July 18 @ the A's

What should the Red Sox do at the trade deadline?


  • Total voters
    106
  • Poll closed .

Doc Zero

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 6, 2007
12,435
Wait a minute

All of the players were hitting the ball in the intro to Extra Innings Live
 

JM3

often quoted
SoSH Member
Dec 14, 2019
15,297
Hopefully Refsnyder rather than Devers against a righty (d2d), Alfaro instead of a professional catcher & a lefty opening for lefties will all be negated by the whole playing the A's thing.
Narrator: it was not
 

joe dokes

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
30,614

Rovin Romine

Johnny Rico
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 14, 2005
24,626
Miami (oh, Miami!)
Or, since they're probably going to lose occasionally, this was a good time to do it
Why? They had a fresh-ish pen, a weak opponent, and everyone else lost. If you'e going to run the B squad out there, do it when you're up 11-0, not because you want to get cute 5 games after the ASB.

Also don't keep preaching you only have to win series. That's bullshit. You have to win winnable games.
 

joe dokes

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
30,614
Because everyone else lost and they didn't lose any ground. If you're gonna lose, and you're gonna, not losing ground seems to be the best outcome.
Also don't keep preaching you only have to win series. That's bullshit. You have to win winnable games.
I only preach about the need to keep starting Yu Chang at SS until Story returns.
As far as "winning series" goes, if they play .667 the rest of the way, they'll be OK. Every game is winnable. Even Oakland wins 1 of every 4. Houston lost to Colorado.

"Getting cute"? Is that the post hoc analysis of every loss now? That Cora was "getting cute"? Is this all because Duval hit for Duran against a pitcher with a 250 OPS split? Or because he rubbed Devers's groin the wrong way? Or because he thought maybe Wong can't play *every* game?
 

pk1627

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
May 24, 2003
2,549
Boston
I loathe these bullpen games every 5 days. Too big an opportunity for either the opener or bulk reliever to have a bad night.

Hopefully the off days next week skips this for a cycle.
 

Rovin Romine

Johnny Rico
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 14, 2005
24,626
Miami (oh, Miami!)
Because everyone else lost and they didn't lose any ground. If you're gonna lose, and you're gonna, not losing ground seems to be the best outcome.

I only preach about the need to keep starting Yu Chang at SS until Story returns.
As far as "winning series" goes, if they play .667 the rest of the way, they'll be OK. Every game is winnable. Even Oakland wins 1 of every 4. Houston lost to Colorado.

"Getting cute"? Is that the post hoc analysis of every loss now? That Cora was "getting cute"? Is this all because Duval hit for Duran against a pitcher with a 250 OPS split? Or because he rubbed Devers's groin the wrong way? Or because he thought maybe Wong can't play *every* game?
The "you' is clearly Cora, not joe dokes.

Last night's results speak for themselves.

And on that point, yes, Cora likes to get cute in a way that is not designed to win. He instead pursues other goals. Sometimes those are worthy goals that can be met intelligently - pitching Scott recently to save BP arms, for example, was a good decision. But we're 5 games out from the ASB and nobody should be dying for rest at this point. In isolation, some of these aren't bad - including Alfaro for Wong (who Cora has kept in laughers, if stealing rest for him was so important.) But collectively?

-Starting Jacques when he's already pitched in 2 games since the ASB.​
-Keeping Jacques into the second inning.​
-Starting Refsnyder against a RHP.​
-Starting Alfaro for Wong when Devers is out (and Chang is, correctly, the SS).​
 

DennyDoyle'sBoil

Found no thrill on Blueberry Hill
SoSH Member
Sep 9, 2008
43,046
AZ
The "you' is clearly Cora, not joe dokes.

Last night's results speak for themselves.

And on that point, yes, Cora likes to get cute in a way that is not designed to win. He instead pursues other goals. Sometimes those are worthy goals that can be met intelligently - pitching Scott recently to save BP arms, for example, was a good decision. But we're 5 games out from the ASB and nobody should be dying for rest at this point. In isolation, some of these aren't bad - including Alfaro for Wong (who Cora has kept in laughers, if stealing rest for him was so important.) But collectively?

