In the modern game, a foot over the ball straight into an opponent's leg is almost always red. I'm used to hard tackles in the derby, so I didn't get too crazy when it happened, but it really should have been red. Especially considering he'd gotten away with a challenge worthy of a yellow earlier.I wouldn't have complained much honestly if he had been given a straight red, but the idea that "there is no possible way" it could be yellow is nonsense.
It was but let's be honest, they didn't show up today, which is beyond disappointing.I can try to convince myself that Schneiderlin's injury was a deal breaker, but Everton hasn't won at Anfield since Tom Davies was born so I'm not too surprised. Lock up 7th, spend the Lukaku money wisely, and regroup for next season.
Hmm actually it's a back 4 with Navas at RB? Equally absurd.This City XI is beautifully ridiculous. Looks like a back 3, but only Pep would have the balls to play two out-and-out wingers as wingbacks with only one defensive midfielder. Never change, Pep.
Arsenal have not done very well the past few years against high-pressing teams. But if they can beat the press and get the ball to Ozil and Sanchez in space, they will get good chances. I think Xhaka is the key player in this game. His ability to play accurate long passes will be crucial, assuming he doesn't pick up a dumb red card in the first half hour.
The only thing I know is it's not ending 0-0.
For the two hundredth time - you don't need the 's' in 'offsides' - it's 'offside' there are only two sides, onside and offside, there are no offsides as in somewhere there are a gaggle of offsides having a party.Now Navas almost gives away a penalty, only saved by the offsides flag.
If two players are in an offside position, can I say "offsides"?For the two hundredth time - you don't need the 's' in 'offsides' - it's 'offside' there are only two sides, onside and offside, there are no offsides as in somewhere there are a gaggle of offsides having a party.
I understand this is an US thing, cos I've seen it on some US streams I've watched, and it's no different to back in the day when some patriotic real US of Americans said, lets spell some words differently to show them limeys we're not like them...I understand that - that's cool.
But offsides makes no sense and if even one of youse stopped saying it, and a fuckin power of youse say it, just think how much smarter the USA would get as a nation. The world quotient of stupid is on the rise...it's everywhere. If we don't know when to apply a plural...what the fuck do we know?
Please don't. I know it is one of the things that make 'America' great, that you do things your own way...but I think the way to go would be to say, both men were 'offside' - but i do respect the need, the urge, the unflinching desire for US of Americans to be different, even if wrong.If two players are in an offside position, can I say "offsides"?
For the two hundredth time - you don't need the 's' in 'offsides' - it's 'offside' there are only two sides, onside and offside, there are no offsides as in somewhere there are a gaggle of offsides having a party.
I understand this is an US thing, cos I've seen it on some US streams I've watched, and it's no different to back in the day when some patriotic real US of Americans said, lets spell some words differently to show them limeys we're not like them...I understand that - that's cool.
But offsides makes no sense and if even one of youse stopped saying it, and a fuckin power of youse say it, just think how much smarter the USA would get as a nation. The world quotient of stupid is on the rise...it's everywhere. If we don't know when to apply a plural...what the fuck do we know?