I don't believe it is too late to rip up this year's deal and replace it in Pivetta's case. Used to be that AAV was locked as of Opening Day but that's no longer the case. It's all about the contract language.Do we know if it's too late to offer Pivetta a deal that replaces his contract for this season?
E.g., could we offer him something like 4/$55 starting *this season*, replacing his 1/$7.5? That would tack on 3/$47.5 of new money, but shift a bit of CBT hit into this year. Even 5/$70m would be pretty interesting.
Crawford makes sense if the valuation is low enough. He's risky, but if the FO believes he's a real mid-rotation starter, the time to commit is before that fact is obvious to everyone. Crawford is 28 and in his second pre-arb year, and given his age, he's unlikely to ever get a huge contract. Could we get him to bite on a five-year deal at $35m (i.e. including one additional year of control), with a $15m club option/$5m buyout for another year? That would have an $8m AAV, I think.
As for Crawford, I'm not sure if there's a lot to gain extending him through only one year of free agency. As it is, his first year of free agency will be his age 33 season. I expect letting him go year-to-year would result in something like 4/25 or so (900K, 4M, 8M, 12M). Unless we think he's going to break out big time (like out of nowhere Porcello-style with a CY season at age 28-29), I don't think he's going to command a salary in 2029 that would be unwieldy for this team to match. I like Kutter, but I want to see him make it through a full season with 150-160+ innings before I worry about locking him down for 2029 and beyond.