Ryne Sandberg has metastatic prostate cancer

bsj

Renegade Crazed Genius
SoSH Member
Dec 6, 2003
22,906
Central NJ SoSH Chapter
i dont know the specifics of his diagnosis, but this is what scares me when I hear they are doing less screening for prostate cancer because it "spreads so slowly"
 

Humphrey

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 3, 2010
3,421
i dont know the specifics of his diagnosis, but this is what scares me when I hear they are doing less screening for prostate cancer because it "spreads so slowly"
I have found the opposite in terms of my medical care. "Bottoms Up" annually as well as a (blood) PSA test. No issues w/insurance coverage.

Hope that in Sandberg's case it wasn't something that was not checked regularly.
 

McBride11

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
23,644
Durham, NC
i dont know the specifics of his diagnosis, but this is what scares me when I hear they are doing less screening for prostate cancer because it "spreads so slowly"
Less screening is being performed due to a ridiculous recommendation from the US preventative task force services in 2012. There was concern for over diagnosing.
That cmte included zero urologists and has headed by a pediatrician. Ya know, the real experts on prostate cancer.

This made headlines big time. Plus lots of trainees learned this message and carried it into practice.
This was reversed in 2018 or 19 but made much less headlines.

So less prostate cancer is being diagnosed and more is being diagnosed at higher stages.

men 55 and over should get yearly test (blood psa) with pcp.
start younger if strong family history or african american descent.
rectal exam is going away so dont fret (i do zero now unless specifically requested).
 

Eric1984

my real name is Ben
SoSH Member
Jun 14, 2001
3,543
Less screening is being performed due to a ridiculous recommendation from the US preventative task force services in 2012. There was concern for over diagnosing.
That cmte included zero urologists and has headed by a pediatrician. Ya know, the real experts on prostate cancer.

This made headlines big time. Plus lots of trainees learned this message and carried it into practice.
This was reversed in 2018 or 19 but made much less headlines.

So less prostate cancer is being diagnosed and more is being diagnosed at higher stages.

men 55 and over should get yearly test (blood psa) with pcp.
start younger if strong family history or african american descent.
rectal exam is going away so dont fret (i do zero now unless specifically requested).
My primary care guy does the rectal prostate exam (which, at 53, I definitely dread each year). Is it still considered useful? And is the blood test more useful? My doc is pretty good and it's easy to get in to see him when I need to, but I hate that part of the physical and it causes me to put it off...
 

CarolinaBeerGuy

Don't know him from Adam
SoSH Member
Mar 14, 2006
11,255
Kernersville, NC
My dad had prostate cancer about a decade or so ago. His was detected early so his doctor recommended he fly down to Florida to have robotic surgery. He did so and fully recovered. Because of this history, I started getting my PSA tested annually in my mid-thirties.
 

mjs

New Member
Mar 30, 2020
46
Gentlemen, I encourage you to get your PSA tested as part of your annual checkup. It is easy to go online and find good information about the age to start this screening. Based on my steadily climbing PSA and family history I was referred to urology and got the full imaging and biopsy workups, which led me to prostate surgery at age 62. No spread was detected so it appears that it was caught early enough. Not fun, but I am so glad I did not put off the screening.
 

McBride11

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
23,644
Durham, NC
My primary care guy does the rectal prostate exam (which, at 53, I definitely dread each year). Is it still considered useful? And is the blood test more useful? My doc is pretty good and it's easy to get in to see him when I need to, but I hate that part of the physical and it causes me to put it off...
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2588931123002924


Patient summary
Our review shows that the screening performance of digital rectal examination for detection of prostate cancer is not particularly impressive, suggesting that it might not be necessary to conduct this examination routinely
 

fiskful of dollars

Well-Known Member
Gold Supporter
SoSH Member
Jul 14, 2005
3,131
Charlottesville, VA
Yep. BUT not to derail the thread...get a colonoscopy at 50! Earlier if you have inflammatory bowel disease (NOT irritable bowel disease) or a family history. It's not nearly as bad as you imagine. nd you get Cheez-its when you're done!

