I plan to pivot to talking about how neither Sale nor Paxton will ever walk again, let alone throw a baseball.If the Sox resign Bogey, can we put the nonsense that the ownership group and the FO is cheap? Or do we need to still cling to that?
I plan to pivot to talking about how neither Sale nor Paxton will ever walk again, let alone throw a baseball.If the Sox resign Bogey, can we put the nonsense that the ownership group and the FO is cheap? Or do we need to still cling to that?
Or that they're going to play next season without a right fielder ... and get better production out of that spot as a resultI plan to pivot to talking about how neither Sale nor Paxton will ever walk again, let alone throw a baseball.
My wife won't let me enter into any more conversations involving Hunter Renfroe.Or that they're going to play next season without a right fielder ... and get better production out of that spot as a result
just like SD….Just in case there was any doubt, source confirms Arizona is not part of the chase for Bogaerts
Common Postnuptial Agreement stipulation.My wife won't let me enter into any more conversations involving Hunter Renfroe.
San Diego isn't out on a big name player until pen is to paper. They weren't in on Judge until they lost out on Turner.
I’m pulling this out of my ass but I’m gonna say 8/230
Depends on Devers!If the Sox resign Bogey, can we put the nonsense that the ownership group and the FO is cheap? Or do we need to still cling to that?
Is that the thread title when they sign Raffy through his age 45 season?Depends on Devers!
FYPPete sometimes gets into it a little too much with “fans“ on Twitter. But he’s a solid, hard-working reporter. He may also have been encouraged by his editors to amp up his opinions and takes on the Red Sox now that he’s in the Cafardo columnist role. Which would explain why he sometimes seems to besiding withinciting the shrieking masses about the potential to lose players. But I like him.
Gold.Is that the thread title when they sign Raffy through his age 45 season?
View: https://twitter.com/kikehndez/status/1600569274539442176?s=20&t=TlJGL2vMa2d1c5YQ4CPCjA
It's coming home?
But it allows them to really focus on those other areas of need, and avoid any potential distractions from this, which was likely their highest priority. It also gives them an actual idea of what they are working with and how much they can budget for those other areas of need.I'll be as happy as anyone, and pleasantly surprised, if/when Xander comes back ... but in reality it's still just counts as keeping the shortstop they've had for years. It doesn't improve the lineup, it just keeps it from getting worse
That's kind of what I was getting at. It's fine and all, but problems still remainBut it allows them to really focus on those other areas of need, and avoid any potential distractions from this, which was likely their highest priority. It also gives them an actual idea of what they are working with and how much they can budget for those other areas of need.
And we finally lock up our star shortstop for good after a revolving door post-Nomar.But it allows them to really focus on those other areas of need, and avoid any potential distractions from this, which was likely their highest priority. It also gives them an actual idea of what they are working with and how much they can budget for those other areas of need.
I get this--but there's also the reality that the Sox have NO SS right now. So it all kinda depends on your POV.That's kind of what I was getting at. It's fine and all, but problems still remain
Am I a "Red Sox person"?
I look at signing Bogaerts as one of two things on the “Don’t F this up” checklist along with extending Devers. Wrapping this up allows us to pivot to the juicy, more entertaining less frightening aspect of FA which is shopping for new toys instead of making sure we don’t lose our current ones.I get this--but there's also the reality that the Sox have NO SS right now. So it all kinda depends on your POV.
Can we put it where?If the Sox resign Bogey, can we put the nonsense that the ownership group and the FO is cheap? Or do we need to still cling to that?
What? Bogey has played more games at shortstop for the Red Sox than anyone in history. What "revolving door" are you talking about?And we finally lock up our star shortstop for good after a revolving door post-Nomar.
Dude, if the Marino Pepin says it's happening, it's happening.View: https://twitter.com/kikehndez/status/1600569274539442176?s=20&t=TlJGL2vMa2d1c5YQ4CPCjA
We're into emoji/cryptic excitement phase. If it's not done today my week will be ruined.
This is as cynical a take as I've seen here in many a moon.I'll be as happy as anyone, and pleasantly surprised, if/when Xander comes back ... but in reality it still just counts as keeping the shortstop they've had for years. It doesn't improve the lineup, it just keeps it from getting worse
Hey, it was open less than 10 years ago.What? Bogey has played more games at shortstop for the Red Sox than anyone in history. What "revolving door" are you talking about?
I don't mean it as cynical, it's just the truth of the situation.This is as cynical a take as I've seen here in many a moon.
I believe when he signs, we start the thread about how overpaid he will be by 2026 and how these emotional decisions fly in the face of everything we were sold on as to why Chaim Bloom was brought to the Red Sox.If the Sox resign Bogey, can we put the nonsense that the ownership group and the FO is cheap? Or do we need to still cling to that?
Bonus points if we trade Marcelo.I believe when he signs, we start the thread about how overpaid he will be by 2026 and how these emotional decisions fly in the face of everything we were sold on as to why Chaim Bloom was brought to the Red Sox.
And costs an extra 8-12mm AAV per year for the next four years.I'll be as happy as anyone, and pleasantly surprised, if/when Xander comes back ... but in reality it still just counts as keeping the shortstop they've had for years. It doesn't improve the lineup, it just keeps it from getting worse
I agree (and the rotation is even worse) but I'm also hopeful that signing Xander is an indication that they have plans to address the lineup and the rotation as well. Otherwise, what's the point?I don't mean it as cynical, it's just the truth of the situation.
It allows the Sox to focus on other areas of the team to improve. If Bogey signs elsewhere then the Sox need to figure out what they are going to do about shortstop and Myers is not an answer. So while yes, this is technically not an addition to the team, it helps the team by locking up a position and allowing the front office to focus on strengthening other areas of the team. Further it allows the team to take resources that might have had to be expended to plug the shortstop hole and utilize them to strengthen other areas of the team.I'll be as happy as anyone, and pleasantly surprised, if/when Xander comes back ... but in reality it still just counts as keeping the shortstop they've had for years. It doesn't improve the lineup, it just keeps it from getting worse
But the Sox don't have a SS right now. Unless you think the Sox should have gone after a better SS, or have a plan for them being better next year without him than they would have been with him, I don't know how you can put a "marching in place" spin on it.I don't mean it as cynical, it's just the truth of the situation.
Yep LogansDad and I posted about that earlier. But until we see what steps they take to shore up the lineup, they're pretty much as they were at season's end, minus JDIt allows the Sox to focus on other areas of the team to improve. If Bogey signs elsewhere then the Sox need to figure out what they are going to do about shortstop and Myers is not an answer. So while yes, this is technically not an addition to the team, it helps the team by locking up a position and allowing the front office to focus on strengthening other areas of the team and use other resources they might have to use if Bogey doesn't sign, to acquire another Shortstop.
I'm not. It's a plus to have him come back.But the Sox don't have a SS right now. Unless you think the Sox should have gone after a better SS, or have a plan for them being better next year without him than they would have been with him, I don't know how you can put a "marching in place" spin on it.
I prefer to think of it as "plus not JD"Yep LogansDad and I posted about that earlier. But until we see what steps they take to shore up the lineup, they're pretty much as they were at season's end, minus JD
This is awesome.As an added bonus - lifetime membership for anyone who beats soxhop to the news (today only).
You should add Red October to that.As an added bonus - lifetime membership for anyone who beats soxhop to the news (today only).