The Game Ball Thread: Wk. 8 at NYJ

johnmd20

mad dog
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 30, 2003
62,085
New York City
The thing with Chubb though is he really isn’t anything as a receiver. And I loved Chubb. I’d take Rham over him because Rham is more versatile.
Chubb can catch, though. Cleveland just doesn't use him that way, for inexplicable reasons.
 

Shelterdog

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Feb 19, 2002
15,375
New York City
Chubb can catch, though. Cleveland just doesn't use him that way, for inexplicable reasons.
If you have him in on passing downs that means he'll do some pass blocking sometimes, and even if he can do that (I"ve never really watched) that's adding challenging physically plays where some DL and blitzing backs get to eff him up some.
 

SMU_Sox

queer eye for the next pats guy
SoSH Member
Jul 20, 2009
8,954
Dallas
Chubb can catch, though. Cleveland just doesn't use him that way, for inexplicable reasons.
For sure. I think you can use him as a basic RB option guy. But Rham can lineup in the slot or out wide and Chubb hasn’t shown he can do that. It’s like those 3 tiers of RB receiving. Tier 3 is you’re below average or worse with basic checkdown routes. Tier 2 is you’re average or better with checkdown routes. Tier 1 is you can line up as a receiver as well. I think Rham is tier 1 (even if he’s a low tier 1 - YMMV) and Chubb is a very solid tier 2 (maybe even a highish tier 2 even if underused). As a pure runner Chubb has the edge on Rham but Chubb has the edge on… everyone?
 

johnmd20

mad dog
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 30, 2003
62,085
New York City
For sure. I think you can use him as a basic RB option guy. But Rham can lineup in the slot or out wide and Chubb hasn’t shown he can do that. It’s like those 3 tiers of RB receiving. Tier 3 is you’re below average or worse with basic checkdown routes. Tier 2 is you’re average or better with checkdown routes. Tier 1 is you can line up as a receiver as well. I think Rham is tier 1 (even if he’s a low tier 1 - YMMV) and Chubb is a very solid tier 2 (maybe even a highish tier 2 even if underused). As a pure runner Chubb has the edge on Rham but Chubb has the edge on… everyone?
I've seen Chubb catch passes down the field. He has excellent hands. He's exceptional in the flat. I don't think he's the best blocker but he's no worse than Kareem Hunt.

Cleveland just doesn't use him to catch passes because it's smarter for an offense to be one dimensional, I guess. The Pats did the same thing with Sony and it was brutal. If Sony was on the field, it was going to be a run.
 

joe dokes

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
30,614
Anyone who watched that entire "football game" deserves a prize. Glad they won, but . . . . .
 

ponch73

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jun 14, 2006
871
Stumptown via Chelmsford
Game ball to Mac Jones for convincing BB not to trade up and pick Zach Wilson in last year's NFL Draft and for being a juicy target for opponent's roughing the passer and unnecessary roughness penalties.
 

Eddie Jurak

canderson-lite
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 12, 2002
44,794
Melrose, MA
For sure. I think you can use him as a basic RB option guy. But Rham can lineup in the slot or out wide and Chubb hasn’t shown he can do that. It’s like those 3 tiers of RB receiving. Tier 3 is you’re below average or worse with basic checkdown routes. Tier 2 is you’re average or better with checkdown routes. Tier 1 is you can line up as a receiver as well. I think Rham is tier 1 (even if he’s a low tier 1 - YMMV) and Chubb is a very solid tier 2 (maybe even a highish tier 2 even if underused). As a pure runner Chubb has the edge on Rham but Chubb has the edge on… everyone?
How many tier 1s can run the ball as well or better than Stevenson? I'm guessing that there are some, but that they tend to be Christian McCaffrey types - smaller faster backs who don't run over people and break tackles like Stevenson does. I think he's something of a unicorn.
 

Arroyoyo

New Member
Dec 13, 2021
829
I kinda like Bart Scott. Every time he speaks he reminds me of the Rex Ryan era Jets. And I love being reminded of that era because the team was kinda stacked outside QB yet never seriously competed for a title. Which reminds me the Jets are a perpetual failure. Which makes me happy.
 

Phil Plantier

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 7, 2002
3,420
I think the special teams overall deserve a shout. Kickoff returns, kickoff coverage, punt returns,* punt coverage, field goals, onside kick recovery. All of it flawless. Jets had a shanked punt, shanked field goal, shanked kickoff. Special teams were the difference.

* one very obvious rookie mistake aside.
 

BigSoxFan

Member
SoSH Member
May 31, 2007
47,261
I think the special teams overall deserve a shout. Kickoff returns, kickoff coverage, punt returns,* punt coverage, field goals, onside kick recovery. All of it flawless. Jets had a shanked punt, shanked field goal, shanked kickoff. Special teams were the difference.

* one very obvious rookie mistake aside.
Marcus Jones is now in 4th place in the league in punt return average at 14.0. Feels like it's only a matter of time before he breaks one.
 

ShaneTrot

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Nov 17, 2002
6,457
Overland Park, KS
Stevenson is killing Damien Harris' contract year.
I am guessing the offensive line would have been a lot better with Andrews. He has been helping out Strange all year because Owenu is a stud and doesn't need it.
 

BusRaker

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 11, 2006
2,379
I think Josh Jacobs is another RB entering the top tier (along with Rham).
Game balls to the D responsible for filling in for Barmore and Dugger (Wise / Guy / Peppers I think did the majority of this work). I thought we were screwed when I read the inactive list.
 

Garshaparra

New Member
Feb 27, 2008
534
McCarver's Mushy Mouth
Spooky game balls to the Halloween ghosts in Zack Wilson's head. The Jets should have won that game going away. 13 (!) negative offensive plays for the Pats, a truly ugly stat, but Wilson just could not bring himself to throw the ball away when warranted.

Two actual game balls to Rham and Nick Folk.
 

Kliq

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 31, 2013
22,846
I would take Henry, Chubb, Cook, Ekler, Kamara, CMC, Taylor and Saquon over Rham and I like Rham.
 

Van Everyman

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 30, 2009
27,118
Newton
One thing I think is perhaps somewhat lost in this win is what Belichick just did to this Jets team.

Going into this game, the prevailing story was Mac. Could he pull it together to beat a division rival that had lost 12 straight to the Patriots? Or was he so broken that it wouldn't be possible to beat a team on the road that was 5-2 with a solid defense? Of course, while Mac didn't exactly light the world on fire, he did enough to win. But instead, the story coming out was how Zack Wilson is completely unsuited to being an NFL quarterback.

We know Bill has a tendency to go after a team's biggest strength -- ie, the Marshall Faulk Strategy in the 2001-2 Super Bowl. And we know he has a habit of not just beating other teams, but breaking them -- such as that 2001 Rams team (and maybe the Steelers that year as well), the 2014 Seahawks and 2018 Rams.

But this game also reminded us that Bill likes to not simply exploit a team's greatest weakness but burst their bubble by pantsing the thing that is key to sustaining their momentum. Often, in the case of Kordell Stewart and Jared Goff, it's the quarterback. In this case, it was Bill kicking Wilson while he was already down. And in a league where the Jets have been a laughing stock for a long time and a division where two other teams are already doing well-to-great, it's absolutely a priority to keep them in their place -- which is to say, the last one in the AFC East.

So while I know the goal of the game was to win, it seems to me that Bill's defense did something more important coming out of the locker room in the second half: he sewed chaos in theirs by throwing looks and packages at Wilson that revealed him to be a quivering bowl of jelly and way, way, way behind where even Mac is right now.

Nice work, Bill.