The OL When Healthy

C4CRVT

Member
SoSH Member
Feb 29, 2008
3,076
Heart of the Green Mountains
Assuming that Cannon, Vollmer and Jackson are all healthy enough to go, what's your starting OL?

Does Andrews lose his starting gig to Stork if Jackson/Kline and Mason can all play?
 

tims4wins

PN23's replacement
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
38,002
Hingham, MA
I highly doubt that anyone will supplant Andrews this year if he remains healthy

And as always, I think they will use a rotation and we will see everyone in there.
 

amarshal2

Member
SoSH Member
Oct 25, 2005
4,913
I highly doubt that anyone will supplant Andrews this year if he remains healthy

And as always, I think they will use a rotation and we will see everyone in there.
I think this is the safer bet but I'm really not sure. The consensus is that Stork is the better run blocker and they might need that dimension in the offense. Also, it's a rough way to lose your job in BB's world when Stork is probably the better player.
 

( . ) ( . ) and (_!_)

T&A
SoSH Member
Feb 9, 2010
5,302
Providence, RI
I think the answer as pointed out above is a rotation of lineman, but that this "problem" will (unfortunately) take care of itself as the season rolls on and other guys are banged up and may need to miss a game or two.
 

mwonow

Member
SoSH Member
Sep 4, 2005
7,192
I'm really hoping that we get a chance to debate optimal use of a surplus of healthy O-linemen. Hasn't really been an issue thus far...
 

Trlicek's Whip

Member
SoSH Member
Feb 8, 2009
5,607
New York City
And as always, I think they will use a rotation and we will see everyone in there.
Agreed. Before the attrition, they had nine different combinations of offensive lines through their first three games. There's also stamina and endurance to consider, so even if we see guys coming back they're probably wanting to shuttle them in and out. [Probably see that with Collins too, if he plays MNF].
 
Apr 7, 2006
2,597
I'd prefer/expect Mason over Kline in that lineup. Is that making an assumption inconsistent with what they've sent out there this season?
 

Shelterdog

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Feb 19, 2002
15,375
New York City
I think this is correct, with Mason as the extra run blocker/fullback.
Just reading tea leaves but I think BB really, really, really likes Mason--he was incredibly complimentary of him a few weeks ago on WEEI in an odd way (essentially "Mason gets himself out of position with bad technique all the time but his balance flexibility and athleticism are so terrific that he gets himself out of trouble"). It suggested to me that they think Mason is just a raw, raw player but so unbelievably athletic that we're talking about a Randall McDaniel/Brian Waters quality athletic guard so we'll put up with shit technique while he learns.
 

soxfan121

JAG
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 22, 2002
23,043
Just reading tea leaves but I think BB really, really, really likes Mason--he was incredibly complimentary of him a few weeks ago on WEEI in an odd way (essentially "Mason gets himself out of position with bad technique all the time but his balance flexibility and athleticism are so terrific that he gets himself out of trouble"). It suggested to me that they think Mason is just a raw, raw player but so unbelievably athletic that we're talking about a Randall McDaniel/Brian Waters quality athletic guard so we'll put up with shit technique while he learns.
No doubt. There is a TON to like about Mason long term. He is strong, fast, and aggressive as a run blocker. Given the experience he got at Georgia Tech, in the flexbone, it is no surprise that he's outstanding at that - one of the better run blocking guards I've seen on film this season, and he's only going to get better as he acclimates.

As a pass protector though...he's very raw. But the potential is off-the-charts, and I think the reason they've rotated so heavily is that Mason is so good as run blocker that they can put up with pass protection struggles in some field position/situations.

However, Kline, Stork and Andrews are (IMO) light years ahead of Mason as pass blocker right now. He needs reps. They are OK with "shit technique" as he learns...but not when it counts.

I took RO's post to be "what's the best five/most likely 5 in critical situations" and I concur with his projections - if healthy, that's the line least likely to get Brady killed. Mason will continue to improve, and get in the mix, but in crunch time, and especially in passing situations, he's still a liability compared to the more dependable Stork/Andrews/Kline trio on the inside.
 

amarshal2

Member
SoSH Member
Oct 25, 2005
4,913
I'd prefer/expect Mason over Kline in that lineup. Is that making an assumption inconsistent with what they've sent out there this season?
I think Kline is a lock to "start" at LG. Everyone says he's been their best G this year, he's had the most snaps (even accounting for injuries), and he just inked an extension - he's the guy.

