First, apologies for the untimely reply, but I want to address the bolded section, because, as others pointed out, it’s only true if he did, in fact, falsely report a crime to a law enforcement agency.Perhaps I misunderstand the sequence of events here. I thought the first story was the interpreter saying that his good buddy Shohei covered his debts. Because he’s swell and all.
Then, as I understood some to be saying here, Ohtahni’s team thought “oh no, that explanation means Shohei committed a crime, we gotta have him lie and say it was theft”.
I guess I’m challenging that his team changed the story to avoid one crime, and had him commit another crime to cover that up (lying about it being theft).
I understand how one thing followed another, I’m just disputing the suggested motivation. Seems like if the first story was true they’d just stick with it, because changing it brings another crime into the mix.
As the ESPN story in post #599 points out, Ohtani’s representatives have pointedly refused to confirm that he has even filed a criminal complaint. And until we get confirmation that he has, I’m not sure it’s wise to make that assumption.
The farther we get into this, the more it looks like Ohtani’s team made a hash of the initial story, and have decided to manage it by putting out a cover story that they know cannot be challenged, because the interpreter is beyond the reach of US law enforcement. And so long as this remains the case, the potential legal damage to Ohtani is minimal.
Again, I’m not making any judgement about Ohtani’s conduct in terms of whether he placed any bets. If I had to speculate, I’d say that the original story (paying off the gambling debt for his friend) was probably true, which makes him a sympathetic figure in my eyes. But, as we often hear, the coverup is always worse than the crime.
Unless we learn that these were his gambling debts, I don’t see Ohtani being suspended by MLB. However, unless the story he’s pushing now is the truth, I think his image is going to take a hit.