Morgan's Magic Snowplow said:
I don't think Klinsmann is a particularly good coach but come the fuck on. That 2006 Germany team was very pedestrian. People in Germany were pleasantly surprised that they finished third and nobody blamed Klinsmann for failing to make the final. Then he coached Bayern for one season, getting knocked out in the quarters of the CL by one of the greatest club sides of all time and finishing second in the Bundesliga by two points (he was three points off the top when he got sacked). That's hardly "running them into the ground," especially given that the club won the double and made the CL final the following year (although finishing with only three more points in the league).
I'll admit that my mind is made up about Klinsmann, and that I'm inclined to interpret his results in the least favorable way possible, but I don't see how his 2006 World Cup results can be interpreted as anything better than par for the course. For the last 60 years, regardless of how lackluster the squad looked or anything else, you've been able to pencil in Germany for a spot in the last 8 every single time. So making it to the last 4 at home, and doing it by beating a bunch of tomato cans, squeaking by a so-so Argentina in the quarters, and then losing to an Italian team that wasn't heavily fancied isn't really a huge feather in your cap.
As far as Bayern, I didn't mean to suggest he ran the club into the ground in the sense that he did significant long-term damage, but rather in the sense that he clearly underachieved. That's a club that's won 60% of Germany's domestic titles and 50% of all DFB cups since the turn of the century, and he couldn't manage to win either. On top of that, he lost the locker room and was generally viewed as not knowing what the hell he was doing, which seems to be consistent with what we're seeing these days.
teddykgb said:
Man, I don't think I could disagree with this post more. I think talking about the USMNT under any coach in terms of results sort of misses the forest for the trees. The US team has always had an ability to grind out heroic results on the back of guile and effort. This is without question. The promise Klinsmann made was to stop playing that style and to try to be one of the big boys, playing proper footy and trying to beat teams while dictating the match. He certainly hasn't delivered on that front.
Last night was really, really depressing for me. I don't care about losing to Mexico, which will happen sometimes, and I don't care about the Confederations Cup. Last night was depressing because Klinsmann felt a need to field THAT lineup and to play that style of football. It was basically a Bob Bradley attempt at winning, and those players were essentially Bradley's team as well, and it nearly worked. But I'm tired of a USMNT that wins because it defends with heart and some attacker has a moment of brilliance and/or we score from a set piece and we manage the result. I have no doubt that the USMNT can be setup this way and achieve greater results than they do today, but they'll never achieve the greatest results playing this way and I don't believe a talent pool of our size should be aiming to at best play the part of spoiler and make a semi deep run in a non CONCACAF tournament. This is why I have no desire to see us playing the MLS All Stars coached by Bruce Arena (again). It's not a pissing match -- the league simply isn't as good as the level we need to aspire to be at.
I don't think it's fair to characterize the Arena era, and particularly 2002, as one in which we worked hard and relied on the odd moment of brilliance from soneone. It's been 13 years, so my recollection isn't the greatest, but I remember our World Cup games playing out as follows:
Portugal: We absolutely took the game to them for about the first half hour, before we got gassed / terrified / Agoosed
Korea: We were a bit on the back foot for most of that game, but not excessively so
Poland: We tried to boss this game and got torched on the counter repeatedly
Mexico (R16): We did sit back and counter here, because that's our formula for beating Mexico
Germany (QF): We held our own with Germany in this one, at the very least -- made tons of good / very good chances, and would have had an equalizer if it hadn't been for some weak officiating -- also, I know these stats aren't perfect, but I took a look back to see if my memory was failing me, and it looks like we outpossessed Germany 58-42 and had more shots, overall and on target, than they did in this game)
So in some games we were on the back foot, but in others we most certainly weren't, and that includes our QF against an eventual finalist. We did that with large contributions from a bunch of guys playing in season 7 of MLS. With how far things have advanced since then, I have a hard time buying the argument that the talent level in MLS is really what's killing us.
As far as Bradley, yeah, his teams counterattacked, but frankly, that's a legit strategy, and it can be both effective and entertaining when it's done well, which it was for a good chunk of Bradley's term. Hell, did you not get a thrill watching that 2009 Confederations Cup team dismantle Brazil on the break? If anyone can complain about not having the right guys, it's Bradley. Charlie Davies was the perfect guy to play up front in that system, and then he got in that car accident and we ended up trying to fit a bunch of square pegs into his role for the rest of Bradley's run.