nattysez said:
Unless I'm missing one, the last five long-term deals on which the Sox "did their diligence" were the second Beckett deal, Pedey, Lackey, Crawford, and Gonzalez. Will even one of those deals have been worth the money by the time it's over? And all of those guys were easy to scout! It was that spotty (to be generous) history that led the team to stop doing long-term deals (and I haven't even mentioned Dice-K). I'm not sure it's being inflammatory in the slightest to say that the team's recent history with long-term deals leaves something to be desired, such that any assertion that they've "diligenced" Castillo is not all that reassuring.
And, to be clear, I think this was probably a risk worth taking, since it cost them nothing but money to sign him, Dombrowski obviously thought a lot of him as well, etc. I'm just saying that defending a long-term Red Sox deal on the ground that they've been looking into the player for a long time doesn't do much for me.
Okay, you are missing or ignoring my point. Just because they don't announce it to the press that doesn't mean they haven't done due diligence on every single player they've acquired. It's their job to turn over every stone. In the case of a big contract, someone from the media is going to ask about the risk and they will throw out the "due diligence" line. In other words, it's meaningless and that they said it about Castillo has absolutely nothing to do with Carl Crawford (or Gonzalez, Pedroia, Beckett, or Lackey).
Pointing to Carl Crawford served only one purpose and it wasn't adding insight. Besides, even if they'd drawn the comparison themselves, they sign Castillo to half what Crawford is being paid.