The McHale half of that would have to be Zach Collins, I bet. I think a gutsy GM could have him as the top guy in this draft (as McHale turned out to be in his).
I like Jarrett Allen as the Parish half. We need a scorer though more than two young bigs.The McHale half of that would have to be Zach Collins, I bet. I think a gutsy GM could have him as the top guy in this draft (as McHale turned out to be in his).
You could no doubt get Okafor and 3 for Fultz
The closest thing I can imagine is Aaron Gordon and Orlando's number 5 pick for number 1. But I'm not sure it's worth it.
How could you tell, was it the dancing banana? I bet it was the dancing banana.
I've been thinking about a PHI-BOS trade since the lottery ended, although I really like Fultz and think he's the best player by far in this class.
Obviously, you did not watch them.
Crowder's contract almost makes him unreadable because it's so good. He's making like $7M/year through the 19-20 season.
Well, you may not be sold on him as YOUR #1, but he's very clearly the consensus #1. Consensus has a specific meaning, and in this case, Fultz is the consensus #1.
The Ben Simmons LSU team was really bad and he had more talented teammates than Fultz.
It explains why he chose UW and whom he has advising him. I think that was what HSG was asking.
Thank you, that was very helpful. So he made his name by taking the MVP of the 2016 U18 FIBA Americas championship, playing alongside the likes of Jarrett Allen. I suppose the next natural question is, is video of those games worthwhile? Are they any better competition than UW's opponents this season?
Saric and 3 I think the sixers would be all in on. And you can have okafor too !
Bradley is almost certainly a goner no later than the deadline (but I'd guess this summer) assuming Fultz is drafted.....and was likely a goner without Fultz given that he is about to command over $20m annually after next season to retain him. You roll with IT/Smart/Fultz/Rozier and evaluate from there. The nice thing about Fultz is that he's going to be capable fairly soon of defending scoring 1's so IT isn't constantly exposed much like Bradley does for him now (except he obviously isn't going to do it as well as Bradley).
I just can't see the Celtics giving the Sixers Fultz. It doesn't make sense to improve an opponent like that.
The best option is to draft Fultz. He fits what this team needs most for the cheapest and for both short and long term.
Or they can deal Nader for Okafor, that's about equal value.The McHale half of that would have to be Zach Collins, I bet. I think a gutsy GM could have him as the top guy in this draft (as McHale turned out to be in his).
You could no doubt get Okafor and 3 for Fultz
If the dancing banana didn't tip you off that he was joking, the multiple posts that followed should have.
?
Yeah, I don't get people sometimes. Nearly everyone admits that the Cs need top-10 talent to compete for a championship, and now that we might able to draft a player with that kind of potential, people are saying we should trade the opportunity for two lesser players?
Agreed. I think only reason you trade down is if you truly believe someone else is a better player and are sure he'll be there. Unlikely.
This. Don't fuck around. Bradley (and perhaps Smart) is going to get paid after next year. Take the stud and trade one of the existing guards to balance out the roster.
