Mr. Rodgers' new neighborhood ... same as the old neighborhood

Where will Aaron Rodgers be next NFL season?

  • Green Bay

    Votes: 49 25.4%
  • Denver

    Votes: 74 38.3%
  • Cleveland

    Votes: 3 1.6%
  • San Francisco

    Votes: 14 7.3%
  • Miami

    Votes: 7 3.6%
  • Tampa Bay

    Votes: 5 2.6%
  • Other NFL team (specify)

    Votes: 12 6.2%
  • Retired / Sitting out

    Votes: 16 8.3%
  • Politics

    Votes: 5 2.6%
  • TV gig

    Votes: 8 4.1%

  • Total voters
    193

amfox1

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Aug 6, 2003
6,828
The back of your computer
On another note, I think it will take more to trade for Rodgers than @amfox1 suggested.
Maybe, but Rodgers can simply indicate that he won't restructure his contract with GB, won't make a decision on retirement until July and won't agree to facilitate his contract for a trade to anyone other than Denver, and GB will be in a salary cap box.
 

BigJimEd

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 4, 2002
4,445
Maybe, but Rodgers can simply indicate that he won't restructure his contract with GB, won't make a decision on retirement until July and won't agree to facilitate his contract for a trade to anyone other than Denver, and GB will be in a salary cap box.
Good point. Rodgers does have some leverage to push a deal. GB could trade him without a restructure but who's dealing for a disgruntled QB on a one year deal that has talked about retirement?
 

Mystic Merlin

Member
SoSH Member
Sep 21, 2007
47,023
Hartford, CT
I don’t think they need to restructure his contract to facilitate a trade, and the dead cap hit they’ll incur for trading him is what it is at this point. The team who trades for him would certainly get permission from the Packers to broach a post-trade extension with Rodgers before committing to anything.

Rodgers certainly has the ability to steer to his preferred destination, as nobody will trade for him if he signals he doesn’t want to play for a team.
 

Willie Clay's Big Play

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 30, 2017
328
Mahomes, Josh Allen, & Dak all make over 40M per year... I suspect Rodgers will want something similar, but they also have 28 UFAs.
He most likely will want top of the market money, and he should. However, the salary cap, as we all know, can be manipulated to free up room. If a team with $40MM + in cap space can't make room to bring Rodgers on, then most likely isn't going anywhere. Here are the current estimates for 2022 cap space.
48860

The Colts are in very good shape, $42MM in cap space, 52 players signed and only $800K in dead cap. I don't know the particulars on Wentz' deal and how that will impact their cap once they fire him into the sun, but I don't think a team with the Colts' cap profile would be prohibited from paying Rodgers, or any franchise QB. YMMV.
 

BigJimEd

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 4, 2002
4,445
Wentz has a little over 28M cap charge currently with about $15M in guaranteed salary. They'll save about 13M in the cap by cutting him. If they can find someone to take him in a trade they would save the full 28M since there is no pro-rated bonus or other money already paid out.
Indy has plenty of room to add Rodgers and a WR.

https://overthecap.com/player/carson-wentz/4715/
 

mauf

Anderson Cooper × Mr. Rogers
Moderator
SoSH Member
Wentz has a little over 28M cap charge currently with about $15M in guaranteed salary. They'll save about 13M in the cap by cutting him. If they can find someone to take him in a trade they would save the full 28M since there is no pro-rated bonus or other money already paid out.
Indy has plenty of room to add Rodgers and a WR.

https://overthecap.com/player/carson-wentz/4715/
I think you’d find a taker for Wentz without doing anything as drastic as what the Texans had to do with Osweiler. Depending on how much the Packers have soured on Jordan Love, they might even agree to take Wentz back.
 

JokersWildJIMED

Blinded by Borges
SoSH Member
Oct 7, 2004
2,754
Sources: Aaron Rodgers has purchased land and is in the process of building a home in the Nashville-suburb of Franklin (Williamson Co.) Also, source says Rodgers is “open” joining the Titans. Another source says that current Packers teammates do not expect Rodgers back in GB.


