He hasn't played more than 45 minutes in a match since Nov. 1, he should be happy he's getting to play for the national team at all.Gio is our best player. Maybe he should have started.
He hasn't played more than 45 minutes in a match since Nov. 1, he should be happy he's getting to play for the national team at all.Gio is our best player. Maybe he should have started.
That pass is why he gets to play for the national teamHe hasn't played more than 45 minutes in a match since Nov. 1, he should be happy he's getting to play for the national team at all.
As our best player everyone else should be happy they get to play with him.He hasn't played more than 45 minutes in a match since Nov. 1, he should be happy he's getting to play for the national team at all.
I mean, Pulisic has had his share of time on the shelf and getting no run for his club too. Hell, soft tissue issues and club trouble are practically an American rite of passage.He is not our best player, but whatevs. He can't stay healthy, gets no run on his club team and is an all-world shithead.
I'll take Pulisic over him all day every day.
No one likes to be subbed on and then subbed off, but I'm on Team Don't Overwork Tyler as it's still very early in his comeback.Tyler Adams looks like he wanted to kill Gregg. I’m not entirely opposed.
This is why it was stupid to bring him on in the first place tbh. I know it was part of the plan, but you gotta change that plan when you’re down 1-0 at the 60 minute mark. There was always a solid chance for this one to go to extra time with or without him on the field.No one likes to be subbed on and then subbed off, but I'm on Team Don't Overwork Tyler as it's still very early in his comeback.
Stealing minutes from a bético to boot!This is why it was stupid to bring him on in the first place tbh. I know it was part of the plan, but you gotta change that plan when you’re down 1-0 at the 60 minute mark. There was always a solid chance for this one to go to extra time with or without him on the field.
Am I that transparent?Stealing minutes from a bético to boot!
Always seemed to me like Pulisic is more effective at RW, despite his personal preferences. From RW he can dribble baseline on his right or cut to the top of the box and shoot on his left. From LW he’s always seemed extremely right-footed to me.Meanwhile Jedi-Puli has never been a strong connection on the left.
Mexico will not sit back and concede possession, so on Sunday we will have plenty of what was working best for us last night: transition and counters. Mexico's midfield is pretty suspect other than Alvarez, and they persist in not playing an enormously in-form Santi Gimenez, so I think we're a terrible matchup for them and we'll look better in that game. Also, Dest will be back, and probably SUPER motivated.I feel bad for Jamaica. I'm glad we scored but really there's nothing here that makes me particularly optimistic.
I they had defended less in the final minute, they probably would have won. #embeddedRedBull.Mexico will not sit back and concede possession, so on Sunday we will have plenty of what was working best for us last night: transition and counters. Mexico's midfield is pretty suspect other than Alvarez, and they persist in not playing an enormously in-form Santi Gimenez, so I think we're a terrible matchup for them and we'll look better in that game. Also, Dest will be back, and probably SUPER motivated.
If Jamaica hadn't scored in the first minute, they probably lose 3-0 in regulation. They'd have had to come out and try to get the ball, there would've been pressing opportunities, and Gregg wouldn't have had to take out Scally and put Wes at RB. That game was very idiosyncratic because of the early goal and Jamaica had the staff to put 10 behind the ball and defend for 95 minutes (but not 96!).
The good news is, Chucky Lozano appears to be broken (and it was Ricardo Pepi that did some of the breaking).I watched half of the MEX/PAN game (until it got to 2-0). Seems like Jamaica used speed down the middle against our CB's. Mexico speed seems to be with their RW.
They would have come out more than they did, but I don't know how much more. Coming out with 3 at the back and a 4th CB in your advanced midfield spot is a pretty extreme commitment to bunkering.If Jamaica hadn't scored in the first minute, they probably lose 3-0 in regulation. They'd have had to come out and try to get the ball, there would've been pressing opportunities, and Gregg wouldn't have had to take out Scally and put Wes at RB. That game was very idiosyncratic because of the early goal and Jamaica had the staff to put 10 behind the ball and defend for 95 minutes (but not 96!).
Yeah they have quality attackers, even if ours are better (and so are Canada's, on a good day). But their defense is far worse, and their midfield has been a bit of a shambles since HH and Guardado fell off a table. Panama was able to get a bunch of decent chances against them, and they were basically unable to handle Carrasquilla all night, from what I saw (how he isn't playing in a Big 5 league yet is beyond me).Uriel Antuna was the guy who impressed me in the first half last night with his electric speed on the right wing.
