I would've thought the Serie A teams needed the cash the most.Okay, new question. Which of the twelve are most f***ed by this failed attempted?
I'm assuming most of that is from their shiny new stadium?I would've thought the Serie A teams needed the cash the most.
But Tottenham puts Juventus, Inter, and Milan to shame.
Most of that for Spurs is their brand new stadium, and given their revenues, plus who the loans are from etc, I think they aren't in as bad shape as the Italian clubs. Barca is the sneaky one... they want/need a new stadium (or significant upgrade) but that debt level they have is already closing in on unsustainable. They need an influx of cash to shore things up so they can take out loans for stadium related matters. Without it, they are stuck servicing that debt, and having growing costs from an aging stadiumI would've thought the Serie A teams needed the cash the most.
But Tottenham puts Juventus, Inter, and Milan to shame.
The Globe article today on fan dissent on the decision said that the FSG declined to comment to The Globe on the criticism LFC fans have had for the proposal. That to me is really embarrassing. It said something like "FSG declined to comment on the story, and referred The Globe to the release the club put on its website yesterday. FSG chairman John Henry also is the owner of The Boston Globe."The writing was on the wall last night when Perez was warning his co-conspirators about backing out.
This was a pretty fragile coalition from the getgo and they knew it.
Another indication - how many of the team owners came out and have PCs to explain their motivations for this? FSG has taken huge criticism for hiding in its bunker and letting poor Jurgen Klopp go in front of the cameras instead
Yep the owners are all complete cowards. None of them were available publicly after the announcement, leaving the players and coaches to face the press.The Globe article today on fan dissent on the decision said that the FSG declined to comment to The Globe on the criticism LFC fans have had for the proposal. That to me is really embarrassing. It said something like "FSG declined to comment on the story, and referred The Globe to the release the club put on its website yesterday. FSG chairman John Henry also is the owner of The Boston Globe."
Agreed, they may actually hire a competent person now.Woodward resigning is the first bad news we have had today
I'm assuming most of that is from their shiny new stadium?
Most of that for Spurs is their brand new stadium, and given their revenues, plus who the loans are from etc, I think they aren't in as bad shape as the Italian clubs. Barca is the sneaky one... they want/need a new stadium (or significant upgrade) but that debt level they have is already closing in on unsustainable. They need an influx of cash to shore things up so they can take out loans for stadium related matters. Without it, they are stuck servicing that debt, and having growing costs from an aging stadium
Thanks, y'all. I'm fascinated by this story, but I'm not as knowledgeable as most of the folks here.Total debt is not the relevant metric, a lot depends on the structure and the stress it puts on cash flows. Tottenham's is mostly stadium-related and the average maturity of their debt is something like 20 years. Meanwhile Barca were reported to have 700m in debt coming due within the next 12 months.
Source?We kinda already know, but all 6 PL clubs have now withdrawn.
Haven't seen that...link?We kinda already know, but all 6 PL clubs have now withdrawn.
This is why I chose my fandom because of the ownerI would've thought the Serie A teams needed the cash the most.
But Tottenham puts Juventus, Inter, and Milan to shame.
![]()
Wait, so that tie to Leeds counts? Dammit.We kinda already know, but all 6 PL clubs have now withdrawn.
Wondering if Mike Gordon - FSG’s Liverpool CEO might be next?Agreed, they may actually hire a competent person now.
I'm sure Henry would offer up his head to save his own.Wondering if Mike Gordon - FSG’s Liverpool CEO might be next?
Birds of a featherWondering if Mike Gordon - FSG’s Liverpool CEO might be next?
Is Phish going back on tour?Wondering if Mike Gordon - FSG’s Liverpool CEO might be next?
And well-deserved.The writing was on the wall last night when Perez was warning his co-conspirators about backing out.
This was a pretty fragile coalition from the getgo and they knew it.
Another indication - how many of the team owners came out and have PCs to explain their motivations for this? FSG has taken huge criticism for hiding in its bunker and letting poor Jurgen Klopp go in front of the cameras instead
This pretty much says it all.Lol, what a total clusterfuck.
A lot of my day job is helping clients think about and respond to potential events in the future including through scenario planning and war gaming. Remains surprising to me how many major firms and leaders don’t get people to plan and game out potential countermoves when they announce a major actionHow can something with this many VERY IMPORTANT AND RICH PEOPLE involved crumble after 1 day of backlash? What did they expect? It's stunning.
EDIT: I don't mean "rich" means they're smarter, but they should have enough money to pay smart people to give them an educated guess.
That's great.
Graham Souness wasnt mincing his words during the Sky TV pre game a few minutes ago. (He got a bit Rule Britannia during the broadcast, but he was Rangers manager.)And well-deserved.
This might be it for me and the Sox too. John Henry and the other American owners have been despicable here.
Kids don't ask for hedge fund T-shirts for Christmas
IIRC, a group of posters watched that live at Phoenix Landing.
Wondering if Mike Gordon - FSG’s Liverpool CEO might be next?
Is it more likely that Henry pulls a Cardinal Law style recall back to the US to hide/protect him?I'm sure Henry would offer up his head to save his own.
There’s a VAR joke in here somewhere.can we add " , unannounced on Tuesday" to the thread title?
The may (at minimum) pull the 2 wild-card spots for 'elite' teams that don't qualify any other way.Wondering if UEFA is thinking of reworking it’s CL revamp given the SLs collapse ? It made all those concessions to the big clubs only to have them shoved in their face.
I find the idea that an Oligarch with questionable ties to Russian mafia and oil rich arabs who have been proping up City being dragged into anything pretty amusing. But he is right about one thing, Liverpool ownership were absolutely spineless in letting Klopp have to field questions about the SL yesterday. If I'm a Liverpool fan, I want these cowards gone pronto.Graham Souness wasnt mincing his words during the Sky TV pre game a few minutes ago. (He got a bit Rule Britannia during the broadcast, but he was Rangers manager.)
View: https://twitter.com/footballdaily/status/1384583349210071040?s=20
Wouldn't a possible idea be to have some form of play-off legs for 'elite' teams that didn't qualify? Cash out with a big game(s) early in the season between big clubs, and at least have some form of merit be involved with UCL qualification?The may (at minimum) pull the 2 wild-card spots for 'elite' teams that don't qualify any other way.
I am and I do .. but one should be careful what one wishes for.I find the idea that an Oligarch with questionable ties to Russian mafia and oil rich arabs who have been proping up City being dragged into anything pretty amusing. But he is right about one thing, Liverpool ownership were absolutely spineless in letting Klopp have to field questions about the SL yesterday. If I'm a Liverpool fan, I want these cowards gone pronto.