Embedded video


Now, who predicted Titans?
 

tims4wins

PN23's replacement
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
37,499
Hingham, MA
Sources: Aaron Rodgers has purchased land and is in the process of building a home in the Nashville-suburb of Franklin (Williamson Co.) Also, source says Rodgers is “open” joining the Titans. Another source says that current Packers teammates do not expect Rodgers back in GB.


Embedded video
Wouldn’t the Titans have a big hit to get rid of Tannehill?

Edit: best they can do is post 6/1 trade which would cost them $9.6m cap this year and $18.8m next year. Would be hard to pay Rodgers his $35-40m and build a team around that.
 

E5 Yaz

polka king
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Apr 25, 2002
90,629
Oregon
Wouldn’t the Titans have a big hit to get rid of Tannehill?
Even if he went back to the Packers in a trade? I don't know, just asking

edit: Meanwhile, having been to Franklin, I can say that Rodgers would be quite comfortable living there
 

JokersWildJIMED

Blinded by Borges
SoSH Member
Oct 7, 2004
2,754
Even if he went back to the Packers in a trade? I don't know, just asking

edit: Meanwhile, having been to Franklin, I can say that Rodgers would be quite comfortable living there
Quite comfortable…Gehrig38 right around the corner.
 

Mystic Merlin

Member
SoSH Member
Sep 21, 2007
47,023
Hartford, CT
The Titans thing is impractical given the Tannehill and Rodgers contracts.

The Titans would free up about 10M in cap with a pre-June trade (they are slated to be over the cap by 6M as of now) by trading Tannehill, but who wants him at a 29M salary that fully guarantees in March? Not the Packers, who couldn’t take on Tannehill’a deal and have Love in the wings.

The Titans would also need to absorb Rodgers’ full 2022 salary….which would put them in a net negative position under the cap than if they just kept Tannehill.

Speaking of Tennessee and Tannehill, it is WILD that that bet on Tannehill with Tom Brady available in the 2020 offseason. Who knows if Tom picks Tennessee over Tampa, but the fact they reportedly didn’t even try at the time because they preferred Tannehill is a tough look in retrospect.
 

Euclis20

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 3, 2004
8,231
Imaginationland
I thought it was established that was Jimmy G.
I believe that was the initial thought, but definitely not confirmed. With Flores' suit showing the Dolphins trying to tamper with Brady, there's another possibility (beyond Tannehill and Jimmy G): Fitzpatrick. All three guys would certainly qualify as a mystery MF'er.
 

Kliq

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 31, 2013
22,844
Can't wait for him to complain about his lack of support while he collects $50 million a year.
 

Gash Prex

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 18, 2002
6,856
Didn't Rodgers deny that he was looking for 50 million a year? And that it was crazy for somebody to suggest it?
 

steveluck7

Member
SoSH Member
May 10, 2007
4,002
Burrillville, RI
Id love to see future cap hits because if his "cap number goes down" (assuming that's for 2022 only) as Rap says, there must be some crazy #s in years 3 & 4
 

SemperFidelisSox

Member
SoSH Member
May 25, 2008
31,425
Boston, MA
It was Dianna Russini of ESPN who reported Rodgers wanted to be paid upwards of $50 million and Rodgers said it was “categorically false." Good reporting by Russini in the end.
 

BigJimEd

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 4, 2002
4,445
Id love to see future cap hits because if his "cap number goes down" (assuming that's for 2022 only) as Rap says, there must be some crazy #s in years 3 & 4
His current cap hit for 2022 is $46.6M so not necessarily too crazy. But the details will be interesting.
 

DeadlySplitter

Member
SoSH Member
Oct 20, 2015
33,640
So we're in agreement Rodgers cast just enough doubt on his status, all to get a megadeal from the Packers?
 