I dread the 60 yo dude w/ atraumatic back pain in the ED...50/50 the L-spine film I order is gonna be meastastic prostate CA. Check your PSA's!
 

McBride11

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
23,644
Durham, NC
Yep. BUT not to derail the thread...get a colonoscopy at 50! Earlier if you have inflammatory bowel disease (NOT irritable bowel disease) or a family history. It's not nearly as bad as you imagine. nd you get Cheez-its when you're done!

I dread the 60 yo dude w/ atraumatic back pain in the ED...50/50 the L-spine film I order is gonna be meastastic prostate CA. Check your PSA's!
Isn't colonoscopy male 45 now? Only on my radar since I have a few more years until that fun.

As for Ryne, the 'good news' is even metastatic prostate cancer can be well treated (vs colon or lung for example) with a slew of new medications and regimens. The 'metastatic' is also vague whether it is lymph nodes or more distant mets.
 

DrBlinky

Member
SoSH Member
Jun 18, 2002
844
Cranston, RI
Gentlemen, I encourage you to get your PSA tested as part of your annual checkup. It is easy to go online and find good information about the age to start this screening. Based on my steadily climbing PSA and family history I was referred to urology and got the full imaging and biopsy workups, which led me to prostate surgery at age 62. No spread was detected so it appears that it was caught early enough. Not fun, but I am so glad I did not put off the screening.
My PSA has been slowly creeping until it took a jump in a followup test in Dec. (I was not told about not engaging in any "activity" the 48 hours prior. Oops) I was retested a couple weeks later and it had dropped back to normal, but the free percentage was low, so I was referred to a urologist. That appointment is in a couple weeks. My PCP thinks a biopsy may be in my future since the numbers were a mixed bag. (My PCP stopped the DREs a few years back.)
 

Andy Merchant

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 2, 2010
2,062
men 55 and over should get yearly test (blood psa) with pcp.
start younger if strong family history or african american descent.
rectal exam is going away so dont fret (i do zero now unless specifically requested).
This is what my new PCP said when I asked last year, good to hear other docs recommending the same.
 

YTF

Member
SoSH Member
Isn't colonoscopy male 45 now? Only on my radar since I have a few more years until that fun.

As for Ryne, the 'good news' is even metastatic prostate cancer can be well treated (vs colon or lung for example) with a slew of new medications and regimens. The 'metastatic' is also vague whether it is lymph nodes or more distant mets.
I think a lot depends on personal health history, family health history and your PCP. Also, part of the thinking is that it is an invasive procedure that does carry some amount of risk so some elect to start later if there are no indicators that a patient should start sooner.
 

kartvelo

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Aug 12, 2003
10,752
At home
A little over year ago (at 65, about to turn 66) I asked my PCP for a PSA test even though I had no symptoms, because I hadn't had one in many years and I wanted to make sure I didn't run into problems later, as some of my friends had been. The test came back with a PSA level of 324. Subsequent scans, a biopsy, etc. showed metastatic prostate cancer that had spread to lymph nodes and bones. We had to remove two vertebrae from my neck because they were so compromised, and I've spent the past year plus going through chemo, radiation, and a lot of medications - not counting the neck surgery and the hospitalization due to COVID in the middle of it all. It's a process, still ongoing.

IANAD, but I recommend ignoring the 2012 guidance and getting PSA testing done. If I'd had the test done maybe 10 years ago, this might have been curable.
 

Spud

New Member
Nov 15, 2006
105
A little over year ago (at 65, about to turn 66) I asked my PCP for a PSA test even though I had no symptoms, because I hadn't had one in many years and I wanted to make sure I didn't run into problems later, as some of my friends had been. The test came back with a PSA level of 324. Subsequent scans, a biopsy, etc. showed metastatic prostate cancer that had spread to lymph nodes and bones. We had to remove two vertebrae from my neck because they were so compromised, and I've spent the past year plus going through chemo, radiation, and a lot of medications - not counting the neck surgery and the hospitalization due to COVID in the middle of it all. It's a process, still ongoing.

IANAD, but I recommend ignoring the 2012 guidance and getting PSA testing done. If I'd had the test done maybe 10 years ago, this might have been curable.
Best of luck to you. Cancer sucks.