The question is which two of Andrews, Mason, and Stork "start" at C and RG.

Andrews has played every offensive snap this year and is the smart bet to continue. Stork also can likely be rotated into a bunch more spots than Andrews can (too small).

I do wonder if their best 5 is Vollmer-Kline-Stork-Mason-Cannon. Maybe you switch Vollmer and Cannon, I dunno about that.

We'll see soon.
 

Pandemonium67

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 17, 2003
5,589
Santa Fe
The fact that Andrews has played every snap so far makes me think BB will spell him a lot with Stork. Ideally the Pats will play 19 games this year -- that's a huge uptick from the 12 or 13 Andrews is used to playing, and against much stiffer competition. He could be in danger of burning out.

The optimal strategy is a rotation. Get everyone reps and experience, keep everyone fresh, minimize risk of injury. Have your best ready for January.
 

Tony C

Moderator
Moderator
SoSH Member
Apr 13, 2000
13,729
In theory I think it'd be Vollmer-Kline-Andrews-Mason-Cannon. Really impressed by how Stork played at RT -- not that he was great, but pretty impressive all the same given his lack of time there. While many are suggesting he'll start at RG if Cannon is back, I'd see Stork more as a guy rotating in across the line given the flexibility he's shown. Andrews seems locked in at C, so think he still starts there.

In reality, not all of the guys healthy enough to practice will be healthy enough to play, so the real decisions will be simpler.
 

RedOctober3829

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 19, 2005
55,622
deep inside Guido territory
As 121 stated, yes that is my optimal 5 guys to play on the OL. Kline has been their best guard all season so he stays in because of his performance. That is to take nothing away from Mason but Kline has just been better. Vollmer and Cannon are the tackles because Cannon has been better overall this year than Fleming. I also like Fleming as the extra tackle in a power running game plan as we saw with the Indy game plans last year. I picked Stork over Mason because Mason has a long ways to go in pass protecting. I also don't want Stork on the bench waiting to rotate in as he is one of the Patriots' best 5 linemen when healthy. Stork is a better option at this point because the Patriots are passing the ball more often than not. Mason has value and he will rotate in depending on what type of game plan the Patriots use from week to week. I think Googe and Bill are treating this as a redshirt year for Mason so to speak. They are putting him in situations that he will succeed in and continue to work on his pass blocking skills. Hell, he only had to pass block a handful of times per game in college so it's not a knock on him. He just simply hasn't had the reps that most other OL have had in pass protection.
 

MarcSullivaFan

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 21, 2005
3,412
Hoo-hoo-hoo hoosier land.
To those of you who watch a lot of film and understand line play, do you think Andrews is playing better this season than Stork played last season? My relatively uniformed impression last season was that Stork made a big difference, particularly in pass protection.
 

RedOctober3829

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 19, 2005
55,622
deep inside Guido territory
To those of you who watch a lot of film and understand line play, do you think Andrews is playing better this season than Stork played last season? My relatively uniformed impression last season was that Stork made a big difference, particularly in pass protection.
I think Andrews is doing a heck of a job but not as good of a job as Stork. Stork is more physical(think Logan Mankins) than Andrews and that allowed him to get more of a push in the running game. As you said, he is also an excellent pass blocker in the interior. Andrews has put has put more than enough good plays on tape to earn himself a starting center job somewhere else in the league if let go. Personally, in the offseason I'd seriously consider keeping Andrews at center and making Stork the right guard. The interior of Kline-Andrews-Stork would be a heck of a protector for Brady.
 

SamK

New Member
May 31, 2012
151
I think Andrews is doing a heck of a job but not as good of a job as Stork. Stork is more physical(think Logan Mankins) than Andrews and that allowed him to get more of a push in the running game. As you said, he is also an excellent pass blocker in the interior. Andrews has put has put more than enough good plays on tape to earn himself a starting center job somewhere else in the league if let go. Personally, in the offseason I'd seriously consider keeping Andrews at center and making Stork the right guard. The interior of Kline-Andrews-Stork would be a heck of a protector for Brady.
Keeping both Stork (at guard) and Andrews is consistent with Patriots' passion for versatility and depth. Keep two NFL centers on the roster, but neither are on the bench or practice squad.
 