BaseballJones

ivanvamp
SoSH Member
Oct 1, 2015
24,743
So we're in agreement Rodgers cast just enough doubt on his status, all to get a megadeal from the Packers?
Almost certainly. Unless he really did have inclinations to leave until the Packers simply overwhelmed him with an absurd amount of money.
 

BaseballJones

ivanvamp
SoSH Member
Oct 1, 2015
24,743
https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/33508952/aaron-rodgers-new-deal-green-bay-packers-includes-150m-first-three-years

"The deal signed Tuesday, a week after he announced he would return to the team after contemplating his future, is essentially a three-year, $150 million deal that also includes two voidable years in 2025 and 2026 that help for salary-cap purposes, according to a copy of the contract obtained by ESPN.

Rodgers, 38, had been on the books for a salary-cap charge of $46,144,156 million, but that figure has been reduced by about $18 million.

The reigning two-time league MVP will make $41.95 million this season, which is fully guaranteed in the form of a $40.8 million roster bonus (which will be treated as a signing bonus for salary-cap purposes) and a base salary of $1.15 million. His 2023 pay of $59.465 million also is guaranteed. In 2024, his $49.25 million is guaranteed only against injury at the time of signing."

Does this mean his cap hit in 2023 will be no less than FIFTY NINE MILLION DOLLARS?

Then I look at Spotrac: https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/green-bay-packers/aaron-rodgers-3745/?ref=trending-players

And I see these numbers for him listed there:

2022:
- Cap Hit: $28.5m
- Dead Cap: $175.2m
- Yearly Cash: $42m

2023:
- Cap Hit: $31.6m
- Dead Cap: $146.8m
- Yearly Cash: $59.5m

2024:
- Cap Hit: $69.8m
- Dead Cap: $115.2m
- Yearly Cash: $94m

2025:
- Cap Hit: $59.3m
- Dead Cap: $76.8m
- Yearly Cash: $20.9m

2026:
- Cap Hit: $53.4m
- Dead Cap: $38.4m
- Yearly Cash: $15.1m

Obviously he's never getting paid $94 million in 2024. But some of these numbers are still staggering.
 

DJnVa

Dorito Dawg
SoSH Member
Dec 16, 2010
54,135
Does this mean his cap hit in 2023 will be no less than FIFTY NINE MILLION DOLLARS?


2023:
- Cap Hit: $31.6m
- Dead Cap: $146.8m
- Yearly Cash: $59.5m
Wouldn't his cap hit in 2023 be exactly what that says? $31.6m? Why would that be listed as his cap hit but not be his cap hit?
 

joe dokes

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
30,614
So if he goes out and commits some heinous crime and has to be cut, GB has to take a 150m cap hit? If there's a heinous crime that has no victim, I hope he commits it, just to see that happen.
 

Gash Prex

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 18, 2002
6,856
Rodgers and Pat McAfee loudly proclaimed the deal was not accurate when first reported...and I guess its only 150 million for 3 years and not 4 for 200...but its basically a 50 million a year contact with some cap friendly stuff added in.
 

BigJimEd

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 4, 2002
4,445
@BaseballJones Where are you getting the $94M number? In the spotrac link you posted, it is showing 2024 numbers as 40M cap hit and 49M in yearly cash.
 

BigJimEd

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 4, 2002
4,445
So if he goes out and commits some heinous crime and has to be cut, GB has to take a 150m cap hit? If there's a heinous crime that has no victim, I hope he commits it, just to see that happen.
I believe most of these contracts have some sort of moral clause where the contract can be voided and teams can even try to recoup some of the signing bonus already paid.
 

BaseballJones

ivanvamp
SoSH Member
Oct 1, 2015
24,743
@BaseballJones Where are you getting the $94M number? In the spotrac link you posted, it is showing 2024 numbers as 40M cap hit and 49M in yearly cash.
Spotrac said $94m when I looked at it. Maybe it was a typo and they corrected it.

EDIT: Just got to my computer and still had the Spotrac page pulled up. Took a screen shot.

50210

So look at the 2024 Yearly Cash column. Is that a typo?
 
Last edited: