why JT was forced to play so many minutes in the playoffs.
My guess is that Ime would be much more willing to sit JT if KD was on the floor instead of JB.
People are also forgetting that heading into the playoffs, by consensus Durant was either the 1st or 2nd best player in the league when healthy. He had a rough 4 games against the best defense in the league, but still averaged 26/6/6 while shooting .386/.333/.895. I'm still definitely in favor of moving Brown/White/+ for Durant.I get why people wouldn’t do it, whether disliking Durant, injury risk, age, whatever. But for the next two seasons on the court? We’d be a much more dangerous team than the current version.
I think people who use that playoff series are being silly and disingenuous, it’s 4 games lol. Tatum had a 48% TS in the finals, Jaylen had a 51% TS through 5 games of the finals. Yes I know the age difference, and that KD naturally is going to decline, but it’s still four games. Dude averaged 30/7/6 on a 63% TS last season, being one of the most aggressively defended players in the league.People are also forgetting that heading into the playoffs, by consensus Durant was either the 1st or 2nd best player in the league when healthy. He had a rough 4 games against the best defense in the league, but still averaged 26/6/6 while shooting .386/.333/.895. I'm still definitely in favor of moving Brown/White/+ for Durant.
Yea, those 4 games of KD are being looked at a little too closely, IMO. As you said, it would similar to just looking at Tatum's last games against GS.I think people who use that playoff series are being silly and disingenuous, it’s 4 games lol. Tatum had a 48% TS in the finals, Jaylen had a 51% TS through 5 games of the finals. Yes I know the age difference, and that KD naturally is going to decline, but it’s still four games. Dude averaged 30/7/6 on a 63% TS last season, being one of the most aggressively defended players in the league.
This is a great post and captures most of what I am feeling.To briefly summarize; I'd rather have a team I enjoy rooting for be competitive than have a team I don't like be more likely to win a championship. I find Durant completely unlikeable and would have a real hard time rooting for him and this team, even if he was wearing a Celtics jersey. It would be a tough pill to swallow after watching Jaylen grow and mature into the player he has become today, nearly winning a title, only to punt him off into the NBA hinterlands to chase the latest shiny object (an aging superstar).
In the broader sense, I find the constant discourse and speculation (and ultimately execution) of player movement in the NBA completely exhausting to follow and keep up with, and it seems to only be trending in a more dramatic as players leap around from team to team every year and nothing feels stable or guaranteed. It's reached such a saturation point that none of it really interests me, and it makes the accomplishments of teams each year feel insignificant and not worthy of my emotional investment. The Celtics came within two games of winning the title last year, that should mean something significant? Actually no it doesn't--we are still going to shake up our entire team and chase Kevin Durant because this is the NBA world we live in.
People seem okay with that and I just feel distant and removed from that kind of investment and find myself rapidly losing interest in the NBA despite maintaining a deep love of the game itself and an appreciation of the skill and athleticism of it's individual players.