-Starting Jacques when he's already pitched in 2 games since the ASB.​
-Keeping Jacques into the second inning.​
-Starting Refsnyder against a RHP.​
-Starting Alfaro for Wong when Devers is out (and Chang is, correctly, the SS).​
The “other goals,” though is always winning. Just macro not micro. I get questioning his game to game decisions, or even whether long term planning can be more effective than inning to inning planning, but “other goals” makes it sound like he is not trying to win.
 

Rovin Romine

Johnny Rico
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 14, 2005
24,626
Miami (oh, Miami!)
The “other goals,” though is always winning. Just macro not micro. I get questioning his game to game decisions, or even whether long term planning can be more effective than inning to inning planning, but “other goals” makes it sound like he is not trying to win.
Fair point - I don't think Cora is trying to lose overall. I think on the individual game-level Cora is often too cute/myopic/tactically inane in trying to meet the goals of the long-term philosophy/strategy. Sometimes you've got to juggle off-days given what's going on on the field. Sometimes you have to seize a moment to bag a winnable game. (Raffy had to argue his way into at least one key game earlier this year.) Not every game is a good game to "try to get player X to start hitting." So on, so forth.

The question really is how often Cora's short-term/game-level choices void the long term goals, or, in other words, "Are they self-defeating?" That is most likely unanswerable with any kind of precision. But, for example, there was no reason to open with Jacques as opposed to another. And there are more egregious examples of Cora punting when he didn't quite have to (e.g., burning good arms late in a losing game instead of earlier when the outcome was still in doubt.)
 
Last edited:

InsideTheParker

persists in error
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
40,570
Pioneer Valley
If they get shut out tonight, I don't start the next game thread
I am going to start the next game thread
Ipso facto, they are not getting shut out tonight
Wait...we didn't score in the first inning? We should probably fire Cora and Execute Bloom at dawn.
Don't forgot @E5 Yaz. He said this game would be a boring win. Instead, it was a boring loss.
 

DennyDoyle'sBoil

Found no thrill on Blueberry Hill
SoSH Member
Sep 9, 2008
43,046
AZ
Fair point - I don't think Cora is trying to lose overall. I think on the individual game-level Cora is often too cute/myopic/tactically inane in trying to meet the goals of the long-term philosophy/strategy. Sometimes you've got to juggle off-days given what's going on on the field. Sometimes you have to seize a moment to bag a winnable game. (Raffy had to argue his way into at least one key game earlier this year.) Not every game is a good game to "try to get player X to start hitting." So on, so forth.

The question really is how often Cora's short-term/game-level choices void the long term goals, or, in other words, "Are they self-defeating?" That is most likely unanswerable with any kind of precision. But, for example, there was no reason to open with Jacques as opposed to another. And there are more egregious examples of Cora punting when he didn't quite have to (e.g., burning good arms late in a losing game instead of earlier when the outcome was still in doubt.)
I think Cora is a little like me with charging my phone. I get stressed when it is under 70. I never let it get to 30. The truth is that my compulsion to find a charger when I don’t need one is causing inconvenience to avoid future possible inconvenience that may never materialize.
 

Al Zarilla

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 8, 2005
59,376
San Andreas Fault
I actually really like the Pivetta games. When the minstrels write ballads to this season, Nick will be praised in song.
When he's "on" Pivetta kind of reminds me of Derek Lowe (albeit with completely different stuff, primarily fastballs vs. sinker balls). The confidence and the bravado...
 

derekson

Member
SoSH Member
Jun 26, 2010
6,254
I think Cora is a little like me with charging my phone. I get stressed when it is under 70. I never let it get to 30. The truth is that my compulsion to find a charger when I don’t need one is causing inconvenience to avoid future possible inconvenience that may never materialize.
I understand this feeling.