This is a good take, and gives me some hope. I just really wish we had more ideas when trailing. Needing the opposition to press for a second goal in order to give us the chance to draw isn't a great situation -- because often the team will get the second goal. Although I suppose this is just a fancy way of saying that being down 1-0 in a soccer game is never good. But, they got the job done, and so onward.Mexico will not sit back and concede possession, so on Sunday we will have plenty of what was working best for us last night: transition and counters. Mexico's midfield is pretty suspect other than Alvarez, and they persist in not playing an enormously in-form Santi Gimenez, so I think we're a terrible matchup for them and we'll look better in that game. Also, Dest will be back, and probably SUPER motivated.
If Jamaica hadn't scored in the first minute, they probably lose 3-0 in regulation. They'd have had to come out and try to get the ball, there would've been pressing opportunities, and Gregg wouldn't have had to take out Scally and put Wes at RB. That game was very idiosyncratic because of the early goal and Jamaica had the staff to put 10 behind the ball and defend for 95 minutes (but not 96!).
Firstly, I think we score plenty from the run of play, but only when we're facing a team trying to soccer against us, and not a bunker that concedes 80%+ of possession. Which is most of the time, but less so against CONCACAF teams that are well below our level and adopt that strategy more often.If the team is going to be in position where it has trouble scoring from the run of play in the final third, it seems like set pieces take on added significance. Anyone want to discuss Pulisic's service? I'm no expert and maybe they are running plays that are not apparent to me, but he seems pretty poor at it. Is this a case where he's the captain so he takes them, where the eye test is misleading and he's doing ok, or where we just don't have anyone better? Or none of the above? Gio has looked ok although maybe you prefer him in the box? I kind of feel like Pulisic has great instincts and the ability to play tricky plays even when well marked. The ball finds him sometimes, and so I guess I'd rather have him potentially get a lucky bounce on the set pieces than take them.
I’m with you on all of this. The USMNT has consistently struggled to score against teams that bunker in. Too much of that U-shaped passing around the outside with very little getting into dangerous areas. Having Gio helps in that regard because he can sit just above the box, is comfortable in tight spaces, and can pick a pass, but he’s not a cure-all. And he only helps if the team can get him the ball in a dangerous spot consistently. The US is at its most dangerous when they can get space and attack with speed. They did get some chances on the break last night, like you/Vince mentioned, but got nothing from them. That Puli chance stands out because I thought it was weighted well for him to shoot it first time with his preferred right foot (Meola said on the broadcast that he thought the pass should have gone to his left foot, but I disagree).View attachment 79821
Firstly, I think we score plenty from the run of play, but only when we're facing a team trying to soccer against us, and not a bunker that concedes 80%+ of possession. Which is most of the time, but less so against CONCACAF teams that are well below our level and adopt that strategy more often.
Second, regarding set pieces, here was the notes from Vince, one of the Scuffed co-hosts:
- Pulisic hit 7/8 corners into the defense.
- Malik passed a ball to Blake from a cutback to the dot
- Pulisic didn’t get a shot off after a 3 v 2 break where he got the ball in the box
Those are... not great. But they're also things that don't happen very often for us, certainly not all of them at once. I do generally think we should give Gio more of the corners and especially the dangerous free kicks, because this is more of a pattern for Pulisic than a one-game anomaly.
I'm on team "Gio is our best player, he processes the game faster than anyone we have including CP, we're only going as far in 2026 as he takes us". So I want him out there getting as many reps as his conditioning will let us give him. Pulisic has incredible dribbling and definitely great instincts around the box (every one of his coaches, from Tuchel to Lampard to Pioli, has said that his late arrivals in the box are world class), but he's not half the passer that Gio is. I'm not sure he's going to be as much of a threat if we put him in the mix for set pieces instead of serving them up, but him getting a rebound seems likelier than him putting a corner or free kick on a dime so we get lucky and score. Aaronson can also take corners pretty well IIRC.
He can definitely ping a nice cross, but he’s also pretty high on the list of players I want on the receiving end of a free kick.I feel like there was a friendly this winter where McKennie was the lone "star" in the lineup. His long distance services into the area were a treat to behold. Makes me think he would be excellent on set pieces from the 36 in.
That was an absolutely magical night. It was also one of the first big post-COVID spectator sporting events (and the return of boorish fan behavior). Always a good excuse to post the 80’+ Watke recap.Finals tonight vs Mexico, 9:15pm ET.
Our game against them 3 years ago was an instant classic, and served as our announcement that we were capital-B Back from our Couva lows. They haven't beaten us since.