WenZink said:
Since I framed my question in the context of development of a top prospect, I hardly think I'm splitting hairs. Pujols' ability to handle 4 positions as a rookie, does have relevance to a larger issue of deep-depth, but not prospect development. I just don't think the Sox are going to place any more tasks in front of Betts, outside of working on what he's already doing well --hit, run and play 2nd, even if it means he's blocked by Pedroia and they have consider trade options to capitalize on his value.
Again, I don't see anyone suggesting they start using him as a super utility right now. This is the first time the question was asked...
It wasn't a suggestion, it was a question. It was met with people saying that you don't toy with his position until he is ready for a major league position or just before that. Let's call it the Xander treatment.SouthernBoSox said:So, at what point does positional experimentation happen?
We keep citing Ben Zobrist and how valuable it is having a guy who can play all over, but when is that going to occur.
Right now we have a second baseman who we feel is athletic enough to play other positions.
When might we see Mookie play some third and outfield?
TheoShmeo said:I don't think it's binary.
Mookie will still have great trade value for a team thinking of using him at his natural position even after he spends 10-20 games in the outfield in the minors.
If the Sox do that, they can have it both ways. They can test drive him as a possible contributor in Boston and not destroy his potential trade value. Said differently, having a little bit of positonal versatility should not hurt him and, to the contrary, might help as teams might start to see him as a Zobrist type.
This is the only suggestion of him moving around the field in the minors, and it's vague enough that I don't see any way to assume Theo meant right now. In fact, I read this to mean 10-20 games before being called up.
In short, you demand for an example of a prospect being turned into a super-utility while they are still developing is irrelevant since no one is suggesting the Sox do this with Mookie. People mostly talk about it as something to do when he gets to the majors with a few people thinking a few games in Pawtucket before his call up would be the time to start moving him.
In other words, your are pounding on a man made out of straw and are then compounding the problem by refusing to acknowledge what is, perhaps, the most important reason for the Sox to consider using Mookie like this... deep depth.
If you just want people to agree with you, this is not the place to find that. Making up positions to argue against and then telling people they aren't allowed to refer to something when responding doesn't bring any value to the discussion and instead derails it into arguing about meta-level stuff... like this.
If you want to discuss Mookie, try responding to what people are actually saying and open yourself up to the possibility that other perspectives might be as valid or more valid than your own.