soxfan121

JAG
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 22, 2002
23,043
To those of you who watch a lot of film and understand line play, do you think Andrews is playing better this season than Stork played last season? My relatively uniformed impression last season was that Stork made a big difference, particularly in pass protection.
I think Andrews is doing a heck of a job but not as good of a job as Stork. Stork is more physical(think Logan Mankins) than Andrews and that allowed him to get more of a push in the running game. As you said, he is also an excellent pass blocker in the interior. Andrews has put has put more than enough good plays on tape to earn himself a starting center job somewhere else in the league if let go. Personally, in the offseason I'd seriously consider keeping Andrews at center and making Stork the right guard. The interior of Kline-Andrews-Stork would be a heck of a protector for Brady.
RedOctober3829 is one of the best observers and football minds in this forum, and there's just so much to like about his response here.

IMO, Andrews is "smarter" than Stork, in that he has excelled all season with the calls and with his assignments, whereas Stork had a few (not many, but a few) growing pains in those areas last season. Andrews also was a center throughout his college career, and Stork bounced around a bit because of his superior athletic skills and strength. Andrews reminds me of Dan Koppen, who wouldn't have been athletic enough to play guard but excelled in the mental aspect of the game and rarely missed an assignment or combo block.

I also think Kline's short extension is a hedge to allow Mason to develop (as discussed above), and while Kline has been superior this season, Mason should seize the LG job next season. He's so mobile, athletic, and mean...I love the kid's potential.
 

joe dokes

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
30,693
I also think Kline's short extension is a hedge to allow Mason to develop (as discussed above), and while Kline has been superior this season, Mason should seize the LG job next season. He's so mobile, athletic, and mean...I love the kid's potential.
It would essentially make Kline the Cannon of the guards. *That's* depth.
 

C4CRVT

Member
SoSH Member
Feb 29, 2008
3,076
Heart of the Green Mountains
I think it's fascinating that people here think that Andrews is good enough at C that he warrants playing Stork out of position at G in order to keep him on the field. Vollmer,Cannon and Jackson were still listed as limited participation yesterday so we're seemingly getting ahead of ourselves.

How does Jackson grade out?

Vollmer-Kline-Andrews-Stork-Cannon
vs.
Vollmer-Kline-Stork-Mason-Cannon
Might be a great OL later in the year to run behind.

I'm by no means an expert in these things. All of the injuries this year piqued my interest.
 

dynomite

Member
SoSH Member
I think it's fascinating that people here think that Andrews is good enough at C that he warrants playing Stork out of position at G in order to keep him on the field.
Andrews has been incredibly reliable. It feels like Belichick has consistently praised his performance and awareness in the weekly breakdowns.

Perhaps because the Patriots have won every week and we've gotten rewarded with 9 Breakdowns already, it's interesting to see how often his name comes up as someone making a heads up play or a good block. I believe the ITP guys have felt similarly.
 

soxfan121

JAG
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 22, 2002
23,043
I think it's fascinating that people here think that Andrews is good enough at C that he warrants playing Stork out of position at G in order to keep him on the field. Vollmer,Cannon and Jackson were still listed as limited participation yesterday so we're seemingly getting ahead of ourselves.

How does Jackson grade out?
Two things:
1. Stork is a better athlete, and thus able to do more things. Plus, he has experience at other positions in college, and is technically (as in the technique of the position) gifted and refined by the best OL coach in CFB, Rick Trickett - who _literally_ wrote a book on it. So, Stork is able to do more, different things than Andrews. Stork wouldn't be "out of position" - Andrews would be. He is strictly a center, because of his size and lack of athletic ability.

2. Jackson - another Trickett coached-up player - also has terrific potential and RG is actually a more "important" position than LG. There's some good reasons for this - Dave Archibald gets into some of it in his ITP piece on OL investment. But Jackson is also "behind" these other players because the other guys are very good - not because Jackson is bad. Like, I'm pretty sure Jackson could step in and start for about 10 teams this weekend, if healthy.
 

Shelterdog

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Feb 19, 2002
15,375
New York City
Two things:
1. Stork is a better athlete, and thus able to do more things. Plus, he has experience at other positions in college, and is technically (as in the technique of the position) gifted and refined by the best OL coach in CFB, Rick Trickett - who _literally_ wrote a book on it. So, Stork is able to do more, different things than Andrews. Stork wouldn't be "out of position" - Andrews would be. He is strictly a center, because of his size and lack of athletic ability.

2. Jackson - another Trickett coached-up player - also has terrific potential and RG is actually a more "important" position than LG. There's some good reasons for this - Dave Archibald gets into some of it in his ITP piece on OL investment. But Jackson is also "behind" these other players because the other guys are very good - not because Jackson is bad. Like, I'm pretty sure Jackson could step in and start for about 10 teams this weekend, if healthy.
Do you think RG is more important in the Pat's system? From what I can see they don't slide to the left side as much (and the RG isn't on an island as much) as with many other teams and they also have the LG pulling a ton.
 

C4CRVT

Member
SoSH Member
Feb 29, 2008
3,076
Heart of the Green Mountains
Two things:
1. Stork is a better athlete, and thus able to do more things. Plus, he has experience at other positions in college, and is technically (as in the technique of the position) gifted and refined by the best OL coach in CFB, Rick Trickett - who _literally_ wrote a book on it. So, Stork is able to do more, different things than Andrews. Stork wouldn't be "out of position" - Andrews would be. He is strictly a center, because of his size and lack of athletic ability.

2. Jackson - another Trickett coached-up player - also has terrific potential and RG is actually a more "important" position than LG. There's some good reasons for this - Dave Archibald gets into some of it in his ITP piece on OL investment. But Jackson is also "behind" these other players because the other guys are very good - not because Jackson is bad. Like, I'm pretty sure Jackson could step in and start for about 10 teams this weekend, if healthy.
Thanks the thoughtful reply.
 

dynomite

Member
SoSH Member
Two things:
1. Stork is a better athlete, and thus able to do more things. Plus, he has experience at other positions in college, and is technically (as in the technique of the position) gifted and refined by the best OL coach in CFB, Rick Trickett - who _literally_ wrote a book on it. So, Stork is able to do more, different things than Andrews. Stork wouldn't be "out of position" - Andrews would be. He is strictly a center, because of his size and lack of athletic ability.
This is the right answer, I think.

Stork is incredibly tough, gifted and versatile -- the kind of player Belichick obviously trusts enough to play multiple positions.
 

tims4wins

PN23's replacement
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
38,002
Hingham, MA
So Andrews only played 23 of 67 snaps last night - I was wrong on that one. They seemed to be moving guys around all game. I haven't seen all of the snap counts posted yet though
 

RedOctober3829

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 19, 2005
55,622
deep inside Guido territory
So Andrews only played 23 of 67 snaps last night - I was wrong on that one. They seemed to be moving guys around all game. I haven't seen all of the snap counts posted yet though
OFFENSIVE LINE

G Josh Kline -- 67

T Marcus Cannon -- 67

G Shaq Mason -- 61

T Sebastian Vollmer -- 55

C/G Bryan Stork -- 51

C David Andrews -- 23

RT Cameron Fleming -- 12

http://espn.go.com/blog/new-england-patriots/post/_/id/4787856/tavon-wilson-turns-back-clock-at-cb-to-help-patriots-in-win
 

TheoShmeo

Skrub's sympathy case
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 19, 2005
12,890
Boston, NY
I will throw this out there at the risk of being shouted down.

Is there an argument that the best alignment is playing Andrews at C, Mason at one guard spot, either Jackson or Kline at the other guard spot, and Vollmer and Stork at the tackle positions?

My thought process is:

- get the best 5 linemen on the field;

- Andrews was not at his best last night but has had a good year;

- Cannon is not as good at tackle as Stork, as disappointing as that is; and

- Fleming is not as good at tackle as Stork, as disappointing as that is.

Why am I wrong? Or do you think I am on to something? (And I get that we are working with the ultimate SSS with Stork at tackle. My response is that we have seen a fair amount of Fleming and Cannon, though less with him, and the results aint pretty).

The other thought that I had last night is that while I understand using multiple linemen to keep guys fresh, especially with so many newly returned linemen, at some point this group needs to become a unit and all the substitutions could retard that. I know, when you are 10-0, you have the luxury of trying different things and substituting, and that's their inclination regardless of their record. But I have heard so many linemen talking about the importance of being a unit that I hope the Pats settle on a core 5 in the next few weeks (with the injury caveat, of course).
 

soxfan121

JAG
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 22, 2002
23,043
So Andrews only played 23 of 67 snaps last night - I was wrong on that one. They seemed to be moving guys around all game. I haven't seen all of the snap counts posted yet though
I thought Andrews was completely overmatched early - just could not make the right line calls or find the blitzer. The exact opposite of what I was praising him for earlier in the week. I think it got bad enough that he was pulled in favor of Stork, which forced Vollmer - who did not look 100% - into more action than they planned/wanted.
 

lexrageorge

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2007
18,327
I will throw this out there at the risk of being shouted down.

Is there an argument that the best alignment is playing Andrews at C, Mason at one guard spot, either Jackson or Kline at the other guard spot, and Vollmer and Stork at the tackle positions?

My thought process is:

- get the best 5 linemen on the field;

- Andrews was not at his best last night but has had a good year;

- Cannon is not as good at tackle as Stork, as disappointing as that is; and

- Fleming is not as good at tackle as Stork, as disappointing as that is.

Why am I wrong? Or do you think I am on to something? (And I get that we are working with the ultimate SSS with Stork at tackle. My response is that we have seen a fair amount of Fleming and Cannon, though less with him, and the results aint pretty).

The other thought that I had last night is that while I understand using multiple linemen to keep guys fresh, especially with so many newly returned linemen, at some point this group needs to become a unit and all the substitutions could retard that. I know, when you are 10-0, you have the luxury of trying different things and substituting, and that's their inclination regardless of their record. But I have heard so many linemen talking about the importance of being a unit that I hope the Pats settle on a core 5 in the next few weeks (with the injury caveat, of course).
Stork had his struggles at RT last week. Cannon had his difficulties at the tackle spot last night, but that's one game, which is not nearly enough to conclude that "Cannon is not as good at tackle as Stork".

Keep in mind also that the center is responsible for the line calls prior to the snap, IIRC. With the caveat that I have not seen the film, but I would not be surprised that part of the OL's problem was simply missed assignments due to the various blitzing stunts Ryan called last night. Stork has a year under his belt, so it's not surprising that he ended up at center when the line was looking rather disorganized in the early going.

The Pats have been rotating OL personnel all season and have been fine. So the hypothesis in your last paragraph does not really stand up.
 

H78

Fists of Millennial Fury!
SoSH Member
Jul 22, 2009
4,613
Cannon did not just have his difficulties last night, he was putrid. I recall at least two false starts, several Brady hits attributed to him, and several times missing blocks in the running game. He was awful.
 

Super Nomario

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 5, 2000
14,025
Mansfield MA
Cannon did not just have his difficulties last night, he was putrid. I recall at least two false starts, several Brady hits attributed to him, and several times missing blocks in the running game. He was awful.
I agree, Cannon was really bad. In his defense, he only returned to practice Wednesday after missing four full weeks of practice and they played him wire-to-wire. Hopefully he looks better next week with some more reps to knock off the rust. I don't think they can continue to play him if he's as bad as he was last night, but I think there's some reason to be optimistic he won't be.
 

bakahump

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jan 8, 2001
7,581
Maine
Sometimes you gotta tip your Cap........he is a blathering idiot....but Rex can scheme up some weird ass unexpected blitz packages. He also knows Brady and BBs tendencys as well as anyone. So while the line looked abused last night (well except for Cannon....he looked worse then that...) Alot of that falls on Rex, a good game plan and some Stellar DLs.

Next week I doubt they look as bad while still facing a stout front 7. And moving forward I think few teams create the same matchup problems (both mentally and physically) that the Bills do.
 

soxfan121

JAG
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 22, 2002
23,043
The good news is that Wade Phillips is not changing his scheme for anyone or anything, so Denver will be running their base defense without trying to copy any of Rex's successful ideas.
 

Hoodie Sleeves

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 24, 2015
1,204
Keep in mind also that the center is responsible for the line calls prior to the snap, IIRC. With the caveat that I have not seen the film, but I would not be surprised that part of the OL's problem was simply missed assignments due to the various blitzing stunts Ryan called last night. Stork has a year under his belt, so it's not surprising that he ended up at center when the line was looking rather disorganized in the early going..
I think you're largely right - there were a lot of unblocked defenders last night - an alarming amount coming through the inside of the line. Some of it was poor blitz pickup by the runningbacks (there were a few plays where White was blocking nobody while a defender came through 1 gap over)- but some of it was definitely assignment issues.
 

DegenerateSoxFan

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 11, 2006
2,071
Flagstaff, AZ
Not sure if this is the right thread to bump, this has to be officially the biggest concern going forward. Getting Edelman, Amendola, McCourty (whose absence was really noticeable last night) & Chung will be big, but if they go down in the postseason, it will almost certainly be because the O-line can't do better than a bank of turnstiles.

My brief observation/impression, and I haven't gone back, and looked at it again, was that the jail break slowed when they moved Stork to RT, and put Andrews in at center, which I think helped the Pats pull that tying drive out of their ass. Stork is a versatile badass, and this is the second time they've had him at tackle where he looked (to my relatively uneducated eye) fairly competent. Any O-line geeks here agree? Is this the solution if Vollmer's really done?

Edit: I loathe autocorrect unconditionally.
 

Byrdbrain

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
8,588
Are you sure Stork was at Tackle at all yesterday?
From what I noticed and what the announcers said Stork was at LG and the Ts were still Cannon and Fleming.
It is certainly possible I missed it and I don't have it DVRd so I can't check.

I do think it is possible that Stork ends up at T next week.
 

DegenerateSoxFan

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 11, 2006
2,071
Flagstaff, AZ
Are you sure Stork was at Tackle at all yesterday?
From what I noticed and what the announcers said Stork was at LG and the Ts were still Cannon and Fleming.
It is certainly possible I missed it and I don't have it DVRd so I can't check.

I do think it is possible that Stork ends up at T next week.
I thought I saw him there. Maybe I got it mixed up. He's got to be a viable option there if it comes to it.
 

Erik Hanson's Hook

Member
SoSH Member
Jun 20, 2013
1,085
That Marcus Cannon extension is looking better and better all the time. All it cost was our QB's ankle. Only this guy could try to commit a penalty in order to protect his quarterback, yet actually aid the injury in the process. It'd almost be funny if it wasn't so sad.


In other news, the Stork / Andrews go-round is fascinating to me. I think Bill believes he has two legitimately good centers, but Stork displays more versatility, as opined in the excellent commentary upthread by SF121, RedOct, and Super Nom. It may be crazy talk, but in the playoffs, I would contemplate Stork at RT over Cannon / Flemming. Shaq, Andrews, Kline, and Jackson can man the interior.
 
Last edited:

TheoShmeo

Skrub's sympathy case
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 19, 2005
12,890
Boston, NY
In other news, the Stork / Andrews go-round is fascinating to me. I think Bill believes he has two legitimately good centers, but Stork displays more versatility, as opined in the excellent commentary upthread by SF121, RedOct, and Super Nom. It may be crazy talk, but in the playoffs, I would contemplate Stork at RT over Cannon / Flemming. Shaq, Andrews, Kline, and Jackson can man the interior.
I don't think it's crazy talk. I think that Stork is very likely to be better at RT than Cannon or Flemming. But at this point, I doubt the Pats will do this since I don't believe they have played Stork much at T since they were forced into it shortly after he returned from injury. That said, I still think that Andrews and Stork are among their best five lineman and that Flemming and Cannon are not that good...and that as a result, Stork at RT and Andrews at C makes the most sense. Again, I don't see it happening.
 
Last edited:

j44thor

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
11,163
Filing this away in the "stats lie, or rather DVOA is a bunch of made up BS folder"
NE was #2 OL in running blocking behind only CIN according to FO DVOA.

Is there anyone that would agree with that? I can't recall many games where they were opening up running lanes on a consistent basis. Perhaps the first 8 or so games but certainly not the second half of the season. Find it extremely hard to believe that there weren't better Run blocking OL's in football besides CIN.

http://www.footballoutsiders.com/stats/ol
 

Shelterdog

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Feb 19, 2002
15,375
New York City
Filing this away in the "stats lie, or rather DVOA is a bunch of made up BS folder"
NE was #2 OL in running blocking behind only CIN according to FO DVOA.

Is there anyone that would agree with that? I can't recall many games where they were opening up running lanes on a consistent basis. Perhaps the first 8 or so games but certainly not the second half of the season. Find it extremely hard to believe that there weren't better Run blocking OL's in football besides CIN.

http://www.footballoutsiders.com/stats/ol
DVOA is a bunch of made up bullshit.

The way to get a good DVOA oline score is to have a shitload of 3-6 yard runs and rarely lose yards. You can do that with Emmitt Smith and the wall of Dallas or you can do that with David Andrews and a rotating cast of rookie guards if you're only running at optimal times (like calling a lot of draws against nickel and dime on 2 or 3 and long). How do you think the Pats did it?