I'm with this^. Exactly. We fans and Sox management give up on players far too quickly and then see them turn a corner on another team (Reddick!!!). Kelly's stuff is far too good, and he's got a good head on his shoulders. He needs exposure and experience and faith from Ben and Co. I'm not sure if this season was scripted as a bridge season or not, but I think it's worth sticking with Kelly and Miley as starters to get them a long view at least to know where we should play them next season. Looking a full season at Clay to know if his options should be picked up... to know if Boegarts can be our long term solution at SS. Whether JBJ can be a F/T corner outfielder. Whether Swihart can make adjustments, etc....EricFeczko said:It's an interesting idea, since Kelly's experience in college was as a closer. However, Kelly's velocity (noted by Snod) provides tremendous upside as a starting pitcher.
Furthermore, he's only been a starting pitcher since 2010. He was never a starter in college or high school; he has started, literally, 122 games in his life (minor league + major league). Chris archer, his closest comp according to Bref, has been a starter since high school and has pitched 225 games over his minor/major league career, and didn't start contributing until after ~160. Kelly's lack of command may simply be driven by a lack of starting.
In other words, Kelly may be a late bloomer who just needs to start more at the MLB level to develop because he has a weird history. The upside of a Kelly with decent command far outweighs what he could contribute as a reliever.
Despite all this, I still think this team will come together and be in contention throughout the season and could make the playoffs.