Because the ball wasn’t there yet and the receiver was still in his route? The DB stopped the receiver with two hands before the ball was even close.. how is that not dpi?
Week 1 vs. Eagles: A New Beginning
- Thread starter RedOctober3829
- Start date
Gotta be honest, you can't call a hold on HH and then not call those holds. You fucking can't, it's garbage.
That's the issue. The RT "held" Wise more than the Pats held anyone on that last drive
If the HH hld is the threshold (no pun intended), then there would be no plays, only penalties.
His right foot was not down when he finally had possession. Even Romo faltered
He can play the ball, and if the receiver gets in the way that’s tough shit for the receiver unless the DB comes through the back
I got the second wind before the game started, maybe should've kept it up.
Agreed but you cant do it one way and not the other. At least make it even.
It was. I was talking about the previous one on Henry and then ruling the WR down five yards back when he was there only because he got drilled back there after his forward progress was five yards downfield.
The ball landed 10 yards behind him...when was he playing the ball at that point? He made contact then ran with the reciever.
For some reason, we watched that movie in middle school (or thereabouts) for no real reason. Like legit 100 kids watched it.
So far, no dice on that. They've allowed illegal formation and holding and DPI on Philly.
He didnt go straight down. He made a move forward. They have been calling that consistently. If the runner makes any move forward they call it behind initial contact. Have been calling it both ways.
